Citations

Surgical treatment of pelvic sarcoma involving the bone is the standard of care but is associated with several sequelae and reduced functional quality of life (QOL). Treatment with photon and proton radiotherapy is associated with relapse. Carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) may reduce both relapse rates and treatment sequelae. The PROSPER study is a tricontinental, nonrandomized, prospective, three-arm, pragmatic trial evaluating treatments of pelvic sarcoma involving the bone. Patients aged at least 15 years are eligible for inclusion. Participants must have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status score of two or less, newly diagnosed disease, and histopathologic confirmation of pelvic chordoma, chondrosarcoma, osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma with bone involvement, rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) with bone involvement, or non-RMS soft tissue sarcoma with bone involvement. Treatment arms include (1) CIRT (n = 30) delivered in Europe and Asia, (2) surgical treatment with or without adjuvant radiotherapy (n = 30), and (3) proton therapy (n = 30). Arms two and three will be conducted at Mayo Clinic campuses in Arizona, Florida, and Minnesota. The primary end point is to compare the 1-year change in functional QOL between CIRT and surgical treatment. Additional comparisons among the three arms will be made between treatment sequelae, local control, and other QOL measures.

AbstractBackgroundCompared to other sarcomas, myxoid liposarcoma (ML) is known to be radiosensitive, with improved oncologic outcomes. Although these tumors “shrink” following radiotherapy, there is a paucity of data examining the degree of radiosensitivity and oncologic outcome. The purpose of the study was to evaluate pre‐ and postradiotherapy tumor volume to determine if size reduction impacts outcome.MethodsWe reviewed 62 patients with ML undergoing surgical resection combined with preoperative radiotherapy, with pre‐ and postradiotherapy MRI. This included 34 (55%) males, with a mean age of 47 ± 14 years. All tumors were deep to the fascia, and 12 (19%) patients had tumors with a >5% round‐cell component.ResultsThe mean volume reduction was 54% ± 29%. Compared to patients with >25% volume reduction, patients with reduction ≤25% had worse 10‐year disease specific survival (86% vs. 37%, p < 0.01), in addition to an increased risk of metastatic disease (HR 4.63, p < 0.01) and death due to disease (HR 4.52, p < 0.01).ConclusionLack of volume reduction is a risk factor for metastatic disease and subsequent death due to disease in patients with extremity ML treated with combined preoperative radiotherapy and surgery. This data could be used to stratify patients for adjuvant therapies and follow‐up intervals.

AbstractBackgroundThis study was aimed at developing and validating a decision‐making tool predictive of overall survival (OS) for patients receiving stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for spinal metastases.MethodsThree hundred sixty‐one patients at one institution were used for the training set, and 182 at a second institution were used for external validation. Treatments most commonly involved one or three fractions of spine SBRT. Exclusion criteria included proton therapy and benign histologies.ResultsThe final model consisted of the following variables and scores: Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS) ≥ 6 (1), time from primary diagnosis < 21 months (1), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status = 1 (1) or ECOG performance status > 1 (2), and >1 organ system involved (1). Each variable was an independent predictor of OS (p < .001), and each 1‐point increase in the score was associated with a hazard ratio of 2.01 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.79–2.25; p < .0001). The concordance value was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.71–0.78). The scores were discretized into three groups—favorable (score = 0–1), intermediate (score = 2), and poor survival (score = 3–5)—with 2‐year OS rates of 84% (95% CI, 79%–90%), 46% (95% CI, 36%–59%), and 21% (95% CI, 14%–32%), respectively (p < .0001 for each). In the external validation set (182 patients), the score was also predictive of OS (p < .0001). Increasing SINS<zaq;6> was predictive of decreased OS as a continuous variable (p < .0001).ConclusionsThis novel score is proposed as a decision‐making tool to help to optimize patient selection for spine SBRT. SINS may be an independent predictor of OS.

BACKGROUND Wide excision of chordoma provides better local control than intralesional resection or definitive radiotherapy. The en bloc excision of high cervical chordomas is a challenging endeavor because of the complex anatomy of this region and limited reconstructive options. OBSERVATIONS This is the first case report to describe reconstruction with a free vascularized fibular graft following the en bloc excision of a chordoma involving C1–3. LESSONS This report demonstrates the durability of this construct at 10-year follow-up and is the first case report demonstrating satisfactory long-term oncological outcomes after a true margin-negative resection of a high cervical chordoma.

Tumours of the sacrum are difficult to manage. The sacrum provides the structural connection between the torso and lower half of the body and is subject to both axial and rotational forces. Thus, tumours or their treatment can compromise the stability of the spinopelvic junction. Additionally, nerves responsible for lower limb motor groups as well as bowel, bladder, and sexual function traverse or abut the sacrum. Preservation or sacrifice of these nerves in the treatment of sacral tumours has profound implications on the function and quality of life of the patient. This annotation will discuss current treatment protocols for sacral tumours. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(12):1284–1291.

AbstractIntroductionThe distal radius is a common location for giant cell tumors (GCTs) of bone. Management includes intralesional curettage or wide excision, however, long‐term comparisons of treatment options are limited. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate our institutions' outcomes of treatment of these tumors.MethodsWe reviewed 24 GCT of the distal radius in 23 patients (12 males: 11 females) with a mean age of 42 years at the time of surgery. Functional outcomes were collected including the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Score (MSTS), QuickDash, the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and the Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE). The mean follow‐up was 13 years.ResultsTumor grade included Campanacci Grade II (n = 14) and Grade III (n = 10). Treatment included extended intralesional curettage (n = 16) and wide excision (n = 8). Reconstruction mainly included bone grafting/cement (n = 16) or free vascularized fibula radiocarpal arthrodesis (n = 5). At most recent follow‐up, there was no difference in MSTS, VAS, and PRWE (p > 0.05) between patients undergoing a joint sparing or arthrodesis. Patients undergoing arthrodesis had a lower QuickDASH score (13.7 vs. 20.8, p = 0.04)ConclusionsTreatment for GCT of the distal radius is individualized however in the setting of articular surface involvement, arthrodesis can lead to superior functional results at long‐term follow‐up.

Radiation-associated sarcoma of the pelvis and/or sacrum (RASB) is a rare but challenging disease process associated with a poor prognosis. We hypothesized that patients with RASB would have worse surgical and oncologic outcomes than patients diagnosed with primary pelvic or sacral bone sarcomas. This was a retrospective, multi-institution, comparative analysis. We reviewed surgically treated patients from multiple tertiary care centers who were diagnosed with a localized RASB. We also identified a comparison group including all patients diagnosed with a primary localized pelvic or sacral osteosarcoma/spindle cell sarcoma of bone (POPS). There were 35 patients with localized RASB and 73 patients with POPS treated with surgical resection. Patients with RASB were older than those with POPS (57 years vs. 38 years, p < 0.001). Patients with RASB were less likely to receive chemotherapy (71% for RASB vs. 90% for POPS, p = 0.01). Seventeen percent of patients with RASB died in the perioperative period (within 90 days of surgery) as compared to 4% with POPS (p = 0.03). Five-year disease-specific survival (DSS) (31% vs. 54% p = 0.02) was worse for patients with RASB vs. POPS. There was no difference in 5-year local recurrence free survival (LRFS) or metastasis free survival (MFS). RASB and POPS present challenging disease processes with poor oncologic outcomes. Rates of perioperative mortality and 5-year DSS are worse for RASB when compared to POPS.

OBJECTIVE The goal of this study was to determine independent risk factors for vertebral compression fracture (VCF) following radiation for metastatic spine disease, including low bone mineral density as estimated by Hounsfield units (HU). METHODS A retrospective chart review identified patients with a single vertebral column metastasis treated with radiation therapy, a pretreatment CT scan, and a follow-up CT scan at least 6 weeks after treatment. Patients with primary spine tumors, preradiation vertebroplasty, preradiation spine surgery, prior radiation to the treatment field, and proton beam treatment modality were excluded. The HU were measured in the vertebral bodies at the level superior to the metastasis, within the tumor and medullary bone of the metastatic level, and at the level inferior to the metastasis. Variables collected included basic demographics, Spine Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS), presenting symptoms, bone density treatment, primary tumor pathology, Weinstein-Boriani-Biagini (WBB) classification, Enneking stage, radiation treatment details, chemotherapy regimen, and prophylactic vertebroplasty. RESULTS One hundred patients with an average age of 63 years and average follow-up of 18 months with radiation treatment dates ranging from 2017 to 2020 were included. Fifty-nine patients were treated with external-beam radiation therapy, with a median total dose of 20 Gy (range 8–40 Gy). Forty-one patients were treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy, with a median total dose of 24 Gy (range 18–39 Gy). The most common primary pathologies included lung (n = 22), prostate (n = 21), and breast (n = 14). Multivariable logistic regression analysis (area under the curve 0.89) demonstrated pretreatment HU (p < 0.01), SINS (p = 0.02), involvement of ≥ 3 WBB sectors (p < 0.01), primary pathology other than prostate (p = 0.04), and ongoing chemotherapy treatment (p = 0.04) to be independent predictors of postradiation VCF. Patients with pretreatment HU < 145 (n = 32), 145–220 (n = 31), and > 220 (n = 37) had a fracture rate of 59%, 39%, and 11%, respectively. An HU cutoff of 157 was found to maximize sensitivity (71%) and specificity (75%) in predicting postradiation VCF. CONCLUSIONS Low preradiation HU, higher SINS, involvement of ≥ 3 WBB sectors, ongoing chemotherapy, and nonprostate primary pathology were independent predictors of postradiation VCF in patients with metastatic spine disease. Low bone mineral density, as estimated by HU, is a novel and potentially modifiable risk factor for VCF.

Background: Osseous reconstruction following total spondylectomy/vertebrectomy in the thoracic spine is indicated to restore spinal stability. To assist with bony reconstruction, vascularized bone flaps including free vascularized fibula flaps and pedicled rib flaps can be used. However, there are limited data comparing various techniques. The authors aimed to evaluate the outcomes of free vascularized fibula flaps and pedicled rib flaps used for thoracic spinal reconstruction. Methods: The authors reviewed 44 vascularized bone flaps [10 anterior pedicled rib flaps, 25 posterior pedicled rib flaps, and nine vascularized fibula flaps] for corpectomy defects spanning T1 to L1 between January of 1999 and June of 2018. Mean age and follow-up were 46 ±17 years and 74 ± 52 months, respectively. Results: The union rate was 93 percent, with a similar mean time to union among the three groups: free vascularized fibula flaps, 9 ± 4 months; anterior pedicled rib flaps, 9 ± 6 months; and posterior pedicled rib flaps, 9 ± 5 months (p = 0.95). Surgical-site complications were found in 27 vascularized bone flaps (61 percent), and reoperations and revisions were performed in 14 (32 percent) and 10 (23 percent) vascularized bone flaps, respectively. No differences were identified among anterior pedicled rib flaps, posterior pedicled rib flaps, and vascularized fibula flaps with regard to complication, reoperation, and revision rates. Conclusions: Free vascularized fibula flaps and pedicled rib flaps provide durable reconstruction for thoracic spinal defects. Union, time to union, revision, and reoperation rates were similar among anterior and posterior pedicled rib flaps and vascularized fibula flaps. Given the variability in indication and defect types among the flap cohorts, the authors’ results should be interpreted carefully as an insight into the outcomes of different vascularized bone flaps for the unique cases of thoracic spinal reconstruction rather than to compare the different flaps used. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.