Citations

Abstract Objectives To compare clinical characteristics, including the frequency of cutaneous, extramuscular manifestations and malignancy, between adults with anti-synthetase syndrome (ASyS) and DM. Methods Using data regarding adults from the MYONET registry, a cohort of DM patients with anti-Mi2/-TIF1γ/-NXP2/-SAE/-MDA5 autoantibodies, and a cohort of ASyS patients with anti-tRNA synthetase autoantibodies (anti-Jo1/-PL7/-PL12/-OJ/-EJ/-Zo/-KS) were identified. Patients with DM sine dermatitis or with discordant dual autoantibody specificities were excluded. Sub-cohorts of patients with ASyS with or without skin involvement were defined based on presence of DM-type rashes (heliotrope rash, Gottron’s papules/sign, violaceous rash, shawl sign, V-sign, erythroderma, and/or periorbital rash). Results In total 1054 patients were included (DM, n = 405; ASyS, n = 649). In the ASyS cohort, 31% (n = 203) had DM-type skin involvement (ASyS-DMskin). A higher frequency of extramuscular manifestations, including Mechanic’s hands, Raynaud’s phenomenon, arthritis, interstitial lung disease and cardiac involvement differentiated ASyS-DMskin from DM (all P < 0.001), whereas higher frequency of any of four DM-type rashes—heliotrope rash (n = 248, 61% vs n = 90, 44%), violaceous rash (n = 166, 41% vs n = 57, 9%), V-sign (n = 124, 31% vs n = 28, 4%), and shawl sign (n = 133, 33% vs n = 18, 3%)—differentiated DM from ASyS-DMskin (all P < 0.005). Cancer-associated myositis (CAM) was more frequent in DM (n = 67, 17%) compared with ASyS (n = 21, 3%) and ASyS-DMskin (n = 7, 3%) cohorts (both P < 0.001). Conclusion DM-type rashes are frequent in patients with ASyS; however, distinct clinical manifestations differentiate these patients from classical DM. Skin involvement in ASyS does not necessitate increased malignancy surveillance. These findings will inform future ASyS classification criteria and patient management.

Background: Non-surgical rhinoplasty with hyaluronic acid (HA) filler is a three-dimensional reshaping technique that achieves tissue enhancement by placing HA deep to nasal skin. Due to its unique rheology, Restylane® Lyft (HA-L, Galderma, Uppsala, Sweden) may be particularly well-suited for injection rhinoplasty, as it has high gel firmness (G’) for strong structural support with minimal integration propensity. Methods: A prospective clinical trial was conducted to evaluate HA-L use for non-surgical rhinoplasty. Thirty-three females were observed over eight months, using the following schedule: Visit 1 = Baseline/Treatment 1; Visit 2 = Optional touch up (Week 2); Visits 3–6 = Follow-ups (Months 1,3,6,8). The primary endpoint was subject improvement at Month 1 assessed by a blinded evaluator using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS). Subject satisfaction and adverse events (AEs) were also evaluated. Results: A deep, periosteal injection using a bolus technique and 0.34 cc of HA-L was most often used. Seven cases of positive aspiration occurred in 167 injection points (4.19%), among 6/33 (18.18%) subjects. Based on the GAIS, 100% of subjects met the primary endpoint. Subject satisfaction was maximal at Month 1 (100%) and largely maintained at Month 8 (78.57%). Besides expected injection-related AEs (eg, ecchymosis, erythema), immediate AEs during/following treatment were limited to presyncopal symptoms [5/33 subjects (15.15%)]. Importantly, no cases of ischemia were observed. Subject-reported AEs (eg, swelling, erythema, pain) dissipated within 2 to 7 days. Conclusion: Given the technical nature of this technique, HA-L may be well-suited for injection rhinoplasty, due to its strong safety and efficacy profile. Level of Evidence: Level III: Evidence obtained from well-designed cohort study.

AbstractBackgroundGene expression changes have been identified in post‐mortem brain tissue of AD cases when compared with controls, implicating various genes and pathways. Such findings provide important insights into molecular dysregulation associated with this disease and nominate therapeutic targets. Here we investigate brain gene and co‐expression network changes in a cohort of AD cases to identify associations with degree of AD neuropathology including Braak stage (Tau), Thal phase (Amyloid beta) and brain tissue levels of five AD‐related proteins (apoE, Aβ40, Aβ42, tau, and p‐tau).MethodGene expression measures were collected from temporal cortex (TCX) tissue of 477 AD cases, available through the Mayo Clinic Brain Bank, using RNA sequencing (Illumina TruSeq mRNA) performed on the HiSeq4000. Following quality control 456 cases remained for analysis. Braak and Thal were provided by an experienced neuropathologist and TCX levels of five AD‐related proteins from three fractions (buffer‐soluble, detergent‐soluble, and insoluble) were measured by ELISA (Liu et al. 2020). Weighted gene coexpression network analysis (WGCNA) R package was used to build co‐expression networks. Genes and networks were tested for association with neuropathology and AD‐related protein levels, adjusting for relevant covariates.ResultA total of 57,353 genes were profiled, of which 19,044 were reliably expressed above background levels and formed 20 co‐expression modules. 36 genes were associated with Braak stage, 10 with Thal phase and up to 9,000 with the AD‐related protein fractions. Brain levels of pTau had the greatest number of associations, with an overrepresentation of genes involved in synaptic signalling and immune response gene ontology biological processes. 16 of the coexpression modules associated with at least one trait after Bonferroni correction for number of tests.ConclusionWe have identified a number of genes and networks associated with different aspects of AD neuropathology and associated proteins, further lending support to the involvement of synaptic and immune biology in AD. However it is not clear whether observed changes cause disease or are a consequence of the neurodegenerative process. Comparison of these findings across different proteins and fractions is expected to reveal common and distinct vulnerabilities associated with amyloid and tau, and different stages of protein aggregation.