Citations

Background and Objectives: Acute small subcortical infarcts (SSI) result in high rates of early neurological deterioration (END) despite best medical management. Those with SSI-related END have worse functional outcomes after stroke leading to increased morbidity. Presently, it is unknown in a robust manner the incidence or risk factors for END within this demographic. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to understand the incidence and risk factors of SSI-related END. Methods: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar between January 1, 2000, and June 1, 2022, including both retrospective cross-sectional and prospective observational studies. The primary outcome was development of END based on publishing authors’ definition. Abstracted data included age, sex, cohort size, diagnoses of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus, study definition of END and SSI, and presence of branch atheromatous disease (BAD) and lesion diameter. Results: We identified 31 studies enrolling 6376 patients. Most studies were conducted in East Asia (27/31, 87%) and had a least some concern for risk of bias. Funnel plot illustrated a high level of publication bias favoring high incidence studies. END was commonly defined as ≥ 2 overall NIHSS change or ≥ 1 motor change within 3 to 7 days from admission (average: 5 days). A pooled proportion of END was 22% (95%CI 0.19 - 0.25, I2 = 91.2%, 31 studies). Meta-regression identified that female sex [risk ratio (RR) 1.23, 95%CI 1.09-1.39, I2=30.8%, 31 studies], diabetes mellitus (RR 1.16 95%CI 1.01-1.33, I2=38.4%, 30 studies), and BAD (RR 1.99 95%CI 1.61-2.46, I2=50.7%, 17 studies) as risk factors for END. Discussion: Our data identified primarily within an East Asian cohort that risk factors for SSI-related END include diabetes mellitus and branch atheromatous disease with a pooled prevalence of END occurring in 1 in 4 patients. Future studies are needed to understand treatment and preventative strategies for this patient population.

Background and Objectives: It is unclear whether induced hypertension in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) may improve long-term outcomes. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the safety and efficacy of induced hypertension vs standard medical care in patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke within 72 hours of symptom onset. Methods: Two reviewers systematically searched PubMed using the prespecified terms “induced hypertension” or “blood pressure augmentation” plus “ischemic stroke” for clinical trials that reported functional independence (mRS 0-2) at 90 days. The safety outcome was symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). Pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI across trials were synthesized using fixed-effect model based on Mantel-Haenszel methods. Forest plots were constructed. Results: Three clinical trials with 270 AIS patients treated with induced hypertension (n=126) or standard medical care (n= 144) were included. Mean age was 66.6 years, 35.2% were women, and the mean initial NIHSS was 7.5. The rate of functional independence at 90 days was higher in patients treated with induced hypertension (70.6%) versus control (54.9%) (OR 1.88; 95% CI 1.13-3.11; p=0.01). sICH did not differ between patients treated with induced hypertension (<1%) versus control (<1%) (OR 1.03; 95% CI 0.14-7.45; p=0.98). Discussion: Among patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke with 72 hours of symptoms onset, induced hypertension resulted in better functional outcome at 90 days than standard medical care and did not increase risk of sICH. Large RCTs to test this observation are ongoing and needed to guide clinical practice.