Citations

Abstract Photon counting detector (PCD) CT represents the newest advance in CT technology, with improved radiation dose efficiency, increased spatial resolution, inherent spectral imaging capabilities, and the ability to eliminate electronic noise. Its design fundamentally differs from conventional energy integrating detector CT because photons are directly converted to electrical signal in a single step. Rather than converting X-rays to visible light and having an output signal that is a summation of energies, PCD directly counts each photon and records its individual energy information. The current commercially available PCD-CT utilizes a dual-source CT geometry, which allows 66 ms cardiac temporal resolution and high-pitch (up to 3.2) scanning. This can greatly benefit pediatric patients by facilitating high quality fast scanning to allow sedation-free imaging. The energy-resolving nature of the utilized PCDs allows “always-on” dual-energy imaging capabilities, such as the creation of virtual monoenergetic, virtual non-contrast, virtual non-calcium, and other material-specific images. These features may be combined with high-resolution imaging, made possible by the decreased size of individual detector elements and the absence of interelement septa. This work reviews the foundational concepts associated with PCD-CT and presents examples to highlight the benefits of PCD-CT in the pediatric population.

AbstractBackgroundThe feasibility of oral dark contrast media is under exploration in abdominal computed tomography (CT) applications. One of the experimental contrast media in this class is dark borosilicate contrast media (DBCM), which has a CT attenuation lower than that of intra‐abdominal fat.PurposeTo evaluate the performances of DBCM using single‐ and multi‐energy CT imaging on a clinical photon‐counting‐detector CT (PCD‐CT).MethodsFive vials, three with iodinated contrast agent (5, 10, and 20 mg/mL; Omnipaque 350) and two with DBCM (6% and 12%; Nextrast, Inc.), and one solid‐water rod (neutral contrast agent) were inserted into two multi‐energy CT phantoms, and scanned on a clinical PCD‐CT system (NAEOTOM Alpha) at 90, 120, 140, Sn100, and Sn140 kV (Sn: tin filter) in multi‐energy mode. CARE keV IQ level was 180 (CTDIvol: 3.0 and 12.0 mGy for the small and large phantoms, respectively). Low‐energy threshold images were reconstructed with a quantitative kernel (Qr40, iterative reconstruction strength 2) and slice thickness/increment of 2.0/2.0 mm. Virtual monoenergetic images (VMIs) were reconstructed from 40 to 140 keV at 10 keV increments. On all images, average CT numbers for each vial/rod were measured using circular region‐of‐interests and averaged over eight slices. The contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR) of iodine (5 mg/mL) against DBCM was calculated and plotted against tube potential and VMI energy level, and compared to the CNR of iodine against water. Similar analyses were performed on iodine maps and VNC images derived from the multi‐energy scan at 120 kV.ResultsWith increasing kV or VMI keV, the negative HU of DBCM decreased only slightly, whereas the positive HU of iodine decreased across all contrast concentrations and phantom sizes. CT numbers for DBCM decreased from −178.5 ± 9.6 to −194.4 ± 6.3 HU (small phantom) and from −181.7 ± 15.7 to −192.1 ± 11.9 HU (large phantom) for DBCM‐12% from 90 to Sn140 kV; on VMIs, the CT numbers for DBCM decreased minimally from −147.1 ± 15.7 to −185.1 ± 9.2 HU (small phantom) and −158.8 ± 28.6 to −188.9 ± 14.7 HU (large phantom) from 40 to 70 keV, but remained stable from 80 to 140 keV. The highest iodine CNR against DBCM in low‐energy threshold images was seen at 90 or Sn140 kV for the small phantom, whereas all CNR values from low‐energy threshold images for the large phantom were comparable. The CNR values of iodine against DBCM computed on VMIs were highest at 40 or 70 keV depending on iodine and DBCM concentrations. The CNR values of iodine against DBCM were consistently higher than iodine to water (up to 460% higher dependent on energy level). Further, the CNR of iodine compared to DBCM is less affected by VMI energy level than the identical comparison between iodine and water: CNR values at 140 keV were reduced by 46.6% (small phantom) or 42.6% (large phantom) compared to 40 keV; CNR values for iodine compared to water were reduced by 86.3% and 83.8% for similar phantom sizes, respectively. Compared to 70 keV VMI, the iodine CNR against DBCM was 13%–79% lower on iodine maps and VNC.ConclusionsWhen evaluated at different tube potentials and VMI energy levels using a clinical PCD‐CT system, DBCM showed consistently higher CNR compared to iodine versus water (a neutral contrast).

AbstractBackgroundCoronary calcification is a strong indicator of coronary artery disease, and patients with a “zero” coronary calcification score have a much lower risk of future cardiac events than those with even small amounts of calcium. However, false‐negative (incorrect zero scores) may occur if small calcifications are missed at CT due to limited spatial resolution.PurposeTo demonstrate lower limits of detection for coronary calcification using an ultra‐high‐resolution (UHR) mode on a clinical photon‐counting‐detector CT (PCD‐CT), compared to a conventional energy‐integrating‐detector CT (EID‐CT).MethodsChicken eggshell fragments (0.4–0.8 mm) mimicking coronary calcifications were scanned on a clinical PCD‐CT (NAEOTOM Alpha) in UHR mode and a conventional EID‐CT (SOMATOM Force) with matched tube potential and radiation dose levels to the PCD‐CT. PCD‐CT images were reconstructed with a sharp kernel (Qr68) and a quantum iterative algorithm (QIR‐3). Two sets of EID‐CT images were reconstructed: routine clinical kernel (Qr36, ADMIRE‐3) and a sharper kernel (Qr54) with similar noise to PCD‐CT images. With institutional review board approval, in vivo exams performed with the PCD‐CT in UHR mode were compared against patients’ clinical EID‐CT exams. The visibility of calcifications on PCD‐CT and EID‐CT images was assessed and compared qualitatively.ResultsPCD‐CT images visualized all calcified fragments, while EID‐CT failed to detect those below 0.6 mm using a routine protocol. EID‐CT with Qr54 improved visibility but distorted boundaries. Calcifications were less visible on EID‐CT than PCD‐CT as phantom sizes increased. 0.6‐ and 0.7‐mm calcified fragments were barely visible on 35‐ and 40‐cm phantom EID‐CT images. Patient cases showed small calcifications missed on EID‐CT but detected on PCD‐CT.ConclusionAt matched radiation dose, PCD‐CT in UHR mode provided higher spatial resolution and improved the detectability of small calcified fragments for different phantom/patient sizes in comparison to EID‐CT.

Background and Purpose Recent introduction of photon counting detector (PCD) computed tomography (CT) scanners into clinical practice further improve CT angiography (CTA) depiction of orbital arterial vasculature compared to conventional energy integrating detector (EID) CT scanners. PCD-CTA of the orbit can provide a detailed arterial roadmap of the orbit which can de diagnostic on its own or serve as a helpful planning adjunct for both diagnostic and therapeutic catheter-based angiography of the orbit. Methods For this review, EID and PCD-CT imaging was obtained in 28 volunteers. The volume CT dose index was closely matched. A dual-energy scanning protocol was used on EID-CT. An ultra-high-resolution (UHR) scan mode was used on PCD-CT. Images were reconstructed at 0.6 mm slice thickness using a closely matched medium-sharp standard resolution (SR) kernel. High-resolution (HR) images with the sharpest quantitative kernel were also reconstructed on PCD-CT at the thinnest slice thickness of 0.2 mm. A denoising algorithm was applied to the HR image series. Results The imaging description of the orbital vascular anatomy presented in this work was derived from these patients’ PCD-CTA images in combination with review of the literature. We found that orbital arterial anatomy is much better depicted with PCD-CTA, and this work can serve primarily as an imaging atlas of the normal orbital vascular anatomy. Conclusion With recent advances in technology, arterial anatomy of the orbit is much better depicted with PCD-CTA as opposed to EID-CTA. Current orbital PCD-CTA technology approaches the necessary resolution threshold for reliable evaluation of central retinal artery occlusion.

Objective Noise quantification is fundamental to computed tomography (CT) image quality assessment and protocol optimization. This study proposes a deep learning–based framework, Single-scan Image Local Variance EstimatoR (SILVER), for estimating the local noise level within each region of a CT image. The local noise level will be referred to as a pixel-wise noise map. Methods The SILVER architecture resembled a U-Net convolutional neural network with mean-square-error loss. To generate training data, 100 replicate scans were acquired of 3 anthropomorphic phantoms (chest, head, and pelvis) using a sequential scan mode; 120,000 phantom images were allocated into training, validation, and testing data sets. Pixel-wise noise maps were calculated for the phantom data by taking the per-pixel SD from the 100 replicate scans. For training, the convolutional neural network inputs consisted of phantom CT image patches, and the training targets consisted of the corresponding calculated pixel-wise noise maps. Following training, SILVER noise maps were evaluated using phantom and patient images. For evaluation on patient images, SILVER noise maps were compared with manual noise measurements at the heart, aorta, liver, spleen, and fat. Results When tested on phantom images, the SILVER noise map prediction closely matched the calculated noise map target (root mean square error <8 Hounsfield units). Within 10 patient examinations, SILVER noise map had an average percent error of 5% relative to manual region-of-interest measurements. Conclusion The SILVER framework enabled accurate pixel-wise noise level estimation directly from patient images. This method is widely accessible because it operates in the image domain and requires only phantom data for training.

AbstractPurposeTo determine the suitability of a quality assurance (QA) program based on the American College of Radiology's (ACR) CT quality control (QC) manual to fully evaluate the unique capabilities of a clinical photon‐counting‐detector (PCD) CT system.MethodsA daily QA program was established to evaluate CT number accuracy and artifacts for both standard and ultra‐high‐resolution (UHR) scan modes. A complete system performance evaluation was conducted in accordance with the ACR CT QC manual by scanning the CT Accreditation Phantom with routine clinical protocols and reconstructing low‐energy‐threshold (T3D) and virtual monoenergetic images (VMIs) between 40 and 120 keV. Spatial resolution was evaluated by computing the modulation transfer function (MTF) for the UHR mode, and multi‐energy performance was evaluated by scanning a body phantom containing four iodine inserts with concentrations between 2 and 15 mg I/cc.ResultsThe daily QA program identified instances when the detector needed recalibration or replacement. CT number accuracy was impacted by image type: CT numbers at 70 keV VMI were within the acceptable range (defined for 120 kV). Other keV VMIs and the T3D reconstruction had at least one insert with CT number outside the acceptable range. The limiting resolution was nearly 40 lp/cm based on MTF measurements, which far exceeds the 12 lp/cm maximum capability of the ACR phantom. The CT numbers in the iodine inserts were accurate on all VMIs (3.8% average percentage error), while the iodine concentrations had an average root mean squared error of 0.3 mg I/cc.ConclusionProtocols and parameters must be properly selected on PCD‐CT to meet current accreditation requirements with the ACR CT phantom. Use of the 70 keV VMI allowed passing all tests prescribed in the ACR CT manual. Additional evaluations such an MTF measurement and multi‐energy phantom scans are also recommended to comprehensively evaluate PCD‐CT scanner performance.

AbstractBackgroundSmall coronary arteries containing stents pose a challenge in CT imaging due to metal‐induced blooming artifact. High spatial resolution imaging capability is as the presence of highly attenuating materials limits noninvasive assessment of luminal patency.PurposeThe purpose of this study was to quantify the effective lumen diameter within coronary stents using a clinical photon‐counting‐detector (PCD) CT in concert with a convolutional neural network (CNN) denoising algorithm, compared to an energy‐integrating‐detector (EID) CT system.MethodsSeven coronary stents of different materials and inner diameters between 3.43 and 4.72 mm were placed in plastic tubes of diameters 3.96–4.87 mm containing 20 mg/mL of iodine solution, mimicking stented contrast‐enhanced coronary arteries. Tubes were placed parallel with or perpendicular to the scanner's z‐axis in an anthropomorphic phantom emulating an average‐sized patient and scanned with a clinical EID‐CT and PCD‐CT. EID scans were performed using our standard coronary computed tomography angiography (cCTA) protocol (120 kV, 180 quality reference mAs). PCD scans were performed using the ultra‐high‐resolution (UHR) mode (120 × 0.2 mm collimation) at 120 kV with tube current adjusted so that CTDIvol was matched to that of EID scans. EID images were reconstructed per our routine clinical protocol (Br40, 0.6 mm thickness), and with the sharpest available kernel (Br69). PCD images were reconstructed at a thickness of 0.6 mm and a dedicated sharp kernel (Br89) which is only possible with the PCD UHR mode. To address increased image noise introduced by the Br89 kernel, an image‐based CNN denoising algorithm was applied to the PCD images of stents scanned parallel to the scanner's z‐axis. Stents were segmented based on full‐width half maximum thresholding and morphological operations, from which effective lumen diameter was calculated and compared to reference sizes measured with a caliper.ResultsSubstantial blooming artifacts were observed on EID Br40 images, resulting in larger stent struts and reduced lumen diameter (effective diameter underestimated by 41% and 47% for parallel and perpendicular orientations, respectively). Blooming artifacts were observed on EID Br69 images with 19% and 31% underestimation of lumen diameter compared to the caliper for parallel and perpendicular scans, respectively. Overall image quality was substantially improved on PCD, with higher spatial resolution and reduced blooming artifacts, resulting in the clearer delineation of stent struts. Effective lumen diameters were underestimated by 9% and 19% relative to the reference for parallel and perpendicular scans, respectively. CNN reduced image noise by about 50% on PCD images without impacting lumen quantification (<0.3% difference).ConclusionThe PCD UHR mode improved in‐stent lumen quantification for all seven stents as compared to EID images due to decreased blooming artifacts. Implementation of CNN denoising algorithms to PCD data substantially improved image quality.