Background and Purpose— Age-related changes in the cerebrovasculature, including blood–brain barrier (BBB) disruption, are emerging as potential risks for diverse neurological conditions. Because the accumulation of senescent cells in tissues is increasingly recognized as a critical step leading to age-related organ dysfunction, we evaluated whether senescent vascular cells are associated with compromised BBB integrity. Methods— Effects of vascular cell senescence on tight junction and barrier integrity were studied using an in vitro BBB model, composed of endothelial cells, pericytes, and astrocytes. In addition, tight junction coverage in microvessels and BBB integrity in BubR1 hypomorphic (BubR1 H/H ) mice, which display senescence cell-dependent phenotypes, were examined. Results— When an in vitro BBB model was constructed with senescent endothelial cells and pericytes, tight junction structure and barrier integrity (evaluated by transendothelial electric resistance and tracer efflux assay using sodium fluorescein and Evans blue-albumin were significantly impaired. Endothelial cells and pericytes from BubR1 H/H mice had increased senescent-associated β-galactosidase activity and p16 INK4a expression, demonstrating an exacerbation of senescence. The coverage by tight junction proteins in the cortical microvessels were reduced in BubR1 H/H mice, consistent with a compromised BBB integrity from permeability assays. Importantly, the coverage of microvessels by end-feet of aquaporin 4–immunoreactive astrocytes was not altered in the cortex of the BubR1 H/H mice. Conclusions— Our results indicate that accumulation of senescent vascular cells is associated with compromised BBB integrity, providing insights into the mechanism of BBB disruption related to biological aging.
Epigenetic signatures of alcohol abuse and hepatitis infection during human hepatocarcinogenesis
Abstract Dysregulation of the intrinsic DNA methylation landscape is a ubiquitous feature of human carcinogenesis, manifested by global hypomethylation and promoter-specific hypermethylation, ultimately resulting in genome instability and tumor suppressor gene silencing, respectively. Alterations in DNA methylation are particularly apparent in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) which afflicts roughly 750,000 new patients each year [1]. Indeed, it has been demonstrated that a variety of tumor suppressor genes (e.g. p53, E-cadherin) are hypermethylated and silenced in HCC [2-4]. Importantly, HCC is accompanied by the premalignant stage of cirrhosis in 80% of cases. One major roadblock to understanding the methylome in HCC is the presence of multiple etiologies such as Hepatitis C virus (HCV), Hepatitis B virus (HBV), and chronic alcoholism. Therefore, we performed genome-wide methylation profiling to dissect the methylation patterns of more than 170 primary liver samples to stratify etiologic and stage-specific changes in the DNA methylation landscape. Our results profile the DNA methylation landscape across normal, cirrhotic, and HCC livers in the largest study of its kind to date. We unveil distinct locus-specific and large-scale effects of HCV, HBV, and chronic alcoholism in hepatocarcinogenesis. Furthermore, analysis indicates a specific methylation profile for individual etiologies as well as conserved patterns throughout cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Our study demonstrates that each etiology contains potential biomarkers and targets for downstream clinical therapeutics. This study is our first step toward defining the epigenome in cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma and will be combined with future genomic and epimutational data (e.g. transcription, histone modifications, miRNA) to determine the true extent and interplay between epigenetic marks across different stages of liver cancer. Overall, this research has the potential to improve our understanding of epigenetics and result in diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic epigenetic signatures in cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma, which are expected to allow for more timely and efficient detection of disease. 1. Jemal, A., et al., Global cancer statistics. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians, 2011. 61(2): p. 69-90. 2. Tischoff, I. and A. Tannapfe, DNA methylation in hepatocellular carcinoma. World journal of gastroenterology : WJG, 2008. 14(11): p. 1741-8. 3. Calvisi, D.F., et al., Mechanistic and prognostic significance of aberrant methylation in the molecular pathogenesis of human hepatocellular carcinoma. The Journal of clinical investigation, 2007. 117(9): p. 2713-22. 4. Lambert, M.P., et al., Aberrant DNA methylation distinguishes hepatocellular carcinoma associated with HBV and HCV infection and alcohol intake. Journal of hepatology, 2011. 54(4): p. 705-15. Citation Format: Ryan A. Hlady, Rochelle Tiedemann, William Puszyk, Chen Liu, Jeong-Hyeon Choi, Keith D. Robertson. Identification of common and unique epigenetic signatures of chronic hepatitis infection and alcohol abuse in human liver disease. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr 2309. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-2309
Small Molecule Inhibitor YM155-Mediated Activation of Death Receptor 5 Is Crucial for Chemotherapy-Induced Apoptosis in Pancreatic Carcinoma
Pancreatectomy is associated with significant morbidity and unpredictable outcome, with few diagnostic tools to determine, which patients gain the most benefit from this treatment, especially before the operation. This study aimed to define a preoperative signature panel of serum markers to indicate response to pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer. Over 1000 patients with pancreatic cancer treated at two independent high‐volume institutions were included in this study and were divided into three groups, including resected, locally advanced and metastatic. Eight serum tumor markers most commonly used in gastrointestinal cancers were analyzed for patient outcome. Preoperative CA19‐9 independently indicated surgical response in pancreatic cancer. Patients with CA19‐9 ≥1000 U/mL generally had a poor surgical benefit. However, a subset of these patients still achieved a survival advantage when CA19‐9 levels decreased postoperatively. CEA and CA125 in the presence of CA19‐9 ≥1000 U/mL could independently predict the non‐decrease of CA19‐9 postoperatively. The combination of the three markers was useful for predicting a worse surgical outcome with a median survival of 5.1 months vs. 23.0 months (p < 0.001) for the training cohort and 7.0 months vs. 18.2 months (p < 0.001) for the validation cohort and also suggested a higher prevalence of early distant metastasis after surgery. Resected patients with this proposed signature showed no survival advantage over patients in the locally advanced group who did not receive pancreatectomy. Therefore, a preoperative serum signature of CEA+/CA125+/CA19‐9 ≥1000 U/mL is associated with poor surgical outcome and can be used to select appropriate patients with pancreatic cancer for pancreatectomy.