Citations

Purpose The purpose of this study was to document management strategies and complications relating to the use of anteromedial portals for elbow arthroscopy in a series of patients with subluxating or previously transposed ulnar nerves. Methods A review of 913 elbow arthroscopies showed that 59 elbows with a subluxating or previously transposed ulnar nerve required anterior compartment arthroscopic surgery. The patients with subluxating nerves had proximal anteromedial portals established by reducing and holding the nerve behind the epicondyle with a thumb while establishing or entering the portal. In cases of prior nerve transposition, the following techniques were used if, by palpation, localization of the ulnar nerve was considered to be (1) unequivocal, (2) equivocal, or (3) impossible: In group 1 (unequivocal) the proximal anteromedial portal was established in the normal antegrade fashion. In group 2 (equivocal) a 1‐cm incision was made at the planned proximal anteromedial portal site and blunt dissection down to the capsule was performed without identification of the nerve. In group 3 (impossible) a 2‐ to 4‐cm skin incision was made and the nerve was identified before placement of the portal. Results We found that 59 elbows in 56 patients had a subluxating ulnar nerve (31 elbows) or previous ulnar nerve transposition (28 elbows). The transposition had been subcutaneous in 21 and submuscular in 7. The proximal anteromedial portal was used in all but 3 cases (2 patients) of submuscular transposition that were early in the series. In those cases only 2 lateral portals were used for anterior compartment surgery. There were no operative ulnar nerve injuries related to the use of the proximal anteromedial portal. Conclusions Neither elbow arthroscopy nor specifically the use of the proximal anteromedial portal is contraindicated in patients with prior transposition or subluxation of the ulnar nerve. The management of the nerve can be based on the degree of certainty with which the nerve can be localized by palpation in the region of the planned portal. Level of Evidence Level IV, therapeutic case series.

AbstractAlthough silicone radial head arthroplasty has been successful in many patients, it has been associated with complications such as fractures of the prosthesis and silicone synovitis. Synovectomy and removal of the failed silicone radial head, with or without reimplantation of a metallic radial head, is indicated in such complications. In an effort to perform minimally invasive surgery, we performed arthroscopic removal of the silicone head combined with synovectomy in a series of such patients. The silicone prostheses were cut into two or three pieces and then removed. After a median follow up of 26 months, all patients reported excellent pain relief and there were no residual loose bodies. Removal of a failed silicone radial head can be successfully performed arthroscopically. This arthroscopic technique has the advantage of being minimally invasive and can be combined with other procedures including capsulectomy, if necessary.

A custom computer-controlled rapid prototyping system was designed and developed in this research. This system for bio-manufacturing of polymer scaffolds included 3D motion control components, a nozzle, a pressure controller, and a temperature-controlled reservoir containing a biomaterial. Heating elements built into the reservoir melted the biomaterial. The pressure line attached to the reservoir provided a controllable force that extruded the polymer biomaterial through the nozzle and deposited the polymer biomaterial onto a platform to fabricate scaffolds. A low pressure (830 KPa) system was designed and fabricated to accommodate different temperatures, motion speeds, and viscosities of polymer biomaterials. The reservoir with the nozzle was mounted to servo motor-controlled linear x-y motion devices along with a third servo motor-controlled device that controlled the z-position of the platform. Poly(ε-caprolactone) [PCL] was used to fabricate scaffolds with designed structure that were used in cell and tissue regeneration studies. 3D computer-aided design (CAD) with Pro-Engineer and computational finite element analysis (FEA) programs with MSC_Patran and MSC_Marc were used to model scaffold designs with appropriate architecture and material selection. The CAD models were used in FEA to develop new methods for determining mechanical properties of tissue scaffolds of desired structure and geometry. FEA models were validated by mechanical testing and other published results. Technology developed in this research has potential for the advancement of bio-manufacturing, and design optimization of scaffolds for tissue engineering.

Background Complete biceps tendon avulsions are frequently missed on clinical examination, suggesting the need for a reliable diagnostic test. Hypothesis Complete distal biceps avulsions can be reliably detected with the Hook test. Study Design Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. Methods The hook test was performed by a single surgeon in a cohort of 45 patients undergoing surgical exploration of the distal biceps tendon. While the patient actively supinates with the elbow flexed 90°, an intact hook test permits the examiner to hook his or her index finger under the intact biceps tendon from the lateral side. With an abnormal hook test, indicating distal avulsion, there is no cord-like structure under which the examiner may hook a finger. Results Thirty-three patients had an avulsion and 12 had a partial tear. The hook test was abnormal in 33 of 33 (100%) patients with complete biceps avulsions, and intact in 12 of 12 with partial detachments. However, it was painful in 9 of those 12. In the noninjured contralateral arms, which served as the normal control group, 45 of 45 (100%) had a normal hook test. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) diagnosed a complete tear in 11 of 12 patients with partial tears and in 11 of 13 with complete lesions. The sensitivity and specificity were both higher with the hook test (both 100%) than with MRI (92% and 85%, respectively). Conclusions The hook test is a highly sensitive and specific test for assessment of distal biceps tendon avulsions.

Purpose Currently, there is little information available concerning the results of shoulder synovectomy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Furthermore, it remains difficult to assess the success of shoulder synovectomy because of a high association of rotator cuff tears in rheumatoid patients. We hypothesized that synovectomy in patients with a functionally intact rotator cuff would provide durable pain relief. Type of Study Case series. Methods Sixteen shoulders in 13 patients with rheumatoid arthritis were treated with arthroscopic shoulder synovectomy from 1988 to 2002 with a mean follow‐up of 5.5 years. Patients with full‐thickness rotator cuff tears or partial tears that required repair were excluded. Two of the 13 patients had been diagnosed with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis and 11 had adult‐onset disease. The medical records of the patients were reviewed and patients were assessed clinically and by questionnaire to assess pain, satisfaction, range of motion, radiographic outcomes, and occurrence of complications. Results There was an improvement in pain at long‐term follow‐up in 13 of 16 patients ( P < .001). Active shoulder elevation improved from a median of 145° to 160° but was not significant ( P = .14). External rotation improved significantly ( P = .01) from a median of 45° (range, 0° to 90°) to 60° (range, 0° to 100°). According to the Neer rating system, there were 5 excellent, 8 satisfactory, and 3 unsatisfactory results. Seven of 8 shoulders followed‐up radiographically for more than 1 year showed radiographic progression of disease. All 3 patients reporting pain that was no better or worse than before surgery had radiographic arthrosis at last follow‐up with advancing periarticular erosions and reduction of glenoid articular space. Conclusions Arthroscopic synovectomy of the shoulder in patients with rheumatoid arthritis with an intact rotator cuff offers a reliable decrease in pain with less predictable improvements in range of motion. Limitations in predicting final results based on preoperative radiographs should be discussed with patients; those with more advanced radiographic changes may not benefit from the procedure. Level of Evidence Level IV, therapeutic study, case series, no control group.