Citations

Background: COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in the United States is high, with at least 63 million unvaccinated individuals to date. Socioeconomically disadvantaged populations experience lower COVID-19 vaccination rates despite facing a disproportionate COVID-19 burden. Objective: To assess the factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among under-resourced, adult patients. Methods: Participants were patients receiving care at a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) in St. Paul, Minnesota. Data were collected via multiple modes over 2 phases in 2020 (self-administered electronic survey) and 2021 (study team-administered survey by telephone, self-administered written survey) to promote diversity and inclusion for study participation. The primary outcome was COVID-19 vaccine acceptance. Using logistic regression analysis, associations between vaccine acceptance and factors including risk perception, concerns about the COVID-19 vaccine, social determinants of health (SDOH), co-morbidities, pandemic-induced hardships, and stress were assessed by adjusted odds ratios (AORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: One hundred sixty-eight patients (62.5% female; mean age [SD]: 49.9 [17.4] years; 32% <$20 000 annual household income; 69% <college education) were included in the study. Sixty-one percent of the patients received or were willing to receive the vaccine. Risk perception was positively associated with vaccine acceptance (AOR: 5.3; 95% CI: 2.5, 11.5, P < .001), while concerns about the vaccine (eg, safety, side effects, rapid development of the vaccine, etc.) were negatively associated with vaccine acceptance (all P < .001). SDOH, co-morbidities, pandemic-induced hardships were not associated with vaccine acceptance. Conclusions: Our study in a socioeconomically disadvantaged population suggests that risk perception is associated with an increased likelihood of vaccine acceptance, while concerns about the COVID-19 vaccine are associated with a lower likelihood of vaccine acceptance. As these factors could impact vaccine uptake, consistent, innovative, and context-specific risk communication strategies may improve vaccine coverage in this population.

Introduction: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a comprehensive secondary cardiovascular disease (CVD) program which integrates structured lifestyle interventions to reduce morbidity and mortality. The Life’s Simple 7 (LS7) is an objective measure of cardiovascular health (CVH) which incorporates health-promoting behaviors and clinical factors however, it has not been rigorously evaluated in the CR setting. Methods: Retrospective cohort study of 937 patients who attended center-based CR at Mayo Clinic from Jan 2018 -Sept 2020. Patient characteristics and LS7 component metrics at baseline (pre-CR) and completion (post-CR) were collected: 3 clinical factors (blood pressure [BP], cholesterol, and hemoglobin A1c [HbA1c]), and 4 health behaviors (smoking, body mass index [BMI], physical activity [PA] and diet). LS7 score was computed as a composite of each LS7 component by assigning 2-points for ideal, 1-point for intermediate, or 0-points for poor CVH ranging from 0-14 points. LS7 score was further categorized as poor 0-6, intermediate 7-8 and ideal 9 -14. Results: Patients were 64±13 years old, 34% were female, and attended a mean of 11±12 CR sessions, Table 1. At baseline, the LS7 components with the highest proportion within the poor category were HbA1c (201/495, 41%) and BMI (465/936, 50%), Table 2. From pre to post-CR, there was a reduction in proportion of patients classified within the poor category for each LS7 component except HbA1c ( Figure 1 ), and the proportion of patients with LS7 scores in the ideal range increased from 6.4% to 19% (P<0.001). There was a statistically significant improvement in LS7 score from 5.5±1.8 to 6.7± 2.4 (+Δ1.6±2.4, P<.0001), Table 2 . Conclusions: Patients attending CR demonstrated an improvement in LS7 score and almost all LS7 components suggesting an overall positive impact of CR on CVH. Further research is needed to better understand the impact of the individual LS7 components on CV outcomes in diverse populations participating in CR.

Background: African-American (AA) adults have a higher prevalence of cardiovascular (CV) risk factors, leading to higher CV disease mortality than White adults. Prior findings of our mobile health (mHealth) lifestyle intervention (FAITH! App) demonstrated efficacy in promoting ideal cardiovascular health (CVH) in AAs. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that the intervention group with preexisting CV risk factors would have a greater increase in LS7 scores than the control group with the same risk factors following use of the FAITH! App. Methods: A cluster randomized controlled trial was conducted among AAs from 16 churches in Minnesota. The intervention included culturally relevant, LS7-focused education modules, diet/physical activity self-monitoring and a group sharing board. A subgroup of participants with ≥1 diagnosis of overweight/obesity, hyperlipidemia, hypertension (HTN) or diabetes was examined. The primary outcome was change in LS7 score—a measure of CVH ranging from poor to ideal (range 0-14 points)—at 6 months post-intervention. Results: Forty-nine participants (75.5% female) were included in the intervention (n=20; mean age [SD]: 58.8 [9.5]) or control (n=29, mean age [SD]: 52.5 [10.7]) groups (Table 1). There was no significant difference in the CV risk factor prevalence between the two groups. There was a greater increase in LS7 score in the intervention vs. control group across all CV risk factors, with significant differences among those with overweight/obesity (1.77, p<.0001) and with 2+ or 3+ CV risk factors (1.00, p=.03; 1.09, p=.04). Compared to the control group, the increase in the percentage of participants with ideal LS7 scores in the intervention group was higher among those with overweight/obesity, HTN, diabetes and 3+ CV risk factors. Conclusions: Our culturally tailored mHealth lifestyle intervention was associated with notable increases in LS7 scores among AAs with preexisting CV risk factors, suggesting its efficacy in improving CVH among this population.

Background: Black women demonstrate higher levels of stress over the life course compared to Black men, White men, and White women, which may help to explain their higher cardiovascular disease (CVD) morbidity and mortality. Despite implications for primary and secondary CVD prevention and racial disparities, few interventions have targeted psychosocial stress to improve blood pressure (BP) levels among Black women. Objective: To test whether a theory-driven, culturally tailored, community intervention focused on the stress experiences of Black women improves psychological outcomes and BP levels. Methods: The “Art for Hearts” pilot trial sought to examine the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a novel intervention encouraging creative self-expression. This individual level, single-arm pilot trial recruited self-identified Black women ≥18 years. Women participated in an 8-week program, including 4 art sessions with a community artist (a self-identified Black woman) accompanied by a moderated focus group discussion and 4 heart health education sessions (facilitated by a Black woman researcher) on home BP monitoring, stress management techniques, diet/physical activity, and patient-clinician communication. All sessions were conducted in-person in a community space. Participants completed a survey including self-rated stress (scale of 0 to 7), perceived stress (PSS-10), depressive symptoms (PHQ-8), and anxiety symptoms (GAD-7) at baseline and 8 weeks. BP was measured by a trained assessor at baseline and 8 weeks as well as before and after each session. We examined within-participant changes in psychological measures as well as mean systolic and diastolic BP from baseline to 8 weeks. Results: The study included 18 Black women with a mean age of 44.1 (SD=15.4) years. Women were highly educated (36.8% with a graduate/professional degree) and 11.1% earned an income of ≥$100,000. Mean systolic BP was 114 mmHg and mean diastolic BP was 66 mmHg at baseline. From baseline to 8 weeks, self-rated stress level decreased by 1-point (from 4.36 to 3.18; p=0.005) (scale range: 0 -7). Perceived stress (-1.08; p=0.58) and anxiety (-1.33; p=0.09) decreased from baseline to 8 weeks; however, these changes did not achieve statistical significance. Depressive symptoms significantly improved from baseline to 8 weeks (19.13 to 13.38; p=0.044). There were no differences in systolic or diastolic BP from baseline to follow-up. The intervention was deemed feasible and acceptable with an attendance rate of >80%; participants expressed high overall satisfaction with the intervention. Conclusion: A tailored 8-week pilot intervention using painting self-expression demonstrated feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy for improving self-rated stress and depressive symptoms. No effects were demonstrated on BP in this sample.

Advances in computer science and data-analytic methods are driving a new era in mental health research and application. Artificial intelligence (AI) technologies hold the potential to enhance the assessment, diagnosis, and treatment of people experiencing mental health problems and to increase the reach and impact of mental health care. However, AI applications will not mitigate mental health disparities if they are built from historical data that reflect underlying social biases and inequities. AI models biased against sensitive classes could reinforce and even perpetuate existing inequities if these models create legacies that differentially impact who is diagnosed and treated, and how effectively. The current article reviews the health-equity implications of applying AI to mental health problems, outlines state-of-the-art methods for assessing and mitigating algorithmic bias, and presents a call to action to guide the development of fair-aware AI in psychological science.

African American (AA) churches are valuable partners in implementing health promotion programming (HPP) to combat health disparities. The study purpose was to evaluate AA church characteristics associated with enrollment into the FAITH! (Fostering African American Improvement in Total Health) Trial, a community-based, cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a mobile health intervention for cardiovascular health promotion among AA churches. Churches located in Minneapolis-St. Paul and Rochester, Minnesota were invited to complete an electronic screening survey and follow-up telephone interview including the PREACH (Predicting Readiness to Engage African American Churches in Health) tool to assess church characteristics and infrastructure for HPP. The primary outcome was church enrollment in the FAITH! Trial. Key predictors included overall PREACH scores and its subscales (Personnel, Physical Structure, Faith-based Approach, Funding), congregation size, and mean congregation member age. Of the 26 churches screened, 16 (61.5%) enrolled in the trial. The enrolled churches had higher overall mean PREACH scores (36.1 vs. 30.2) and subscales for Personnel (8.8 vs. 5.6), Faith-based Approach (11.0 vs. 9.6), and Funding (7.3 vs. 4.8) compared with non-enrolled churches; all differences were not statistically significant due to small sample size. Twelve (75.0%) of the enrolled churches had >75 members versus six (60.0%) of the non-enrolled churches. Twelve (80.0%) of the enrolled churches had an average congregation member age ≤54 years versus six (67.0%) of the non-enrolled churches. AA churches enrolling into a community-based RCT reported greater infrastructure for HPP, larger congregations, and members of younger age. These characteristics may be helpful to consider among researchers partnering with AA churches for HPP studies.

Background Religiosity/spirituality is a major coping mechanism for African Americans, but no prior studies have analyzed its association with the American Heart Association Life's Simple 7 (LS7) indicators in this group. Methods and Results This cross‐sectional study using Jackson Heart Study (JHS) data examined relationships between religiosity (religious attendance, private prayer, religious coping) and spirituality (theistic, nontheistic, total) with LS7 individual components (eg, physical activity, diet, smoking, blood pressure) and composite score among African Americans. Multivariable logistic regression assessed the odds of achieving intermediate/ideal (versus poor) LS7 levels adjusted for sociodemographic, behavioral, and biomedical factors. Among the 2967 participants (mean [SD] age=54.0 [12.3] years; 65.7% women), higher religious attendance was associated with increased likelihood (reported as odds ratio [95% CI]) of achieving intermediate/ideal levels of physical activity (1.16 [1.06–1.26]), diet (1.10 [1.01–1.20]), smoking (1.50 [1.34–1.68]), blood pressure (1.12 [1.01–1.24]), and LS7 composite score (1.15 [1.06–1.26]). Private prayer was associated with increased odds of achieving intermediate/ideal levels for diet (1.12 [1.03–1.22]) and smoking (1.24 [1.12–1.39]). Religious coping was associated with increased odds of achieving intermediate/ideal levels of physical activity (1.18 [1.08–1.28]), diet (1.10 [1.01–1.20]), smoking (1.32 [1.18–1.48]), and LS7 composite score (1.14 [1.04–1.24]). Total spirituality was associated with increased odds of achieving intermediate/ideal levels of physical activity (1.11 [1.02–1.21]) and smoking (1.36 [1.21–1.53]). Conclusions Higher levels of religiosity/spirituality were associated with intermediate/ideal cardiovascular health across multiple LS7 indicators. Reinforcement of religiosity/spirituality in lifestyle interventions may decrease overall cardiovascular disease risk among African Americans.

Background: African Americans continue to have suboptimal cardiovascular health (CVH) based on the American Heart Association Life’s Simple 7 (LS7), 7 health-promoting behaviors and biological risk factors (eg, physical activity, blood pressure). Innovative, community-level interventions in partnership with trusted institutions such as African American churches are potential means to improve CVH in this population. Methods: Using a community-based participatory research approach, the FAITH! Trial (Fostering African American Improvement in Total Health) rigorously assessed the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a refined, community-informed, mobile health intervention (FAITH! App) for promoting CVH among African Americans in faith communities using a cluster randomized controlled trial. Participants from 16 churches in Rochester and Minneapolis-St Paul, MN, were randomized to receive the FAITH! App (immediate intervention) or were assigned to a delayed intervention comparator group. The 10-week intervention core features included culturally relevant and LS7-focused education modules, diet/physical activity self-monitoring, and a group sharing board. Data were collected via electronic surveys and health assessments. Primary outcomes were average change in mean LS7 score (continuous measure of CVH ranging from poor to ideal [0–14 points]) from baseline to 6 months post-intervention (using generalized estimating equations) and app engagement/usability (by the Health Information Technology Usability Evaluation Scale; range, 0–5). Results: Of 85 enrolled participants (randomized to immediate [N=41] and delayed [control] intervention [N=44] groups), 76 and 68 completed surveys/health assessments at baseline and 6 months post-intervention, respectively (80% retention rate with assessments at both baseline and 6-month time points); immediate intervention [N=30] and control [N=38] groups). At baseline, the majority of participants (mean age [SD], 54.2 [12.3] years, 71% female) had <4-year college education level (39/66, 59%) and poor CVH (44% in poor category; mean LS7 score [SD], 6.8 [1.9]). The mean LS7 score of the intervention group increased by 1.9 (SD 1.9) points compared with 0.7 (SD 1.7) point in the control group (both P <0.0001) at 6 months. The estimated difference of this increase between the groups was 1.1 (95% CI, 0.6–1.7; P <0.0001). App engagement/usability was overall high (100% connection to app; >75% completed weekly diet/physical activity tracking; Health Information Technology Usability Evaluation Scale, mean [SD], 4.2 [0.7]). Conclusions: On the basis of preliminary findings, the refined FAITH! App appears to be an efficacious mobile health tool to promote ideal CVH among African Americans. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT03777709.

Background: Black adults experience a disproportionately higher burden of cardiovascular risk factors and disease in comparison with White adults in the United States. Less is known about how sex-based disparities in cardiovascular mortality between these groups have changed on a national scale over the past 20 years, particularly across geographic determinants of health and residential racial segregation. Methods: We used CDC WONDER (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research) to identify Black and White adults age ≥25 years in the United States from 1999 to 2019. We calculated annual age-adjusted cardiovascular mortality rates (per 100 000) for Black and White women and men, as well as absolute rate differences and rate ratios to compare the mortality gap between these groups. We also examined patterns by US census region, rural versus urban residence, and degree of neighborhood segregation. Results: From 1999 to 2019, age-adjusted mortality rates declined overall for both Black and White adults. There was a decline in age-adjusted cardiovascular mortality among Black (602.1 to 351.8 per 100 000 population) and White women (447.0 to 267.5), and the absolute rate difference (ARD) between these groups decreased over time (1999: ARD, 155.1 [95% CI, 149.9–160.3]; 2019: ARD, 84.3 [95% CI, 81.2–87.4]). These patterns were similar for Black (824.1 to 526.3 per 100 000) and White men (637.5 to 396.0; 1999: ARD, 186.6 [95% CI, 178.6–194.6]; 2019: ARD, 130.3 [95% CI, 125.6–135.0]). Despite this progress, cardiovascular mortality in 2019 was higher for Black women (rate ratio, 1.32 [95% CI, 1.30–1.33])— especially in the younger (age <65 years) subgroup (rate ratio, 2.28 [95% CI, 2.23–2.32])—as well as for Black men (rate ratio, 1.33 [95% CI, 1.32–1.34]), compared with their respective White counterparts. There was regional variation in cardiovascular mortality patterns, and the Black-White gap differed across rural and urban areas. Cardiovascular mortality rates among Black women and men were consistently higher in communities with high levels of racial segregation compared with those with low to moderate levels. Conclusions: During the past 2 decades, age-adjusted cardiovascular mortality declined significantly for Black and White adults in the United States, as did the absolute difference in death rates between these groups. Despite this progress, Black women and men continue to experience higher cardiovascular mortality rates than their White counterparts.