Citations

Distinguishing reactive mesothelial proliferation from malignant mesothelioma (MM) can be difficult, particularly on small biopsies. In this scenario, a diagnosis of atypical mesothelial proliferation might be rendered. However, the distinction between a reactive process and MM is important for prognosis and treatment. Recently, loss of BRCA1-associated protein 1 (BAP1) expression and/or homozygous deletion of CDKN2A were identified in some MM, but not in reactive mesothelial proliferations. We studied 34 cases of atypical mesothelial proliferation from our institutional files (1993 to 2016) for BAP1 expression, deletion of CDKN2A, and clinical outcome. Fifteen of 34 patients (44%) were subsequently diagnosed with MM. BAP1 expression was lost in 6 of these 15 (40%) patients. Ten of 15 (67%) patients died of disease within a median time of 18.2 months. BAP1 expression was also lost in 1 case of probable MM. In this case atypical mesothelial proliferation was identified in the pleura during a lobectomy procedure for lung adenocarcinoma. Follow-up of 57.0 months was remarkable for visceral and parietal pleural thickening with continued unilateral effusion identified on imaging studies but no subsequent definitive diagnosis of MM. CDKN2A studies by fluorescence in situ hybridization (performed in 31 cases) found no homozygous deletion of that gene in any case. In conclusion, loss of BAP1 expression in atypical mesothelial proliferation helps to predict MM and is a useful adjunct test in these cases. Homozygous deletion of CDKN2A in mesothelial cell proliferations did not prove to be useful to predict MM in cases of atypical mesothelial proliferation.

AbstractMost FDA‐approved drugs are not equally effective in all patients, suggesting that identification of biomarkers to predict responders to a chemoprevention agent will be needed to stratify patients and achieve maximum benefit. The goal of this study was to investigate both patient‐specific and cell context‐specific heterogeneity of metformin response, using fibroblast cell lines and induced pluripotent stem cells differentiated into lung epithelial lineages. We performed cell survival analysis, transcriptome and whole exome sequencing analysis on both patient‐derived cell lines and cancer cell lines to assess differential metformin response and identify response genes. We found differences in response to metformin treatment across a variety of cell lines and cellular contexts, suggesting that heterogeneity may be patient‐ and cell type‐specific. Gene expression profiling and analysis of metformin‐sensitive and metformin‐resistant cells identified differentially expressed genes that may be able to stratify patients into metformin responders and non‐responders. Sequencing analysis found genomic alterations that correlated with metformin response. These results suggest that the identification of genomic biomarkers for patients who may respond to metformin treatment can provide an opportunity for individualizing metformin chemoprevention in the clinical setting.

Context.— The diagnosis and grading of acute cellular and antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in lung allograft biopsies is important because rejection can lead to acute graft dysfunction and/or failure and may contribute to chronic graft failure. While acute cellular rejection is well defined histologically, no reproducible specific features of AMR are currently identified. Therefore, a combination of clinical features, serology, histopathology, and immunologic findings is suggested for the diagnosis of AMR. Objective.— To describe the perspective of members of the Pulmonary Pathology Society (PPS) on the workup of lung allograft transbronchial biopsy and the diagnosis of acute cellular rejection and AMR in lung transplant. Data Sources.— Reports by the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT), experience of members of PPS who routinely review lung allograft biopsies, and search of literature database (PubMed). Conclusions.— Acute cellular rejection should be assessed and graded according to the 2007 working formulation of the ISHLT. As currently no specific features are known for AMR in lung allografts, the triple test (clinical allograft dysfunction, donor-specific antibodies, pathologic findings) should be used for its diagnosis. C4d staining might be performed when morphologic, clinical, and/or serologic features suggestive of AMR are identified.

Abstract Previous preclinical studies and a phase I clinical trial suggested that myo-inositol may be a safe and effective lung cancer chemopreventive agent. We conducted a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled phase IIb study to determine the chemopreventive effects of myo-inositol in smokers with bronchial dysplasia. Smokers with ≥1 site of dysplasia identified by autofluorescence bronchoscopy-directed biopsy were randomly assigned to receive oral placebo or myo-inositol, 9 g once a day for 2 weeks, and then twice a day for 6 months. The primary endpoint was change in dysplasia rate after 6 months of intervention on a per-participant basis. Other trial endpoints reported herein include Ki-67 labeling index, blood and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BAL) levels of proinflammatory, oxidant/antioxidant biomarkers, and an airway epithelial gene expression signature for PI3K activity. Seventy-four (n = 38 myo-inositol and n = 36 placebo) participants with a baseline and 6-month bronchoscopy were included in all efficacy analyses. The complete response and the progressive disease rates were 26.3% versus 13.9% and 47.4% versus 33.3%, respectively, in the myo-inositol and placebo arms (P = 0.76). Compared with placebo, myo-inositol intervention significantly reduced IL6 levels in BAL over 6 months (P = 0.03). Among those with a complete response in the myo-inositol arm, there was a significant decrease in a gene expression signature reflective of PI3K activation within the cytologically normal bronchial airway epithelium (P = 0.002). The heterogeneous response to myo-inositol suggests a targeted therapy approach based on molecular alterations is needed in future clinical trials to determine the efficacy of myo-inositol as a chemopreventive agent. Cancer Prev Res; 9(12); 906–14. ©2016 AACR.

Abstract PURPOSE: Previous mutational analyses have failed to identify a predictive or prognostic marker for pulmonary carcinoid tumors (PCT). The heterogeneity of PCTs coupled with a lack of detailed information about the tumor biology, impedes patient stratification into groups based on tumor phenotypes or treatment response. We sought to use high-throughput next-generation sequencing to improve prognostication. METHODS: We stratified 37 patients with resected PCTs as low risk (n = 17) and high risk (n = 20) based on a 5 year long follow up for recurrence. Patients with no recurrence within 5 years from initial treatment were deemed low risk. Macrodissection was followed by genomic DNA isolation and next-generation sequencing was performed using an Illumina Mate Pair library protocol. Sequence reads were mapped to the human genome, and primers spanning the fusion junctions were used for validation polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: Carcinoids commonly harbor rearrangements (median 3.5, range 1-167). Large chromosomal gains or losses were found in 24 of the cases (64.8%). We developed a prognostic score that included the total amount of genetic alterations (deletions and translocations). ROC analysis revealed an AUC of 0.76. High risk patients had a mean score of 20 and low risk patients had a mean score of 5.45 (p value = 0.03, Welch Two Sample t-test). Further analysis of the specific genetic alterations harbored by high and low risk PCTs and correlation with the pathologic and immunohistochemical information is currently underway. CONCLUSION: Large chromosomal rearrangements and aneuploidy portend a poor prognosis for patients with PCTs. Mate Pair sequencing of PCTs provides valuable prognostic information for this highly heterogeneous group of cancers. Citation Format: Konstantinos Leventakos, Aaron S. Mansfield, Stephen J. Murphy, Sarah H. Johnson, Sarah E. Kerr, Marie Christine Aubry, George Vasmatzis, Julian R. Molina. A prognostic model for pulmonary carcinoid tumors based on large chromosomal alterations. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 4513.

Abstract Lung cancer accounts for about 27% of the cancer related deaths in the USA annually. Pathologically, it is a very complex disease broadly classified into small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). NSCLCs are further classified into squamous cell carcinoma, large cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma. Achaete-scute homolog 1 (ASCL1), an important transcription factor essential in the development of neuroendocrine cells (NE) in lungs is shown to be specifically expressed in lung NE cancers and 10-20% of adenocarcinomas (AD) with NE differentiation (NED), thus suggesting a role in the pathogenesis of these tumors. Our previous study showed that ASCL1 is a regulator of the RET oncogene in AD with NED. RET is a receptor tyrosine kinase with two isoforms in humans: RET9 (short) and RET51 (long). We performed survival analysis to study implications of RET isoforms in ASCL1+ tumors and found that elevated expression of the long RET mRNA was associated with poor survival. Subsequent in vitro experiments demonstrated that treatment with EGF robustly induced phosphorylation of RET in HCC1833 and H1755 cell lines which have high endogenous levels of ASCL1 and RET but not in VMRC-LCD cell line which has high level of ASCL1 but low level of RET. EGF induced phosphorylation of RET was diminished by gefitinib and by EGFR siRNA. Immunoprecipitation results indicated direct binding between EGFR and RET in presence of EGF. Furthermore, a high throughput drug screening found 8 EGFR inhibitors that were 10 - 250 fold more cytotoxic in ASCL1+ compared with ASCL1- AD cells. These results implicate EGFR as a key regulator of RET activation in ASCL1+ AD and suggest that EGFR inhibitors may be therapeutic for this population of patients. Citation Format: Kaustubh N. Bhinge, Yang Lin, Hamed Rahi, Marie Christine Aubry, Aaron Mansfield, Irina Kovtun, Stephen Murphy, Ping Yang, Dennis Wigle, Joanne (Eunhee) Yi, Aqsa Nasir, Simone Terra, Julian Molina, George Vasmatzis, Farhad Kosari. EGFR-mediated activation of RET in ASCL1+ lung adenocarcinoma. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 1129.

Ciliated muconodular papillary tumors (CMPTs) are rare peripheral lung lesions, characterized by papillary architecture and ciliated columnar cells admixed with mucinous cells and basal cells. They often have prominent surrounding intra-alveolar mucin, which can lead to diagnostic confusion with mucinous adenocarcinoma. Recognition of the ciliated component is the key to diagnosis of CMPT. The literature contains few reported cases to date, all occurring in East-Asian patients. Although follow-up data are limited, CMPT seems to be an indolent tumor with very good prognosis, leading some to question whether it is a reactive or hamartomatous lesion. However, a very recent molecular study has identified BRAF (40%) and EGFR (30%) alterations in CMPT, supporting a truly neoplastic process. Here for the first time, we report 4 cases of morphologically typical CMPT in western patients, occurring in 1 man (60 y) and 3 women (71 to 83 y). Interestingly, 1 case occurred in background of pronounced small airway disease with necrotizing bronchiolitis and multiple carcinoid tumorlets. We further analyzed 1 tumor using a 50 gene next-generation sequencing oncology panel that identified 2 pathogenic mutations (BRAF V600E and AKT1 E17K). Our study is the first to describe that CMPT can occur in western (non-Asian) patients. Our data confirm BRAF V600E mutation as a probable driver in a subset of these tumors, along with AKT1 mutation, which further supports that CMPT are indolent pulmonary neoplasms.