Citations

In this Commentary, the authors explore the scoping review by Lawrence and colleagues by challenging their conclusion that with over 25 years’ worth of “ambiguous and seemingly ubiquitous use” of the hidden curriculum construct in health professions education scholarship, it is time to either move to a more uniform definitional foundation or abandon the term altogether. The Commentary authors counter these remedial propositions by foregrounding the importance of theoretical diversity and the conceptual richness afforded when the hidden curriculum construct is used as an entry point for studying the interstitial space between the formal and a range of other-than-formal domains of learning. They document how tightly delimited scoping strategies fail to capture the wealth of educational scholarship that operates within a hidden curriculum framework, including “hidden” hidden curriculum articles, studies that employ alternative constructs, and investigations that target important tacit sociocultural influences on learners and faculty without formally deploying the term. They offer examples of how the hidden curriculum construct, while undergoing significant transformation in its application within the field of health professions education, has created the conceptual foundation for the application of a number of critical perspectives that make visible the field’s political investments in particular forms of knowing and associated practices. Finally, the Commentary authors invite readers to consider the methodological promise afforded by conceptual heterogeneity, particularly strands of scholarship that resituate the hidden curriculum concept within the magically expansive dance of social relationships, social learning, and social life that form the learning environments of health professions education.

Background: Strong evidence supports the role of both genetic and environmental factors in pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis (POMS) etiology. Objective: We comprehensively investigated the association between established major histocompatibility complex (MHC) and non-MHC adult multiple sclerosis (MS)-associated variants and susceptibility to POMS. Methods: Cases with onset <18 years ( n = 569) and controls ( n = 16,251) were included from the United States and Sweden. Adjusted logistic regression and meta-analyses were performed for individual risk variants and a weighted genetic risk score (wGRS) for non-MHC variants. Results were compared to adult MS cases ( n = 7588). Results: HLA–DRB1*15:01 was strongly associated with POMS (odds ratio (OR) meta = 2.95, p < 2.0 × 10 −16 ). Furthermore, 28 of 104 non-MHC variants studied (23%) were associated ( p < 0.05); POMS cases carried, on average, a higher burden of these 28 variants compared to adults (OR avg = 1.24 vs 1.13, respectively), though the difference was not significant. The wGRS was strongly associated with POMS (OR meta = 2.77, 95% confidence interval: 2.33, 3.32, p < 2.0 × 10 −16 ) and higher, on average, when compared to adult cases. Additional class III risk variants in the MHC region associated with POMS were revealed after accounting for HLA–DRB1*15:01 and HLA–A*02. Conclusion: Pediatric and adult MS share many genetic variants suggesting similar biological processes are present. MHC variants beyond HLA–DRB1*15:01 and HLA–A*02 are also associated with POMS.

AbstractBackgroundObservational reports suggest that supplementation that increases citric acid cycle intermediates via anaplerosis may have therapeutic advantages over traditional medium‐chain triglyceride (MCT) treatment of long‐chain fatty acid oxidation disorders (LC‐FAODs) but controlled trials have not been reported. The goal of our study was to compare the effects of triheptanoin (C7), an anaplerotic seven‐carbon fatty acid triglyceride, to trioctanoin (C8), an eight‐carbon fatty acid triglyceride, in patients with LC‐FAODs.MethodsA double blinded, randomized controlled trial of 32 subjects with LC‐FAODs (carnitine palmitoyltransferase‐2, very long‐chain acylCoA dehydrogenase, trifunctional protein or long‐chain 3‐hydroxy acylCoA dehydrogenase deficiencies) who were randomly assigned a diet containing 20% of their total daily energy from either C7 or C8 for 4 months was conducted. Primary outcomes included changes in total energy expenditure (TEE), cardiac function by echocardiogram, exercise tolerance, and phosphocreatine recovery following acute exercise. Secondary outcomes included body composition, blood biomarkers, and adverse events, including incidence of rhabdomyolysis.ResultsPatients in the C7 group increased left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction by 7.4% (p = 0.046) while experiencing a 20% (p = 0.041) decrease in LV wall mass on their resting echocardiogram. They also required a lower heart rate for the same amount of work during a moderate‐intensity exercise stress test when compared to patients taking C8. There was no difference in TEE, phosphocreatine recovery, body composition, incidence of rhabdomyolysis, or any secondary outcome measures between the groups.ConclusionsC7 improved LV ejection fraction and reduced LV mass at rest, as well as lowering heart rate during exercise among patients with LC‐FAODs.Clinical Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01379625.

Abstract BACKGROUND: Incidence of glioma varies significantly by sex, and most glioma histologies occur with greater incidence in males. Previous analyses have examined the impact of estrogen exposure as a risk factor for these tumors, but have found results of varying significance and low effect size. There may be differences in effect of previously discovered risk alleles that contribute to sex differences. METHODS: Using data collected for three previous glioma GWAS in European-ancestry populations (MD Anderson Cancer Center, the San Francisco Adult Glioma Study, and the Glioma International Case Control Study) we assessed sex-specific effects for 14 previously identified and 13 newly identified glioma risk SNPs (27 total) overall and for glioblastoma (GBM) and non-GBM tumors separately. There were 3,892 male cases (59% GBM), 4,522 male controls, 2,500 female cases (52% GBM) and 4,940 female controls. Sex-specific odds ratios (ORM and ORF), 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) and p values (pM and pF) were generated using stratified logistic regression models. Data from each study were analyzed separately and combined using inverse variance weighted meta-analysis. Results were considered statistically significant at p&lt;6.2x10-4. RESULTS: In GBM, rs11979158 (7p11.2, pM=1.01x10-10, ORM=1.43 [95% CI: 1.28-1.59]; pF=3.43x10-3, ORF=1.22 [95% CI: 1.07-1.39]) and rs2562152 (16p13.3, pM=5.59x10-4, ORM=1.23 [95% CI: 1.09-1.39]; pF=1.22x10-1, ORF=1.12 [95% CI: 0.97-1.29]) had significant effect in males only. In non-GBM gliomas, rs12076373 (1q44, pM=3.56x10-7, ORM=1.41, 95% CI: 1.23-1.61; pF=1.76x10-2, ORF=1.20, 95% CI: 1.03-1.38), rs11979158 (7p11.2, pM=1.77x10-5, ORM=1.32 [95% CI: 1.16-1.49]; pF=2.73x10-1, ORF=1.08 [95% CI: 0.94-1.24]), and rs3751667 (16p13.3, pM=9.44x10-7, ORM=1.30 [95% CI: 1.17-1.44]; pF=5.18x10-2, ORF=1.13 [95% CI: 1.00-1.28]) had significant effect in males only. Effect size for rs55705857 (8q24.21) varied significantly by sex, with ORM=2.63 (95% CI: 2.24-3.09, pM=4.42x10-32), as compared to ORF=3.95 (95% CI: 3.28-4.76, pF=1.82x10-47). A sensitivity analysis was performed due to allele frequency heterogeneity by study and results did not change. CONCLUSIONS: Sex differences and other demographic differences in cancer susceptibility can provide important clues to etiology, and these differences can be leveraged for discovery in genetic association studies. Significant differences in effect size may suggest variation in genetic effect of risk alleles or in unidentified risk factors that vary in prevalence or effect by sex. There may also be differences in the distribution of molecular subtypes within each histology by sex. Further investigation using an agnostic approach may further elucidate the relationship between effect of risk alleles and sex. Citation Format: Quinn T. Ostrom, Ben Kinnersley, Margaret Wrensch, Jeanette E. Eckel-Passow, Georgina Armstrong, Terri Rice, Yanwen Chen, John Wiencke, Lucie McCoy, Helen Hansen, Christopher Amos, Jonine L. Bernstein, Elizabeth B. Claus, Dora Il'yasova, Christoffer Johansen, Daniel Lachance, Rose Lai, Ching C. Lau, Ryan T. Merrell, Sara H. Olson, Siegal Sadetzki, Joellen Schildkraut, Sanjay Shete, Richard S. Houlston, Robert B. Jenkins, Beatrice Melin, Melissa Bondy, Jill S. Barnholtz-Sloan. Estimating sex-specific effects of genetic loci associated with glioma risk [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 1315. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-1315

Abstract BACKGROUND: Glioma accounts for ~27% of all primary brain tumors and is responsible for ~13,000 cancer-related deaths in the US each year. Glioma tumors can be broadly classified into glioblastoma (GBM) and lower-grade non-GBM. Typically gliomas have a poor prognosis irrespective of medical care, with the most common form, GBM, having a five-year survival rate of only 5%. While genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have transformed our understanding of glioma susceptibility, individual studies have had limited power to identify risk loci. METHODS: We performed the largest glioma GWAS to date, comprising a meta-analysis of six existing GWAS (6,405 cases, 14,100 controls) as well as new GWAS from the Glioma International Case Control Consortium (GICC; 4,572 cases and 3,286 controls) and University of California, San Francisco (UCSF)-Mayo (1,519 cases, 804 controls), totaling 12,496 cases (6,191 classified as GBM, 5,819 as non-GBM) and 18,190 controls. RESULTS: We identified five new risk loci for GBM at 1p31.3 (rs12752552; near JAK1, P=2.04×10-9, odds ratio (OR)=1.22), 11q14.1 (rs11233250; P=9.95×10-10, OR=1.24), 16p13.3 (rs2562152; near MPG, P=1.93x10-8, OR=1.21), 16q12.1 (rs10852606; HEATR3, P=1.29×10-11, OR=1.18), 22q13.1 (rs2235573; P=1.76×10-10, OR=1.15) and eight for non-GBM at 1q32.1 (rs4252707; MDM4, P=3.34×10-9, OR=1.19), 1q44 (rs12076373; AKT3, P=2.63×10-10, OR=1.23), 2q33.3 (rs7572263; near IDH1, P=2.18×10-10, OR=1.20), 3p14.1 (rs11706832; LRIG1, P=7.66×10-9, OR=1.15), 10q24.33 (rs11598018; OBFC1, P=3.39×10-8, OR=1.14), 11q21 (rs7107785; P=3.87×10-10, OR=1.16), 14q12 (rs10131032; P=5.07x10-11, OR=1.33) and 16p13.3 (rs3751667; P=2.61×10-9, OR=1.18). Case-only analyses confirmed the specificity of 11q14.1, 16p13.3 and 22q13.1 associations for GBM and 1q44, 2q33.3, 3p14.1, 11q21 and 14q12 for non-GBM tumors. In the combined meta-analysis, among previously published glioma risk SNPs, those for all glioma at 17p13.1 (TP53), GBM at 5p15.33 (TERT), 7p11.2 (EGFR), 9p21.3 (CDKN2B-AS1) and 20q13.33 (RTEL1) and for non-GBM at 8q24.21 (CCDC26), 11q23.2, 11q23.3 (PHLDB1) and 15q24.2 (ETFA) showed even greater evidence for association. SNPs at 10q25.2 and 12q12.1 for non-GBM tumors retained genome-wide significance (i.e. P&lt;5.0x10-8). Associations at the previously reported loci for GBM at 3q26.2 (near TERC) and 12q23.33 (POLR3B) did not retain statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings substantiate genetic susceptibility to GBM and non-GBM glioma being highly distinct, consistent with their distinctive molecular profiles presumably resulting from different etiological pathways. Functional analyses should lead to further insights into the biological basis of the different glioma histologies. Such information can inform gene discovery initiatives and therefore have a measurable impact on the successful development of new therapeutic agents. Citation Format: Ben Kinnersley, Beatrice S. Melin, Jill S. Barnholtz-Sloan, Margaret R. Wrensch, Christoffer Johansen, Dora Il’yasova, Quinn Ostrom, and members of GICC, Karim Labreche, Jeanette E. Eckel-Passow, Paul A. Decker, Marianne Labussière, Ahmed Idbaih, Khe Hoang-Xuan, Anna-Luisa Di Stefano, Karima Mokhtari, Jean-Yves Delattre, Pilar Galan, Konstantinos Gousias, Johannes Schramm, Minouk J. Schoemaker, Sarah J. Fleming, Stefan Herms, Stefanie Heilmann, Marcus M. Nöthen, Heinz-Erich Wichmann, Stefan Schreiber, Anthony Swerdlow, Mark Lathrop, Matthias Simon, Marc Sanson, Preetha Rajaraman, Stephen Chanock, Martha Linet, Zhaoming Wang, Meredith Yeager, Rose K. Lai, Elizabeth B. Claus, Sara H. Olson, Robert B. Jenkins, Richard S. Houlston, Melissa L. Bondy. Genome-wide association study of glioma reveals specific differences in genetic susceptibility to glioblastoma and non-glioblastoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 1302. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-1302

Background: Following resection of malignant tumors of the spine and pelvis, reconstructive surgeons often face large structural defects. Unlike reconstruction in the extremities, wherein a free vascularized fibular graft (FVFG) is a highly utilized option for segmental osseous reconstruction, there are limited data on the use of an FVFG in the spine and pelvis. The aim of this study was to review our institution’s experience with reconstruction with use of an FVFG following oncological resection in the spine and pelvis. Methods: We reviewed 24 cases involving the use of an FVFG in reconstruction of segmental osseous defects of the spine and pelvis following oncological resection from 2000 to 2015. The cohort consisted of 12 male and 12 female patients with a mean age of 37 years and a mean follow-up of 5 years. Fifty-four percent of the reconstructions were spinopelvic or sacropelvic. Results: The overall 2, 5, and 10-year rate of survival was 76%, 55%, and 37%, respectively. With regard to disease-free survival, the overall 2, 5, and 10-year rate was 81%, 72%, and 48%. The overall rate of union was 86%, with a mean time to union of 7 months. Complications were common, with 83% of the patients sustaining at least 1 postoperative complication. Following the procedure, the mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society rating was 53%. Conclusions: An FVFG provides a durable means of reconstruction of osseous defects in the spine and pelvis. Although patient function was acceptable following these large reconstructions, the rate of postoperative complications was high. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Objectives: Extraskeletal osteosarcoma (EO) is a malignant neoplasm that produces osteoid, bone, and chondroid material without direct attachment to bone or periosteum. Surgical resection is the mainstay of treatment; the role of chemotherapy is not well defined. Therefore, we evaluated the impact of chemotherapy in the survival of patients with EO. Methods: All EO patients seen at Mayo Clinic between 1990 and 2014 were assessed. Forty-three patients were included after all archived pathology slides were reviewed to confirm the diagnosis of EO. Results: Of 43 patients, 37 patients had localized disease and 6 patients had metastatic disease at diagnosis. Chemotherapy was used in 73% and 75% of patients, respectively. Chemotherapy was predominantly anthracycline based, and included platinum in 22 patients (84%). Median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 50 months (95% confidence interval, 25-99), and 21 months (95% confidence interval, 13-not reached), respectively. There was a trend towards longer OS and PFS in patients who received chemotherapy. Those who received platinum-based therapy had remarkably prolonged OS (median, 182 vs. 18 mo; 5-year, 61% vs. 0%; P=0.01) and PFS (median, not reached vs. 10 mo; 5-year, 56% vs. 0%; P=0.005). Baseline characteristics were similar in the platinum and nonplatinum group. In patients who received chemotherapy, relapse/recurrence rate was lower in the platinum-based group (41%) as opposed to the nonplatinum-based group (100%; P=0.02). In the neoadjuvant setting, the overall response rate of platinum-containing regimens was 27%. Conclusions: Our results suggest a clinical benefit when platinum-based chemotherapy is incorporated in the management of patients with EO. We plan to validate this further with an expanded multicenter analysis.