Citations

Clear

1099 citation(s) found for "Lewis, B".

Kidney Cancer, Version 3.2022, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology
Alva, Ajjai , Carlo, Maria I. , Choueiri, Toni K. , Costello, Brian A. , Derweesh, Ithaar , Desai, Arpita, Ged, Yasser , Kyriakopoulos, Christos E. , Lara, Primo N. , Lau, Clayton, Lewis, Bryan , Michaelson, M. Dror , Mortazavi, Amir , Nandagopal, Lakshminarayanan , Ponsky, Lee , Ramalingam, Sundhar, Shuch, Brian , Smith, Zachary L. , Sosman, Jeffrey A. , Dwyer, Mary A., Gurski, Lisa A., Motter, Angela D., Anderson, Larry D. , Choueiri, Toni K , Anderson, Larry D , Motzer, Robert J. , Jonasch, Eric W. , Agarwal, Neeraj , Baine, Michael J. , Beckermann, Kathryn E. , George, Saby , Gore, John L. , Haas, Naomi B , Hancock, Steven Lee , Kapur, Payal , Lam, Elaine T. , Madoff, David C. , Manley, Brandon J. , Plimack, Elizabeth R.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | January 28, 2022 | Volume: 20 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 71-90

10.6004/jnccn.2022.0001 | PMID 34991070 Get It

The NCCN Guidelines for Kidney Cancer focus on the screening, diagnosis, staging, treatment, and management of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Patients with relapsed or stage IV RCC typically undergo surgery and/or receive systemic therapy. Tumor histology and risk stratification of patients is important in therapy selection. The NCCN Guidelines for Kidney Cancer stratify treatment recommendations by histology; recommendations for first-line treatment of ccRCC are also stratified by risk group. To further guide management of advanced RCC, the NCCN Kidney Cancer Panel has categorized all systemic kidney cancer therapy regimens as “Preferred,” “Other Recommended Regimens,” or “Useful in Certain Circumstances.” This categorization provides guidance on treatment selection by considering the efficacy, safety, evidence, and other factors that play a role in treatment selection. These factors include pre-existing comorbidities, nature of the disease, and in some cases consideration of access to agents. This article summarizes surgical and systemic therapy recommendations for patients with relapsed or stage IV RCC.
Aspirin, Statins, Non-aspirin NSAIDs, Metformin, and the Risk of Biliary Cancer: A Swedish Population-Based Cohort Study
Marcano-Bonilla, Lorena , Schleck, Cathy D., Harmsen, William S., Sadr-Azodi, Omid, Borad, Mitesh J., Patel, Tushar, Petersen, Gloria M., Therneau, Terry M., Roberts, Lewis R. , Brusselaers, Nele , Sadr‐Azodi, Omid , Roberts, Lewis R , Marcano-Bonilla, Lorena , Schleck, Cathy D., Harmsen, William S., Borad, Mitesh J., Patel, Tushar, Petersen, Gloria M., Therneau, Terry M., Brusselaers, Nele

Mayo Clinic

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention | January 27, 2022 | Volume: 31 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 804-810

10.1158/1055-9965.epi-20-1322 | PMID 35086822 Get It

Abstract Background: Chemoprevention for biliary tract cancers (BTC), which comprise intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA), extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (eCCA), and gallbladder cancer, is controversial. We examined associations between low-dose aspirin, statins, NSAIDs, and metformin with BTC risk. Methods: We used a population-based cohort of 5.7 million persons over age 18 without personal history of cancer (except nonmelanoma skin cancer), receiving at least one commonly prescribed drug between July 1, 2005, and December 31, 2012, from the Swedish Prescribed Drug Registry. Hazard ratios (HR) were calculated using age-scaled multivariable-adjusted Cox models. Results: 2,160 individuals developed BTC. Low-dose aspirin was not associated with BTC risk [HR, 0.93; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.81–1.07], iCCA (HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.93–1.57), eCCA (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.60–1.07), or gallbladder cancer (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.71–1.06). Statins were associated with lower risk of BTC (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.56–0.78), iCCA (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.50–0.95), eCCA (HR 0.54; 95% CI, 0.38–0.76), and gallbladder cancer (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.57–0.91). For all BTC subtypes, combined low-dose aspirin and statins were not associated with lower risk than statins alone. NSAIDs were associated with higher risk of BTC and its subtypes. Metformin was not associated with BTC risk (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.82–1.18), iCCA (HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.77–1.48), eCCA (HR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.82–1.61), or gallbladder cancer (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.63–1.11). Conclusions: Statins were associated with a decreased risk of BTC and its subtypes. Low-dose aspirin alone was not associated with a decreased risk, and use of both was not associated with further decrease in risk beyond statins alone. Impact: Statins were most consistently associated with a decreased risk of BTC and its subtypes.
Autologous CD34+ Stem Cell Therapy Increases Coronary Flow Reserve and Reduces Angina in Patients With Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction
Henry, Timothy D. , Merz, C. Noel Bairey , Wei, Janet , Corban, Michel T., Quesada, Odayme, Joung, Sandy , Kotynski, Christine L., Wang, Jian, Lewis, Michelle, Schumacher, Ann M., Bartel, Ronnda L., Takagi, Hiroshi, Shah, Vishal, Lee, Anna, Losordo, Douglas W., Bairey Merz, C Noel , Sietsema, William K , Lerman, Amir , Wei, Janet , Henry, Timothy D , Corban, Michel T., Quesada, Odayme, Joung, Sandy , Kotynski, Christine L., Wang, Jian, Lewis, Michelle, Schumacher, Ann M., Bartel, Ronnda L., Takagi, Hiroshi, Shah, Vishal, Lee, Anna, Losordo, Douglas W.

Mayo Clinic

Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions | January 24, 2022 | Volume: 15 | Issue: 2 | Pages: No page available

10.1161/circinterventions.121.010802 | PMID 35067072 Get It

Background: Coronary microvascular dysfunction results in angina and adverse outcomes in patients with evidence of ischemia and nonobstructive coronary artery disease; however, no specific therapy exists. CD34+ cell therapy increases microvasculature in preclinical models and improves symptoms, exercise tolerance, and mortality in refractory angina patients with obstructive coronary artery disease. The objective of this research was to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of intracoronary CD34+ cell therapy in patients with coronary microvascular dysfunction. Methods: We conducted a 2-center, 20-participant trial of autologous CD34+ cell therapy (protocol CLBS16-P01; NCT03508609) in patients with ischemia and nonobstructive coronary artery disease with persistent angina and coronary flow reserve ≤2.5. Efficacy measures included coronary flow reserve, angina frequency, Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina class, Seattle Angina Questionnaire, SF-36, and modified Bruce exercise treadmill test obtained at baseline and 6 months after treatment. Autologous CD34+ cells (CLBS16) were mobilized by administration of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor 5µg/kg/day for 5 days and collected by leukapheresis. Participants received a single intracoronary left anterior descending infusion of isolated CD34+ cells in medium that enhances cell function. Results: Coronary flow reserve improved from 2.08±0.32 at baseline to 2.68±0.79 at 6 months after treatment ( P <0.005). Angina frequency decreased ( P <0.004), Canadian Cardiovascular Society class improved ( P <0.001), and quality of life improved as assessed by the Seattle Angina Questionnaire ( P ≤0.03, all scales) and SF-36 ( P ≤0.04, all scales). There were no cell-related serious adverse events. Conclusions: In this pilot clinical trial of microvascular angina, patients with ischemia and nonobstructive coronary artery disease receiving intracoronary infusion of CD34+ cell therapy had higher coronary flow reserve, less severe angina, and better quality of life at 6 months. The current study supports a potential therapeutic role for CD34+ cells in patients with microvascular angina. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT03508609.
P377 Impact of moderate-to-severe endoscopic disease criteria on endoscopic response, endoscopic remission, and deep remission in patients receiving ustekinumab or adalimumab in the SEAVUE study
Lewis, James D. , Gasink, Christopher , Hoops, Timothy, Izanec, James , Scherl, Ellen , Sandborn, William J. , Sands, B E, Allez, Matthieu , Lewis, James D , Hanauer, Stephen B. , Danese, Silvio , Irving, Peter Miles , Ma, T, Loftus, Edward V. , Panaccione, Remo

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Crohn's and Colitis | January 21, 2022 | Volume: 16 | Issue: Supplement_1 | Pages: i379-i380

10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjab232.504 Get It

Abstract Background Entry criteria and outcome measures of Crohn’s disease (CD) clinical trials have evolved. Patients are now required to have active inflammation on screening endoscopy, with some studies requiring moderate-severe SES-CD scores. Recent trials have endoscopic response as a co-primary endpoint and endoscopic remission (ER) and deep remission (DR) as major secondary endpoints. Pivotal CD maintenance studies typically examine only responders to induction. The SEAVUE study required ≥1 ulceration of any size (SES-CD≥3) at baseline and had a treat-through design. To examine the results in the context of these trial design characteristics, we evaluated endoscopic outcomes at wk52 in the subgroup of pts with moderate-severe baseline SES-CD scores in SEAVUE, as well as those who were in clinical response after induction. Methods Biologic-naïve pts failing or intolerant to conventional therapy with CDAI≥220/≤450 and SES-CD≥3 were eligible. Pts were randomized, 1:1 to UST (~6mg/kg IV at wk0 then, 90mg SC q8w) or ADA (SC, 160mg at wk0, 80mg at wk2, then, 40mg q2w). Endoscopic outcomes were evaluated in all pts and the subgroup with moderate-severe endoscopic disease (baseline SES-CD≥6 for ileocolonic or colonic disease or SES-CD≥4 for isolated ileal disease). Endoscopic response was a ≥50% reduction from baseline in SES-CD, SES-CD≤3, or SES-CD=0 for pts with baseline SES-CD=3. ER was SES-CD≤3 or, 0 in pts with baseline SES-CD=3. DR was CDAI&lt;150 and ER. Results Endoscopic outcomes for the subgroup with moderate-severe endoscopic disease were similar to those of the full cohort of pts. In UST-treated pts, endoscopic response was achieved at wk52 in, 41.9% in the full cohort and, 43.1% in the moderate-severe subgroup (Table, 1). In ADA-treated pts, endoscopic responses were, 36.9% and, 35.4%, respectively. For pts who were in clinical response after induction (Table, 1), endoscopic response rates were, 48.2% in the full cohort and, 49.5% in the moderate-severe subgroup for UST and, 44.8% and, 43.1%, respectively, for ADA. ER and DR rates were generally similar between the full cohort and the moderate-severe subgroup (Table, 2; eg, ERs were UST, 28.5% and ADA, 30.7% in full cohort; UST, 27.1% and, 27.8% ADA in subgroup). ER and DR rates were, 3%-7% higher in induction responders compared with the full cohort. Of note, even among wk16 nonresponders, some pts attained endoscopic outcomes at wk52 (eg, endoscopic responses in wk16 nonresponders were UST, 21.4% and ADA 13.3%). Conclusion In SEAVUE, both the UST and ADA treatment groups achieved high endoscopic response, ER, and DR rates at wk52. Results in pts with moderate-severe endoscopic disease were similar to those of the full cohort, but clinical responders after induction had higher rates than the full cohort.
Multi-target blood test to improve the performance of hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance programs: A modeling-based virtual trial.
Samur, Sumeyye , Yang, Ju Dong , Roberts, Lewis R. , Nguyen, Mindie H. , Ayer, Turgay , Parikh, Neehar D. , Roberts, Lewis R , Parikh, Neehar D , Chhatwal, Jagpreet , Yang, Ju Dong , Ozbay, A. Burak , Singal, Amit G.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | January 19, 2022 | Volume: 40 | Issue: 4_suppl | Pages: 405-405

10.1200/jco.2022.40.4_suppl.405 Get It

405 Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fastest rising cause of cancer mortality in the United States. Although clinical guidelines recommend ultrasound (U/S), with or without the serum biomarker alpha fetoprotein (AFP) for HCC surveillance in at-risk patients, only 24% of patients adhere to surveillance and only one-third of HCCs are detected before developing symptoms. A multi-target HCC blood-based test (mt-HBT) was recently shown to have promising sensitivity for early HCC detection and may help improve surveillance adherence given its blood-based nature. Our objective was to evaluate the comparative clinical effectiveness of mt-HBT with the current standard-of-care surveillance strategy in patients with cirrhosis. Methods: We simulated a virtual trial by developing a microsimulation model of the natural history of HCC in patients with compensated (Child Pugh A) cirrhosis over a 30-year horizon. To inform model parameters, we used published data on tumor progression, competing risks of mortality, and real-world HCC surveillance adherence. Test performance characteristics were informed by a network meta-analysis. We simulated the life course of 51-year-old patients with cirrhosis and compared no surveillance with biannual surveillance using (1) AFP only, (2) U/S only, (3) U/S+AFP, (4) mt-HBT, and (5) mt-HBT with improved adherence. We assumed a blood-based test—without U/S—would improve surveillance adherence by 10% compared with current adherence (̃4% absolute improvement). Results: Per 100,000 cirrhosis patients, mt-HBT detected 6,220 more early-stage HCC than no surveillance, 2,250 (+57%) more than AFP, 1080 (+21%) more than U/S, and 200 (-3%) less than U/S+AFP. mt-HBT with improved adherence detected 210 (+3%) more early-stage HCC than U/S+AFP (Table). The remaining HCC cases were either symptomatic or the patients died per other competing causes prior to detection. The number of screening tests needed to detect one HCC were 296 for AFP, 287 for U/S, 253 for U/S+AFP, 254 for mt-HBT and 262 for mt-HBT with improved adherence. The number of diagnostic MRI/CT needed to detect one HCC were 40 for AFP, 38 for U/S, 45 for U/S+AFP, 37 for mt-HBT, and 38 for mt-HBT with improved adherence. Conclusions: mt-HBT detects more early-HCC cases than U/S and similar number of early-HCC cases with U/S+AFP. By decreasing surveillance barriers and increasing adherence, mt-HBT could improve early HCC detection and could be promising option for HCC surveillance in patients with cirrhosis. [Table: see text]
A phase 1b/2 trial of the PLK1 inhibitor onvansertib in combination with FOLFIRI-bev in 2L treatment of KRAS-mutated (mKRAS) metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC).
Lenz, Heinz‐Josef , Kasi, Anup , Mendelsohn, Lawrence, Starr, Jason S. , Ruffner, Katherine, Erlander, Mark G. , Ahn, Daniel H. , Cannon, Timothy Lewis , Hubbard, Joleen M. , Bekaii‐Saab, Tanios , Ridinger, Maya , Samuëlsz, Errin

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | January 19, 2022 | Volume: 40 | Issue: 4_suppl | Pages: 100-100

10.1200/jco.2022.40.4_suppl.100 Get It

100 Background: CRC is a common cancer world-wide, accounting for ̃10% of cancer cases and mortality. Treatment options are limited, and survival is poor for pts with advanced disease, particularly those with mKRAS. After failure of 1L treatment for mCRC, regardless of KRAS mutation status, the ORR for FOLFIRI-bev is 5-13%, with PFS 4-6 mos, and OS 10-12 mos. Onvansertib is a highly selective, ATP-competitive, orally bioavailable PLK1 inhibitor that is synergistic with irinotecan and with 5FU in xenograft models of mKRAS CRC. We present preliminary safety, efficacy, and biomarker data from an ongoing Ph1b/2 trial of onvansertib + FOLFIRI-bev in pts with mKRAS mCRC progressing after 1L treatment with fluoropyrimidine + oxaliplatin, +/- bev. Methods: Pts with mCRC with a KRAS mutation detected by a CLIA-certified lab were eligible. In the Ph1b portion of the study, onvansertib was given on a 3+3 dose escalation at 12, 15 or 18 mg/m2 on days 1-5 and 15-19 of each 28-day cycle in combination with FOLFIRI-bev. The MTD was 15 mg/m2 and was chosen as the RP2D. The primary endpoint for the Ph2 was ORR, and radiographic response was assessed every 8 wks per RECIST v1.1. Safety was evaluated continuously, and AEs were recorded using CTCAE v5.0. Baseline and post-treatment blood samples were collected for biomarker analyses, including mutant allele frequency (MAF) of the pt’s known KRAS mutation. Results: As of 16Sep2021, a total of 50 pts had been treated: 18 on the Ph1b and 32 on the Ph2, including 35 pts at the RP2D, and median follow up was 4.7 mos (range 0.4-18). Of the 50 pts, 26 remain on treatment, as do 24 of 35 RP2D pts. The combination was well-tolerated: fatigue, neutropenia, and nausea were the most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) and were generally low-grade. Neutropenia was managed by removing the 5FU bolus from subsequent cycles of FOLFIRI and adding growth factor. Of the 50 pts, 44 were evaluable for efficacy, including 31 of 35 RP2D pts. ORR was 36% for the total group (1CR and 15 PR in 44 pts) and 35% for the RP2D group (1 CR and 10 PR in 31 pts). First responses were seen between 2 and 6 months after the start of therapy. Responses were observed across different KRAS variants. Pts achieving a CR or PR showed the greatest decreases in plasma MAF after the first cycle of therapy. Of the 50 pts, 24 pts have discontinued for the following reasons: progressive disease (13), toxicity (4), patient decision (4), proceeding to potentially curative surgery or other localized therapy (3). Conclusions: The combination of onvansertib with FOLFIRI-bev was well tolerated: observed TEAEs have been generally low-grade and manageable. The combination has demonstrated a promising ORR in 2L treatment of mCRC pts harboring various KRAS mutations, and efficacy was correlated with early changes in plasma mKRAS. Updated safety, efficacy, and biomarker analyses will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT03829410.
Novel and emerging targets for cholangiocarcinoma progression: therapeutic implications
Fonkoua, Lionel Aurelien Kankeu , Usón, Pedro Luiz Serrano , Mody, Kabir , Roberts, Lewis R. , Kankeu Fonkoua, Lionel A, Serrano Uson Junior, Pedro Luiz, Roberts, Lewis R , Uson, Pedro L S , Mahipal, Amit , Borad, Mitesh J.

Mayo Clinic

Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Targets | January 17, 2022 | Volume: 26 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 79-92

10.1080/14728222.2022.2029412 | PMID 35034558 Get It

Two distinct stem cell‐like subtypes of hepatocellular carcinoma with clinical significance and their therapeutic potentials
Lee, Sung Hwan , Jeong, Yun Seong , Sohn, Bo Hwa, Hwang, Ho Kyoung , Choi, Gi Hong , Kang, Chang Moo , Choi, Jin Sub , Lee, Woo Jung , Cheong, Jae‐Ho , Jang, Hee Jin, Roberts, Lewis R. , Yim, Sun Young , Chun, Yun Shin , Roberts, Lewis, Roberts, Lewis R , Kang, Chang Moo , Cheong, Jae-Ho , Lee, Sunyoung , Kaseb, Ahmed O , Lee, Ju‐Seog

Mayo Clinic

Cancer Communications | January 15, 2022 | Volume: 42 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 179-183

10.1002/cac2.12251 | PMID 35032367 Get It

The impact of pulmonary hypertension on outcomes of transcatheter mitral valve replacement in mitral annular calcification
Cajigas, Héctor , Kaptzan, Tatiana, Lewis, Bradley R., El‐Sabbagh, Abdallah, Al‐Hijji, Mohammed , Eleid, Mackram F. , Wang, Dee Dee , Eng, Marvin H. , Kodali, Susheel , Chakravarty, Tarun , O’Hair, Daniel, Jones, Noah, Makkar, Raj , Reisman, Mark, Leon, Martin B. , Rihal, Charanjit S. , Cajigas, Hector R , Eleid, Mackram F , Wang, Dee Dee , Pershad, Ashish , Rihal, Charanjit, Guerrero, Mayra E , Al-Hijji, Mohammed A , Alkhouli, Mohamad , George, Isaac , Pershad, Ashish , O’Neill, William W. , Rihal, Charanjit S. , Guerrero, Mayra

Mayo Clinic

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions | January 12, 2022 | Volume: 99 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 1647-1658

10.1002/ccd.30057 | PMID 35019204 Get It

AbstractObjectivesTo assess the impact of pulmonary hypertension (PH) on outcomes of patients with severe mitral annular calcification (MAC) undergoing transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR).BackgroundPH is associated with poor outcomes after mitral valve surgery. Whether the presence of PH in patients with MAC undergoing (TMVR) is associated with poor outcomes, is unknown.MethodsRetrospective evaluation of 116 patients from 51 centers in 11 countries who underwent TMVR with valve in mitral annular calcification (ViMAC) using balloon‐expandable aortic transcatheter valves (THVs) from September 2012 to March 2017. Pulmonary artery systolic blood pressure (PASP) by echocardiogram was available in 90 patients. The subjects were stratified based on PASP: No PH = PASP ≤35 mmHg (n = 11); mild to moderate PH = PASP 36–49 mmHg (n = 21) and severe PH = PASP ≥50 mmHg (n = 58). Clinical, procedural, and echocardiographic outcomes were assessed.ResultsMean age was 72.7 (±12.8) years, 59 (65.6%) were female, Society of Thoracic Surgeons score was 15.8 + 11.8% and 90.0% where in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III–IV. There was no significant difference in all‐cause mortality at 30 days (no PH = 27.3%, mild–moderate PH = 19.0%, severe PH = 31.6%; p = 0.55) or at 1 year (no PH = 54.5%, mild–moderate PH = 38.1%, severe PH = 56.1%; p = 0.36). No difference in adverse events, NYHA class or amount of residual mitral regurgitation at 1 year were observed between the groups.ConclusionThis study suggests that the presence of PH in patients with predominantly mitral stenosis with MAC undergoing TMVR does not impact mortality or adverse events. Further studies are needed to fully understand the effect of PH in this group of patients.
Assessment of Regional Variability in COVID-19 Outcomes Among Patients With Cancer in the United States
Hawley, Jessica E. , Sun, Tianyi , Chism, David D. , Duma, Narjust , Fu, Julie , Gatson, Na Tosha , Mishra, Sanjay , Nguyen, Ryan H., Reid, Sonya , Serrano, Oscar K. , Singh, Sunny , Venepalli, Neeta K. , Bakouny, Ziad , Bilen, Mehmet Asım , Choueiri, Toni K. , Dawsey, Scott J. , Fecher, Leslie A. , Flora, Daniel , Friese, Christopher R. , Glover, Michael , Gonzalez, Cyndi J, Goyal, Sharad , Khan, Hina, Lewis, Mark A. , McKay, Rana R. , Messing, Ian , Puc, Matthew , Ravindranathan, Deepak , Rhodes, Terence D., Rivera, Andrea Verghese, Roller, John , Shah, Sumit , Shaya, Justin , Streckfuss, Mitrianna, Wulff‐Burchfield, Elizabeth , Xie, Zhuoer , Shah, Dimpy P. , French, Benjamin , Verma, Amit , Gartrell, Benjamin A. , Ohri, Nitin , Butt, Omar H. , Campian, Jian , Fiala, Mark A. , Monahan, Ryan, Bohachek, Pamela, Mundt, Daniel , Tadesse, Eyob, Lammers, Philip E. , Prete, Salvatore A. Del , Bär, Michael , Gulati, Anthony P., Lo, K. M. Steve, Stratton, Jamie , Weinstein, Paul L., García, Jorge A. , Nakayama, John , Gupta, Shilpa , Ahluwalia, Manmeet S. , Lemmon, Christopher A. , Nizam, Amanda , Hoppenot, Claire , Bouchard, Gabrielle, Busser, Fiona, Connors, Jean M. , Curran, Catherine , Demetri, George D., Kelleher, Kaitlin M. , Shaw, Grace, Allen, Eli Van, Nuzzo, Pier Vitale , Zon, Rebecca L. , Zhang, Tian , Leighton, John, Grivas, Petros , Lynch, Ryan C. , Schweizer, Michael T. , Vinayak, Shaveta , Wagner, Michael J. , Clément, Jessica , Daher, Ahmad , Dailey, Mark, Jayaraj, Asha, Hsu, Emily , Menendez, Alvaro G. , Rathmann, Joerg, Accordino, Melissa , Alexander, Mariam P., Mushtaq, Sarah, Bernicker, Eric , Deeken, John F. , Shafer, Danielle , Gill, David , Low, Clarke A., Mashru, Sandeep H., Mansoor, Abdul-Hai, Zaren, Howard A. , Smith, Stephanie J., Akhtari, Mojtaba, Lau, Eric , Reeves, Mark E. , Elms, Destry, Altman, Jessica K. , Gurley, Michael, Mulcahy, Mary F. , Kulkarni, Amit , Shah, Surbhi , Rosovsky, Rachel , Reynolds, Kerry L. , Bardia, Aditya , Gainor, Justin F. , Zubiri, Leyre , Bonnen, Mark , Mahadevan, Daruka , Salazar, Mary, Faller, Bryan A. , Ajmera, Archana , Brouha, Sharon S. , Cabal, Angelo , Kligerman, Seth , Weissmann, Lisa B., Jani, Chinmay , Thomson, Carey C. , Knoble, Jeanna, Glace, Mary Grace, Stauffer, Karen, Zacks, Rosemary, Blau, Sibel , Menon, Harry, Rovito, Marc A., Elshoury, Amro, Misdary, Christian, Shah, Mansi , Mahmood, Sana , Mico, Vasil, Logan, Barbara, Mandapakala, Chaitanya, Cabebe, Elwyn C., Jha, Alokkumar , Schapira, Lidia , Wu, Julie , Subbiah, Suki , Lopes, Gilberto , Revankar, Sanjay G. , Addison, Daniel , Chen, James L. , Karivedu, Vidhya , Lustberg, Maryam B. , Wall, Sarah , Williams, Nicole , Kasi, Anup , Edwin, Natasha, Smits, Melissa, Owenby, Susie, Doroshow, Deborah B. , Galsky, Matthew D. , Zhu, Huili , Sueyoshi, Mark, Riess, Jonathan W. , Patel, Kanishka G. , Rubinstein, Samuel M. , Ahmad, Syed A. , Grover, Punita , Kharofa, Jordan , Marcum, Michelle, Park, Cathleen, Geiger, Christoper L., Bishnoi, Rohit , Russ, Atlantis Dawn, Rho, Young Soo , Feldman, Lawrence , Hoskins, Kent , Gantt, Gerald, Liu, Li , Khan, Mahir, Nguyen, Ryan H., Schwartz, Candice, Mavromatis, Blanche H., Bijjula, Ragneel R., Cheng, Alex , Duda, Stephany N. , Enriquez, Kyle T. , Gillaspie, Erin A. , Hennessy, Cassandra , Johnson, Douglas B. , Slosky, David, Solórzano, Carmen C. , Vega-Luna, Karen, Kennecke, Hagen F. , Schroeder, Brett A., Carducci, Theresa M., Goldsmith, Karen J., Loon, Susan Van, Topaloĝlu, Ümit , Alimohamed, Saif, Rice, Robert, Cabalona, Wilhelmina D., Pilar, Christine, Peddi, Prakash , Rosen, L, McCollough, Briana Barrow, LoRusso, Patricia , Masters, Tyler, Choueiri, Toni K , Bakouny, Ziad , Hawley, Jessica E , Mishra, Sanjay , Wu, Julie T , Xie, Zhuoer , Zubiri, Leyre , Gatson, Na Tosha N , Fiala, Mark A , Ahluwalia, Manmeet S , Lustberg, Maryam , Nguyen, Ryan H., Bashir, Babar , Caimi, Paolo F. , Hálfdánarson, Þorvarður R. , Hershman, Dawn L. , Labaki, Chris , Pennell, Nathan A , Schwartz, Gary K. , Thompson, Michael A. , Yu, Peter Paul , Warner, Jeremy L. , Hwang, Clara , Halmos, Balázs , Goel, Sanjay , Sica, Roberto Alejandro , Thakkar, Astha , Stockerl‐Goldstein, Keith , Henderson, Jeffrey P. , Zhou, Alice Y. , Panagiotou, Orestis A. , Egan, Pamela , Farmakiotis, Dimitrios , Olszewski, Adam J. , Loaiza‐Bonilla, Arturo , Bar, Michael H., Rose, Suzanne J. , Barnholtz‐Sloan, Jill S. , Li, Ang , Giordano, Antonio , Nohria, Anju , Schmidt, Andrew , Xu, Vincent Eric , Halabi, Susan , Lyman, Gary H , Graber, Jerome J. , Khaki, Ali Raza , Loggers, Elizabeth T , Nakasone, Elizabeth S. , Tachiki, Lisa , Yeh, Albert C. , Huynh‐Le, Minh‐Phuong , Rosenstein, Lori J. , Dailey, Mark, Elias, Rawad , Gadgeel, Shirish M. , Bhutani, Divaya , Reuben, Daniel Y. , Alexander, Mariam, Nagaraj, Gayathri , Berg, Stephanie , Morgans, Alicia K. , Wehbe, Firas , Durbin, Eric B. , Nelson, Heather H. , Sachs, Zohar , Boland, Genevieve M. , Bekaii‐Saab, Tanios , Desai, Aakash , Mesa, Ruben A. , Ramirez, Amelie G , Shah, Pankil , Hsiao, Albert , Rink, Cameron L. , Joshi, Monika , Griffiths, Elizabeth A. , Jabbour, Salma K , McNair, Christopher M. , Kloecker, Goetz Hans , Stover, Daniel G. , Gatti-Mays, Margaret Elena , Jhawar, Sachin R. , Palmer, Joshua D. , Wotman, Michael T. , Fazio, Alyson, Huber, Kathryn E. , Wood, William A. , Jensen, Christopher Edward , Kumar, Vaibhav , Wise-Draper, Trisha Michel , Gulati, Shuchi , Latif, Tahir , Shaikh, Hira , Bowles, Daniel W. , Markham, Merry Jennifer , Shah, Chintan , Acoba, Jared David , Nguyen, Ryan H., Pasquinelli, Mary M. , Vikas, Praveen , Zaman, Qamar U., Davis, Elizabeth J. , Hausrath, Daniel J. , Hsu, Chih–Yuan , Li, Xuanyi , Rini, Brian I. , Shyr, Yu , Tucker, Matthew D. , Wang, Lucy Lu , Aboulafia, David M. , Schroeder, Brett , Hafez, Navid , Herbst, Roy S. , Stratton, Catherine

Mayo Clinic

JAMA Network Open | January 4, 2022 | Volume: 5 | Issue: 1 | Pages: e2142046

10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.42046 | PMID 34982158 Get It