Citations

Clear

898 citation(s) found for "Cook, D A".

Wilms Tumor (Nephroblastoma), Version 2.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology
Anderson, Clarke, Cook, Shelly, Gow, Kenneth W. , Hiniker, Susan M. , Jasty‐Rao, Rama, Lin, Chi , Lovvorn, Harold N. , MacEwan, Iain, Martínez-Agosto, Julián A. , Mullen, Elizabeth A. , Murphy, Erin S. , Ranalli, Mark , Rhee, Daniel S. , Tracy, Elisabeth T. , Vern-Gross, T.Z., Walsh, Michael F. , Wickiser, Jonathan E., Zapala, Matthew A. , Berardi, Ryan A., Hughes, Miranda, Vern-Gross, Tamara, Tracy, Elisabeth T , Balis, Frank M. , Green, Daniel M. , Dhillon, Jasreman , Rokitka, Denise A. , Walz, Amy L.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | August 20, 2021 | Volume: 19 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 945-977

10.6004/jnccn.2021.0037 | PMID 34416707 Get It

The NCCN Guidelines for Wilms Tumor focus on the screening, diagnosis, staging, treatment, and management of Wilms tumor (WT, also known as nephroblastoma). WT is the most common primary renal tumor in children. Five-year survival is more than 90% for children with all stages of favorable histology WT who receive appropriate treatment. All patients with WT should be managed by a multidisciplinary team with experience in managing renal tumors; consulting a pediatric oncologist is strongly encouraged. Treatment of WT includes surgery, neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy, and radiation therapy (RT) if needed. Careful use of available therapies is necessary to maximize cure and minimize long-term toxicities. This article discusses the NCCN Guidelines recommendations for favorable histology WT.
Association Between Transtibial Meniscus Root Repair and Rate of Meniscal Healing and Extrusion on Postoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Prospective Multicenter Study
Krych, Aaron J. , Nauert, Richard F. , Song, Bryant M. , Cook, Corey S., Johnson, Adam C. , Smith, Patrick A. , Krych, Aaron J , Stuart, Michael J.

Mayo Clinic

Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine | August 16, 2021 | Volume: 9 | Issue: 8 | Pages: No page available

10.1177/23259671211023774 | PMID 34423058 Get It

Background: Prospective studies evaluating second-look imaging of meniscus root repair using a transtibial pull-out technique are limited; therefore, optimal surgical indications and the technique for meniscus root repair remain uncertain. Hypothesis: It was hypothesized that there would be a high rate of healing, improvement in meniscal extrusion, and prevention of articular cartilage degeneration and subchondral bone abnormalities after meniscus root repair. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing transtibial root repair were prospectively enrolled at 2 orthopaedic centers between March 2017 and January 2019. Pre- and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were reviewed by a musculoskeletal radiologist in a blinded fashion for meniscal healing, quantification of extrusion, articular cartilage grade, subchondral bone changes, and coronary/meniscotibial ligament abnormalities. Given persistent extrusion observed on postoperative MRI scans, an additional 10 patients gave consent and were enrolled for immediate (before weightbearing) postoperative MRI scans. Results: A total of 45 patients (16 male, 29 female; mean ± standard deviation age, 42.3 ± 12.9 years; body mass index, 31.6) were prospectively enrolled in the study; there were 47 meniscus root repairs: 29 medial and 18 lateral (2 with both). Postoperative MRI was obtained at an average of 6.3 months (range, 5.1-8 months); 98% of meniscal repairs had evidence of healing. Mean extrusion increased significantly, from 1.9 ± 1.5 mm preoperatively to 2.6 ± 1.4 mm postoperatively ( P = .03). There was no significant progression of chondromalacia grade, subchondral edema, insufficiency fracture, subchondral cysts, or subchondral collapse. In the additional 10-patient cohort, the mean preoperative extrusion (1.6 ± 1.2 mm) was not significantly different from that immediately postoperatively (2.0 ± 1.0 mm; P = .23). Conclusion: Prospective MRI analysis of transtibial meniscus root repair confirmed a high rate of meniscal healing and no observable progression of cartilage degeneration or subchondral bone abnormalities at the short-term follow-up. However, meniscal extrusion worsened in the first 6 months after surgery. Registration: NCT03037242 ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).
Multi-facet Contextual Bandits
Ban, Yikun , He, Jingrui , Cook, Curtiss B.

Mayo Clinic

Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining | August 13, 2021 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: 35-45

10.1145/3447548.3467299 Get It

Case Studies in Pediatric Lipid Disorders and Their Management
Ashraf, Ambika P. , Sunil, Bhuvana , Bamba, Vaneeta , Breidbart, Emily , Brar, Preneet Cheema , Chung, Stephanie T , Gupta, Anshu , Kumar, Seema , Lightbourne, Marissa , Kamboj, Manmohan K. , Patni, Nivedita , Raman, Vandana, Shah, Amy S. , Kohn, Brenda , Lightbourne, Marissa , Kohn, Brenda , Khokhar, Aditi , Miller, Ryan S, Wilson, Don P.

Mayo Clinic

The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism | August 7, 2021 | Volume: 106 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 3605-3620

10.1210/clinem/dgab568 | PMID 34363474 Get It

Abstract Context Identification of modifiable risk factors, including genetic and acquired disorders of lipid and lipoprotein metabolism, is increasingly recognized as an opportunity to prevent premature cardiovascular disease (CVD) in at-risk youth. Pediatric endocrinologists are at the forefront of this emerging public health concern and can be instrumental in beginning early interventions to prevent premature CVD-related events during adulthood. Aim In this article, we use informative case presentations to provide practical approaches to the management of pediatric dyslipidemia. Cases We present 3 scenarios that are commonly encountered in clinical practice: isolated elevation of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), combined dyslipidemia, and severe hypertriglyceridemia. Treatment with statin is indicated when the LDL-C is ≥190 mg/dL (4.9 mmol/L) in children ≥10 years of age. For LDL-C levels between 130 and 189 mg/dL (3.4-4.89 mmol/L) despite dietary and lifestyle changes, the presence of additional risk factors and comorbid conditions would favor statin therapy. In the case of combined dyslipidemia, the primary treatment target is LDL-C ≤130 mg/dL (3.4 mmol/L) and the secondary target non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol <145 mg/dL (3.7 mmol/L). If the triglyceride is ≥400 mg/dL (4.5 mmol/L), prescription omega-3 fatty acids and fibrates are considered. In the case of triglyceride >1000 mg/dL (11.3 mmol/L), dietary fat restriction remains the cornerstone of therapy, even though the landscape of medications is changing. Conclusion Gene variants, acquired conditions, or both are responsible for dyslipidemia during childhood. Extreme elevations of triglycerides can lead to pancreatitis. Early identification and management of dyslipidemia and cardiovascular risk factors is extremely important.
Breast and Prostate Cancer Risks for MaleBRCA1andBRCA2Pathogenic Variant Carriers Using Polygenic Risk Scores
Barnes, Daniel R. , Silvestri, Valentina , Leslie, Goska , McGuffog, Lesley, Yang, Xin , Adlard, Julian , Agnarsson, Bjarni A. , Ahmed, Munaza, Aittomäki, Kristiina, Andrulis, Irene L. , Arason, Aðalgeir , Azzollini, Jacopo , Barkardóttir, Rósa B. , Barrowdale, Daniel , Belotti, Muriel, Berthet, Pascaline, Boonen, Susanne E. , Borg, Åke , Brady, Angela F., Brewer, Carole, Brunet, Joan , Bucalo, Agostino, Caldés, Trinidad , Cassingham, Hayley , Christensen, Lise Lotte , Cini, Giulia , Claes, Kathleen , Collaborators, GEMO Study, Collaborators, EMBRACE, Cortesi, Laura , Damante, Giuseppe , Darder, Esther , Davidson, Rosemarie, Leeneer, Kim De , Putter, Robin De , Valle, Jesús Del , Ding, Yuan Chun , Donaldson, Alan , Eason, Jacqueline , Eeles, Rosalind A. , Engel, Christoph , Evans, D. Gareth , Feliubadaló, Lídia , Frone, Megan N. , Frost, Debra, Gehrig, Andrea, Giraud, Sophie , Glendon, Gord , Goldgar, David E. , Greene, Mark H. , Gregory, Helen , Groß, Eva, Hahnen, Eric, Hamann, Ute, Hansen, Thomas van Overeem , Hanson, Helen , Horváth, Judit , Investigators, KConFab, Investigators, HEBON, Izatt, Louise , James, Paul A. , Janavičius, Ramūnas , Jensen, Uffe Birk , Johannsson, Oskar T., John, Esther M. , Kramer, Gero , Kroeldrup, Lone , Kruse, Torben A. , Lautrup, Charlotte Kvist , López‐Fernández, Adrià , Mai, Phuong L, Manoukian, Siranoush , Mátrai, Zoltán , Matricardi, Laura , Mebirouk, Noura, Meindl, Alfons , Montagna, Marco , Monteiro, Álvaro N.A. , Morrison, Patrick J. , Muranen, Taru , Nathanson, Katherine L. , Niederacher, Dieter , Oláh, Edith , Olopade, Olufunmilayo I. , Pedersen, Inge Søkilde , Peissel, Bernard , Peterlongo, Paolo , Petersen, Annabeth Høgh , Pinto, Pedro, Porteous, Mary, Pottinger, Caroline , Pujana, Miquel Angel, Ramser, Juliane, Rantala, Johanna, Rogers, Mark T., Rønlund, Karina, Abajo, A.M. SÁnchez De, Shah, Payal D. , Sharif, Saba , Side, Lucy, Stadler, Zsofia, Steele, Linda , Sutter, Christian , Tan, Yen Y. , Teixeira, Manuel R. , Teulé, Àlex , Thull, Darcy L. , Trainer, Alison H., Tripathi, Vishakha , Valentini, Virginia , Viel, Alessandra , Walker, Lisa, Wang‐Gohrke, Shan , Wappenschmidt, Barbara , Whaite, Anna , Offit, Kenneth, Thomassen, Mads , Schmutzler, Rita K., Simard, Jacques , Easton, Douglas F. , Chenevix‐Trench, Georgia , Antoniou, Antonis C. , Pujana, Miguel Ángel , Dennis, Joe , Yang, Xin , Adlard, Julian , Agnarsson, Bjarni A , Andrulis, Irene L , Arason, Adalgeir , Arnold, Norbert , Auber, Bernd , Azzollini, Jacopo , Barkardottir, Rosa B , Barrowdale, Daniel , Benitez, Javier , Boonen, Susanne E , Bozsik, Aniko , Brennan, Paul , Brunet, Joan , Bucalo, Agostino , Caligo, Maria A , Campbell, Ian G , Cassingham, Hayley , Cini, Giulia , Claes, Kathleen B M , Coppa, Anna , Cortesi, Laura , Darder, Esther , de la Hoya, Miguel , de Putter, Robin , Del Valle, Jesús , Domchek, Susan M , Donaldson, Alan , Eason, Jacqueline , Engel, Christoph , Fostira, Florentia , Frone, Megan , Glendon, Gord , Godwin, Andrew K. , Greene, Mark H , Hahnen, Eric , Hanson, Helen , Izatt, Louise , Izquierdo, Angel , James, Paul , John, Esther M , Kroeldrup, Lone , Kruse, Torben A , Lazaro, Conxi , Lesueur, Fabienne , Matrai, Zoltan , Montagna, Marco , Monteiro, Alvaro N , Morrison, Patrick J , Muranen, Taru A , Nathanson, Katherine L , Neuhausen, Susan L. , Nevanlinna, H , Nguyen-Dumont, Tu , Niederacher, Dieter , Palli, Domenico , Parsons, Michael T , Perez-Segura, Pedro , Peterlongo, Paolo , Pinto, Pedro , Pottinger, Caroline , Radice, Paolo , Robson, Mark , Rump, Andreas , Sharif, Saba , Steele, Linda , Stoppa-Lyonnet, Dominique , Teixeira, Manuel R , Thull, Darcy L , Tischkowitz, Marc D. , Toland, Amanda Ewart , Tommasi, Stefania , Toss, Angela , Tripathi, Vishakha , Valentini, Virginia , van Asperen, Christi J , Venturelli, Marta , Viel, Alessandra , Joseph, Vijai , Whaite, Anna , Simard, Jacques , Easton, Doug , Chenevix-Trench, Georgia , Ottini, Laura , Barnes, Daniel R , Leslie, Goska , Pujana, Miquel Angel , Eeles, Rosalind A , Evans, D Gareth , Matricardi, Laura , Olopade, Olufunmilayo I , Silvestri, Valentina , De Leeneer, Kim , Feliubadaló, Lidia , Hansen, Thomas van Overeem , Manoukian, Siranoush , Arnold, Norbert , Auber, Bernd , Balmañà, Judith , Barwell, Julian , Benı́tez, Javier , Bozsik, Anikó , Brady, Angela F., Buys, Saundra S. , Caligo, Maria A. , Campbell, Ian , Collaborators, GEMO Study, Collaborators, EMBRACE, Cook, Jackie A , Hoya, Miguel de la , Dı́ez, Orland , Domchek, Susan M. , Gallagher, David James , Hentschel, Julia , Investigators, KConFab, Investigators, HEBON, Izquierdo, Á. , Lázaro, Conxi , Lesueur, Fabienne , Mai, Phuong L, Maxwell, Kara N. , Meindl, Alfons , Nevanlinna, Heli , Nguyen‐Dumont, Tú , Palli, Domenico , Parsons, Michael T. , Radice, Paolo , Robson, Mark E. , Rump, Andreas , Singer, Christian F. , Stoppa‐Lyonnet, Dominique , Asperen, Christi J. van , Vijai, Joseph , Zanna, Ines , Couch, Fergus J. , Ottini, Laura

Mayo Clinic

JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute | July 26, 2021 | Volume: 114 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 109-122

10.1093/jnci/djab147 | PMID 34320204 Get It

AbstractBackgroundRecent population-based female breast cancer and prostate cancer polygenic risk scores (PRS) have been developed. We assessed the associations of these PRS with breast and prostate cancer risks for male BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers.Methods483 BRCA1 and 1318 BRCA2 European ancestry male carriers were available from the Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/2 (CIMBA). A 147-single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) prostate cancer PRS (PRSPC) and a 313-SNP breast cancer PRS were evaluated. There were 3 versions of the breast cancer PRS, optimized to predict overall (PRSBC), estrogen receptor (ER)–negative (PRSER-), or ER-positive (PRSER+) breast cancer risk.ResultsPRSER+ yielded the strongest association with breast cancer risk. The odds ratios (ORs) per PRSER+ standard deviation estimates were 1.40 (95% confidence interval [CI] =1.07 to 1.83) for BRCA1 and 1.33 (95% CI = 1.16 to 1.52) for BRCA2 carriers. PRSPC was associated with prostate cancer risk for BRCA1 (OR = 1.73, 95% CI = 1.28 to 2.33) and BRCA2 (OR = 1.60, 95% CI = 1.34 to 1.91) carriers. The estimated breast cancer odds ratios were larger after adjusting for female relative breast cancer family history. By age 85 years, for BRCA2 carriers, the breast cancer risk varied from 7.7% to 18.4% and prostate cancer risk from 34.1% to 87.6% between the 5th and 95th percentiles of the PRS distributions.ConclusionsPopulation-based prostate and female breast cancer PRS are associated with a wide range of absolute breast and prostate cancer risks for male BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers. These findings warrant further investigation aimed at providing personalized cancer risks for male carriers and informing clinical management.
Sustained minimal residual disease negativity in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma and the impact of daratumumab in MAIA and ALCYONE
Miguel, Jesús F. San , Paiva, Bruno , Kumar, Shaji , Mateos, María‐Victoria , Usmani, Saad Z. , Cook, Gordon , Cavo, Michèle , Quach, Hang , Ukropec, Jon, Ramaswami, Priya, Pei, Huiling , Qi, Mia, Sun, Steven , Wang, Jianping , Krevvata, Maria, DeAngelis, Nikki, Heuck, Christoph, Rampelbergh, Rian Van , Kudva, Anupa, Kobos, Rachel, Qi, Ming , San-Miguel, Jesus , Paiva, Bruno , Kumar, Shaji K , Mateos, María-Victoria , Quach, Hang , Cook, Gordon , Usmani, Saad , Avet‐Loiseau, Hervé , Dimopoulos, Meletios Α. , Facon, Thierry T.F. , Touzeau, Cyrille , Jakubowiak, Andrzej , Bahlis, Nizar Jacques

Mayo Clinic

Blood | July 16, 2021 | Volume: 139 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 492-501

10.1182/blood.2020010439 | PMID 34269818 Get It

Abstract In patients with transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM), daratumumab reduced the risk of disease progression or death by 44% in MAIA (daratumumab/lenalidomide/dexamethasone [D-Rd]) and 58% in ALCYONE (daratumumab/bortezomib/melphalan/prednisone [D-VMP]). Minimal residual disease (MRD) is a sensitive measure of disease and response to therapy. MRD-negativity status and durability were assessed in MAIA and ALCYONE. MRD assessments using next-generation sequencing (10−5) occurred for patients achieving complete response (CR) or better and after at least CR at 12, 18, 24, and 30 months from the first dose. Progression-free survival (PFS) by MRD status and sustained MRD negativity lasting ≥6 and ≥12 months were analyzed in the intent-to-treat population and among patients achieving at least CR. In MAIA (D-Rd, n = 368; lenalidomide and dexamethasone [Rd], n = 369) and ALCYONE (D-VMP, n = 350; bortezomib/melphalan/prednisone [VMP], n = 356), the median duration of follow-up was 36.4 and 40.1 months, respectively. MRD-negative status and sustained MRD negativity lasting ≥6 and ≥12 months were associated with improved PFS, regardless of treatment group. However, daratumumab-based therapy improved rates of MRD negativity lasting ≥6 months (D-Rd, 14.9% vs Rd, 4.3%; D-VMP, 15.7% vs VMP, 4.5%) and ≥12 months (D-Rd, 10.9% vs Rd, 2.4%; D-VMP, 14.0% vs VMP, 2.8%), both of which translated to improved PFS vs control groups. In a pooled analysis, patients who were MRD negative had improved PFS vs patients who were MRD positive. Patients with NDMM who achieved MRD-negative status or sustained MRD negativity had deep remission and improved clinical outcomes. These trials were registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02252172 (MAIA) and #NCT02195479 (ALCYONE).
Surgical Reduction of Spondylolisthesis During Lumbar Fusion
Barber, Joshua A, Smith, Caleb J. , Li, Jinpu , Goldstein, Christina L, Leary, Emily , Lambrechts, Mark James , Barber, Joshua A, Beckett, Nathan , Goldstein, Christina L, Cook, James L. , Choma, Theodore J.

Mayo Clinic

Clinical Spine Surgery | July 7, 2021 | Volume: 35 | Issue: 1 | Pages: E1-E6

10.1097/bsd.0000000000001230 | PMID 34232155 Get It

Study Design: This was a retrospective cohort study. Objective: The objective of this study was to quantify the rates of complication following surgical treatment for symptomatic degenerative and isthmic spondylolisthesis and to examine the association between slip reduction and complication rates. Summary of Background Data: It is unclear if the degree of spondylolisthesis reduction during lumbar spine fusion in adults influences the rate of surgical complications. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of 1-level and 2-level adult fusion patients with degenerative or isthmic spondylolisthesis. The degree of reduction and complications were calculated, and complication rates between those with and without reduction were compared. Results: The surgical reduction was improved by 1 Meyerding grade in 56.5% of the 140 patients included in this analysis. Of those patients, 60% had a grade 1 spondylolisthesis. In addition, 62.5% of grade 2 slips had an improvement by 1 grade. Surgical reduction during lumbar fusion did not result in a higher rate of complications compared with in situ fusion. Conclusions: During 1-level or 2-level lumbar fusion for degenerative or isthmic spondylolisthesis, a 1-grade reduction of the slip was achieved in 56% of patients in this retrospective case series. Reduction of the spondylolisthesis was not associated with a higher rate of complication when compared with in situ fusion. Level of Evidence: Level IV.
Abstract 17129: Trends of Inpatient Malignancy Admissions Among Patients With a History of Heart Transplant: Analysis of National Inpatient Sample Database
Fugar, Setri , Uchenna, Mbachi C, Okoh, Alexis K. , Olagoke, Olakanmi , Solomon, Alfred, Akthar, Tauseef, Gomez, Jorge O , Vafah, Atefeh, Yirerong, Juliet , Al‐Ogaili, Ahmed , Sreenivasan, Jayakumar , Fuentes, Harry E

Mayo Clinic

Circulation | July 2, 2021 | Volume: 138 | Issue: Suppl_1 | Pages: No page available

10.1161/circ.138.suppl_1.17129 Get It

Introduction: Heart transplantation is associated with prolonged survival and improved quality of life in patients with advanced cardiac disease albeit with an increased risk of malignancies due to the use of immunosuppressant medications. Our study aimed to determine the types and trends of in patients’ hospitalization for malignancies among heart transplant patients. Methods: We queried the 2005 to 2014 National Inpatient Sample(NIS) database to identify all patients with a history of heart transplant (ICD-9 codes V412, 99683) who were hospitalized with a diagnosis of cancer. The main outcome was the trend in cancer admissions. Secondary outcome were inpatient mortality, total charge and length of stay. Cochran’s and Mantel-Haenszel test was used to assess trends of cancer admissions. Adjusted OR were used to compare the incidence of death between the two groups. Results: A total of 36543(weighted national estimate of 177,604) patients were admitted with a history of heart transplantation over the study period, out of which 2347(6.4%) had a diagnosis of a malignancy. Cancer patients were older (Mean age 66±12 Vs. 61.1±18 P-Value <0.001) and were more likely to be male. There was an increasing trend in the rate of cancer admissions over the study period from 60 per 1000 patients in 2005 to 70 per 1000patients in 2014(P-Vale <0.0001). Overall the most prevalent cancer was Non-Hodgkin’s 20.9% followed by lung Cancer 19.1%. ninety-seven patients(4.1%) had a 2 or more cancers. Patients with a diagnosis of cancer were more likely to die while inpatients as compared those without a diagnosis of cancer (6.6% vs. 3.1%, adjusted OR 2.42 95%CI 1.53-3.38 P-value <0.001). Lastly, patients with cancer had an increased total median coast and a longer length of stay(Total charge(39735 vs, 32,035, P value =<0.001 and 5 vs. 4. P-value <0.001). Conclusion: Development of cancer among patients with a history of transplant adds significant morbidity and mortality. Further studies are needed to determine effective ways to reduce morbidity in this patient cohort.
Use of Cross-sectional and Perspective Mapping to Spatially and Statistically Represent Inpatient Glucose Control
Saulnier, George E., Castro, Janna C. , Mi, Lanyu , Cook, Curtiss B.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology | July 2, 2021 | Volume: 16 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 1385-1392

10.1177/19322968211027230 | PMID 34210201 Get It

Background: The use of inpatient location for the depiction of glycemic control is an alternative approach to the traditional analysis of hospital-derived glucometric data. Our aim was to develop a method of spatial representation and to test for corresponding statistical variation in inpatient glucose control data. Methods: Point-of-care blood glucose data from inpatients with diabetes mellitus were extracted. Calculations included patient-day weighted means (PDWMs) and percentage of patient hospital days with hypoglycemia. Results were overlaid onto hospital floor plans, and room numbers were used as geolocators to generate cross-sectional (2-dimensional) and perspective (3-dimensional) views of the data. Linear mixed and mixed-effects logistic regression models were used to compare the location effect and to assess statistical variation in the data after adjusting for age, sex, and severity of illness. Results: Visual inspection of cross-sectional and perspective maps demonstrated variation in glucometric outcomes across areas within the hospital. Statistical analysis confirmed significant variation between some hospital wings and floors. Conclusions: Spatial depiction of glucometric data within the hospital could yield insights into hot spots of poor glycemic control. Future studies on how to operationalize this approach, and whether this method of analysis can drive changes in glycemic management practices, need to be conducted.