Citations

3056 Background: In metastatic Breast Cancer (mBC), Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs) are established prognostic indicators of patients (pts) not responding to new lines of therapy and who have poor clinical outcomes. However, CTCs are typically found in < 20% of mBC pts and many pts without CTCs will also progress. Recently an inflammatory pro-tumorigenic macrophage emanating from tumor stroma (i.e. Cancer associated macrophage-like cell [CAML]) was found in > 90% of mBC pts and were also indicative of poor clinical outcomes. As CTCs & CAMLs are isolated in conjunction from a single blood sample, and both are prognostic for therapy response, we evaluated CTCs & CAMLs before and after initiation of new therapies in mBC to determine their combined prognostic/predictive values. Methods: An observational prospective 2-year multi-institutional study was undertaken to evaluate CTCs & CAMLs before, and after, induction of any new line of therapy in pts with diagnosed mBC (n = 101). Anonymized and blinded blood samples were taken at baseline (BL), prior to starting a new systemic therapy, and a 2nd sample (T1) taken after therapy initiation (̃30 days). Blood was filtered by CellSieve filtration. The quantities and subtypes of CTCs & CAMLs were analyzed based on RECIST v1.1 for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) hazard ratios (HRs) by censored univariate & multivariate analysis at 2 years. Results: CTCs were identified in 35% (n = 35/101) of pts at BL & 24% (n = 24/101) at T1, with a single CTC at T1 being highly prognostic for worse PFS HR = 6.2 95%CI 3.0-13.2, p < 0.001 & OS (HR = 5.1 95%CI 2.0-13.4, p = 0.002. In parallel, CAMLs were found in 93% of BL and 86% of T1 samples, and whose decreases were significantly prognostic for improved PFS (HR = 2.7, 95%CI 1.4-5.1, p = 0.006) and OS (HR = 4.4 95%CI 1.5-13.2, p = 0.018) when CTCs were absent. Overall ≥1 CTC at T1 (n = 24) had median PFS = 2.4 & mOS = 4.8 months (mos), however, in pts without CTCs plus an increase in CAMLs (n = 36) had mPFS = 5.9 & mOS = 14.1 mos, while in pts without CTCs plus a decrease in CAMLs (n = 41) had mPFS = 14.8 & mOS = 18.8 mos. Conclusions: Our data confirms that pts with persistent CTCs have the worst clinical outcomes. Further, simultaneous CAML quantification provided a new dynamic predictive blood based biomarker in pts without detectable CTCs which may be useful to better individualize therapy and improve outcomes, though future studies are need to validate these findings.

3009 Background: The NCI-Children’s Oncology Group (COG) Pediatric Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice (MATCH) trial assigns patients age 1 to 21 years with relapsed or refractory solid tumors, lymphomas, and histiocytic disorders to phase 2 treatment arms of molecularly-targeted therapies based on genetic alterations detected in their tumor. Arm J evaluated the ERK1/2 inhibitor ulixertinib (BVD-523FB) in patients whose tumors harbored activating alterations in the MAPK pathway ( ARAF, BRAF, HRAS, KRAS, NRAS, MAPK1, MAP2K1, GNA11, GNAQ hotspot mutations; NF1inactivating mutations; BRAF fusions). Methods: As there were no prior pediatric data, ulixertinib was initially tested in a dose escalation cohort using a rolling 6 design to establish the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) before proceeding with enrollment to the phase 2 cohort. Ulixertinib was administered at 260 mg/m2/dose PO BID (dose level 1, DL1, n = 15) or 350 mg/m2/dose PO BID (dose level 2, DL2, n = 5). Patients were treated on continuous 28-day cycles for up to 2 years, until disease progression or intolerable toxicity; response assessment occurred every 2-3 cycles. The primary endpoint was objective response rate; secondary endpoints included safety/tolerability and progression-free survival (PFS). Results: Twenty patients (median age 12 years; range 5-20) were enrolled between November 2018 and March 2021. All patients were evaluable for response. High-grade glioma (HGG, n = 7) was most common, with CNS tumors comprising 55% (11/20) of diagnoses; all CNS tumors except one (HGG with KRAS and NF1 mutations) harbored BRAF fusions or V600 mutations. Rhabdomyosarcoma (n = 5) was the most frequent non-CNS diagnosis, with NRAS mutations detected in 4 tumors. DL1 was declared the RP2D after first-cycle dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) occurred in 1/6 DLT-evaluable patients at DL1 and 2/5 patients at DL2 in the dose escalation cohort. Any-cycle DLTs in 8 patients in the dose escalation and primary cohorts included fatigue, anorexia, rash, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, dehydration, increased creatinine, hypoalbuminemia, hypernatremia, and hip fracture. No objective responses were observed. Six-month PFS was 37% (95% CI: 17%, 58%). Three patients with CNS tumors achieved stable disease > 6 months (HGG with BRAF fusion, 15 cycles; glioneuronal tumor with BRAF V600E, 9 cycles; low-grade glioma with BRAF fusion, 7 cycles). Analyses of correlative studies, including pharmacokinetics and circulating tumor DNA, are ongoing. Conclusions: The pediatric RP2D of ulixertinib was established as 260 mg/m2/dose PO BID. There were no objective responses in this cohort of children and young adults with treatment-refractory tumors with activating MAPK alterations. Clinical benefit of prolonged disease control was observed in 3 patients with BRAF-altered gliomas and glioneuronal tumors. Clinical trial information: NCT03698994.

Abstract Introduction REM sleep without atonia (RSWA) is the neurophysiological substrate of REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD), a form of prodromal parkinsonism in most older adults. Isolated RSWA (without clinical RBD) elevation was demonstrated recently in older adults following SARS-CoV2 (COVID-19) infection, but comparison to controls was not reported. We aimed to comparatively analyze RSWA between patients with previous COVID-19 infection and COVID-19 negative controls. Methods 25 patients with previous COVID-19 infection were compared to 25 age-sex matched controls who tested negative for COVID-19 prior to polysomnography. Patients receiving medications known to increase RSWA were excluded. We reviewed medical records to determine clinical features and quantitatively analyzed RSWA in the submentalis (SM) and anterior tibialis (AT) muscles for phasic, tonic, and “any” muscle activity, phasic burst duration, and the automated REM atonia index. Non-parametric analyses compared clinical and polysomnographic features between groups, with combined SM and AT RSWA as the defined primary outcome. The comparative frequency of COVID-19 positive cases and COVID-19 negative controls who met or exceeded proposed isolated RSWA thresholds was also determined. Results COVID-19 patients had significantly greater RSWA than COVID-19 negative controls in the combined SM and AT muscles (p = 0.00076). Most other RSWA metrics were also higher in COVID-19 patients than controls (p&lt;0.03), except tonic muscle activity, phasic burst durations, and RAI. Isolated RSWA occurred more frequently in COVID-19 (9 patients, 36%) than controls (3, 12%; p&gt;0.05). No patients had a clinical history or polysomnographic evidence for parasomnia behavior or a primary neurological condition. Conclusion Quantitative RSWA amounts were comparatively greater in COVID-19 patients than in COVID-19 tested-negative controls, suggesting association of previous COVID-19 infection with central nervous system brainstem dysfunction in the region of the dorsal pons and/or ventromedial medulla. Further prospective studies are needed to determine whether RSWA is a predisposing influence to, or consequence of, COVID-19 infection in these patients, and whether COVID-19 survivors might harbor neurodegenerative risk or disease markers. Support (If Any)

Abstract Introduction Advanced Practice Providers (APPs; Advanced practice registered nurses, physician assistants) and physicians-in-training (residents, fellows) receive inadequate education on obstructive sleep apnea (OSA)/perioperative OSA risks. However, they are front-line providers assessing these patients. Failure to mitigate this risk has led to significant postoperative morbidity/mortality. We assessed these providers’ perceptions to OSA/perioperative OSA training. Methods Surveys were sent to three provider roles, APPs, residents, and fellows, in four categories of practice at nine academic institutions between May 9-June 30, 2021. Chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests assessed association between survey responses and participant characteristics. False discovery rate adjustment accounted for multiple comparisons, threshold of q&lt;0.05 for statistical significance. Cochran-Mantel-Haenzsel tests evaluated associations stratified by institution. Results 2236 of 6724 (33.3%) participants responded: 48.4% APPs, 11% Fellows and 40.6% Residents. Primary category of practice included: 20.3% Anesthesiology, 8.9% Family Medicine, 34.1%, Internal Medicine (IM)/IM subspecialties, 6.7% Obstetrics/Gynecology/Gynecologic Oncology, 25.9% Surgery/Surgery subspecialties, 4.1% Other.While 93.2% of respondents believed OSA is a risk factor for perioperative complications, fewer respondents reported that they felt adequately trained to assess for OSA (50.9%) in general, with significant differences noted by provider role (range 42-70%, q=0.001) and across the categories of practice (range 12-82%, q=0.001). Even fewer felt adequately trained to assess for OSA in perioperative patients (38.2%) with significant differences noted by provider role (range 31-52%, q=0.001) and across the categories of practice (range 15-84%, q=0.001).Across all categories of practice, respondents indicated that they would like additional educational training about OSA (76.7%). This varied by clinical role (range 64-82%, q=0.003), but not categories of practice (range 73-84%, q=0.13). Furthermore, respondents indicated they also desired additional education about OSA in the perioperative patient (75.5%). This extended across all clinical roles (range 68-77%, q=0.09) and categories of practice (range 72-80%, q=0.09). Conclusion We found significant differences in APP and physician-in-training perceptions of the adequacy of their current training and desire for further OSA/perioperative OSA education. Our study identifies a critical gap and opportunity to improve provider understanding and patient care. Support (If Any) American Academy of Sleep Medicine Foundation (AASMF) award.

A concerted commitment across research stakeholders is necessary to increase equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) and address barriers to cancer clinical trial recruitment and participation. Racial and ethnic diversity among trial participants is key to understanding intrinsic and extrinsic factors that may affect patient response to cancer treatments. This ASCO and Association of Community Cancer Centers (ACCC) Research Statement presents specific recommendations and strategies for the research community to improve EDI in cancer clinical trials. There are six overarching recommendations: (1) clinical trials are an integral component of high-quality cancer care, and every person with cancer should have the opportunity to participate; (2) trial sponsors and investigators should design and implement trials with a focus on reducing barriers and enhancing EDI, and work with sites to conduct trials in ways that increase participation of under-represented populations; (3) trial sponsors, researchers, and sites should form long-standing partnerships with patients, patient advocacy groups, and community leaders and groups; (4) anyone designing or conducting trials should complete recurring education, training, and evaluation to demonstrate and maintain cross-cultural competencies, mitigation of bias, effective communication, and a commitment to achieving EDI; (5) research stakeholders should invest in programs and policies that increase EDI in trials and in the research workforce; and (6) research stakeholders should collect and publish aggregate data on racial and ethnic diversity of trial participants when reporting results of trials, programs, and interventions to increase EDI. The recommendations are intended to serve as a guide for the research community to improve participation rates among people from racial and ethnic minority populations historically under-represented in cancer clinical trials. ASCO and ACCC will work at all levels to advance the recommendations in this publication.

Objective The effect of gestational age (GA) on gastroschisis outcomes is unclear and delivery timing varies in practice. We aimed to correlate clinical outcomes of infants with gastroschisis and GA at delivery in the Children's Hospitals Neonatal Consortium (CHNC). Study Design This was a retrospective multicenter cohort study of infants with gastroschisis admitted to CHNC neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) from 2010 to 2016. Patients were categorized by GA: 32 to 346/7, 35 to 366/7, and ≥37 weeks. Respiratory and feeding interventions, mortality, length of stay, and common complications were compared. Results In 2021 for patients with gastroschisis, median GA at delivery was 36.3 weeks (interquartile range [IQR] 35.1, 37.3) and mean birth weight 2,425 g (IQR 2,100, 2,766). Overall mortality was low and there was no difference across GA groups. Infants <35 weeks' gestation had the greatest need for respiratory and feeding interventions. Complications such as medical necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), cholestasis, and central line-associated blood stream infection were less common in infants ≥37 weeks. Feeding initiation and full feeds were earliest in term infants, compared with infants between 35 and 366/7 weeks, and longest in infants <35 weeks. Prematurity had a significant negative association with breast milk exposure. Enteral feeding tube support at discharge increased with prematurity. Compared with term, infants born between 35 and 366/7 weeks' gestation had a higher incidence of medical NEC and lower exposure to mother's milk at discharge but the need for respiratory interventions or tube feeding at discharge was similar. Conclusion Premature infants with gastroschisis had more neonatal complications including respiratory interventions, longer NICU stay, longer time to full enteral feeds, and higher need for tube feeds at discharge as compared with those delivered at term. Differences were greatest for those <35 weeks GA. While overall mortality remains low, these results provide additional information about GA at birth in gastroschisis, with no evidence of benefit from preterm delivery. Key Points

Objective The objective of this study was to determine whether a triple therapy regimen incorporating twice-daily saquinavir is as effective as a three-times daily regimen. Methods This was an open-label, Phase III, multicentre, 48-week study involving 837 HIV-1-infected patients randomised to one of the following: saquinavir soft gel capsule (SGC) 1200 mg three-times daily, plus two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) (arm A); saquinavir SGC 1600 mg twice-daily, plus two NRTIs (arm B); saquinavir SGC 1200 mg twice-daily and nelfinavir 1250 mg twice-daily, plus a single NRTI (arm C). The primary outcome measure was the virological response in arm A versus B and in arm A versus C with respect to the percentage of patients whose plasma HIV-1 RNA levels fell below the level of quantification for the Amplicor assay (<400 copies/ml) at weeks 24 and 48. Results At 48 weeks, the percentage of patients with plasma HIV-1 RNA levels <400 copies/ml was 47.1% (arm A), 45.3% (arm B) and 42.7% (arm C) in the intention-to-treat analysis. The treatment difference between arm B–arm A was -1.8% (95% confidence intervals -10.1, 6.5) and for arm C–arm A was -4.5% (95% confidence intervals -12.7, 3.7) in the intention-to-treat analysis. These differences fell within the maximum allowable difference (±12%) for arm B compared with arm A. At week 24, the percentage of patients with HIV-1 RNA levels <400 copies/ml was 59.6% (arm A), 57.6% (arm B) and 51.3% (arm C). Conclusions A twice-daily triple therapy regimen incorporating saquinavir SGC plus two NRTIs was of equivalent efficacy to the three-times daily regimen studied. All regimens were generally well tolerated.

Abstract Objective The Genomic Medicine Working Group of the National Advisory Council for Human Genome Research virtually hosted its 13th genomic medicine meeting titled “Developing a Clinical Genomic Informatics Research Agenda”. The meeting’s goal was to articulate a research strategy to develop Genomics-based Clinical Informatics Tools and Resources (GCIT) to improve the detection, treatment, and reporting of genetic disorders in clinical settings. Materials and Methods Experts from government agencies, the private sector, and academia in genomic medicine and clinical informatics were invited to address the meeting's goals. Invitees were also asked to complete a survey to assess important considerations needed to develop a genomic-based clinical informatics research strategy. Results Outcomes from the meeting included identifying short-term research needs, such as designing and implementing standards-based interfaces between laboratory information systems and electronic health records, as well as long-term projects, such as identifying and addressing barriers related to the establishment and implementation of genomic data exchange systems that, in turn, the research community could help address. Discussion Discussions centered on identifying gaps and barriers that impede the use of GCIT in genomic medicine. Emergent themes from the meeting included developing an implementation science framework, defining a value proposition for all stakeholders, fostering engagement with patients and partners to develop applications under patient control, promoting the use of relevant clinical workflows in research, and lowering related barriers to regulatory processes. Another key theme was recognizing pervasive biases in data and information systems, algorithms, access, value, and knowledge repositories and identifying ways to resolve them.

Cardiovascular disease surveillance involves quantifying the evolving population‐level burden of cardiovascular outcomes and risk factors as a data‐driven initial step followed by the implementation of interventional strategies designed to alleviate this burden in the target population. Despite widespread acknowledgement of its potential value, a national surveillance system dedicated specifically to cardiovascular disease does not currently exist in the United States. Routinely collected health care data such as from electronic health records (EHRs) are a possible means of achieving national surveillance. Accordingly, this article elaborates on some key strengths and limitations of using EHR data for establishing a national cardiovascular disease surveillance system. Key strengths discussed include the: (1) ubiquity of EHRs and consequent ability to create a more “national” surveillance system, (2) existence of a common data infrastructure underlying the health care enterprise with respect to data domains and the nomenclature by which these data are expressed, (3) longitudinal length and detail that define EHR data when individuals repeatedly patronize a health care organization, and (4) breadth of outcomes capable of being surveilled with EHRs. Key limitations discussed include the: (1) incomplete ascertainment of health information related to health care–seeking behavior and the disconnect of health care data generated at separate health care organizations, (2) suspect data quality resulting from the default information‐gathering processes within the clinical enterprise, (3) questionable ability to surveil patients through EHRs in the absence of documented interactions, and (4) the challenge in interpreting temporal trends in health metrics, which can be obscured by changing clinical and administrative processes.