Citations

AbstractAimThe aim of this study was to systematically appraise the quality of a sample of COVID-19-related systematic reviews (SRs) and discuss internal validity threats affecting the COVID-19 body of evidence.DesignWe conducted a scoping review of the literature. SRs with or without meta-analysis (MA) that evaluated clinical data, outcomes or treatments for patients with COVID-19 were included.Main outcome measuresWe extracted quality characteristics guided by A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews-2 to calculate a qualitative score. Complementary evaluation of the most prominent published limitations affecting the COVID-19 body of evidence was performed.ResultsA total of 63 SRs were included. The majority were judged as a critically low methodological quality. Most of the studies were not guided by a pre-established protocol (39, 62%). More than half (39, 62%) failed to address risk of bias when interpreting their results. A comprehensive literature search strategy was reported in most SRs (54, 86%). Appropriate use of statistical methods was evident in nearly all SRs with MAs (39, 95%). Only 16 (33%) studies recognised heterogeneity in the definition of severe COVID-19 as a limitation of the study, and 15 (24%) recognised repeated patient populations as a limitation.ConclusionThe methodological and reporting quality of current COVID-19 SR is far from optimal. In addition, most of the current SRs fail to address relevant threats to their internal validity, including repeated patients and heterogeneity in the definition of severe COVID-19. Adherence to proper study design and peer-review practices must remain to mitigate current limitations.

Objective An understanding of the etiologic heterogeneity of colorectal cancer (CRC) is critical for improving precision prevention, including individualized screening recommendations and the discovery of novel drug targets and repurposable drug candidates for chemoprevention. Known differences in molecular characteristics and environmental risk factors among tumors arising in different locations of the colorectum suggest partly distinct mechanisms of carcinogenesis. The extent to which the contribution of inherited genetic risk factors for CRC differs by anatomical subsite of the primary tumor has not been examined. Design To identify new anatomical subsite-specific risk loci, we performed genome-wide association study (GWAS) meta-analyses including data of 48 214 CRC cases and 64 159 controls of European ancestry. We characterised effect heterogeneity at CRC risk loci using multinomial modelling. Results We identified 13 loci that reached genome-wide significance (p<5×10 −8 ) and that were not reported by previous GWASs for overall CRC risk. Multiple lines of evidence support candidate genes at several of these loci. We detected substantial heterogeneity between anatomical subsites. Just over half (61) of 109 known and new risk variants showed no evidence for heterogeneity. In contrast, 22 variants showed association with distal CRC (including rectal cancer), but no evidence for association or an attenuated association with proximal CRC. For two loci, there was strong evidence for effects confined to proximal colon cancer. Conclusion Genetic architectures of proximal and distal CRC are partly distinct. Studies of risk factors and mechanisms of carcinogenesis, and precision prevention strategies should take into consideration the anatomical subsite of the tumour.

Abstract Background: Growing data established the pivotal role of preexisting immune response in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). Conventionally, preexisting immune response can be evaluated by quantifying tumor infiltrating lymphocytes mainly in the stroma or gene expression analysis from the whole tumor section. Due to technical challenges with these conventional methods, limited data regarding specific subtypes and spatial distribution of these immune infiltrates are currently available. Methods: NanoString IO360 gene expression analysis and Digital Spatial Profiling (DSP) were used. DSP was used to quantify 29 immune-related proteins in stromal and tumor-enriched segments from 44 TNBC samples from the FinXX trial (NCT00114816) and 335 samples from the Mayo Clinic (MC) cohort of centrally reviewed TNBC (Leon-Ferre BCRT 2018). In FinXX trial, 22 patients with recurrence and 22 patients without recurrence were included. In MC cohort, 217/335 patients received adjuvant chemotherapy while 118 patients had surgery only without adjuvant chemotherapy. Regions were segmented based on pancytokeratin staining. The general linear model was used for statistical analysis of differential expression with recurrence free survival (RFS) as a categorical variable (recur yes or no). Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates and Cox regression models were also used for analysis. Results: In the FinXX trial, there were 12 out of 29 proteins in tumor epithelial segments (intraepithelial) which were significantly expressed at higher levels among patients who were free of recurrence. These proteins include Beta-2 microglobulin, CD11c, CD20, CD40, CD56, CD8, Granzyme B, HLA-DR, ICOS, PD-L1, PD-L2, and TGFB1. In contrast, merely 5 out of 29 proteins in stromal segments were significantly differentially expressed in these 2 groups of patients. Granzyme B, IDO1, PD-L1, and PD-L2 in stroma were significantly higher and SMA was significantly lower in patients without recurrence. Using Cox regression models, intraepithelial CD56, CD40, and HLA-DR were significantly associated with outcome. When comparing between highest and lowest intraepithelial protein expression by tertile, intraepithelial CD56 (HR 0.12, 95%CI 0.03-0.39, p &lt; 0.001), CD40 (HR 0.13, 95%CI 0.04-0.46, p = 0.002), and HLA-DR (HR 0.24, 95%CI 0.06-0.89, p = 0.032) were significantly associated with improved outcome. However, expression of these same proteins in stroma was not associated with outcome. Using KM estimates, intraepithelial CD56 (p &lt; 0.0001), CD40 (p = 0.0006), and HLA-DR (p = 0.013) were also significantly associated with improved outcome. Nonetheless, RNA expression of these proteins by IO360 from whole tumor sections were not significantly associated with outcome (CD56 p = 0.27, CD40 p = 0.21, HLA-DR p = 0.48). Similar findings with DSP were observed in MC TNBC cohort. Comparing between the highest and lowest quartiles, there were significantly fewer patients who developed recurrence with high protein expression of intraepithelial CD56 (p &lt; 0.001), CD40 (p = 0.002), and HLA-DR (p = 0.006). Conclusions: Using an in-depth analysis with spatially defined context, we identify that there were numerically more intraepithelial immune-related proteins associated with outcome compared to proteins in stroma. Specifically, intraepithelial CD56, CD40, and HLA-DR were significantly associated with improved outcome in both FinXX and MC TNBC cohorts. However, neither expression of these proteins in stroma nor RNA expression from whole tumor were associated with outcome. Our study highlights the impact of spatial biology and the importance of evaluating each potential biomarker in a spatially defined manner. Support: W81XWH-15-1-0292, BCRF 19-161, P50CA116201-9, P50CA015083 Citation Format: Saranya Chumsri, Jodi M. Carter, Yaohua Ma, Douglas Hinerfeld, Heather Ann Brauer, Sarah Warren, Torsten O. Nielsen, Karama Asleh, Heikki Joensuu, Edith A. Perez, Roberto A. Leon-Ferre, David W. Hillman, Judy C. Boughey, Minetta C. Liu, James N. Ingle, Krishna R. Kalari, Fergus J. Couch, Keith L. Knutson, Matthew P. Goetz, E. A. Thompson. Spatially defined immune-related proteins and outcome in triple negative breast cancer in the FinXX trial and Mayo Clinic cohort [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS6-02.

Abstract Background: Cyclin dependent 4/6 kinase inhibitors (CDK4/6i) and endocrine therapy (ET) have improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival in hormone-receptor (HR)-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC), but progression of disease is inevitable. Serum thymidine kinase-1 (TK1) is a secreted marker of proliferation that is prognostic in patients (pts) with HR-positive, HER2-negative MBC and may be predictive of ET and CDK 4/6i response. PROMISE (NCT0281902) is a prospective study enrolling women with HR-positive MBC starting palbociclib (Pb) + letrozole (L) (1st line) or Pb + fulvestrant (2nd line). We undertook a comprehensive “omic” assessment of blood, tumor, urine and the fecal microbiome in order to identify novel genomic variants and pathways associated with an early decline in TK1 (measured after 2 months) and PFS. Additionally, patient derived xenografts/organoids were generated at baseline and progression to test new therapeutic approaches to overcome resistance to CDK4/6i and ET. We report the initial association between the baseline genomic landscape and baseline TK1 levels. Methods: FFPE tumor biopsies were obtained for DNA/RNA sequencing (TempusTM) and blood samples for TK1 (Divitum® assay, Biovica) were collected pretreatment (pre-Pb) and after 2 cycles of Pb + ET (post-Pb2). Both whole-exome (exome capture) sequencing (WES) and RNA-Seq used the Integrated DNA Technologies xGen Exome Research Panel v1.0 capture kit. TK1+ disease was defined as &gt; 200 Du/L and TK1- disease as below limit of detection up to 200 Du/L. We tested the association between genomic and transcriptomic characteristics with baseline TK1 data in pretreatment samples where both WES and RNA-seq and TK1 was available. The data were analyzed using bioinformatics pipelines for somatic and germline mutations and copy number alterations. The current analysis focuses on baseline 1st-line pre-Pb omics data in conjunction with baseline TK1 levels. The database was locked for analysis on 5/29/2020. Results: Thirty-three pts (median age: 59 yrs.) were evaluable, with paired samples for TK1 in 32. Six pts had TK1+ disease pre-Pb and post-Pb2. Twenty-two pts had TK1- disease pre-Pb and post-Pb2. Four pts had a decrease in TK1 after 2 cycles of treatment that altered the classification from TK1+ to TK1-. Both baseline RNA seq and serum TK1 (n=16) were available for 4 TK1+ and 12 TK1- pts. In this group, 476 genes were differentially regulated (398 upregulated; 78 downregulated). Pathway analysis demonstrated enrichment in complement and coagulation cascade pathway, PPAR signaling pathway, and metabolism-related pathways related to up-regulation of CYP and UGT gene families. Further testing for the association of WES data with baseline TK1+ (n=8) and TK1- (n=16) disease demonstrated somatic copy number variations on chromosomes 6, 11, 12 and 15. CDK4 copy number gains were observed in 3/8 TK1+ pts and 0/16 TK1- pts. We also observed that somatic mutations (LOH, copy number and/or SNV/INDELs) were more prevalent in the TK1+ compared to the TK1- pre-Pb group in several cancer-associated genes (FAS [p=0.06] PTEN, PIK3CB, NAB2, SOX9 and FAT1 [p=0.08], TP53, and MAP2K4 [p=0.22]). Conversely, we also noted that 6/7 pts with GATA3 mutations had TK1- disease (p=0.23). Conclusions: Using a comprehensive “omics” approach, our data suggest that a secreted biomarker of proliferation (TK1) obtained prior to initiating CDK4/6i and ET for the first line treatment of HR+ MBC is associated with established and novel genes and pathways associated with prognosis of pts receiving ET and CDK 4/6i. Analysis of on-treatment (after 2 cycles) tumor RNA seq and its association with change in TK1 as well as data from the 2nd-line cohort will be presented at the meeting. Citation Format: Ciara C O Sullivan, Krishna R Kalari, Vera J Suman, Peter T Vedell, Ann Moyer, Abraham D Eyman Casey, Jason Sinnwell, Xiaojia Tang, Kevin Thompson, Alvaro Moreno-Aspitia, Donald W Northfelt, Minetta C Liu, Tufia C Haddad, Saranya Chumsri, Prema Peethambaram, Kathryn J Ruddy, Karthik V Giridhar, Roberto A Leon-Ferre, Adrian Nordmark, Mattias Bergqvist, Brendan P McMenomy, Richard M Weinshilboum, Liewei Wang, Matthew P Goetz. Novel genomic variants and pathways associated with baseline serum thymidine kinase 1 levels in HR-positive HER2-negative MBC patients commencing palbociclib and letrozole [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS5-24.

Abstract Introduction: Stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) have established prognostic and predictive significance in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, the roles of other immune cells in TNBC are less well-established. We performed high-plex quantitative spatial profiling in a cohort of early-stage TNBC to 1) apply spatial context to tumoral immune landscapes and 2) identify immune proteins associated with clinical outcomes, independently of TILs and other established prognostic clinicopathologic variables, in patients (pts) treated with or without adjuvant chemotherapy (CTX). Methods: The Mayo TNBC cohort comprises pts with centrally-verified, CTX-naive tumors resected from 1985-2012. Using a cohort-based TMA, with Nanostring GeoMX DSP, we quantitated 58 proteins within spatially-distinct intra-epithelial, cytokeratin-positive tumor segments and adjacent cytokeratin-negative/nuclei-positive stromal segments. Differentially-expressed (DE) proteins were identified using a negative binomial generalized linear model (SNR&gt;2, p&lt; 0.05) and a target DE protein set was dichotomized (80th percentile). After adjusting for prognostic clinicopathologic variables, proteins associated with recurrence-free survival (RFS, defined as time from surgery to either local, regional, and distant recurrence, or death by any cause) were identified by performing variable selection using the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) obtained from fitting all possible Cox proportional hazards regression models (performed separately for intra-epithelial/stromal segments, and in groups +/- adjuvant CTX. Results: From the TNBC TMA, DSP data (N=250 tumors) included 169 pts who received adjuvant CTX+ and 81 who did not (CTX-). Overall, 85/250 developed recurrent disease. In the CTX+ group, intra-epithelial tumor segments from pts without recurrent disease were enriched in 10 immune proteins, including CD8, markers involved in antigen presentation/dendritic cells (CD11c, CD40, HLA-DR) or NK cells (CD56) (FC: 1.4-2.1, p&lt;0.05); CD14 was increased in stroma (FC: 1.5, p&lt;0.05). In contrast, in the CTX- group, both the intra-epithelial tumor and stromal segments from pts without recurrences were enriched in immune proteins (N= 12 and 15 respectively; FC 1.6-5.5, p&lt; 0.05) most markedly CD40, IDO1 and HLA-DR (FC: 3.2-5.5, p&lt; 0.05). Overall, CD3, CD4, CD27, CD44, and ICOS among others were enriched only in the CTX- group; CD14 and CD56 were enriched only in the CTX+ group. Based on these spatial data, biologic function and DSP data from another set of TNBC (FinXX trial), CD11c, CD14, CD27, CD40, CD56, and IDO1 were selected for RFS analysis. After applying our model selection criterion and adjusting for pt age at surgery, tumor size, lymph node status, and sTILs, intra-epithelial CD56 was independently associated with improved RFS in the CTX+ group (HR: 0.31[0.12, 0.81]). In the CTX- group, intra-epithelial CD11c was independently associated with improved RFS (0.10 [0.01, 0.81]). Conclusion: In this early-stage TNBC cohort, spatially-distinct tumor immune landscapes were associated with RFS but differed according to receipt of CTX after surgical resection. In the patients who received CTX, the intra-epithelial compartment, rather than stromal compartment, was immune-enriched in pts without recurrences. Among a targeted protein set, intra-epithelial CD56 remained associated with improved outcomes, independent of sTILs and other clinicopathologic features. In the CTX- group, spatial landscapes were more balanced, and intra-epithelial CD11c was independently associated with improved outcomes. These data provide insight into the spatial context of intrinsic immune landscapes in TNBC, and identify candidate prognostic immune biomarkers which may inform therapeutic strategies. Citation Format: Jodi M Carter, Saranya Chumsri, David W Hillman, David M Zahrieh, Yaohua Ma, Xue Wang, Jennifer M Kachergus, Judy C Boughey, Minetta C Liu, Krishna R Kalari, JC Villasboas, Roberto A Leon Ferre, Fergus J Couch, Matthew P Goetz, E. Aubrey Thompson. Intra-epithelial tumor immune landscapes are associated with clinical outcomes in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS16-01.

Abstract Background: In ER+ breast cancer (BC) models, Aurora A kinase (AURKA) activation is associated with expansion of CD44+/CD24low/- tumor initiating cells, down-regulation of ERα, and endocrine therapy resistance. Alisertib, a selective AURKA inhibitor, can restore ERα expression and endocrine sensitivity. Early phase studies evaluating alisertib alone or with fulvestrant for ER+ metastatic BC (MBC) demonstrated a favorable safety profile and promising antitumor activity [Haddad, Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018]. A phase II trial was conducted to determine if the addition of fulvestrant to alisertib improved objective response rate (ORR) and to assess clinical activity of alisertib alone or with fulvestrant in patients (pts) with prior fulvestrant and CDK 4/6 inhibitor (CDK 4/6i). Methods: Pts were randomized 1:1 to Arm A, alisertib (50 mg PO BID Days 1-3, 8-10, 15-17 q 28 days) or Arm B, alisertib with fulvestrant (500 mg IM Day 1, 15 for Cycle 1 and q 28 days thereafter). Eligibility included postmenopausal women, history of ER+ BC, prior fulvestrant, ≤ 2 prior chemotherapy lines, and measurable disease. Stratification factors included prior CDK4/6i, ER level (&lt;10%, ≥10%), and primary/secondary endocrine resistance. Pts on Arm A could cross over to Arm B at progression. With 45 pts per arm, a one sided alpha=0.15 sequential binomial test would have an 85% chance of detecting an increase of ≥ 20% in the ORR of ArmB when the true ORR for Arm A is ≤ 20%. ORR was defined as a partial response (PR) + complete response (CR) by RECIST v.1.1 criteria. Secondary endpoints include progression free survival (PFS), 24-week clinical benefit rate (CBR = CR + PR + absence of progression for&gt; 6 cycles), overall survival, duration of response (DoR), and safety. Blood and tumor specimens were collected at baseline, end of Cycle 1, and progression. Results: Pts enrolled July 2017 - November 2019 with 118 pre-registered, 96 registered, and 90 evaluable for the primary endpoint (Arm A: 45, Arm B: 45). Median age was 60 (range 33, 85). Nearly all received prior fulvestrant (n=89, 98.9%), aromatase inhibitor (n=83, 92.2%), and CDK4/6i (n=88, 97.8%). Most had secondary endocrine resistance (n=71, 78.9%). Pre-registration biopsy for ER was positive in 84 pts (86.7%) and negative in 6 pts (13.3%). More pts on Arm B had prior everolimus (A: 35.6%, B: 57.8%) and prior chemotherapy (A: 44.4%, B: 55.6%) for MBC. The ORR for alisertib and fulvestrant was 20.0% (90% CI: 10.9-32.3%), not significantly greater than alisertib alone 17.8% (90% CI: 9.2-29.8%). The 24-week CBR for Arm A was 42.2% (90% CI: 29.7-55.6%; n=19, including 7 PR) and Arm B was 31.1% (90% CI: 19.9-44.3%; n=14, including 8 PR). As of July 1, 2020, the median DoR was not reached in either arm. The median PFS time was 5.6 months (95% CI: 3.9 - 9.3) for Arm A and 5.1 months (95%CI: 3.8 - 7.6) for Arm B. Seventeen pts (18.9%) remain on treatment (A: 12, B: 5) having received at least 11 cycles (range up to 32+ cycles). At least one dose reduction was required for pts (A: 19, B: 18), most commonly due to neutropenia. The most common severe (grade ≥3) adverse events included neutropenia (n=19, 42.2% in each arm), anemia (A: 15.6%, B: 8.8%), and fatigue (n=5, 11.1% Arm B only). Pts discontinued therapy due to disease progression equally in each arm (n=28, 62.2%), however more pts on Arm B (n=12) than Arm A (n=5) discontinued therapy due to toxicity, refusal or other reasons. Conclusion: While the addition of fulvestrant to alisertib did not improve ORR, promising clinical activity with alisertib monotherapy was observed overall and notably for pts with endocrine and CDK 4/6i-resistant MBC. More severe toxicities and treatment discontinuation were observed in pts receiving combination therapy. Correlative blood (CTC/cfDNA) and tissue (AURKA, ERα, and stemness biomarkers) studies are underway. Citation Format: Tufia Haddad, Antonino D'Assoro, Vera Suman, Jodi Carter, Brendan McMenomy, Erica Mayer, Meghan Karuturi, Aki Morikawa, Paul Marcom, Claudine Isaacs, Sun Young Oh, Amy Clark, Ingrid Mayer, Khandan Keyomarsi, Roberto Leon-Ferre, Karthik Giridhar, Ciara O'Sullivan, Prema Peethambaram, Timothy Hobday, Minetta Liu, James Ingle, Matthew Goetz. Randomized phaseII trial to evaluate alisertib alone or combined with fulvestrant for advanced, endocrine-resistant breast cancer (TBCRC 041) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD2-05.

Abstract Background: Several studies suggest clinical utility of serial circulating tumor cell (CTC) enumeration as a means of assessing response status in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). The aim of this study is to conduct a comprehensive pooled analysis comprising globally available data to further define and explore the role of CTC enumeration as a tool for early treatment monitoring in patients with MBC with a focus on the predictive power in different breast cancer subtypes and clinical settings. Methods: In a global effort, peer-reviewed published studies with data on repeated CTC assessments (CellSearch® technology; Menarini Silicon Biosystems; Bologna, Italy) in MBC patients were screened and investigators were asked to provide individual patient data for this pooled analysis. 2761 cases from 32 data sets with data on both baseline and one follow up CTC assessments were included in the analysis (median time interval between the two CTC assessments 35 days). Data were analyzed using log rank tests and Cox regressions to evaluate the association between serial CTC enumeration results and overall survival (OS) in the full patient cohort and defined subgroups. Results: 588 (21.3%) patients had no CTCs at both time points (neg/neg), 236 (8.5%) patients were CTC negative at baseline and CTC positive at follow up (neg/pos), 712 (25.8%) patients converted from CTC positive at baseline to CTC negative (pos/neg), and 1225 (44.4%) patients had at least one CTC at both time points (pos/pos). Log rank tests showed significant differences in OS between these four CTC change groups (p &lt; 0.0001 for all pairwise comparisons except for the comparison between neg/pos and pos/neg, p = 0.015). Median OS for the neg/neg, neg/pos, pos/neg and pos/pos group was 45.6, 26.1, 34.6, and 17.6 months, respectively. Hazard ratios (HR) (reference group neg/neg) were 1.38 (95% CI 1.16 - 1.64) for the pos/neg group, 1.78 (95% CI 1.43 - 2.22) for the neg/pos group, and 3.06 (95% CI 2.63 - 3.56) for the pos/pos group. Results were similar if a cutoff of 5 CTCs was used for CTC positivity (pos/neg group: HR 1.43, 95% CI 1.25 - 1.63; neg/pos group: HR 2.39, 95% CI 1.91 - 2.99; pos/pos group: HR 3.54, 95% CI 3.12 - 4.02). In total, 2586 patients could be assigned to different tumor subtypes based on known hormone receptor (ER) and HER2 status of the primary tumor: 1513 (58.5%) patients had a luminal-like tumor (ER positive, HER2 negative), 682 (26.4%) patients had a HER2-positive tumor, and 391 (15.1%) patients had a triple-negative tumor. In patients with luminal-like tumors, the hazard ratios were 1.67 (95% CI 1.29 - 2.17), 2.01 (95% CI 1.45 - 2.77), and 3.87 (95% CI 3.09 - 4.83) for the pos/neg, neg/pos, and pos/pos group, respectively. In patients with HER2-positive tumors, the neg/pos group (HR 1.68, 95% CI 1.12 - 2.53) and the pos/pos group (HR 2.11, 95% CI 1.58 - 2.83) showed significantly worse OS compared to the neg/neg group, while in triple-negative patients, the pos/pos group had a significantly shorter OS compared to the neg/neg group (HR 2.99, 95% CI 2.11 - 4.24). The results will be up-dated by inclusion of additional large data sets (CALGB 40502, CALGB 40503, COMET, SWOG S0500, TBCRC 001) for the analysis to be presented at SABCS 2020. Conclusion: This large pooled analysis confirms that at a median of 35 days after treatment initiation, follow-up CTC assessments strongly predict overall survival. These results suggest potential clinical utility of CTC monitoring as early response marker in MBC, especially in luminal-like tumors. Citation Format: Wolfgang J Janni, Tracy C. Yab, Daniel F. Hayes, Massimo Cristofanilli, Francois-Clement Bidard, Michail Ignatiadis, Meredith M. Regan, Catherine Alix-Panabières, William E. Barlow, Carlos Caldas, Lisa A. Carey, Luc Dirix, Tanja Fehm, Jose A. Garcia-Saenz, Paola Gazzaniga, Daniele Generali, Lorenzo Gerratana, Rafael Gisbert-Criado, William Jacot, Zefei Jiang, Evi Lianidou, Mark J.M. Magbanua, Luis Manso, Dimitrios Mavroudis, Volkmar Müller, Elisabetta Munzone, Klaus Pantel, Jean-Yves Pierga, Brigitte Rack, Sabine Riethdorf, Hope S. Rugo, Kostandinos Sideras, Stefan Sleijfer, Jeffrey Smerage, Justin Stebbing, Leon W.M.M. Terstappen, José Vidal-Martínez, Rita Zamarchi, Karthik Giridhar, Thomas W.P. Friedl, Minetta C. Liu. Clinical utility of repeated circulating tumor cell (CTC) enumeration as early treatment monitoring tool in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) - a global pooled analysis with individual patient data [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS4-08.

Abstract Context. —Malignant mesothelioma (MM) is an uncommon tumor that can be difficult to diagnose. Objective. —To develop practical guidelines for the pathologic diagnosis of MM. Data Sources. —A pathology panel was convened at the International Mesothelioma Interest Group biennial meeting (October 2006). Pathologists with an interest in the field also contributed after the meeting. Conclusions. —There was consensus opinion regarding (1) distinguishing benign from malignant mesothelial proliferations (both epithelioid and spindle cell lesions), (2) cytologic diagnosis of MM, (3) key histologic features of pleural and peritoneal MM, (4) use of histochemical and immunohistochemical stains in the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of MM, (5) differentiating epithelioid MM from various carcinomas (lung, breast, ovarian, and colonic adenocarcinomas and squamous cell and renal cell carcinomas), (6) diagnosis of sarcomatoid mesothelioma, (7) use of molecular markers in the differential diagnosis of MM, (8) electron microscopy in the diagnosis of MM, and (9) some caveats and pitfalls in the diagnosis of MM. Immunohistochemical panels are integral to the diagnosis of MM, but the exact makeup of panels used is dependent on the differential diagnosis and on the antibodies available in a given laboratory. Immunohistochemical panels should contain both positive and negative markers. The International Mesothelioma Interest Group recommends that markers have either sensitivity or specificity greater than 80% for the lesions in question. Interpretation of positivity generally should take into account the localization of the stain (eg, nuclear versus cytoplasmic) and the percentage of cells staining (>10% is suggested for cytoplasmic membranous markers). These guidelines are meant to be a practical reference for the pathologist.