Citations

Clear

493 citation(s) found for "Warren, LE".

Osteosarcoma of the spine: prognostic variables for local recurrence and overall survival, a multicenter ambispective study
Dekutoski, Mark B. , Rose, Peter S. , Luzzati, Alessandro , Rhines, Laurence D. , Fisher, Charles G. , Chou, Dean , Fehlings, Michael G. , Reynolds, Jeremy , Williams, Richard P., Quraishi, Nasir A. , Germscheid, Niccole, Sciubba, Daniel M. , Gokaslan, Ziya L., Boriani, Stefano , _, _, Reynolds, Jeremy , Rose, Peter, Clarke, Michelle J. , Varga, Péter , _, _, Fehlings, Michael G , Reynolds, Jeremy

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine | March 4, 2016 | Volume: 25 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 59-68

10.3171/2015.11.spine15870 | PMID 26943248 Get It

OBJECTIVE Primary spinal osteosarcomas are rare and aggressive neoplasms. Poor outcomes can occur, as obtaining marginal margins is technically demanding; further Enneking-appropriate en bloc resection can have significant morbidity. The goal of this study is to identify prognostic variables for local recurrence and mortality in surgically treated patients diagnosed with a primary osteosarcoma of the spine. METHODS A multicenter ambispective database of surgically treated patients with primary spine osteosarcomas was developed by AOSpine Knowledge Forum Tumor. Patient demographic, diagnosis, treatment, perioperative morbidity, local recurrence, and cross-sectional survival data were collected. Tumors were classified in 2 cohorts: Enneking appropriate (EA) and Enneking inappropriate (EI), as defined by pathology margin matching Enneking-recommended surgical margins. Prognostic variables were analyzed in reference to local recurrence and survival. RESULTS Between 1987 and 2012, 58 patients (32 female patients) underwent surgical treatment for primary spinal osteosarcoma. Patients were followed for a mean period of 3.5 ± 3.5 years (range 0.5 days to 14.3 years). The median survival for the entire cohort was 6.7 years postoperative. Twenty-four (41%) patients died, and 17 (30%) patients suffered a local recurrence, 10 (59%) of whom died. Twenty-nine (53%) patients underwent EA resection while 26 (47%) patients underwent EI resection with a postoperative median survival of 6.8 and 3.7 years, respectively (p = 0.048). EI patients had a higher rate of local recurrence than EA patients (p = 0.001). Patient age, previous surgery, biopsy type, tumor size, spine level, and chemotherapy timing did not significantly influence recurrence and survival. CONCLUSIONS Osteosarcoma of the spine presents a significant challenge, and most patients die in spite of aggressive surgery. There is a significant decrease in recurrence and an increase in survival with en bloc resection (EA) when compared with intralesional resection (EI). The effect of adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapeutics, as well as method of biopsy, requires further exploration.
Research Priorities, Measures, and Recommendations for Assessment of Tobacco Use in Clinical Cancer Research
Toll, Benjamin A. , Moinpour, Carol M. , Gritz, Ellen R., Prindiville, Sheila A. , Sarna, Linda, Leischow, Scott J. , Dresler, Carolyn M., Warren, Graham , Land, Stephanie R , Mitchell, Sandra A , Ostroff, Jamie S , Hatsukami, Dorothy K. , Duffy, Sonia A. , Rigotti, Nancy A. , Brandon, Thomas Henry , Schnoll, Robert A. , Herbst, Roy S. , Cinciripini, Paul M , Fiore, Michael C.

Mayo Clinic

Clinical Cancer Research | February 17, 2016 | Volume: 22 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 1907-1913

10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-16-0104 | PMID 26888828 Get It

Abstract There is strong evidence that cigarette smoking causes adverse outcomes in people with cancer. However, more research is needed regarding those effects and the effects of alternative tobacco products and of secondhand smoke, the effects of cessation (before diagnosis, during treatment, or during survivorship), the biologic mechanisms, and optimal strategies for tobacco dependence treatment in oncology. Fundamentally, tobacco is an important source of variation in clinical treatment trials. Nevertheless, tobacco use assessment has not been uniform in clinical trials. Progress has been impeded by a lack of consensus regarding tobacco use assessment suitable for cancer patients. The NCI-AACR Cancer Patient Tobacco Use Assessment Task Force identified priority research areas and developed recommendations for assessment items and timing of assessment in cancer research. A cognitive interview study was conducted with 30 cancer patients at the NIH Clinical Center to evaluate and improve the measurement items. The resulting Cancer Patient Tobacco Use Questionnaire (C-TUQ) includes “Core” items for minimal assessment of tobacco use at initial and follow-up time points, and an “Extension” set. Domains include the following: cigarette and other tobacco use status, intensity, and past use; use relative to cancer diagnosis and treatment; cessation approaches and history; and secondhand smoke exposure. The Task Force recommends that assessment occur at study entry and, at a minimum, at the end of protocol therapy in clinical trials. Broad adoption of the recommended measures and timing protocol, and pursuit of the recommended research priorities, will help us to achieve a clearer understanding of the significance of tobacco use and cessation for cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res; 22(8); 1907–13. ©2016 AACR.
Mobile spine chordoma: results of 166 patients from the AOSpine Knowledge Forum Tumor database
Gokaslan, Ziya L., Zadnik, Patricia L., Sciubba, Daniel M. , Germscheid, Niccole, Goodwin, C. Rory , Wolinsky, Jean‐Paul , Groves, Mari L. , Luzzati, Alessandro , Rhines, Laurence D. , Fisher, Charles G. , Varga, Péter , Dekutoski, Mark B. , Fehlings, Michael G. , Quraishi, Nasir A. , Chou, Dean , Reynolds, Jeremy , Williams, Richard P., Kawahara, Norio , Boriani, Stefano , Reynolds, Jeremy , Bettegowda, Chetan , Clarke, Michelle J. , Fehlings, Michael G , Goodwin, C Rory , Reynolds, Jeremy

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine | December 18, 2015 | Volume: 24 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 644-651

10.3171/2015.7.spine15201 | PMID 26682601 Get It

OBJECT A chordoma is an indolent primary spinal tumor that has devastating effects on the patient's life. These lesions are chemoresistant, resistant to conventional radiotherapy, and moderately sensitive to proton therapy; however, en bloc resection remains the preferred treatment for optimizing patient outcomes. While multiple small and largely retrospective studies have investigated the outcomes following en bloc resection of chordomas in the sacrum, there have been few large-scale studies on patients with chordomas of the mobile spine. The goal of this study was to review the outcomes of surgically treated patients with mobile spine chordomas at multiple international centers with respect to local recurrence and survival. This multiinstitutional retrospective study collected data between 1988 and 2012 about prognosis-predicting factors, including various clinical characteristics and surgical techniques for mobile spine chordoma. Tumors were classified according to the Enneking principles and analyzed in 2 treatment cohorts: Enneking-appropriate (EA) and Enneking-inappropriate (EI) cohorts. Patients were categorized as EA when the final pathological assessment of the margin matched the Enneking recommendation; otherwise, they were categorized as EI. METHODS Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data (Student t-test, chi-square, and Fisher exact tests). Recurrence and survival data were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves, log-rank tests, and multivariate Cox proportional hazard modeling. RESULTS A total of 166 patients (55 female and 111 male patients) with mobile spine chordoma were included. The median patient follow-up was 2.6 years (range 1 day to 22.5 years). Fifty-eight (41%) patients were EA and 84 (59%) patients were EI. The type of biopsy (p < 0.001), spinal location (p = 0.018), and if the patient received adjuvant therapy (p < 0.001) were significantly different between the 2 cohorts. Overall, 58 (35%) patients developed local recurrence and 57 (34%) patients died. Median survival was 7.0 years postoperative: 8.4 years postoperative for EA patients and 6.4 years postoperative for EI patients (p = 0.023). The multivariate analysis showed that the EI cohort was significantly associated with an increased risk of local recurrence in comparison with the EA cohort (HR 7.02; 95% CI 2.96–16.6; p < 0.001), although no significant difference in survival was observed. CONCLUSIONS EA resection plays a major role in decreasing the risk for local recurrence in patients with chordoma of the mobile spine.
Congestive Heart Failure Cardiopoietic Regenerative Therapy (CHART-1) Trial Design
Sherman, Warren, Povsic, Thomas J. , Henry, Timothy D. , Metra, Marco , Filippatos, Gerasimos , Hajjar, Roger J. , Behfar, Atta , Homsy, Christian, Wijns, William , Tendera, Michał , Bartúnek, Jozef , Davison, Beth A. , Gersh, Bernard J. , Cotter, Gad , Terzic, André , Behfar, Atta , Metra, Marco , Wijns, William

Mayo Clinic

European Journal of Heart Failure | December 14, 2015 | Volume: 18 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 160-168

10.1002/ejhf.434 | PMID 26662998 Get It

Abstract Aims Cardiopoiesis is a conditioning programme that aims to upgrade the cardioregenerative aptitude of patient-derived stem cells through lineage specification. Cardiopoietic stem cells tested initially for feasibility and safety exhibited signs of clinical benefit in patients with ischaemic heart failure (HF) warranting definitive evaluation. Accordingly, CHART-1 is designed as a large randomized, sham-controlled multicentre study aimed to validate cardiopoietic stem cell therapy. Methods Patients (n = 240) with chronic HF secondary to ischaemic heart disease, reduced LVEF (&lt;35%), and at high risk for recurrent HF-related events, despite optimal medical therapy, will be randomized 1:1 to receive 600 × 106 bone marrow-derived and lineage-directed autologous cardiopoietic stem cells administered via a retention-enhanced intramyocardial injection catheter or a sham procedure. The primary efficacy endpoint is a hierarchical composite of mortality, worsening HF, Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire score, 6 min walk test, LV end-systolic volume, and LVEF at 9 months. The secondary efficacy endpoint is the time to cardiovascular death or worsening HF at 12 months. Safety endpoints include mortality, readmissions, aborted sudden deaths, and serious adverse events at 12 and 24 months. Conclusion The CHART-1 clinical trial is powered to examine the therapeutic impact of lineage-directed stem cells as a strategy to achieve cardiac regeneration in HF populations. On completion, CHART-1 will offer a definitive evaluation of the efficacy and safety of cardiopoietic stem cells in the treatment of chronic ischaemic HF. Trial registration: NCT01768702
In reference to “national cohort study of opioid analgesic dose and risk of future hospitalization”
Sundaragiri, Pranathi R., Vallabhajosyula, Saraschandra , Shah, Neel , Shah, Neel B, Vallabhajosyula, Saraschandra

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Hospital Medicine | November 23, 2015 | Volume: 11 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 155-156

10.1002/jhm.2514 | PMID 26595452 Get It

MDS research criteria for prodromal Parkinson's disease
Berg, Daniela , Bloem, Bastiaan R. , Dubois, Bruno, Gasser, Thomas , Halliday, Glenda M. , Joseph, Lawrence , Lang, Anthony E. , Liepelt‐Scarfone, Inga , Litvan, Irene , Marek, Kenneth , Oertel, Wolfgang H. , Olanow, C. Warren , Deuschl, Günther , Postuma, Ronald B. , Adler, Charles H. , Chan, Piu , Goetz, Christopher G. , Obeso, Jose Angel , Poewe, Werner H , Stern, Matthew , Halliday, Glenda , Lang, Anthony E , Deuschl, Günther , Litvan, Irene

Mayo Clinic

Movement Disorders | October 16, 2015 | Volume: 30 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 1600-1611

10.1002/mds.26431 | PMID 26474317 Get It

ABSTRACT This article describes research criteria and probability methodology for the diagnosis of prodromal PD. Prodromal disease refers to the stage wherein early symptoms or signs of PD neurodegeneration are present, but classic clinical diagnosis based on fully evolved motor parkinsonism is not yet possible. Given the lack of clear neuroprotective/disease‐modifying therapy for prodromal PD, these criteria were developed for research purposes only. The criteria are based upon the likelihood of prodromal disease being present with probable prodromal PD defined as ≥80% certainty. Certainty estimates rely upon calculation of an individual's risk of having prodromal PD, using a Bayesian naïve classifier. In this methodology, a previous probability of prodromal disease is delineated based upon age. Then, the probability of prodromal PD is calculated by adding diagnostic information, expressed as likelihood ratios. This diagnostic information combines estimates of background risk (from environmental risk factors and genetic findings) and results of diagnostic marker testing. In order to be included, diagnostic markers had to have prospective evidence documenting ability to predict clinical PD. They include motor and nonmotor clinical symptoms, clinical signs, and ancillary diagnostic tests. These criteria represent a first step in the formal delineation of early stages of PD and will require constant updating as more information becomes available. © 2015 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society
MDS clinical diagnostic criteria for Parkinson's disease
Berg, Daniela , Olanow, C. Warren , Oertel, Wolfgang H. , Marek, Kenneth , Litvan, Irene , Lang, Anthony E. , Halliday, Glenda M. , Gasser, Thomas , Dubois, Bruno, Bloem, Bastiaan R. , Deuschl, Günther , Postuma, Ronald B. , Stern, Matthew , Poewe, Werner H , Obeso, Jose Angel , Goetz, Christopher G. , Chan, Piu , Adler, Charles H. , Halliday, Glenda , Lang, Anthony E , Deuschl, Günther , Litvan, Irene

Mayo Clinic

Movement Disorders | October 16, 2015 | Volume: 30 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 1591-1601

10.1002/mds.26424 | PMID 26474316 Get It

AbstractThis document presents the Movement Disorder Society Clinical Diagnostic Criteria for Parkinson's disease (PD). The Movement Disorder Society PD Criteria are intended for use in clinical research but also may be used to guide clinical diagnosis. The benchmark for these criteria is expert clinical diagnosis; the criteria aim to systematize the diagnostic process, to make it reproducible across centers and applicable by clinicians with less expertise in PD diagnosis. Although motor abnormalities remain central, increasing recognition has been given to nonmotor manifestations; these are incorporated into both the current criteria and particularly into separate criteria for prodromal PD. Similar to previous criteria, the Movement Disorder Society PD Criteria retain motor parkinsonism as the core feature of the disease, defined as bradykinesia plus rest tremor or rigidity. Explicit instructions for defining these cardinal features are included. After documentation of parkinsonism, determination of PD as the cause of parkinsonism relies on three categories of diagnostic features: absolute exclusion criteria (which rule out PD), red flags (which must be counterbalanced by additional supportive criteria to allow diagnosis of PD), and supportive criteria (positive features that increase confidence of the PD diagnosis). Two levels of certainty are delineated: clinically established PD (maximizing specificity at the expense of reduced sensitivity) and probable PD (which balances sensitivity and specificity). The Movement Disorder Society criteria retain elements proven valuable in previous criteria and omit aspects that are no longer justified, thereby encapsulating diagnosis according to current knowledge. As understanding of PD expands, the Movement Disorder Society criteria will need continuous revision to accommodate these advances. © 2015 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society
Boerhaave Syndrome Presenting as Tension Pneumothorax
Vallabhajosyula, Saraschandra , Sundaragiri, Pranathi R., Berim, Ilya , Vallabhajosyula, Saraschandra

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Intensive Care Medicine | September 22, 2015 | Volume: 31 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 349-352

10.1177/0885066615606698 | PMID 26395053 Get It

Tension pneumothorax is a rare and potentially life-threatening clinical complication. A 43-year-old Caucasian woman with type 1 diabetes mellitus presented with nausea and retching and examination revealed dehydration. Laboratory parameters were consistent with a diagnosis of diabetic ketoacidosis, which responded to therapy. Suddenly, 30 hours later, she developed cardiorespiratory compromise due to a tension pneumothorax. After emergent decompression and catheter placement, computerized tomographic scan of the chest demonstrated esophageal-pleural fistula confirming Boerhaave syndrome as the etiology for the pneumothorax. The patient underwent emergent esophagectomy with pleural washout with a subsequent gastric pull-up surgery. Boerhaave syndrome frequently presents atypically with chest pain, dyspnea, and nausea. It communicates with the left pleural space in 80% to 90% of cases, but <5% of cases involve the right pleural cavity. Unexplained and rapidly progressive pleural effusions have been associated with this entity. Only 4 cases of Boerhaave syndrome causing tension pneumothorax have been reported in the literature so far.
Abstract 5049: Physician preferences in tobacco cessation support for cancer patients: A survey of physicians at National Cancer Institute Designated Cancer Centers
Pommerenke, Alix W., Alberg, Anthony J. , Croghan, Ivana T. , Cummings, Michael K. , Dresler, Carolyn, Gritz, Ellen R., Leischow, Scott J. , Marshall, James R. , Toll, Benjamin A. , Warren, Graham , Brandon, Thomas Henry , Dresler, Carolyn M., Herbst, Roy S.

Mayo Clinic

Cancer Research | May 1, 2015 | Volume: 74 | Issue: 19_Supplement | Pages: 5049-5049

10.1158/1538-7445.am2014-5049 Get It

Abstract Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate oncologists' preferences for methods to increase delivery of tobacco cessation support to cancer patients. Methods: An email list of 6844 physicians at NCI Designated Cancer Centers was generated using publically available online resources. An online survey was conducted in the fall of 2013 to assess tobacco assessment and cessation practices by physicians, barriers to providing cessation support, and methods to improve access to cessation services for cancer patients. Results of this survey are compared to similar survey findings by the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC). Results: Of 6844 electronically delivered survey invitations, we received 887 responses (13%). Consistent with previously published ASCO and IASLC surveys, 90% of physicians agreed that tobacco use by patients affects cancer treatment outcomes (vs. 87-92% in ASCO/IASLC), 90% of respondents reported that they ask patients about their tobacco use (vs. 90% in ASCO/IASLC), and 83% routinely advise tobacco users to quit (vs. 80-82% in ASCO/IASLC). However, only 37% of respondents regularly discussed medications, and 35% actively treated patients (vs. 39-44% in ASCO/IASLC). Most (71%) responding oncologists preferred cessation support be provided at the initial patient consult, and few (11%) were concerned about the use of tobacco cessation medications. Lack of time and lack of available resources were the dominant barriers to the administration of tobacco cessation support to cancer patients by oncologists. Only 10% of oncologists believed they were adequately trained to counsel patients on smoking cessation, but 55% reported that training for someone else in their clinic would increase tobacco cessation support. When asked what provider they prefer to administer cessation support to cancer patients, 16% reported a primary care physician, 18% reported a mid-level (nurse practitioner or physician assistant), 50% reported any other clinical staff, and only 1% preferred to personally provide cessation support. Whereas most (58%) oncologists preferred to have dedicated cessation services within their institution, 38% reported they would use dedicated services either within, or outside their institution. Conclusions: Most oncologists at NCI Designated Cancer Centers recognize the importance of tobacco cessation, but prefer to have tobacco cessation support for cancer patients provided by another trained professional. Citation Format: Alix Pommerenke, Anthony Alberg, Thomas H. Brandon, Ivana Croghan, Michael K. Cummings, Carolyn Dresler, Ellen R. Gritz, Roy Herbst, Scott Leischow, James R. Marshall, Benjamin Toll, Graham Warren. Physician preferences in tobacco cessation support for cancer patients: A survey of physicians at National Cancer Institute Designated Cancer Centers. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr 5049. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-5049
Novel Associations between Common Breast Cancer Susceptibility Variants and Risk-Predicting Mammographic Density Measures
Stone, Jennifer , Thompson, Deborah J. , dos‐Santos‐Silva, Isabel , Lindström, Sara , Hazra, Aditi , Li, Jingmei , Eriksson, Louise , Jensen, Matt , Cunningham, Julie M. , Purrington, Kristen S. , Brown, Judith, Leyland, Jean, Warren, Ruth , Luben, Robert , Smith, Paula , Jud, Sebastian M. , Heusinger, Katharina, Beckmann, Matthias W. , Douglas, Julie A. , Shah, Kaanan P., Chan, Heang‐Ping , Helvie, Mark A. , Kolonel, Laurence N. , Woolcott, Christy , Haiman, Christopher A. , Giles, Graham G. , Baglietto, Laura , Krishnan, Kavitha , Southey, Melissa C. , Apicella, Carmel, Andrulis, Irene L. , Knight, Julia A. , Ursin, Giske , Alnæs, Grethe I.G., Kristensen, Vessela N. , Børresen‐Dale, Anne‐Lise , Bolla, Manjeet K. , Wang, Qin , Michailidou, Kyriaki , Simard, Jacques , Dunning, Alison M. , Easton, Douglas F. , Fasching, Peter A. , Vachon, Celine M. , Durocher, Francine , Cunningham, Julie, Scott, Christopher G. , Tamimi, Rulla M. , Kraft, Peter , Czene, Kamila , Hall, Per N , Olson, Janet E. , Couch, Fergus J. , Khaw, Kay‐Tee , Wareham, Nicholas J. , Marchand, Loı̈c Le , Maskarinec, Gertraud , Gram, Inger Torhild , Dennis, Joe , Pharoah, Paul D.P. , Pankratz, V. Shane , Hopper, John L. , Vachon, Celine M. , Luben, Robert N , Giles, Graham G , Southey, Melissa C , Dunning, Alison M , Li, Jingmei , Michailidou, Kyriaki , Simard, Jacques , Stone, Jennifer , Baglietto, Laura , Purrington, Kristen S , Chan, Heang-Ping

Mayo Clinic

Cancer Research | April 10, 2015 | Volume: 75 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 2457-2467

10.1158/0008-5472.can-14-2012 | PMID 25862352 Get It

Abstract Mammographic density measures adjusted for age and body mass index (BMI) are heritable predictors of breast cancer risk, but few mammographic density-associated genetic variants have been identified. Using data for 10,727 women from two international consortia, we estimated associations between 77 common breast cancer susceptibility variants and absolute dense area, percent dense area and absolute nondense area adjusted for study, age, and BMI using mixed linear modeling. We found strong support for established associations between rs10995190 (in the region of ZNF365), rs2046210 (ESR1), and rs3817198 (LSP1) and adjusted absolute and percent dense areas (all P &lt; 10−5). Of 41 recently discovered breast cancer susceptibility variants, associations were found between rs1432679 (EBF1), rs17817449 (MIR1972-2: FTO), rs12710696 (2p24.1), and rs3757318 (ESR1) and adjusted absolute and percent dense areas, respectively. There were associations between rs6001930 (MKL1) and both adjusted absolute dense and nondense areas, and between rs17356907 (NTN4) and adjusted absolute nondense area. Trends in all but two associations were consistent with those for breast cancer risk. Results suggested that 18% of breast cancer susceptibility variants were associated with at least one mammographic density measure. Genetic variants at multiple loci were associated with both breast cancer risk and the mammographic density measures. Further understanding of the underlying mechanisms at these loci could help identify etiologic pathways implicated in how mammographic density predicts breast cancer risk. Cancer Res; 75(12); 2457–67. ©2015 AACR.