Citations

e16023 Background: Stroke is an underrecognized cause of death among patients with gastric cancer. While overall cancer mortality has improved, less is known about long-term trends and disparities in stroke-related deaths. We examined national patterns in stroke mortality among gastric cancer patients from 1999 to 2023. Methods: U.S. national mortality data were used to calculate age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMR) per 100,000. Joinpoint regression identified temporal changes and estimated annual percent change (APC) and average annual percent change (AAPC). Analyses were stratified by age, sex, race and ethnicity, census region, and urbanization. Results: Between 1999 and 2023, an overall decline in stroke-related mortality was noted with AAMR falling from 167.29 to 111.35 per 100,000 people (AAPC −1.70%, 95% CI −1.9 to −1.5). The decline was greatest between 2002 and 2009 (−5.28% per year) after which it began to plateau until it rose significantly between 2018 and 2021 (APC 6.56%) followed by a decline after 2021 (−3.63%). Older adults had the highest level of stroke related mortality, and therefore the greatest reduction over time (from 756.36 to 479.63) with a total reduction of −36.6% yet they saw a significant increase in mortality between 2018 and 2021. Middle aged patients had little overall improvement and demonstrated the steepest recent increase (APC 8.46%). Younger patients concluded the study period at rates similar to those seen in 1999. Men demonstrated a greater incidence of stroke related mortality compared to women (118.67 vs 104.15 in 2023) with similar trends over time. Racial disparities were present with Black patients showing the highest stroke related mortality in all years (from 242.47 to 156.26) and the largest recent increase (APC 7.37%). Regionally, the South and rural areas carried the highest mortality burden; however, all geographic areas demonstrated an identical increase between 2018 and 2021. Conclusions: Although stroke-related mortality among gastric cancer patients has declined over two decades, recent nationwide increases highlight ongoing vulnerability and persistent disparities. Targeted integration of cardiovascular risk assessment and stroke prevention into gastric cancer care may help sustain progress and reduce inequities. Group (Category A / Category B) AAMR 1999 (A / B) AAMR 2023 (A / B) Recent Surge Trend 2018–2021 (APC) Overall 167.3 111.4 +6.6%* Sex (Male / Female) 181.5 / 156.2 118.7 / 104.2 +6.8%* / +6.2%* Race (NH White / NH Black) 160.4 / 242.5 108.2 / 158.4 +6.3%* / +7.4%* Race (Hispanic / Asian) 140.3 / 153.6 97.7 / 80.0 +6.9%* / +5.2%* Age (Young / Middle) 6.7 / 47.7 6.7 / 42.3 +7.8%* / +8.5%* Age (Old 65+) 756.4 479.6 +6.2%* Region (Northeast / Midwest) 141.5 / 172.0 82.7 / 115.3 +4.4%* / +6.7%* Region (South / West) 177.5 / 171.4 125.7 / 107.2 +6.9%* / +6.2%* An asterisk (*) indicates that the APC is statistically significant (p < 0.05).

e16021 Background: Esophageal cancer (EC) remains highly lethal in the United States, with approximately 22,370 new cases in 2024. Respiratory failure (RF) frequently complicates advanced disease, and deaths involving both conditions have risen substantially since 1999, necessitating population-based mortality analysis. This study aimed to characterize national mortality trends involving EC and RF, with a focus on demographic, geographic, and urban–rural disparities. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of U.S. deaths associated with EC (C15) and RF (J96) among adults aged ≥45 years using data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention WONDER database. Age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs) per 1 million were computed and stratified by year of death, sex, race, census region, and urbanization. Joinpoint regression estimated Average Annual Percent Changes (AAPC) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: Between 1999 and 2024, 32,348 deaths were attributed to EC and RF. National AAMRs increased during this period from 8.2 to 13.7 (AAPC: 2.18*; 95% CI: 1.70 to 2.67). Males bore a higher mortality burden than females (AAPC: 2.23*; 95% CI: 1.7 to 2.7). Mortality was elevated in both examined age groups (45-64 and 64-85+), with the most significant impact observed among individuals aged 65-85+ years (AAPC: 2.52*; 95% CI: 2.02 to 3.02). Race-stratified analysis revealed non-Hispanic (NH) White individuals demonstrated the most pronounced increase across the study period (AAPC: 2.72*; 95% CI: 2.19 to 3.25). Geographically, the Midwestern census region showed the steepest rise in mortality, with rural counties nationwide exhibiting a similar increase(In Table). Conclusions: Mortality due to EC and RF has increased insidiously over the past two decades, while the literature on the combined effects of diseases remains limited. The burden is disproportionately higher among males, adults aged ≥65 years, and NH White individuals, particularly in Midwestern and rural regions. These disparities highlight a growing public health burden and emphasize the need for targeted prevention, early detection, optimized respiratory and oncologic care, and region-specific policies to mitigate inequities. Variable AAMR 1999 AAMR 2024 AAPC (95% CI) Overall 8.2 13.7 2.18*(1.70-2.67) Gender:FemaleMale 3.714 5.123.8 1.73*(0.89-2.56)2.23*(1.71-2.75) Census region:NortheastMidwestSouthWest 8.277.510.8 15.513.412.214.9 2.43 *(2.05-2.82)3.22 *(2.38-4.07)1.91*(1.06-2.77)1.30 (-0.16-2.80) Age:45-64years65-85+years 415.5 5.727.7 1.37(-0.01-2.78)2.52*(2.02-3.02) Race:HispanicNH WhiteNH Black 5.27.712.8 9.514.411.2 2.54*(1.76-3.33)2.72*(2.19-3.25)-0.41(-1.33-0.52) Urbanization: (1999-2020)MetroNon-Metro 1999 8.56.9 2020 11.313.8 1.34*(0.83-1.85)3.47*(2.25-4.71) *Indicates p<0.05.

e16018 Background: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) exhibits marked heterogeneity in outcomes that is incompletely explained by stage or treatment timing. Although treatment delay is frequently cited as a modifiable risk factor, its prognostic significance in real-world practice remains unclear. We applied machine learning (ML) to model iCCA as a dynamic disease process and to evaluate whether longitudinal disease trajectories better explain outcomes than treatment timing alone. Methods: We conducted a population-based retrospective analysis of adults diagnosed with iCCA using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2000–2022). Time from diagnosis to first cancer-directed therapy was categorized as ≤30 days, 31–60 days, or > 60 days. Associations between treatment delay, disease characteristics, and overall survival (OS) were assessed using multivariable logistic and Cox regression models. To capture real-world disease evolution, each patient’s clinical course was encoded as an ordered longitudinal sequence of diagnosis, treatment states (surgery, chemotherapy, radiation), and outcome. Unsupervised ML was used to identify latent disease-course trajectories. A supervised ML model using variables available at diagnosis was developed to predict membership in high-risk trajectories. Results: The cohort included 18,312 patients with iCCA. Treatment initiation beyond 30 days occurred in more than half of patients and was more common in localized than advanced disease. In adjusted survival analyses, shorter time to treatment was paradoxically associated with worse OS, consistent with confounding by disease severity rather than a protective effect of delay. Unsupervised ML identified four distinct and reproducible disease trajectories with markedly different outcomes. Median OS ranged from approximately 2 months in early-failure trajectories to approximately 15 months in favorable multimodality trajectories. Trajectory membership was not fully explained by stage or treatment timing. A supervised ML model predicted high-risk trajectory membership with good discrimination (AUC 0.82). Key predictors included tumor grade, age, tumor burden, and incomplete staging, whereas treatment timing had minimal influence. Conclusions: In iCCA, treatment delay reflects underlying disease biology and care prioritization rather than independently determining survival. ML-based trajectory modeling reveals clinically meaningful disease courses that better explain outcome heterogeneity than treatment timing or stage alone and enables early identification of patients at highest risk for unfavorable real-world outcomes.

e14524 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibition has demonstrated meaningful clinical benefit in microsatellite instability–high (MSI-H) colorectal cancer (CRC); however, outcomes remain heterogeneous. The interaction between tumor immune microenvironment features, tumor mutational burden (TMB), and survival outcomes has not been fully characterized. We conducted an integrative analysis of publicly available genomic data to evaluate the prognostic impact of immune infiltration stratified by MSI status and TMB in CRC. Methods: Transcriptomic, somatic mutation, and clinical data for primary colorectal adenocarcinoma were obtained from TCGA-COAD and TCGA-READ. About 600 patients with overall survival data were analyzed. MSI status was taken from TCGA molecular subtype annotations. TMB was defined as the number of nonsynonymous somatic mutations per tumor and dichotomized at the median.Immune infiltration (CD8⁺ and CD4⁺ T cells, macrophages, neutrophils, dendritic cells) was estimated using TIMER. Patients were classified as high or low infiltration by the median. Overall survival was assessed using Kaplan–Meier analysis and Cox models adjusted for age, sex, and tumor stage., and tumor stage. Results: The cohort included approximately 15% MSI-H tumors, which demonstrated significantly higher TMB compared with microsatellite-stable (MSS) tumors. MSI-H tumors exhibited an inflamed immune phenotype, with approximately twofold higher CD8⁺ T-cell infiltration relative to MSS tumors. Across the overall cohort, high CD8⁺ T-cell infiltration was associated with improved OS compared with low infiltration (median OS not reached vs approximately 60–70 months). In contrast, increased macrophage infiltration was associated with inferior survival outcomes. When stratified by genomic features, the favorable prognostic association of CD8⁺ T-cell infiltration was most pronounced in MSI-H and TMB-high tumors, corresponding to an estimated 30–40% relative reduction in mortality risk compared with MSI-H/TMB-high tumors with low immune infiltration. Immune infiltration demonstrated weaker and less consistent associations with OS in MSS/TMB-low tumors. In multivariable analyses, CD8⁺ T-cell infiltration remained independently associated with improved OS after adjustment for clinical covariates, whereas macrophage infiltration remained independently associated with worse outcomes. Findings were consistent across colon and rectal cancer subgroups. Conclusions: In this integrative analysis of TCGA colorectal cancer datasets, features of the tumor immune microenvironment, together with MSI status and TMB, were associated with survival. These results support immune-genomic stratification and suggest that combining immune and molecular biomarkers may improve prognostic assessment and immunotherapy trial design in colorectal cancer.

e14111 Background: Primary CNSL (PCNSL) is a rare, aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma limited to the CNS, while secondary CNSL (SCNSL) represents CNS involvement from systemic lymphoma. Previous observations focused on CNSL have limited data clinically comparing PSNSL and SCNSL. We aimed to evaluate overall survival and associated factors in patients with PCNSL vs SCNSL using a large population database. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the SEER-22 database to identify patients diagnosed with CNSL between 2020-2022. Group comparisons used t-tests or ANOVA for continuous variables, chi-square tests for categorical variables, and Kaplan–Meier survival analysis, with all analyses performed in RStudio 4.1.1 and significance deemed as p<0.05. Results: 14,964 patients with CNS lymphoma were identified, with 84.6% PCNSL and 15.4% SCNSL cases. The overall median age was 65 years (IQR 20), with 52% male, 66% White patients, residing in urban areas (90%) and median household income of $50,000–$75,000 (52%). Compared with PCNSL, patients with SCNSL were significantly older (72 vs 64 years, p<0.0001). SCNSL more frequently involved the cerebrum (39% vs 34%) and cerebellum (5.5% vs 4.5%), but less commonly affected the nerves (12.0% vs 12.5%) and spinal cord (4.2% vs 5.1%) (p<0.05). Disease was predominantly unilateral (95.8%) in both groups. Chemotherapy (55% vs 56%) and radiotherapy (19% vs 18%) utilization did not differ significantly, with external beam radiation comprising 94.3% of radiated cases. PCNSL patients were more likely to undergo surgical intervention than SCNSL patients (31.8% vs 28.7%; p=0.0027). Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma was the most common histologic subtype in both PCNSL (70.1%) and SCNSL (74.3%). Median overall survival was shorter in SCNSL (1.64 years) than PCNSL (1.99 years). Survival improved significantly across diagnostic eras (2000–2005 to 2016–2020; log-rank p<0.001), while lower income (<$50,000) and rural residence were associated with inferior outcomes (p=0.028 and p=0.033). Conclusions: Survival in CNS lymphoma remains poor, with SCNSL associated with worse outcomes compared with PCNSL. Greater understanding of treatment variation and disease differences is needed to optimize therapy and improve patient outcomes. Characteristic PCNSL SCNSL Total p-Value N 12667 2297 14964 Population Distribution 0.033 Urban 11426 2038 13464 Rural 1241 259 1500 Surgery 0.0027 Yes 3630 730 4360 No 9037 1567 10604 Months from Diagnosis to Rx(Mean, SD) 0.31 (0.86) 0.27 (0.65) 0.30 (0.83) 0.0077 Death Status <0.0001 Dead 8603 1772 10375 Alive 4064 525 4589 Overall Survival (in years, Mean, SD) 1.99 (2.85) 1.64 (2.31) 1.93 (2.77) <0.0001

e13677 Background: The development of AI led to the emergence of tools such as AIS, which have been increasingly adopted in medicine. However, formal evaluation of barriers and clinical care gaps in HemOnc is limited, particularly regarding treatment plan complexities and toxicity documentation. Methods: Structured investigator-developed surveys about AIS availability, adoption, benefits, and challenges were developed on Qualtrics and approved by the IRB. HemOnc faculty physicians (FP), advanced practice providers (APP), and trainees (HOT) were surveyed between 11/14/25-1/16/26. Surveys were distributed in the USA via email, social media (on X), and ASCO myConnection. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis. Results: 132 participants responded to the survey: 55 FP (42%), 14 APP (11%), and 63 HOT (48%). 80% of them reported having AIS at their institutions, and 54% of those reported using these tools in their clinical practice. Among FP and APP, 72% practiced in academic settings, 14% in community, and 13% in hybrid centers. Among those not using AIS, identified barriers were issues with note formatting (56%), lack of training (25%), and concerns that the note content is incorrect or inadequate (25%). 60% are willing to use AIS if note formatting matched their preference, and 42% would try it if contents better reflected the patient encounter. Table 1 details the proportion of encounters using AIS, the portion of documentation it was used for, and the perceived challenges with these tools. Among AIS users, the average satisfaction score was 5.3 on a 7 point scale, corresponding to participants being somewhat satisfied. Participants agreed slightly that AIS had reduced their feeling of work-related burnout, with an average score of 3.6 on a 5 point scale. Overall, participants felt neutral about how well-suited AIS are for HemOnc, with an average score of 4.0 on a 7 point scale. Conclusions: Despite AIS being widely available, 46% of the surveyed HemOnc workforce do not use them in clinical practice. Those who do reported decreased time spent on documentation outside work hours and a slight reduction in the feeling of burnout. Formatting issues and record integration remain barriers, with substantial concerns about AIS not adequately describing HemOnc treatment plans. To bridge the last mile of integration into HemOnc, partnership between AIS developers and the clinical workforce is essential to meet clinical needs, while prioritizing patient safety and data privacy. FP + APP % HOT % Patient encounters where AIS is used 62 44 Used AIS for the subjective portion of note 68 96 Used AIS for the assessment/plan portions of note 40 25 AIS decreased the time on clinical documentation outside work hours 96 93 AIS note formatting needs improvement 68 57 Issues integrating AIS and outside records 46 71 AIS note contents about the plan are suboptimal 32 61

Background/Objectives: Juxtapleural and perifissural nodules are commonly encountered on thoracic imaging, are typically presumed benign, and are often considered to represent intrapulmonary lymph nodes. We evaluated the prevalence, clinical context, and management of juxtapleural nodules over a 10-year period and to assess factors associated with concern for malignancy. Methods: In this retrospective, single-center study, radiology reports from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2024, were queried using natural language processing to identify examinations containing terminology consistent with juxtapleural nodules. After exclusion of duplicate encounters, 85,435 unique patient encounters were analyzed. Reports were further filtered to identify cases with imaging concern for malignancy and recommendations for follow-up or intervention (N = 659). Clinical characteristics, imaging modality, and prior malignancy history were compared using appropriate statistical tests. Results: Among 85,435 unique encounters, 659 patients (<1%) had juxtapleural nodules considered concerning for malignancy. These patients were older (68 vs. 64 years, p < 0.001), more frequently imaged with PET/CT (8% vs. 5%, p < 0.001), and more likely to be evaluated in inpatient settings (16% vs. 12%, p < 0.001). Of the cohort with a juxtapleural nodule considered concerning for malignancy by imaging criteria, 360 patients (55%) had a prior history of malignancy. In these patients, nodules were more commonly identified in outpatient settings (70% vs. 43%, p < 0.001) and on routine imaging (94% vs. 86%, p < 0.001). Representative cases demonstrated that malignant nodules may mimic benign perifissural morphology on initial imaging. Conclusions: Although the vast majority of reported juxtapleural nodules did not prompt malignancy-directed evaluation, a small subset of cases (approximately 0.8%), particularly in patients with prior malignancy, were interpreted as sufficiently concerning to warrant follow-up imaging or intervention. Because pathologic confirmation and standardized long-term outcome adjudication were not available for all patients, these findings should be interpreted as reflecting real-world radiologist concern and management patterns rather than a definitive malignancy rate.

Abstract Aims To characterize global variation in cardiac rehabilitation (CR) staffing, indications, and prescribed dose by country income classification and compare findings with the International Council of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation’s 2016 Global Audit. Methods and results Cross-sectional REDCap survey of Phase II/post-discharge CR programmes (May–September 2025). Outcomes were multidisciplinary team size/composition, accepted cardiac and non-cardiac indications, and centre-based CR dose. Comparisons were made across World Bank country income classifications and Audit decade (2016 vs. 2025). Of 7025 programmes identified globally, 1505 (median programme response rate = 62%/country) initiated a survey, from 90/113 (80%) countries with CR. CR was delivered by a multidisciplinary team of 7 (median; P25–P75 = 5–8; nurses, physiotherapists, cardiologists, and dietitians most common); teams were smaller in low-income countries (median = 4; P &lt; 0.001), and physician specialty varied. Non-low-income programmes consistently accepted (≥90%) patients with acute coronary syndrome, with programmes in low-income countries less often accepting related interventions (e.g. surgery: low-income 0% vs. high-income 97%; P &lt; 0.01), but non-cardiac indications were more frequently accepted (e.g. primary prevention, diabetes, and lung disease). Acceptance of heart failure increased compared with the previous Audit (70% vs. 87%; P &lt; 0.001). Centre-based programmes prescribed a median of 20 h (P25–P75 = 12–30), typically two sessions/week over 8 weeks. Globally, 65 (72%) countries prescribed a median ≥12 sessions/programme. Programmes in upper-middle-income countries prescribed more sessions (median = 24, P25–P75 = 12–36; P &lt; 0.001). Dose did not differ meaningfully between Audits (P = 0.07). Conclusion CR programmes globally are offered by small, but multidisciplinary teams. They accept guideline-indicated patients, with applicable variation by context. Insufficient dose in one-quarter of countries underscores investment need.

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are increasingly conceptualized as multisystem neurodevelopmental conditions involving behavioral, gastrointestinal, immune, and metabolic alterations. The microbiota–gut–brain axis (MGBA) has been proposed as a key framework linking these systems, although evidence from human studies remains heterogeneous and inconclusive. We conducted a structured narrative review of pediatric human studies investigating the microbiota-gut-brain axis (MGBA) in ASD and ADHD, excluding preclinical and animal studies. PRISMA 2020 principles were used as a transparency framework to support reporting of study identification, screening, and eligibility. Observational, cohort, and interventional studies were synthesized with particular attention to study design, methodology, associations with standardized clinical scales, dietary factors, and therapeutic implications. Across ASD ( n = 90), most studies were observational, predominantly cross-sectional or case-control in designs, reporting consistent associations between ASD symptom severity and gastrointestinal symptoms, intestinal permeability, immune activation, and dietary selectivity. Evidence in ADHD ( n = 21) was substantially more limited and largely observational. Diet emerged as a major modulating and confounding factor in microbiota–behavior associations. Interventional studies involving probiotics, microbiota transfer therapy, and other gut-directed approaches showed more consistent improved gastrointestinal outcomes but showed modest and heterogeneous effects on core ASD symptoms, often limited to subgroups with prominent gastrointestinal comorbidities. To strengthen interpretation of interventional findings, randomized trial reports and non-randomized interventional studies were appraised according to study design, whereas the predominantly heterogeneous observational literature was interpreted narratively. Overall, this review suggests that MGBA alterations may be better conceptualized as modifiers of symptom expression, particularly in ASD and with only emerging relevance in ADHD, rather than as disorder-specific causal mechanisms. This interpretation underscores the need for stratified, longitudinal, and clinically informed research frameworks, in line with the focus of the present research topic.

9524 Background: Unresectable melanoma in-transit metastases (ITM) can pose a significant clinical challenge. Our recently published data comparing first-line treatments for ITM, isolated limb infusion or perfusion (ILI/ILP), immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and intralesional talimogene laherparepvec (TVEC), found superior outcomes with TVEC. However, TVEC was used more often in patients with lower disease burden and earlier stage (IIIB vs. IIIC/D). Therefore, we sought to better investigate these differences with a propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis. Methods: A multi-institutional, international IRB- approved retrospective analysis was conducted for unresectable melanoma ITM from 2016-2022. PSM analysis comparing first-line ILI/ILP, ICI, and TVEC for was performed. Patients were matched for stage, number of ITM, anatomical site, CLND status, gender and age. Kaplan-Meier curves (OS, PFS, DMFS) and Cumulative incidence function (MSS) were used to visualize time-to-event outcomes in the PSM cohort, though both methods do not account for the matched structure. Results: 274 patients were identified, 120 female/154 male; 96 treated with ILI/ILP, 111 with ICI, and 67 with TVEC. Median follow-up was 40 months (range, 1-80). PSM was performed and identified 36 TVEC–ICI pairs and 27 TVEC–ILI pairs. These were combined resulting in a final cohort of 108 observations (45 TVEC, 36 ICI and 27 ILI). The groups were well balanced. No statistical difference was found for metastasis-free survival (DMFS), progression-free survival (PFS), melanoma-specific survival (MSS), and overall survival (OS) between treatment modalities. TVEC was associated with significant improvement in local PFS (median was 2.2 years (y) for ILI/ILP, 1.5y for ICI and not reached for TVEC, p=0.048). While not statistically significant, a clinical benefit was seen in PFS being longer for TVEC (2.1y for TVEC vs. 1.2y for ILI/ILP and 1.1y for ICI; p=0.2) and OS (not reached vs 2.9y for ILI/ILP and 5.2y for ICI; p=0.2). On mixed effect Cox regression proportional hazard model using the matched data set, there were no significant differences in any of the survival and recurrence outcomes. Conclusions: When patients are propensity-matched, there were no significant differences in first-line treatment modalities for unresectable melanoma ITM. Treatment with TVEC did result in clinically meaningful improved overall and local PFS and OS. This supports that selection of ITM therapy should incorporate an individualized approach, incorporating disease distribution, stage, burden, treatment side effects and patient priorities.