Citations

e13054 Background: Combination therapy with cyclin dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i: palbociclib, ribociclib and abemaciclib) and endocrine therapy (ET) has markedly improved treatment of hormone receptor positive (HR+), HER2-negative (-) advanced or metastatic breast cancer (MBC) worldwide.However, data is limited on why patients may discontinue CDK4/6i based therapy and how healthcare providers (HCPs) see their role in educating patients (Px) about side effects and supporting compliance. Objective: This study identifies reasons for suboptimal compliance and early discontinuation of CDK4/6i in US HR+ HER2- MBC Px, with a focus on HCPs and Px educational needs related to on-treatment monitoring, side effects and symptom management. Methods: A sequential mixed-methods design was used; 45-minute phone interviews (n=25) informed the development of an online survey (n=193). Both phases included HCPs comprising medical oncologists (ONCs), oncology registered nurses (RNs), nurse practitioners, and physician assistants (NPs/PAs) in community-based settings. Results: Identified areas of improvement for HCPs included: suboptimal competencies were identified: educating Px adequately regarding potential side effects and engaging them to monitor, report, and address them. Among HCPs surveyed, 26%-48% reported suboptimal knowledge of side effects of specific CDK4/6i [Table]. Interviewees noted that educating Px and setting expectations on potential side effects was critical, but 52% of ONCs reported suboptimal skill doing so. A majority of HCPs (68%-91%) expect Px to be able to report all side effects, with half of ONCs considering compliance with medication entirely Pxs’ responsibility, compared with NPs/PAs and RNs at 16-17%. Conclusions: This study identified areas where HCPs can improve their ability to counsel Px and address concerns that may influence a Px’s decision to prematurely discontinue therapy and should be used to inform future professional development initiatives. [Table: see text]

Oral anticoagulants (OACs) are medications commonly used in patients with atrial fibrillation and other cardiovascular conditions. Both warfarin and direct oral anticoagulants are susceptible to drug-drug interactions (DDIs). DDIs are an important cause of adverse drug reactions and exact a large toll on the health care system. DDI for warfarin mainly involve moderate to strong inhibitors/inducers of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C9, which is responsible for the elimination of the more potent S-isomer of warfarin. However, inhibitor/inducers of CYP3A4 and CYP1A2 may also cause DDI with warfarin. Recognition of these precipitating agents along with increased frequency of monitoring when these agents are initiated or discontinued will minimize the impact of warfarin DDI. Direct oral anticoagulants are mainly affected by medications strongly affecting the permeability glycoprotein (P-gp), and to a lesser extent, strong CYP3A4 inhibitors/inducers. Dabigatran and edoxaban are affected by P-gp modulation. Strong inducers of CYP3A4 or P-gp should be avoided in all patients taking direct oral anticoagulant unless previously proven to be otherwise safe. Simultaneous strong CYP3A4 and P-gp inhibitors should be avoided in patients taking apixaban and rivaroxaban. Concomitant antiplatelet/anticoagulant use confers additive risk for bleeding, but their combination is unavoidable in many cases. Minimizing duration of concomitant anticoagulant/antiplatelet therapy as indicated by evidence-based clinical guidelines is the best way to reduce the risk of bleeding.

The role of adjuvant therapy in renal cell carcinoma and urothelial carcinoma is rapidly evolving. To date, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has approved sunitinib and pembrolizumab in the adjuvant setting for renal cell carcinoma and nivolumab for urothelial carcinoma based on disease-free survival benefit. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration held a joint workshop with the National Cancer Institute and the Society of Urologic Oncology in 2017 to harmonize design elements, including eligibility and radiologic assessments across adjuvant trials in renal cell carcinoma and urothelial carcinoma. Considerations from the discussion at these workshops led the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to draft guidances to help inform subsequent adjuvant trial design for renal cell carcinoma and urothelial carcinoma. Patient-centered decision-making is crucial when determining therapeutic choices in the adjuvant setting; utility functions can be used to help quantify each patient’s goals, values, and risk/benefit trade-offs to ensure that the decision regarding adjuvant therapy is informed by their preferences and the evolving outcomes data.

The NCCN Guidelines for Hematopoietic Growth Factors provide recommendations for the appropriate use of growth factors in the clinical management of febrile neutropenia (FN), chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (CIT), and chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA). Management and prevention of these sequelae are an integral part of supportive care for many patients undergoing cancer treatment. The purpose of these guidelines is to operationalize the evaluation, prevention, and treatment of FN, CIT, and CIA in adult patients with nonmyeloid malignancies and to enable the patient and clinician to assess management options for FN, CIT, and CIA in the context of an individual patient’s condition. These NCCN Guidelines Insights provide a summary of the important recent updates to the NCCN Guidelines for Hematopoietic Growth Factors, with particular emphasis on the incorporation of a newly developed section on CIT.

Introduction: Atrial arrhythmias are common in patients with D-TGA and atrial switch. We sought to analyze the arrhythmia substrate and catheter ablation approaches and outcomes. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of all clinical and procedural data in patients with D-TGA followed at a large tertiary care center. Results: In a cohort of 152 patients (mean age 30±11 years), atrial tachycardia was present in 69(45%) patients. Ablations were performed in 39(26%) patients: macro-reentrant atrial flutter (N=37), atrial fibrillation (N=4), and focal automatic atrial tachycardia (N=3). Detailed electrophysiology study data was available for 34 patients. At first ablation (N=28), cavo-tricuspid isthmus dependent flutter (CTI, 23(82%)) was most common, followed by right atriotomy-related flutter (IART, 16(57%)) and focal atrial tachycardia (FAT, 1(3.5%)). Bidirectional CTI block often required ablation on both sides of the baffle to complete the isthmus line. Access to the pulmonary venous atrium was obtained in 82% of first-time ablations (via retrograde aortic access, 74%, baffle puncture, 6%, or baffle fenestration, 12%) and in 100% of redo procedures. The first ablation was acutely successful in 25 (89%) patients; the other 3 patients had either partial procedural success (1), failed ablation (1), or underwent an empirical ablation (1). Long-term arrhythmia recurrence occurred in 13(46%) after the first ablation and class III antiarrhythmic medications were utilized in 12 patients. At least one long-term recurrence occurred in 11(44%) patients. Importantly, clinical arrhythmia burden was significantly reduced post-ablation, with rare and short-limited episodes amenable to antiarrhythmic drugs or cardioversion. Repeat ablation was required in 3 cases. Long-term arrhythmia recurrence after a previously completed CTI line involved different arrhythmia mechanisms: scar-related reentry (80%) and automatic atrial tachycardia (40%). Conclusions: Atrial arrhythmia in patients with D-TGA often involves the CTI and atriotomy scars. Ablation of the CTI typically requires access to the pulmonary venous atrium to achieve bidirectional block. Despite late recurrence, the clinical arrhythmic burden is substantially improved.

The evidence base supporting the management of patients with acute stroke is evolving at a rapid rate, as new methods that aim to reduce disability and death from stroke are explored. Intravenous tissue plasminogen activator remains the only treatment shown in numerous studies to reduce disability 3 months after stroke with no increase in the risk of death and a relatively minor rate of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage complications. Despite these findings, health care providers have been slow to adopt this evidence-based treatment, which results in many patients experiencing disability caused by stroke. Numerous controversies exist related to the management of patients with acute stroke, including the use of tissue plasminogen activator, positioning and early mobility, blood pressure lowering in acute intracerebral hemorrhage, and even the use of innovative advanced practice nurse–led stroke treatment teams, with varying amounts of evidence available to provide direction. This article explores controversies associated with both approved and evolving treatments for ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke and makes recommendations for practice on the basis of the body of existing evidence, with an aim to improve the delivery of acute stroke treatment.

AbstractDrug‐resistant epilepsy (DRE) is characterized by recurrent seizures despite appropriate treatment with antiseizure medication (ASM). Due to their regenerative and immunomodulatory potential, therapies with biologics such as mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) offer a potential therapeutic benefit for structural causes of epilepsy, such as hippocampal sclerosis. In this article, we report a systematic review of the literature evaluating the preclinical and clinical studies of MSCs for DRE. Medline, Ovid EMBASE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Databases were searched electronically from their dates of inception to November 2021 using the following keywords: ((“mesenchymal”) AND (“stem cell”)) AND ((“epilepsy”) OR (“convulsion”) OR (“seizures”)). This review followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The initial query identified 488 studies representing 323 unique manuscripts. After application of selection criteria, 15 studies were included in this systematic review; 11 were preclinical studies and 4 were clinical studies. All preclinical studies were performed in rodents and all clinical studies were phase 1 trials. Thus far, therapy with MSCs appears to be safe for use in humans, as no severe adverse events related directly to the therapy were reported. Furthermore, MSC therapy appears to provide a statistically significant clinical benefit by reducing the seizure burden of patients, reducing the electrophysiological biomarkers of epilepsy, and improving their comorbidities, such as depression and anxiety. In addition, animal studies reveal that the therapy exerts its effect by reducing aberrant mossy fiber sprouting (reduce excitatory pathways) and increasing γ‐aminobutyric acid (GABA)ergic interneurons (increase inhibitory pathways). Both preclinical and clinical studies have shown MSC therapy to be safe and preliminary effective, thus warranting further studies to investigate its therapeutic potential.

Oncolytic viruses (OVs) encoding a variety of transgenes have been evaluated as therapeutic tools to increase the efficacy of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)–modified T cells in the solid tumor microenvironment (TME). Here, using systemically delivered OVs and CAR T cells in immunocompetent mouse models, we have defined a mechanism by which OVs can potentiate CAR T cell efficacy against solid tumor models of melanoma and glioma. We show that stimulation of the native T cell receptor (TCR) with viral or virally encoded epitopes gives rise to enhanced proliferation, CAR-directed antitumor function, and distinct memory phenotypes. In vivo expansion of dual-specific (DS) CAR T cells was leveraged by in vitro preloading with oncolytic vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) or reovirus, allowing for a further in vivo expansion and reactivation of T cells by homologous boosting. This treatment led to prolonged survival of mice with subcutaneous melanoma and intracranial glioma tumors. Human CD19 CAR T cells could also be expanded in vitro with TCR reactivity against viral or virally encoded antigens and was associated with greater CAR-directed cytokine production. Our data highlight the utility of combining OV and CAR T cell therapy and show that stimulation of the native TCR can be exploited to enhance CAR T cell activity and efficacy in mice.

Background: Racial and ethnic disparities in stroke care are known to contribute to inequality in stroke outcomes. The goal of the FL-PR CReSD Study is to assess and evaluate Get With The Guidelines-Stroke (GWTG-S) quality improvement data collected among Florida and Puerto Rico hospitals to evaluate for race-ethnic, sex, and regional disparities in stroke performance metrics. We sought to analyze the temporal trends in stroke performance metrics among the 9 hospitals located in Puerto Rico from 2010 to 2013. Methods: Age-adjusted temporal trends were evaluated in the following GWTG-S pre-defined performance measures (IV tPA treatment within 3 hours among eligible patients arriving in 2 hours, in-hospital antithrombotic therapy, DVT prophylaxis, antithrombotic therapy at discharge, anticoagulation therapy, statin medication at discharge, and smoking cessation counseling) and defect-free care (compliance with all 7 performance measures). Results: The mean age of 3,094 registered stroke cases was 69.5 ± 14.0 years, 50% were men, and 2,184 (71%) were diagnosed as ischemic strokes. Defect-free care occurred in 60% of ischemic stroke patients. Lower performance metrics were found for IV tPA treatment (78%), DVT prophylaxis (64%), and statin medication at discharge (83%). An additional IV tPA measure of treatment by 4.5 hours when arriving by 3.5 hours was observed in 65% of patients. The performance metrics that significantly improved over time from 2010 to 2013 included: IV tPA treatment within 3 hours (64% to 87%, p=0.04), DVT prophylaxis (33% to 87%, p<0.0001), statin medication at discharge (78% to 87%, p=0.01), and defect-free care (37% to 79%, p<0.0001). Conclusions: In only four years, Puerto Rico hospitals participating in GWTG-S showed significant improvement across all pre-defined acute stroke performance measures. Wider implementation of quality improvement programs like GWTG-S among the 3.7 million inhabitants of Puerto Rico could further improve acute stroke care.

Introduction: Conduction disturbance after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) remains a common complication. Predictive tools to identify conduction disturbance requiring pacing are limited. Our main objective was to develop a deep learning model to predict the need for a permanent pacemaker. Hypothesis: An electrocardiogram (ECG) based deep learning algorithm can predict the need for permanent pacemaker post TAVR. Methods: We evaluated patients who had TAVR at Mayo Clinic between June 2010 and May 2021. Digital ECGs done on the TAVR date or within 24 hours post procedure were partitioned into training, validation, and testing datasets. We trained a deep learning algorithm on the training data and optimized hyperparameters against the validation data. All model performance metrics are based on the reserved test data that were estimated once model architecture was optimized. Need for permanent pacemaker, defined as pacemaker placement due to development of conduction disturbance post TAVR and at least 1% ventricular pacing on device interrogation done at least 2 weeks post pacemaker implantation, was the training target. Results: A total of 3021 patients were evaluated for inclusion and 2,407 cases were available for modeling (exclusions: prior pacemaker (n=419), unsuccessful TAVR (n=27) and no ECG within the pre-specified period (n=168)). Overall, the median age was 82 (Q1: 76, Q3: 86) and 41% were female. In the withheld test data, 15% had a permanent pacemaker with at least 1% ventricular pacing. The algorithm detected the need for pacemaker in the test set with an AUC of 0.83 (95% CI: 0.73 to 0.92). Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive were 80%, 72%, 81%, 41% and 94%, respectively. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the ability of a deep learning model based on ECG data to assist in making the decision to implant a pacemaker following TAVR with a high negative predictive value. Larger validation studies are warranted.