Abstract P5-23-02: Quality of life (QoL) in male breast cancer (BC): Prospective study of the EORTC10085/TBCRC029/BIG2-07/NABCG International male BC program
Abstract Introduction: Male BC is a rare disease (dx) for which management is extrapolated from trials in female BC. Comprehensive prospective data about QoL in men with BC could inform treatment. The international Male BC Consortium conducted a prospective registry of male BC patients of all stages who newly presented to a participating center between October 2013 and February 2017. A QoL substudy was conducted as part of this registry at most participating sites. Methods: Informed consent for participation in the QoL substudy was requested from new enrollees. Those who consented were asked to complete a survey including the EORTC QLQ-C30 and BR23 (breast cancer specific module), adapted by replacing female-specific items with male-specific sexual activity/function items from the prostate module (PR25). Outcomes were scored according to standard EORTC QLQ procedures on a 0-100 scale (with higher scores on QoL/functioning scales representing better QoL and functioning, and higher scores on symptom scales representing worse symptoms). Forms were analyzed centrally by EORTC. In order to compare to female BC, we used reference data from 2782 mixed age (62% under age 60) women with BC (of whom 1,147 had recurrent or metastatic dx, and 464 had stage 1-2 dx) reported in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Reference Values manual (2008). Results: A total of 557 men were enrolled in EORTC10085, 445 at sites participating in the QoL substudy. Consent forms were received from 422/445 (95%) for the substudy. Baseline survey (required to be completed within 30 days of enrollment) compliance was 85% (359/422). Median age at diagnosis was 67 years. There were 111 men (45%) with node-positive M0/MX dx and 27 men (8%) with M1 dx. Their median global health status score at baseline was 75 (IQR 67-83), higher than that documented historically in female BC (67, with IQR 50-83, in both the 2782 women with mixed stage and the subgroup of 464 with stage 1-2 tumors). The participating men's median social functioning score was 100 (IQR 67-100), also higher than the 83.3 (IQR 67-100) reported in mixed stage female BC patients, though no different than the 100 (IQR 67-100) found in women with stage 1-2 dx. Men's most commonly reported symptoms included fatigue (median score 13.9, IQR 0-33), insomnia (median score 0, IQR 0-33), and pain (median score 0, IQR 0-33), for which women's median scores were 33 (IQR 11-44), 33 (IQR 0-33), and 17 (IQR 0-50) with mixed stage dx, and 22 (IQR 0-33), 33 (IQR 0-33), and 17 (IQR 0-33) with stage 1-2 dx. Men's median sexual activity score was 33.3 (IQR 0-50), with less sexual activity reported by older patients and men with M1 dx. In those who were sexually active, median sexual function score was 83 (IQR 75-92), with no difference by age or stage. Conclusions: QoL and symptom burden in male BC patients appears no worse (and possibly better) than that in female patients. Future analyses of 1- and 5-year surveys from this study will assess the impact of specific treatments on changes in symptoms and QoL over time. These data will be useful in future efforts to tailor treatments and target interventions for male BC. Funding: Breast Cancer Research Foundation, Dutch Pink Ribbon Foundation, Swedish BRO, and EBCC Council. Citation Format: Schroder C, Cardoso F, Dijkstra N, van Leeuwen-Stok E, Linderholm B, Morgenstern D, Van Poznak C, Wolff AC, Poncet C, Gomez HL, Aalders K, Bjelic-Radisic V, Werutsky G, Tryfonidis K, Coens C, Giordano SH, Ruddy KJ. Quality of life (QoL) in male breast cancer (BC): Prospective study of the EORTC10085/TBCRC029/BIG2-07/NABCG International male BC program [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-23-02.
Abstract GS5-03: Risk of arm morbidity after local therapy in young breast cancer survivors
Abstract BACKGROUND: Arm morbidity, the most reported comorbidity following axillary surgery for breast cancer, is of particular importance in young patients given the longer survivorship period and detrimental effects of arm-morbidity on body image and social-, home- and personal care functions. We assessed the incidence of arm-morbidity stratified by local therapy strategies in young women enrolled in the Young Women's Breast Cancer Study (YWS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The YWS, a multicenter prospective cohort study, established to explore biological, medical and psychosocial issues in young breast cancer patients, enrolled 1302 women with stage 0-4 breast cancer ≤40 years of age from October 2006 to June 2016. For this analysis, we examined incidence of patient reported arm-swelling or decreased range of motion (ROM) 1-year after diagnosis using relevant items of the CARES-SF. Patients with stage 4 disease (n = 60), those for whom no information on arm-morbidity was available (n=198) and those with bilateral cancer with different local therapy strategies on each side (n=7), were excluded. We performed logistic regression analyses to identify risk factors for arm morbidity. RESULTS: Among 1037 patients (median age 37 years), 13% and 40% reported arm-swelling or decreased ROM, respectively, in the ipsilateral arm at 1-year. 52% (n=539) of patients underwent SLNB and 39% (n=407) ALND. The incidence of arm-swelling was 4% (11/280) in patients who underwent SLNB without RT, 8% (21/252) in patients who underwent SLNB with RT, 20% (13/66) in patients who underwent ALND without RT and 24% (84/337) in patients who received ALND with RT. The incidence of decreased ROM was 21% (59) in patients who underwent SLNB without RT, 34% (86) in patients who underwent SLNB with RT, 33% (22) in patients who underwent ALND without RT and 44% (148) in patients who received ALND with RT. Being overweight, uncomfortable financial status, T4 tumors, ALND and RT were independently associated with an increased risk of arm-swelling. Overweight, mastectomy and RT were independently associated with an increased risk of a decreased ROM Table 1). Results of the logistic regression analyses. Arm swelling at 1 year (n=137)Decreased ROM at 1 year (n=335) ORpORpBMI <18.50.70.620.70.4018.5-24.9ref ref 25-29.91.70.031.50.05≥301.10.791.10.70Financial comfort Comfortableref ref Uncomfortable0.60.020.90.67pT stage pT1ref ref pT21.20.621.50.13pT31.20.701.30.63pT44.40.032.20.29pN stage pN0ref ref pN11.10.851.70.08pN23.00.111.90.27pN33.20.112.70.16Surgery BCSref ref Mastectomy1.20.611.80.02Bilateral mastectomy1.10.841.60.06Axillary surgery SLNBref ref SLNB + ALND3<0.011.30.33ALND3.6<0.011.00.90RT Noref ref Yes1.80.052.4<0.01Note. In these analysis we also corrected for age, incidence year, employment status, stage of disease, reconstructive surgery, and chemotherapy treatment. . CONCLUSION: Patient reported outcomes reveal high rates of arm-swelling and decreased ROM 1 year after breast cancer diagnosis in a large prospective cohort of young breast cancer survivors. These findings suggest an opportunity for pre-operative education and early intervention for arm impairment in this population. Citation Format: Kuijer A, Dominici LS, Rosenberg SM, Hu J, Gelber S, Di Lascio S, Ruddy KJ, Wong J, Tamimi RM, Schapira L, Borges VF, Come SE, Sprunck-Harrild K, Partridge AH, King TA. Risk of arm morbidity after local therapy in young breast cancer survivors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS5-03.
Common Genetic Variation and Breast Cancer Risk—Past, Present, and Future
Purpose of review Due to medical advances and an aging population, the number of cancer survivors continues to rise. Survivors often experience late and long-term sequelae of cancer and its treatment (e.g., fatigue, pain, fear of recurrence, and stress). As a result, some patients have utilized or expressed interest in integrative medicine (IM) modalities for prevention of recurrence, optimizing health, enhancing quality of life, and managing symptoms. The purpose of this review is to focus on research published during the past year that informs our understanding of the utility of IM for cancer survivors. Recent findings Physical activity, diet, dietary supplements, mind–body modalities, acupuncture, and massage therapy all may play a role in the management of the physical (e.g., fatigue and pain) and emotional (e.g., anxiety and fear) issues faced by cancer survivors. Summary IM therapies are appealing to and utilized by many cancer survivors and may reduce symptom burden. Clinicians who provide cancer survivorship care may improve patient care by understanding the evidence for and against their use.
Partners of young breast cancer survivors: A cross-sectional evaluation of psychosocial issues and mental health.
184 Background: While evidence of the challenges of cancer caregiving has been growing, scant research addresses the experience of partners of young adults with cancer. These individuals and their relationships may be particularly vulnerable to stress, especially when managing the complexity of cancer care and survivorship with their partner. We sought to evaluate psychosocial concerns and mental health in the partners of young survivors of early stage breast cancer (BC). Methods: We invited partners of young women w/BC diagnosed at age ≤ 40 yrs enrolled in a prospective cohort study to participate in a one-time survey evaluating psychosocial concerns including quality of life, coping, social support, financial insecurity, partnership concerns, parenting concerns, anxiety and depression. Logistic regression was used to explore predictors of anxiety (score > 8 on Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)). Results: Most respondents (284/289) were male, with median age 43 yrs (range 27-65). The median time of survey completion was 62 months (range 16 -114) after their partner’s dx. Respondents were mostly white (93%), working full time (94%), and college educated (78%); 29% reported some financial stress, 74% were parenting children < 18 yrs, and 32% reported at least a fair amount of relationship concern. 42% (106/250) had anxiety (39/289 respondents (13%) had incomplete/missing HADS). In univariable analyses, lower education, working full time, parenting concerns, insufficient social support and maladaptive coping were associated (p < .05) with anxiety. In the multivariable model, only maladaptive coping remained significantly associated with anxiety (p < .01, OR = 2.32 (95% CI: 1.22, 4.39)). Conclusions: Partners of young BC survivors who used less constructive/more maladaptive coping strategies experience negative mental health outcomes after tx has ended. Caregivers’ anxiety may have implications for both their own and survivors’ health and QOL. Future interventions might focus on the development of constructive coping strategies to enhance adjustment and role effectiveness in dealing with the impact of cancer.
Abstract P2-09-07: Drugs don't work if people don't take them: Non-initiation of endocrine therapy in young women
Abstract Background: Despite the well-established survival benefit associated with adjuvant hormonal treatment, younger women with hormone receptor positive (HR+) breast cancer (BC) are less adherent to endocrine therapy (ET) as prescribed, compared to their older counterparts, and may have unique issues that contribute to ET non-adherence. In an effort to identify factors that can be targeted to improve ET uptake and adherence, we sought to evaluate ET initiation in young women with BC. Methods: As part of a multi-center, prospective cohort enrolling women with newly diagnosed BC at age ≤40 years between 2006-2016, we identified 657 women with HR+, Stage 0-III BC. Participants complete serial surveys that included questions about socio-demographics, fertility concerns, and treatment. Women who did not report taking tamoxifen or an aromatase inhibitor (AI) at least once in the 18 months after diagnosis (dx) were classified as non-initiators. Variables significant at p<0.20 in univariable models were entered into a multivariable logistic regression model to identify independent (p<0.05) predictors of non-initiation. Results: By 18 months post-dx, 15% (99/657) had not initiated ET; among women with Stage 0 BC, 77% (51/66) had not initiated vs 8% (48/591) with invasive BC (p<0.0001). Among initiators (N=558), 93% were on tamoxifen, with 7% reporting AI alone or in addition to tamoxifen; 97% started ET within 12 months of dx. Among women with invasive BC (Table), non-initiation was associated with having less than a college degree (OR: 2.49 95% CI: 1.25-4.94), non-Caucasian race (OR: 2.58 95% CI: 1.18-5.64) and non-receipt of radiation (OR: 0.40 95% CI: 0.21-0.75).Age at dx, marital status, having children, employment, perceived financial comfort, fertility concern, stage, surgery, and chemotherapy were not significantly associated with non-initiation. Conclusion: Most young women with HR+ DCIS do not take adjuvant ET despite the potential benefits (substantially reduced risk of local recurrence and contralateral BC) and very low risk of serious toxicity. Among young women with invasive HR+ BC, a significant minority fails to start ET within 18 months of dx. Adjuvant ET non-initiation may contribute in part to the racial and SES outcomes disparities that have been observed. Further study is needed to elucidate barriers to initiation with the goal of developing targeted interventions that will enhance ET initiation and adherence in general. Table. Predictors of ET non-initiation in women with invasive BC (N=577*) Univariable Multivariable Median (range)OR (95% CI)pOR (95% CI)ppAge at dx (years)36 (17-40)1.08 (0.99-1.18)0.07 N (%) Financial comfort300 (51)0.88 (0.49-1.60)0.68 Non-white59 (10)2.68 (1.25-5.71)0.012.58 (1.18-5.64)0.02Full employment282 (48)0.76 (0.42-1.39)0.38 Less than college graduate95 (16)2.61 (1.36-5.02)0.0042.49 (1.25-4.94)0.009Married/living as married452 (77)0.79 (0.41-1.55)0.50 Children pre-diagnosis369 (62)1.11 (0.60-2.05)0.75 Fertility concern234 (40)0.92 (0.50-1.70)0.80 Stage (ref=3) 1244 (41)1.22 (0.47-3.15)0.68 2259 (44)1.27 (0.50-3.24)0.62 Mastectomy vs lumpectomy335 (57)1.16 (0.64-2.12)0.63 Radiation therapy331 (56)0.40 (0.21-0.73)0.0030.40 (0.21-0.75)0.004Chemotherapy411 (70)0.66 (0.36-1.22)0.18 *multivariable analytic cohort Citation Format: Rosenberg SM, Gelber S, Ruddy KJ, Tamimi RM, Schapira L, Borges VF, Come S, Meyer ME, Partridge AH. Drugs don't work if people don't take them: Non-initiation of endocrine therapy in young women [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-09-07.
Pilot study of minocycline for the prevention of paclitaxel-associated neuropathy: ACCRU RU221408I.
220 Background: Paclitaxel is associated with both an acute pain syndrome (P-APS) and chronic chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN). Preliminary animal data suggest that minocycline may be effective for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced neurotoxicity. The purpose of this pilot study was to investigate the efficacy of minocycline for the prevention of CIPN and P-APS. Methods: Patients with breast cancer were enrolled prior to initiating neoadjuvant or adjuvant weekly paclitaxel for 12 weeks. They were randomized to receive minocycline 200mg on day 1 followed by 100mg twice daily or a placebo, with the same dosing schedule. Patients completed (1) an acute pain syndrome questionnaire daily during chemotherapy, and (2) the EORTC QLQ-CIPN20 questionnaire at baseline, prior to each dose of paclitaxel, and monthly for 6 months post treatment. The primary goal was to obtain pilot data regarding the possible effect of minocycline on the prevention of paclitaxel-induced CIPN and P-APS, to determine if conducting a larger phase III placebo-controlled trial was indicated. Scores obtained from patient questionnaires were converted to a 0-100 scale, where higher scores = better quality of life. Results: Forty-seven patients were randomized, 45 of which were evaluable, with a mean age of 55. There were no remarkable differences noted between the two groups for the overall sensory score of the EORTC-CIPN 20 or its individual sub-questions, which evaluated tingling, numbness, or shooting burning pain in hands and feet. However, there was a significant difference in the daily average AUC pain score attributed to P-APS, favoring minocycline (median 96.0 vs 84.3; p = 0.02). Correspondingly, patients receiving minocycline used less opioid pain medications for control of P-APS (0% vs 23%, P = 0.05). Not only were no increased toxicities reported with minocycline, but there was an apparent improvement in fatigue (median AUC 76.7 vs 59.0; P = 0.02). Conclusions: Based on the results of this pilot study, minocycline did not appear to be beneficial for the prevention of CIPN, but did look promising for reducing P-APS. Further study of this effect may be warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT02297412.
Olanzapine for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC): Alliance A221301, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
176 Background: The purpose of the study was to determine the effectiveness of olanzapine (OLN) for the prevention of nausea and vomiting in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC). Methods: A randomized, double-blind, phase III trial was performed in chemotherapy-naïve patients receiving cisplatin, > 70 mg/m2, or cyclophosphamide-anthracycline-based chemotherapy, comparing OLN to placebo in combination with aprepitant (APR), a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist (5-HT3), and dexamethasone (DEX). The OLN regimen was 10 mg of oral OLN, 125 mg APR, a 5-HT3, and oral DEX 12 mg pre-chemotherapy, day 1, and 10 mg/day of oral OLN and 8 mg DEX on days 2-4 post-chemotherapy plus 80 mg APR on days 2, 3 post-chemotherapy. The placebo (PLA) regimen was oral placebo, pre-chemotherapy, day 1, and on days 2-4 post-chemotherapy; the APR, 5-HT3, and DEX pre- and post-chemotherapy were identical to that used in the OLN regimen. Fosaprepitant (150 mg IV), day 1 was allowed for substitution for the oral aprepitant. Palonosetron, ondansetron, or granisetron were the permitted 5-HT3 options. Nausea was measured on a 0-10 visual analogue scale, with 0 being “no nausea at all” and 10 being “nausea as bad as it can be”. No nausea was the primary endpoint and, complete response (no emesis and no use of rescue medications) was a secondary endpoint. Results: 401 patients (202 OLN, 199 PLA) were enrolled in the study. The proportion of patients who had no nausea was significantly greater for the OLN regimen compared to the PLA regimen for the acute period (24h post-chemotherapy) (74% vs. 45%, p < 0.0006), for the delayed period ( 24-120 h post-chemotherapy) (43% vs. 26%, p < 0.0006), and for the overall period (0-120 h) (39% vs. 22%, p < 0.0006). Complete response was significantly improved for the OLN patients compared to PLA patients for the acute (85% vs. 65%, p < 0.0001), the delayed (67% vs. 53%, p < 0.0078), and the overall periods (64% vs. 41%, p < 0.0001). There were no grade 3 or 4 toxicities. Conclusions: No nausea, the primary endpoint, and complete response, a secondary endpoint, were significantly improved with OLN, compared to PLA. Clinical trial information: NCT02116530.