Citations

AbstractBackgroundThe rapid development of blood‐based biomarkers (BBMs) has improved Alzheimer’s disease (AD) diagnostics with some tests now potentially suitable for clinical use. This aligns with the clinical availability of anti‐Aβ immunotherapies for early symptomatic AD, where BBMs can help address the increasing need for more rapid and early diagnosis. Clinical practice guidelines (CPG) can help guide healthcare professionals in incorporating BBMs into their clinical practice. The Alzheimer’s Association is collaborating with methodologists and a panel of 11 clinical and subject‐matter experts to develop a CPG for specialists, informed by a systematic review, on the use of BBMs for AD.MethodThe panel drafted several clinical questions prioritizing two questions on the use of BBMs in cognitively impaired or cognitively unimpaired individuals as the populations of immediate interest. Plasma p‐tau and Aβ biomarkers tests are index tests, and amyloid PET imaging, neuropathology, and CSF are reference standards. Experts in the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations) approach are conducting a systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of BBMs index tests by searching three databases (Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library) and will include assessments of the quality of collected evidence to inform the panel’s decision‐making process. Patients/caregivers and key external organizations will be engaged throughout.ResultThis session will cover preliminary evidence for answering the two clinical questions. At the time of abstract submission, the search strategy resulted in 880 titles/abstracts for the study selection process. Data abstraction, analysis, and evidence development are pending. Recommendations for answering clinical questions will be developed after July 2024, and all recommendations will be finalized and published by early 2025.ConclusionThe integration of BBMs into clinical care offers the potential to improve earlier and more accurate AD diagnosis for a broader patient population and expand access to new AD therapies. The development of evidence‐based CPGs is a critical step forward in optimizing and standardizing the clinical use of BBMs. As the field of AD diagnostics and treatment continues to evolve, this CPG on the use of BBMs for AD will expand and be regularly updated to include new target audiences/settings, patient populations, and associated evidence.

AbstractBackgroundTraumatic encephalopathy syndrome (TES) is the proposed clinical syndrome of the neurodegenerative disease chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE). As part of the 2021 TES NINDS consensus diagnostic criteria, certainty levels of underlying CTE neuropathology can be determined (i.e., suggestive, possible, probable) partially based on the presence/absence of supportive psychiatric features including but not limited to depression, anxiety, and apathy. These are ‘supportive’ because of their non‐specificity and unclear biological correlates in this setting. We examined the association between CSF biomarkers of amyloid, tau, neurodegeneration, microglial activation and neuroinflammation and supportive psychiatric features of TES in former American football players.MethodThe sample included 180 male former football players (120 professional, 60 college) from the DIAGNOSE CTE Research Project. Participants completed a lumbar puncture, and CSF assays were conducted for biomarkers of amyloid (Aβ40, Aβ42), p‐tau (p‐tau181, p‐tau231, p‐tau217), neurodegeneration (total tau), axonal degeneration (NfL), microglial activation (strem2) and neuroinflammation (GFAP, IL‐6). Biomarkers were log‐transformed. The Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES), Beck Depression Inventory‐II (BDI‐II) and the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) self‐report questionnaires were completed by participants. Multivariable regression models tested the association between each CSF biomarker and each scale, controlling for age, race, body mass index, revised Framingham stroke risk profile and Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test. P‐values were adjusted for multiple comparisons using false discovery rate methods.Result140 participants had successful LPs and available CSF for assays. 33(22%) reported moderate/severe anxiety, 34(22%) reported moderate/severe depression, and 51(33%) had an elevated AES score. Higher CSF concentrations of IL‐6 were associated with higher scores on the BAI (unstandardized‐β=0.016, 95%CI [0.017, 0.026], padj=0.004), BDI‐II (unstandardized‐β=0.013, 95%CI [0.004, 0.021], padj=0.008) and AES (unstandardized‐β=0.014, 95%CI [0.006,0.022], padj=0.002). There were no significant relationships between other biomarkers with the BDI‐II, BAI or AES.ConclusionIn this sample of former American football players, there were significant associations between IL‐6 (a proinflammatory cytokine) and reported symptoms of depression, anxiety, and apathy. CSF biomarkers of amyloid, tau and neurodegeneration had no associations, highlighting the role of neuroinflammatory processes in the manifestation of psychiatric symptoms of TES. Continued research on the biological correlates of TES features will inform future iterations of the criteria.

AbstractBackgroundThe quantification of neurofilament light chain (NfL) in blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) has proved useful in many contexts, for the diagnosis and prognosis of various neurological disorders. There is, however, a diversity of practices between centers, essentially linked to the context of use (COU), analytical methods, consideration of comorbidities, determination of cut‐points or use of interpretation scales. Finally, for the same biochemical profile, the interpretation and reporting of results may differ from one center to another, raising the question of test commutability. To date, no consensus has been reached between the different laboratories involved to define the most appropriate conclusions/comments based on COU and cut‐points. This work is an essential step towards consensual harmonization of the clinical use of NfL after CSF and/or blood analysis in various neurological contexts, as advocated by the Alzheimer's Association "Biofluid Based Biomarkers PIA" working group.MethodThis international project involves 58 clinical laboratories in 16 countries, specializing in the biochemical diagnosis of neurological disorders. By means of a questionnaire, we obtained a description of the COU, pre‐analytical and analytical (biological fluid and method used to quantify NfL) protocols of all the centers involved.ResultsOf the centers, 42% quantified NfL in CSF, 29% in serum and 28% in plasma, and 1% in dried blood spot. The COUs were as follows: Frontotemporal dementia (FTD, 17%), Alzheimer's disease (AD, 16%), multiple sclerosis (MS, 16%), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS, 11%), psychiatric syndrome (PS, 10%), Creutzfeldt‐Jakob disease (CJD, 8%), Parkinson's disease (PD, 8%), peripheral neuropathy (PN, 7%) and traumatic brain injury (TBI, 7%). Most centers define pathological cut‐points based on published literature and take age into account (50%).ConclusionOur initial results highlight the state of the art in terms of the clinical use of NfL analysis in CSF and blood in the context of different neurological diseases. We have now defined a coordinator for each COU subgroup and are organizing consensus meetings to harmonize the use and reporting of NfL measurements for the identified clinical applications. The results of these next steps will be presented.

AbstractBackgroundGlial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) is a marker of cerebral astrogliosis and occasionally elevated in patients with dementia. GFAP in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), is routinely requested in referrals to neurochemistry laboratories; however, its ability to differentiate dementias and diagnostic capability is unclear. Our aim was to elucidate this, using two large datasets.MethodFirst, GFAP data measured since 2015 was retrieved from the database of the Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory at the Sahlgrenska University hospital. We then cross‐referenced with the Swedish dementia registry (SveDem). Here, information on ten different diagnoses such as early onset AD (EAD [<65 years]), late onset AD (LAD [≥65 years]), Parkinson disease with dementia (PDD), vascular dementia (VaD) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD), each with specific diagnostic criteria, were retrieved.The GFAP data was log10‐transformed, followed by an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) and a subsequent post‐hoc Tukey’s test, with GFAP as dependent variable, diagnosis as independent variable and sex and age as covariates.ResultIn total, 1912 individuals (mean [SD] age, 71.9 [8.2] years; 52% male), were included. Lower log10‐transformed GFAP concentrations were seen in PDD (mean [SD], 2.68, [0.28] pg/mL), than in EAD, LAD, VaD and FTD; here, mean concentrations of 2.76 (0.24), 2.89 (0.23), 2.89 (0.32) and 2.76 (0.25) pg/mL were observed, respectively.In the post hoc analysis, GFAP differentiated VaD from EAD (p<0.001). PDD concentrations were significantly different from VaD (p<0.001) and LAD (p<0.001). Further, it also differentiated FTD from VaD (p=0.006) and LAD (p=0.001).ConclusionCSF GFAP could on a group level help differentiate VaD from EAD, FTD and PDD. Also, it could differentiate PDD from LAD. These results bear potential clinical relevance, where clinicians in some uncertain cases could use this marker as a differential tool.

AbstractBackgroundAlzheimer’s disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disorder with significant environmental factors, including diet, that influence its onset and progression. While the ketogenic diet (KD) holds promise in reducing metabolic risks and potentially affecting AD progression, only a few studies have explored the KD’s molecular impact for markers of AD therapeutic potential. The BEAM diet study simultaneously profiled the KD’s effect on the lipidome, blood and cerebrospinal metabolome, and microbiome of both cognitively impaired and cognitively normal individuals. The findings summarized here assess the biological impact of a Modified Mediterranean KD in the context of Alzheimer’s disease treatment and prevention.MethodBEAM involved participants at risk for AD, either cognitively normal or with mild cognitive impairment. The participants consumed both a modified Mediterranean‐ketogenic diet (MMKD) and the American Heart Association diet (AHAD) for 6 weeks each, separated by a 6‐week washout period. We employed HPLC‐MS/MS lipidomics profiling in plasma, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)‐based metabolomics to profile serum and CSF, and metagenomics profiling on fecal samples before and after each diet to assess dietary‐induced changes.ResultThe MMKD led to significant alterations in the blood, CSF, and microbiome. These changes included a global elevation across all plasmanyl and plasmenyl ether lipid species, improved modifiable risk factors, like increased HDL‐C and reduced BMI, the reversal of serum metabolic disturbances linked to AD such as an increase in valine levels, and a reduction in systemic inflammation. Leveraging prior clinical studies on AD (n = 1,912), we found that MMKD was inversely associated with the peripheral lipidomic signature of prevalent and incident AD. In the CSF, the MMKD was linked to modified amino acid levels and the breakdown of branched‐chain amino acids (BCAAs). Importantly, we observed a strong correlation between metabolic changes in the CSF and serum, suggesting a systemic regulation of metabolism. In addition, participants with MCI on the MMKD had lower levels of GABA‐producing microbes and GABA, and higher levels of GABA‐regulating microbes.ConclusionOur findings highlight that MMKD can improve AD‐related risk factors, reverse some metabolic disturbances associated with AD, and align metabolic changes across the blood‐CSF barrier.Funding: Alzheimer’s Gut Microbiome Project, NIA U19AG063744

AbstractBackgroundThe newly proposed criteria by the AA working group incorporates both biological and clinical stages to characterize the progression of AD. In this study, we aim to evaluate the agreement between these two complementary systems.MethodsUsing 188 participants from McGill TRIAD and 139 from the HEAD cohorts, we categorized participants into biological (0‐4) and clinical (0‐4) stages using amyloid PET, tau PET(MK‐6240), and clinical measures as described by the working group. Participants were then stratified into three categories: congruent (clinical = biological), higher in the biological stage (clinical < biological), and higher in the clinical stage (clinical > biological). In the TRIAD cohort, we further compared these groups for age, sex, years of education, vascular burden (WMH), microglial activation (PBR scan), Astrocyte reactivity (GFAP), amyloid load, tau load, and NPI‐Q scores using Welch two‐sided t‐test with FDR multiple comparison correction.ResultsIn the TRIAD cohort, 34% of participants were congruent, 24.5% had a higher clinical stage, and 41.5% had a higher biological stage. Meanwhile in the HEAD cohort 68.2% were congruent, 20.7% had a higher clinical stage, and 17% had a higher biological stage. TRIAD participants with a higher clinical stage had lower education (P = 0.02), more neuropsychiatric symptoms (P = 0.03), and a higher vascular burden (P = 0.03) (Table 1). As expected, people with higher biological stage had more amyloid(P<0.001), tau(P<0.001), and astrocyte reactivity(P<0.001) (Table 1, Figure 2).ConclusionsOur findings highlight important discordance between clinical and biological stages, which could be partially explained by cognitive reserve. This was supported by the protective effects of educational attainment in participants with a higher biological stage. Vascular burden played a major role in the cognitive impairment of individuals with higher clinical stages. Future studies should replicate these findings in larger more representative population‐based cohorts.

AbstractBackgroundClinically meaningful cognitive impairment has typically been defined as a single impaired test score, but this approach is prone to false‐positive errors. Examining two test scores at a lower threshold (i.e., using neuropsychological criteria) can improve diagnostic reliability and has shown stronger associations with biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease. Cognitive impairment in episodic memory and/or executive functioning is a core feature of traumatic encephalopathy syndrome (TES). However, there remains a need to improve the specificity of TES criteria. We applied 1‐ vs. 2‐test criteria for cognitive impairment in former American football players to examine whether 2‐test criteria showed stronger associations with biomarkers of tau, axonal injury, and neurodegeneration.Method169 male former American football players from the DIAGNOSE CTE Research Project completed neuropsychological assessment, lumbar puncture, and MRI (see Table). Episodic memory measures were delayed recall from Craft Story, Brief Visuospatial Memory Test, and NAB List Learning. Executive functioning measures were FAS, Stroop Interference, NAB Mazes, and Trails B. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was measured using Lumipulse technology (p‐tau, t‐tau) and an in‐house ELISA (neurofilament light [NfL]). Hippocampal volumes were extracted from structural MRI using Freesurfer 7.1. Cognitive impairment was identified by 1‐test criteria (≥1.5 SD below norms on one test in either domain) and 2‐test criteria (>1 SD below norms on two tests within a domain). Regressions adjusting for age, race, education, and APOE ε4 status assessed whether meeting 1‐ or 2‐test criteria, separately, predicted log‐transformed CSF p‐tau181, p‐tau231, t‐tau, and NfL, and hippocampal volumes.Result37 of the 99 football players that were impaired by 1‐test criteria did not meet 2‐test criteria, and four uniquely met 2‐test but not 1‐test criteria (see Figure). Cognitive impairment by 2‐test but not 1‐test criteria predicted higher log‐CSF NfL (2‐test: B = 0.24, p = .007; 1‐test: B = 0.06, p = .53), smaller left hippocampal volume (2‐test: B = ‐195.84, p = .01; 1‐test: B = ‐131.52, p = .08), and smaller right hippocampal volume (2‐test: B = ‐161.19, p = .045; 1‐test: B = ‐134.88, p = .08). Neither criterion predicted p‐tau181, p‐tau231, or t‐tau.Conclusion2‐test criteria demonstrated stronger associations between cognitive impairment and markers of axonal injury and neurodegeneration. Incorporating multiple test scores to identify cognitive impairment could improve diagnostic specificity in TES.

Abstract In animal models, brain neurodegeneration biomarkers drain into cervical lymph nodes (CLNs), and this drainage function is reduced with ageing. If this occurred in humans, CLNs may provide a readily accessible measure of this aspect of protein clearance. We tested this hypothesis in people using ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration. We measured amyloid-beta 40 and 42, phosphorylated tau 181 (pTau181), glial fibrillary acidic protein and neurofilament light using single molecule array in CLN aspirates and plasma from: (i) a discovery cohort of 25 autoimmune patients; and (ii) plasma, CLNs and capillary blood in four healthy volunteers, an optimization cohort. Ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration was well-tolerated by all participants. In both cohorts, all biomarkers were detected in all plasma and CLN samples, other than neurofilament light (8/17 of discovery cohort). CLN biomarker concentrations were significantly greater than plasma concentrations for all except neurofilament light, most markedly for pTau181 (266-fold; P &lt; 0.02), whose CLN concentrations decreased with age (Spearman r = −0.66, P = 0.001). This study presents the first evidence that neurodegenerative biomarkers are detectable in human CLNs. Raised CLN:plasma biomarker ratios suggest their concentration in CLNs may offer a distinct compartment for minimally-invasive measurement of brain clearance and lymphatic drainage, with potential applicability to study of ageing and future clinical trials.

AbstractINTRODUCTIONBlood‐based biomarkers offer a promising approach for the detection of neuropathologies from repetitive head impacts (RHI). We evaluated plasma biomarkers of amyloid, tau, neurodegeneration, and inflammation in former football players.METHODSThe sample included 180 former football players and 60 asymptomatic, unexposed male participants (aged 45–74). Plasma assays were conducted for beta‐amyloid (Aβ) 40, Aβ42, hyper‐phosphorylated tau (p‐tau) 181+231, total tau (t‐tau), neurofilament light (NfL), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), interleukin‐6 (IL‐6), Aβ42/p‐tau181 and Aβ42/Aβ40 ratios. We evaluated their ability to differentiate the groups and associations with RHI proxies and traumatic encephalopathy syndrome (TES).RESULTSP‐tau181 and p‐tau231(padj = 0.016) were higher and Aβ42/p‐tau181 was lower(padj = 0.004) in football players compared to controls. Discrimination accuracy for p‐tau was modest (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.742). Effects were not attributable to AD‐related pathology. Younger age of first exposure (AFE) correlated with higher NfL (padj = 0.03) and GFAP (padj = 0.033). Plasma GFAP was higher in TES‐chronic traumatic encephalopathy (TES‐CTE) Possible/Probable (padj = 0.008).DISCUSSIONPlasma p‐tau181 and p‐tau231, GFAP, and NfL may offer some usefulness for the characterization of RHI‐related neuropathologies.Highlights Former football players had higher plasma p‐tau181 and p‐tau231 and lower Aβ42/ptau‐181 compared to asymptomatic, unexposed men. Younger age of first exposure was associated with increased plasma NfL and GFAP in older but not younger participants. Plasma GFAP was higher in participants with TES‐CTE possible/probable compared to TES‐CTE no/suggestive.

AbstractThe tauopathies are defined by pathological tau protein aggregates within a spectrum of clinically heterogeneous neurodegenerative diseases. The primary tauopathies meet the definition of rare diseases in the United States. There is no approved treatment for primary tauopathies. In this context, designing the most efficient development programs to translate promising targets and treatments from preclinical studies to early‐phase clinical trials is vital. In September 2022, the Rainwater Charitable Foundation convened an international expert workshop focused on the translation of tauopathy therapeutics through early‐phase trials. Our report on the workshop recommends a framework for principled drug development and a companion lexicon to facilitate communication focusing on reproducibility and achieving common elements. Topics include the selection of targets, drugs, biomarkers, participants, and study designs. The maturation of pharmacodynamic biomarkers to demonstrate target engagement and surrogate disease biomarkers is a crucial unmet need.Highlights Experts provided a framework to translate therapeutics (discovery to clinical trials). Experts focused on the “5 Rights” (target, drug, biomarker, participants, trial). Current research on frontotemporal degeneration, progressive supranuclear palsy, and corticobasal syndrome therapeutics includes 32 trials (37% on biologics) Tau therapeutics are being tested in Alzheimer's disease; primary tauopathies have a large unmet need.