Citations

Clear

51 citation(s) found for "Wang, Yang".

Abstract GS4-05: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) response in postmenopausal women with clinical stage II or III estrogen receptor positive (ER+) and HER2 negative (HER2-) breast cancer (BC) resistant to endocrine therapy (ET) in the ALTERNATE trial (Allianc
Cynthia, X. , Leitch, A. Marilyn , Sanati, Souzan , Unzeitig, Gary, Hahn, Olwen, Guenther, Joseph M., Caudle, Abigail S. , Crouch, Erika C., Maluf, Horacio , Tiersten, Amy , Mita, Monica , Razaq, Wajeeha, Dockter, Travis , Zujewski, Jo Anne , Weiss, Anna , Hudis, Clifford A. , Suman, Vera J. , Vij, Kiran R , Hoog, Jeremy , Watson, Mark A. , Hieken, Tina J. , Wang, Yang , Hunt, Kelly K. , Winer, Eric P. , Ellis, Matthew J. , Carey, Lisa A. , Partridge, Ann H.

Mayo Clinic

Cancer Research | February 15, 2021 | Volume: 81 | Issue: 4_Supplement | Pages: GS4-05-GS4-05

10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs20-gs4-05 Get It

Abstract Background: Ki67 values >10% 2-4 weeks (wks) after starting neoadjuvant ET (NET) indicates persistent cell proliferation, resistance to ET, and is associated with increased risk of recurrence. The ACOSOG Z1031 trial suggested that these tumors are also relatively chemotherapy (chemo) resistant with a low pathologic complete response (pCR) rate to NCT. The ALTERNATE trial (NCT01953588) is a randomized study of neoadjuvant anastrozole (ANA), fulvestrant (FUL), or ANA + FUL in postmenopausal patients (pt) with newly diagnosed clinical stage II or III ER+ (Allred score 6-8)/HER2- BC. Ki67 >10% at wk 4 or 12 after starting NET triggered triage to NCT of physician choice or weekly paclitaxel. Pts who refused protocol-directed therapy, were not candidates for NCT, or decided to undergo immediate surgery are being followed per protocol. Here we report the rates of pCR and residual cancer burden (RCB) following NCT for pts triaged to NCT due to Ki67 >10% at wk 4 or 12. Results: Of the 1,299 eligible pts randomized to receive ANA, FUL, or ANA + FUL, 286 (22%) had Ki67 >10% at wk 4 or 12. 168 of these 286 pts (58.7%) chose to switch to NCT, 32 went to surgery (11.2%), and 86 discontinued further protocol-directed therapy (30.1%). Among the 168 pts who underwent NCT, the presenting clinical T stages were cT2 (n=113; 67.26%), cT3 (n=47; 27.98%) and cT4 (n=8; 4.76%) and N stages were cN0 (n=82; 48.8%), cN1 (n=75; 44.6%), cN2/3 (n=9; 5.4%) and cNx (n=2; 1.2%). Central ER testing was performed on pre-treatment biopsies and confirmed ER Allred score 6-8 in 155 of 168 (92.2%) pts, with the rest being ER Allred score 4-5 (n=5; 3%), ER- (Allred score 0) (n=2; 1.2%), or not tested (n=6; 3.6%). Most (n=139; 82.7%) were ER+/PR+, while 17.3% (n=29) were ER+/PR-, and tumor grades were G1 (n=10; 6%), G2 (n=99; 58.9%), G3 (n=54; 32.1%), not reported (n=5; 3%). Baseline Ki67 levels prior to NET were >10% in 94% (n=158), ≤10% in 3% (n=5), and not done in 3% (n=5). NCT regimens administered included doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (AC) followed by paclitaxel (T) (n=60; 35.71%); weekly paclitaxel (n=56; 33.33%), docetaxel/cyclophosphamide (TC) (n=33; 19.65%), other doxorubicin and/or taxane containing regimen (n=17; 10.12%), and cyclophosphamide/methotrexate/fluorouracil (CMF) (n=2; 1.19%). 35 (20.8%) pts did not complete planned course of NCT due to toxicity (n=27) or refusal (n=8). 154 NCT pts underwent surgery (mastectomy in 40.3%, and breast conserving surgery in 59.7%). The path ypT stages were Tis/0 (n=10; 6.5%), T1 (n=62; 40.3%), T2 (n=61; 39.6%), and T3/4 (n=21; 13.6%), and the ypN stages were N0 (n=66; 42.9%), N1 (n=57; 37%), N2/3 (n=30; 19.5%), and Nx (n=1; 0.6%). Among the 168 pts who started on NCT (intent to treat population), there were 8 pCRs (no invasive disease in the breast or lymph nodes) (4.8%; 95% CI: 2.1% to 9.2%). Residual Cancer Burden (RCB) categories include RCB 0 (n=8; 4.8%), RCB 1 (n=15; 8.9%), RCB 2 (n=82; 48.8%), RCB 3 (n=42; 25.0%), and not determined (n=21; 12.5%). Correlations of baseline pt and tumor characteristics with pathology response to NCT will also be presented. Conclusion: In pts with NET-resistant ER+/HER2- BC, salvage NCT is not likely to induce a complete or near complete response. More effective treatments are needed for this high-risk ER+/HER2- pt population. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U24CA196171, UG1CA189856, U10CA180868 (NRG); NCI BIQSFP, BCRF, Genentech, AstraZeneca. https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org. Clinical Trials.gov Identifier: NCT01953588 Citation Format: Cynthia X Ma, Vera Suman, A. Marilyn Leitch, Souzan Sanati, Kiran Vij, Gary W Unzeitig, Jeremy Hoog, Mark Watson, Olwen Hahn, Joseph Guenther, Abigail Caudle, Erika Crouch, Horacio Maluf, Amy Tiersten, Monica Mita, Wajeeha Razaq, Tina J Hieken, Yang Wang, Travis Dockter, Jo Anne Zujewski, Anna Weiss, Kelly Hunt, Clifford Hudis, Eric P Winer, Matthew J Ellis, Lisa A Carey, Ann H Partridge. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) response in postmenopausal women with clinical stage II or III estrogen receptor positive (ER+) and HER2 negative (HER2-) breast cancer (BC) resistant to endocrine therapy (ET) in the ALTERNATE trial (Alliance A011106) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS4-05.
Guidelines of the International Headache Society for controlled trials of preventive treatment of migraine attacks in episodic migraine in adults
Diener, Hans‐Christoph, Tassorelli, Cristina , Silberstein, Stephen D. , Ashina, Messoud , Becker, Werner J. , Ferrari, Michel D. , Goadsby, Peter J. , Wang, Shuu‐Jiun , Hoek, Thomas C. van den , Martinelli, Daniele , Silberstein, Stephan D , Goadsby, Peter J , Wang, Shuu-Jiun , Martinelli, Daniele , Ashina, Messoud , Diener, Hans‐Christoph, Dodick, David W. , Lipton, Richard B. , Pozo‐Rosich, Patricia , Houle, Timothy T. , Terwindt, Gisela M.

Mayo Clinic

Cephalalgia | July 29, 2020 | Volume: 40 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 1026-1044

10.1177/0333102420941839 | PMID 32722936 Get It

Clinical trials are a key component of the evidence base for the treatment of headache disorders. In 1991, the International Headache Society Clinical Trials Standing Committee developed and published the first edition of the Guidelines for Controlled Trials of Drugs in Migraine. Advances in drugs, devices, and biologicals, as well as novel trial designs, have prompted several updates over the nearly 30 years since, including most recently the Guidelines for controlled trials of preventive treatment of chronic migraine (2018), the Guidelines for controlled trials of acute treatment of migraine attacks in adults (2019), and Guidelines for controlled trials of preventive treatment of migraine in children and adolescents (2019). The present update incorporates findings from new research and is intended to optimize the design of controlled trials of preventive pharmacological treatment of episodic migraine in adults. A guideline for clinical trials with devices will be published separately.
The duration of acupuncture effects and its associated factors in chronic severe functional constipation: secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial
Wang, Yang , Zhou, Kehua , Bauer, Brent A. , Su, Tongsheng, Mo, Qian , Liu, Yan , Liu, Baoyan , Liu, Zhishun

Mayo Clinic

Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology | October 9, 2019 | Volume: 12 | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1177/1756284819881859 | PMID 31636713 Get It

Background: Electroacupuncture (EA) has been shown to improve complete spontaneous bowel movements (CSBMs), but the duration of its effects remains unknown. The objective of this study was to explore the duration of acupuncture effects after treatment and its associated factors for chronic severe functional constipation (CSFC). Methods: This was a secondary analysis of a multicenter, randomized, sham-acupuncture (SA) controlled trial that included 1075 participants with CSFC. The primary outcome, the duration of acupuncture effects after treatment, was the number of weeks during the 12-week follow-up period that participants were to meet the weekly CSBM responder criteria. A weekly CSBM responder was defined as a participant who had at least three CSBMs for a given week and an increase from baseline of at least one CSBM for that same week. We performed a retrospective multivariate analysis to explore potential factors associated with sustained acupuncture effects. Results: The duration of acupuncture effects in the EA group (5.5 weeks) was significantly higher than the duration of SA effects in the SA group (2.2 weeks) with a between-group difference of 3.2 weeks (95% CI, 2.77–3.78; p < 0.001). A younger age and higher baseline CSBMs per week [regression coefficient (RC) –0.06, 95% confidence interval (CI) (−0.06 to −0.04); RC 2.43, 95% CI 1.78–3.60; respectively] were associated with longer durations of acupuncture effects. Conclusions: EA had sustained post-treatment effects for CFSC. A significant association among a younger age, higher baseline CSBMs and sustained acupuncture effects was observed. Further research is needed to confirm the association. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01726504). Registered on 26 August 2012.
The Miami International Evidence-based Guidelines on Minimally Invasive Pancreas Resection
Asbun, Horacio J. , Moekotte, Alma , Vissers, Frederique L., Kunzler, F. , Cipriani, Federica , D’Angelica, Michael I. , Balduzzi, Alberto , Bassi, Claudio , Björnsson, Bergþór , Boggi, Ugo , Callery, Mark P., Chiaro, Marco Del , Coimbra, Felipe José Fernández , Conrad, Claudius , Cook, Andrew , Coppola, Alessandro , Dervenis, Christos, Dokmak, Safi , Edil, Barish H. , Giulianotti, Pier Cristoforo , Hansen, Paul D., Heijde, Nicky van der , Hilst, Jony van , Hester, Caitlin A. , Hogg, Melissa E. , Jarufe, Nicolás , Jeyarajah, D. Rohan, Kim, Song Cheol, Khatkov, Igor , Kokudo, Norihiro , Kooby, David A. , Korrel, Maarten , Leon, Francisco J. de, Lluís, Núria , Lof, Sanne , Demartines, Nicolas , Merchant, Nipun B. , Molenaar, I. Quintus, Moravek, Cassadie, Mou, Yiping , Nealon, William H. , Palanivelu, Chinnusamy, Pessaux, Patrick , Pitt, Henry A. , Primrose, John N., Rawashdeh, Arab , Sanford, Dominic E. , Senthilnathan, Palanisamy, Shrikhande, Shailesh V. , Stauffer, John , Takaori, Kyoichi , Tang, Chung Ngai, Vollmer, Charles M., Wakabayashi, Go , Walsh, R. Matthew , Wang, Shin-E, Zinner, Michael J. , Wolfgang, Christopher L. , Zureikat, Amer H. , Zwart, M. , Conlon, Kevin C. , Kendrick, Michael L., Zeh, Herbert J. , Hilal, Mohammad Abu, Besselink, Marc G. , Primrose, John , Hilal, Mohammad Abu , Demartines, N , A Stauffer, John , Alseidi, Adnan A. , Edwin, Bjørn , Han, Ho-Seong , Jeyarajah, D. Rohan , Keck, Tobias , Machado, Marcel Autran C. , Martinie, John B. , Moravek, Cassadie, Nakamura, Masafumi , Palanivelu, Chinnusamy , Polanco, Patricio Marcelo , Talamonti, Marina , Wang, Shin‐E , Kendrick, Michael L. , Besselink, Marc G , Cipriani, Federica

Mayo Clinic

Annals of Surgery | September 22, 2019 | Volume: 271 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 1-14

10.1097/sla.0000000000003590 | PMID 31567509 Get It

Objective: The aim of this study was to develop and externally validate the first evidence-based guidelines on minimally invasive pancreas resection (MIPR) before and during the International Evidence-based Guidelines on Minimally Invasive Pancreas Resection (IG-MIPR) meeting in Miami (March 2019). Summary Background Data: MIPR has seen rapid development in the past decade. Promising outcomes have been reported by early adopters from high-volume centers. Subsequently, multicenter series as well as randomized controlled trials were reported; however, guidelines for clinical practice were lacking. Methods: The Scottisch Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) methodology was used, incorporating these 4 items: systematic reviews using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases to answer clinical questions, whenever possible in PICO style, the GRADE approach for assessment of the quality of evidence, the Delphi method for establishing consensus on the developed recommendations, and the AGREE-II instrument for the assessment of guideline quality and external validation. The current guidelines are cosponsored by the International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association, the Americas Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association, the Asian-Pacific Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association, the European-African Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association, the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery, Pancreas Club, the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgery, the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, and the Society of Surgical Oncology. Results: After screening 16,069 titles, 694 studies were reviewed, and 291 were included. The final 28 recommendations covered 6 topics; laparoscopic and robotic distal pancreatectomy, central pancreatectomy, pancreatoduodenectomy, as well as patient selection, training, learning curve, and minimal annual center volume required to obtain optimal outcomes and patient safety. Conclusion: The IG-MIPR using SIGN methodology give guidance to surgeons, hospital administrators, patients, and medical societies on the use and outcome of MIPR as well as the approach to be taken regarding this challenging type of surgery.
RasGRP1 is a potential biomarker for stratifying anti-EGFR therapy response in colorectal cancer
Gbenedio, Oghenekevwe M. , Bonnans, Caroline , Grün, Delphine , Wang, Chih‐Yang , Hatch, Ace J. , Mahoney, Michelle R., Matli, Mary, Miao, Yi , García, K. Christopher , Delorenzi, Mauro , Warren, Robert S. , Roose, Jeroen P. , Depeille, Philippe , Nixon, Andrew B. , Barras, David , Tejpar, Sabine , Venook, Alan P.

Mayo Clinic

JCI Insight | June 25, 2019 | Volume: 4 | Issue: 15 | Pages: No page available

10.1172/jci.insight.127552 | PMID 31237864 Get It

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most frequent neoplastic disorder and is a main cause of tumor-related mortality, as many patients progress to stage IV metastatic CRC. Standard care consists of combination chemotherapy (FOLFIRI or FOLFOX). Patients with WT KRAS typing are eligible to receive anti-EGFR therapy combined with chemotherapy. Unfortunately, predicting efficacy of CRC anti-EGFR therapy has remained challenging. Here we uncovered that the EGFR pathway component RasGRP1 acts as a CRC tumor suppressor in the context of aberrant Wnt signaling. We found that RasGRP1 suppresses EGF-driven proliferation of colonic epithelial organoids. Having established that RasGRP1 dosage levels impact biology, we next focused on CRC patients. Mining 5 different data platforms, we establish that RasGRP1 expression levels decrease with CRC progression and predict poor clinical outcome of patients. Last, deletion of 1 or 2 Rasgrp1 alleles made CRC spheroids more susceptible to EGFR inhibition. Retrospective analysis of the CALGB 80203 clinical trial showed that addition of anti-EGFR therapy to chemotherapy significantly improved outcome for CRC patients when tumors expressed low levels of RasGRP1 suppressor. In sum, our data support RasGRP1 as a biomarker in the EGFR pathway that has potential relevance to anti-EGFR therapy for CRC patients.
Guidelines of the International Headache Society for controlled trials of acute treatment of migraine attacks in adults: Fourth edition
Tassorelli, Cristina , Ashina, Messoud , Becker, Werner J. , Ferrari, Michel D. , Goadsby, Peter J. , Wang, Shuu‐Jiun , Mandrekar, Jay , Goadsby, Peter J , Wang, Shuu-Jiun , Ashina, Messoud , Diener, Hans‐Christoph , Dodick, David W. , Silberstein, Stephen D. , Lipton, Richard B. , Pozo‐Rosich, Patricia

Mayo Clinic

Cephalalgia | February 26, 2019 | Volume: 39 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 687-710

10.1177/0333102419828967 | PMID 30806518 Get It

The quality of clinical trials is an essential part of the evidence base for the treatment of headache disorders. In 1991, the International Headache Society Clinical Trials Standing Committee developed and published the first edition of the Guidelines for controlled trials of drugs in migraine. Scientific and clinical developments in headache medicine led to second and third editions in 2000 and 2012, respectively. The current, fourth edition of the Guidelines retains the structure and much content from previous editions. However, it also incorporates evidence from clinical trials published after the third edition as well as feedback from meetings with regulators, pharmaceutical and device manufacturers, and patient associations. Its final form reflects the collective expertise and judgement of the Committee. These updated recommendations and commentary are intended to meet the Society's continuing objective of providing a contemporary, standardized, and evidence-based approach to the conduct and reporting of randomised controlled trials for the acute treatment of migraine attacks.
Guidelines of the International Headache Society for controlled trials of preventive treatment of chronic migraine in adults
Tassorelli, Cristina , Diener, Hans‐Christoph , Dodick, David W. , Silberstein, Stephen D., Ashina, Messoud , Becker, Werner J. , Ferrari, Michel D. , Goadsby, Peter J. , Wang, Shuu‐Jiun , Goadsby, Peter J , Dodick, David W , Wang, Shuu-Jiun , Diener, Hans-Christoph , Lipton, Richard B. , Pozo‐Rosich, Patricia , Ashina, Messoud

Mayo Clinic

Cephalalgia | March 5, 2018 | Volume: 38 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 815-832

10.1177/0333102418758283 | PMID 29504482 Get It

Background Quality clinical trials form an essential part of the evidence base for the treatment of headache disorders. In 1991, the International Headache Society Clinical Trials Standing Committee developed and published the first edition of the Guidelines for Controlled Trials of Drugs in Migraine. In 2008, the Committee published the first specific guidelines on chronic migraine. Subsequent advances in drug, device, and biologicals development, as well as novel trial designs, have created a need for a revision of the chronic migraine guidelines. Objective The present update is intended to optimize the design of controlled trials of preventive treatment of chronic migraine in adults, and its recommendations do not apply to trials in children or adolescents.
Intra‐articular dexamethasone to inhibit the development of post‐traumatic osteoarthritis
Grodzinsky, Alan J. , Wang, Yang , Vrahas, Mark S. , Evans, Christopher H. , Kakar, Sanjeev

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Orthopaedic Research | May 13, 2016 | Volume: 35 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 406-411

10.1002/jor.23295 | PMID 27176565 Get It

ABSTRACT Injury to the joint provokes a number of local pathophysiological changes, including synthesis of inflammatory cytokines, death of chondrocytes, breakdown of the extra‐cellular matrix of cartilage, and reduced synthesis of matrix macromolecules. These processes combine to engender the subsequent development of post‐traumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA). To prevent this from happening, it is necessary to inhibit these disparate responses to injury; given their heterogeneity, this is challenging. However, dexamethasone has the necessary pleiotropic properties required of a drug for this purpose. Using in vitro models, we have shown that low doses of dexamethasone sustain the synthesis of cartilage proteoglycans while inhibiting their breakdown after injurious compression in the presence or absence of inflammatory cytokines. Under these conditions, dexamethasone is non‐toxic and maintains the viability of chondrocytes exposed chronically to such cytokines as interleukin (IL) ‐1, IL‐6, and tumor necrosis factor‐α. Moreover, the anti‐inflammatory properties of dexamethasone have been appreciated for decades. In view of this information, we have initiated a pilot clinical study to determine whether a single, intra‐articular injection of dexamethasone into the wrist shows promise in preventing PTOA after intra‐articular fracture of the distal radius. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Suppressing the various etiopathophysiological responses to injury in the joint is an attractive strategy for lowering the clinical burden of PTOA. The intra‐articular administration of dexamethasone soon after injury offers a simple and inexpensive means of accomplishing this. © 2017 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 35:406–411, 2017.
Treatment of medication-overuse headache: A systematic review
Chiang, Chia‐Chun , Schwedt, Todd J. , Wang, Shuu‐Jiun , Dodick, David W. , Chiang, Chia-Chun

Mayo Clinic

Cephalalgia | June 29, 2015 | Volume: 36 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 371-386

10.1177/0333102415593088 | PMID 26122645 Get It

Introduction The objective of this review is to provide an evidence-based discussion of different treatment strategies for medication-overuse headache (MOH). Method We searched PubMed for articles discussing the treatment and prognosis of MOH published between 2004 and August 2014. Titles, abstract and articles were reviewed systematically. The level of evidence provided by each study of the included articles was determined according to the American Academy of Neurology Clinical practice guideline manual. We discuss the level of evidence to support the early discontinuation/withdrawal of overused medications, the level of evidence to support the use of preventive treatment, the short- and long-term prognosis, and the outcome according to the class of drug overused in patients diagnosed with MOH. Results The initial search resulted in 1313 articles; 68 articles met our inclusion criteria and were discussed. The level of evidence to support early discontinuation of overused medications alone is low due to the absence of controlled studies. Adding preventive medication to early discontinuation led to a better outcome than early discontinuation alone. For patients with chronic migraine (CM) and medication overuse (MO), there are large randomized control trials supporting the use of onabotulinumtoxinA and topiramate without early discontinuation of overuse; however, the evidence is limited since data were obtained from post hoc analysis. Conclusion Considering current available evidence and the systemic toxicity of overusing acute headache medication, we suggest discontinuation of the overused medication with the addition of preventive medication. Appropriately sized, randomized controlled trials evaluating the safety and long-term efficacy of preventive medication plus early discontinuation of overuse vs preventive medication alone vs early discontinuation of overuse alone are needed.