Abstract Lung cancer in never-smokers is increasingly recognized as distinct from that in ever-smokers owing to substantial differences in etiology, clinical characteristics, and prognosis. Therefore, we aimed to identify prognostic markers specific for lung cancer in never-smokers in a two-stage study. First, 11,930 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 904 inflammation-related genes were genotyped, and their associations with overall survival in 411 never-smokers with lung cancer at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center were analyzed. Next, fast-track validation of the top 37 SNPs in 311 never-smokers with lung cancer at Mayo Clinic was performed. Three SNPs (interleukin 17 receptor A:rs879576, bone morphogenetic protein 8A:rs698141, and spleen tyrosine kinase:rs290229) were validated (p<0.05), and two more SNPs (CD74:rs1056400 and CD38:rs10805347) were borderline significant (p=0.08) in the Mayo Clinic population. In combined analysis of the MD Anderson and Mayo Clinic patients, IL17RA:rs879576 resulted in a 40% reduction in the risk of death (p=4.1 × 10−5 [p=0.61, heterogeneity test]). We successfully validated a survival tree created in MD Anderson population based on gene-gene interactions in the Mayo Clinic population. This survival tree stratified patients into subsets with significantly different risks of death: patients at MD Anderson with the rs1056400_GG/rs698141_GA+AA genotype had a 2.32-fold higher risk of death (p=1.72 × 10−5) and 9-month shorter median survival time (MST) (p=4.5 × 10−4, log-rank test) than did those with the rs1056400_GG/rs698141_GG or rs1056400_GA+AA genotype in the discovery phase. Also, the patients at Mayo Clinic with the former genotype had an approximately twofold higher risk of death (p=0.02) and a strikingly shorter (by 26 months) MST (p=0.029, log-rank test) than did those with the latter genotype in the validation phase. We evaluated these five SNPs in 996 ever-smokers and found no significant associations. To our knowledge, this is the first study to systematically evaluate the associations of genetic variations in major inflammation-related genes with outcome of lung cancer in never-smokers. It provides strong evidence that inflammation-related genetic variations can affect clinical outcomes in these patients, which may lead to significant biological insight into these outcomes. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 2929. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-2929
Abstract 5060: Gene network predicts overall survival in patients with primary lung adenocarcinoma
Abstract Lung adenocarcinoma is the most common type of primary lung cancer. Previous studies have shown that gene expression signatures may predict clinical outcome. In this study, we used a systems biology approach, weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA), to identify survival related networks and gene signatures. We first analyzed whole genome gene expression profiles in 82 lung adenocarcinoma tumor tissues from never smokers (smoked <100 cigarettes lifetime) and found a significant correlation of an expression module with tumor grade of differentiation (r=0.38, p=4×10−4) and overall survival (OS, p =0.027, HR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.06-2.74) after adjusting for potential confounders (age and tumor grade). When this module signature was incorporated and compared to the conventional model consisting of clinical variables only, the survival prediction accuracy was increased from 0.70 to 0.75. Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis indicated this module was significantly enriched in biological process GO term “cell cycle” (p = 2.1×10−53). To explore the effect of this network module at germline level, we performed the WGCNA on normal lung tissues derived from 78 of the 82 patients and observed significant association of an expression module with OS (adjusted p=3×10−4, HR=1.98; 95% CI, 1.36-2.87). Interestingly, this module was also significantly enriched in cell cycle-related genes (p=4.1×10−41). To further validate this result, we analyzed an independent microarray gene expression dataset including 442 lung adenocarcinoma patients from NCI Director's Challenge Consortium. We found the same association: the cell cycle-enriched module was correlated with tumor grade of cell differentiation (r=0.55, p-value=5×10−37) and OS (adjusted p=7.4×10−3; HR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.05-1.37). We further identified 30 genes in the OS-related module that overlapped between the discovery and validation data sets. Furthermore, all these 30 genes were found to be up-regulated in adenocarcinoma compared to adjacent normal lung tissues in the discovery data set. Of the 30 genes, three key genes, UBE2C, TPX2 and MELK, were identified with highest connectivity in cell cycle-enriched module; their expression levels were significantly associated with OS in both discovery and validation sets. UBE2C and TPX2 have been reported as gene signatures for human lung cancer prognosis in vitro lung carcinogenesis system; MELK was identified as a key regulator of the proliferation of malignant brain tumors and malignant grade in human astrocytomas, and was also associated with breast cancer prognosis. Our results suggest that genes involved in cell-cycle are likely related with tumor aggressiveness and therefore can predict survival in lung adenocarcinoma. Further studies are needed to validate the key genes that could improve survival prediction and provide potential new targets to intervene progression of lung adenocarcinoma. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 5060. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-5060
Abstract 4704: A sequence variant in the phospholipase C epsilon C2 domain is associated with esophageal carcinoma and esophagitis
Abstract Phospholipase C epsilon (PLCε or PLC∈ 1) is a phosphoinositide-specific enzyme phospholipase C that converts phosphatidylinositol 4,5-biphosphate to two intracellular second messengers, diacylglycerol and inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate, which regulate protein kinase C activity and calcium mobilization, respectively. These responses are involved in the regulation of cell growth, differentiation and oncogenesis. However, the involvement of PLCε in human carcinogenesis, particularly in esophageal cancer, was not been recognized until a susceptible SNP (rs2274223: A5780G:His1927Arg) was recently identified in a large genome-wide association study (GWAS). This SNP, located within exon 26 and C2 domain of the PLCε gene at chromosome 10q23, leads to a nonsynonymous alteration from CAC (A allele, encoding histidine) to CGC (G allele, encoding arginine), which was associated with an increased risk of both squamous cell carcinoma and esophagus-cardia gastric adenocarcinoma. In the current report, we demonstrate that the presence of the G allele (AG or GG) at this locus leads to increased PLCε mRNA and protein expression in human esophageal cancer tissues and in human esophageal cancer cell lines. The present of G allele also leads o a higher enzyme activity in esophageal cancer cells in vitro. Quantitative analysis of the C2 domain sequences revealed that A:G allelic imbalance is strongly associated with esophageal malignancy. Moreover, the analysis of 10,614 non-cancer subjects from high- and low-risk areas of China demonstrated that the presence of the G allele is strongly associated with moderate to severe esophagitis in the subjects from the high-risk areas of China: 77% of the severe esophagitis individuals in high-risk areas had AG/GG genotypes vs. only 37% of these subjects in low-risk areas (OR 6.03 with 95% CI 1.59-22.9 vs. OR 0.74 with 95% CI 0.33-1.64; p=0.008). These data suggest that the interaction of potential environmental factors with PLCε, particularly in individuals with AG or GG allele, not only exists in high-risk areas for esophageal cancer development in China, but also correlates with the severity of esophagitis. In conclusion, PLCε is likely to play a pivotal role in esophageal carcinogenesis: the presence of the 5780G allele may not only predict a high risk of future esophageal cancer development, but may also participate in esophageal cancer growth and progression by upregulating levels of PLCε mRNA, protein, and enzyme activity, ultimately leading to augmentation of the inflammatory process in esophageal epithelium. Thus, the 5780G allele in PLCε may constitute a promising biomarker for esophageal squamous carcinoma risk stratification, early detection, and progression prediction. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 4704. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-4704
Variants in Inflammation Genes Are Implicated in Risk of Lung Cancer in Never Smokers Exposed to Second-hand Smoke
Abstract Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-186.
Abstract 1513: Pre-clinical evaluation of two oncolytic viral vectors expressing IFNβ in treatment of thoracic cancer: Vaccinia virus versus vesicular stomatitis virus
Abstract Rationale: Given recent success in delivering interferon-beta (IFNβ) using replication incompetent adenovirus in patients with malignant pleural effusions, we hypothesized that vectors that could replicate (inducing oncolysis) and express IFNβ at high level would be more effective. Both vaccinia virus (VV) and vesicular stomatitis (VSV) expressing mouse IFNβ have been constructed in a manner to improve their safety and efficacy as oncolytic vectors. In this study, we evaluated these two oncolytic vectors in different murine thoracic cancer models for clinical translation. Experimental procedures: We compared the efficacy of VVIFNβ and VSVIFNβ to kill 3 mouse lung cancer and 4 mouse mesothelioma lines in vitro over a 5 day-period assessing cell viability by MTT assay. The amount of IFNβ produced by these two vectors were measured with ELISA. The viral replication in infected mice was assessed by measuring viral titers in both immunocompetent and immunodeficient mice bearing an IFN-non-responsive AB12 tumor, following intratumoral injection of either vector at 108 pfu/mouse. To assess their anti-tumor activity, the two vectors were also given at 108 pfu/mouse intratumorally in mice bearing two lung cancer tumors on their flanks. Results: The replication of VSVIFNβ and its killing ability was limited in some of the tumor lines. This appeared to be due to an intact IFN response pathway. In contrast, VVIFNβ was able to kill all of the tumor lines. In culture, VSV replicates faster than VV, which resulted in faster cell killing (in susceptible cell lines), but with less IFNβ production. The amount of IFNβ production by VVIFNβ was comparable with AdIFNβ over a 5 day period. VVIFNβ-infected immunodeficient mice showed minimal or no toxicity when given virus intravenously, while all 5 mice infected with VSVIFNβ developed neurotoxicity within a week. In the TC-1 lung cancer model, VVIFNβ caused tumor regression, while VSVIFNβ and AdIFNβ were completely ineffective. In a second model using LKRM2, all 3 viral vectors were equivalent. The anti-tumor effect of VVIFNβ was shown to be mainly CD8 dependant, as depletion of CD8 with antibody dampened the tumor growth inhibition from 48% to 20%. Conclusions: Overall, VVIFNβ appears to be a better oncolytic vector than VSVIFNβ for a number of reasons: 1) it is safer, 2) it is able to replicate in vitro and in vivo in almost every cell line tested, 3) it induces longer and larger IFNβ production, and 4) it can potentially be given intravenously. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 1513.
Gene Networks and microRNAs Implicated in Aggressive Prostate Cancer
Abstract Prostate cancer, a complex disease, can be relatively harmless or extremely aggressive. To identify candidate genes involved in causal pathways of aggressive prostate cancer, we implemented a systems biology approach by combining differential expression analysis and coexpression network analysis to evaluate transcriptional profiles using lymphoblastoid cell lines from 62 prostate cancer patients with aggressive phenotype (Gleason grade ≥ 8) and 63 prostate cancer patients with nonaggressive phenotype (Gleason grade ≤ 5). From 13,935 mRNA genes and 273 microRNAs (miRNA) tested, we identified significant differences in 1,100 mRNAs and 7 miRNAs with a false discovery rate (FDR) of <0.01. We also identified a coexpression module demonstrating significant association with the aggressive phenotype of prostate cancer (P = 3.67 × 10−11). The module of interest was characterized by overrepresentation of cell cycle–related genes (FDR = 3.50 × 10−50). From this module, we further defined 20 hub genes that were highly connected to other genes. Interestingly, 5 of the 7 differentially expressed miRNAs have been implicated in cell cycle regulation and 2 (miR-145 and miR-331-3p) are predicted to target 3 of the 20 hub genes. Ectopic expression of these two miRNAs reduced expression of target hub genes and subsequently resulted in cell growth inhibition and apoptosis. These results suggest that cell cycle is likely to be a molecular pathway causing aggressive phenotype of prostate cancer. Further characterization of cell cycle–related genes (particularly, the hub genes) and miRNAs that regulate these hub genes could facilitate identification of candidate genes responsible for the aggressive phenotype and lead to a better understanding of prostate cancer etiology and progression. [Cancer Res 2009;69(24):9490–7]