Citations

Abstract We identified resistance mechanisms to abiraterone acetate/prednisone (AA/P) in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in the Prostate Cancer Medically Optimized Genome-Enhanced Therapy (PROMOTE) study. We analyzed whole-exome sequencing (WES) and RNA-sequencing data from 83 patients with metastatic biopsies before (V1) and after 12 weeks of AA/P treatment (V2). Resistance was determined by time to treatment change (TTTC). At V2, 18 and 11 of 58 patients had either short-term (median 3.6 months; range 1.4–4.5) or long-term (median 29 months; range 23.5–41.7) responses, respectively. Nonresponders had low expression of TGFBR3 and increased activation of the Wnt pathway, cell cycle, upregulation of AR variants, both pre- and posttreatment, with further deletion of AR inhibitor CDK11B posttreatment. Deletion of androgen processing genes, HSD17B11, CYP19A1 were observed in nonresponders posttreatment. Genes involved in cell cycle, DNA repair, Wnt-signaling, and Aurora kinase pathways were differentially expressed between the responder and non-responder at V2. Activation of Wnt signaling in nonresponder and deactivation of MYC or its target genes in responders was detected via SCN loss, somatic mutations, and transcriptomics. Upregulation of genes in the AURKA pathway are consistent with the activation of MYC regulated genes in nonresponders. Several genes in the AKT1 axis had increased mutation rate in nonresponders. We also found evidence of resistance via PDCD1 overexpression in responders. Implications: Finally, we identified candidates drugs to reverse AA/P resistance: topoisomerase inhibitors and drugs targeting the cell cycle via the MYC/AURKA/AURKB/TOP2A and/or PI3K_AKT_MTOR pathways.

Background: Thirty-six states, including Florida, have legalized marijuana for medical and/or recreational use, yet how it is used and perceived by persons with cancer is not well understood. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to identify patterns of use, perceived benefits, and side effects of medical marijuana (MMJ) among cancer patients in Florida. Methods: For this descriptive, cross-sectional study, anyone residing within the state of Florida who was diagnosed or treated for a malignancy within the last five years and had used MMJ was eligible. An online survey containing questions about dosing, side effects, perceived benefits, and barriers to use was used. Descriptive statistics including frequencies, percentages, means, and standard deviations were used to analyze quantitative data. Responses to open-ended questions were coded and categorized. Results: Sleep ( n = 112), pain ( n = 96), and anxiety ( n = 82) were the most common symptoms participants used MMJ to relieve and overall felt it was highly effective. MMJ was well tolerated with a minority (10.3%) reporting any adverse effects. Cost was the most frequent barrier reported by participants (42.8%). A variety of legal, bureaucratic, and system-related barriers were described. Conclusion: Participants perceived MMJ to be helpful in alleviating cancer symptoms. They held negative perceptions of the way MMJ is implemented and integrated into their oncology treatment plan. Enhanced communication and patient/provider education on MMJ are needed to inform patient decision making.

As survival in breast cancer patients from newer therapies increases, concerns for chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity (CIC) have offset some of these benefits, manifesting as a decline in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Patients receiving anthracycline-based chemotherapy followed by trastuzumab are at risk for CIC. Previous research evaluating whether clinical biomarkers predict cardiotoxicity has been inconsistent. Recently, angiotensin II type 1 receptor (ATR1) and endothelin 1 (ET1) have been shown to play a role in breast tumor growth. We evaluated ATR1 and ET1 expression in breast cancer tissue and its association with CIC. A total of 33 paraffin-embedded breast tissue specimens from women with breast cancer treated with anthracycline-based chemotherapy and trastuzumab were analyzed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and qRT-PCR. We found that ET1 expression was increased in patients with an LVEF ≤ 50% (p = 0.032) with a lower LVEF correlating with higher ET1 expression (r = 0.377, p = 0.031). In patients with a change in LVEF of greater than 10%, greater ET1 expression was noted compared to those without a change in LVEF (p = 0.017). Increased ET1 expression in breast tumor tissue is associated with reduced LVEF. Future studies need to examine whether ET1 may be a tissue biomarker that helps predict the risk of developing CIC in women with breast cancer.

e17036 Background: Elevated serum CGA is associated with an intrinsic or treatment-related neuroendocrine differentiation in men with mCRPC. We previously demonstrated that elevated serum CGA was negatively associated with OS in men with mCRPC. Fluctuations in serum CGA during mCRPC therapy is not well known. We analyzed the impact of (i) rising serum CGA and (ii) baseline CGA/PSA ratio during treatment to identify associations with AA therapy. Methods: Between June 2013 and August 2015, 92 men with mCRPC were enrolled in a prospective trial (“PROMOTE”; NCT#01953640) with uniform serum processing performed prior to initiating abiraterone acetate/prednisone (AA/P) and serially after 12 weeks of AA/P treatments. Serum CGA was measured using a homogenous automated immunofluorescent assay. Patients (pts) receiving proton pump inhibitors or with abnormal renal function were excluded due to possible false elevations of serum CGA (n = 21 excluded). All patients underwent a composite response assessment at 12-weeks with imaging/PSA/QOL questionnaires. Kaplan Meier estimates, and Cox Regression models were used to calculate association with time-to-treatment failure (TTF) analyses, defined as time from treatment initiation to AA/P discontinuation based on disease progression (BlueSky Statistics, Chicago, IL, USA). Results: Of the 71 eligible pts, 67/71 had paired baseline and 12-week CGA and 70/71 pts had a baseline and a 12-week PSA available. The median baseline CGA was 83.0ng/ml (range: 53.0 - 127.0 ng/ml), median baseline PSA was 14.4 ng/ml (range: 6.4-40.2 ng/ml), and the median TTF was 10 months (range: 6-25 months). The median CGA after 12 weeks of AA/P was 98.0 ng/ml (58.0 -148.0 ng/ml) and we observed a CGA rise in 41/67 (61.2%) pts. An increase in chromogranin was associated with a lower risk of treatment failure (HR: 0.52, p = 0.0181). The median CGA/PSA ratio was 7.8 (2.6 -16.0). An elevated pretreatment CGA/PSA ratio above the median was associated with a lower risk of treatment failure (HR: 0.54 p value = 0.0185). Conclusions: We show that an increasing chromogranin on AA/P and an elevated baseline CGA/PSA in pts with mCRPC were associated with a favorable response to AA/P. Further studies are needed to assess if rising CGA during therapy reflects neuroendocrine differentiation and may indicate a sign of treatment effect targeting the androgen susceptible cells. Clinical trial information: NCT#01953640.

2648 Background: To characterize the safety and tolerability of PY314, an immunosuppressive macrophage depleting antibody, as a single agent and in combination with pembrolizumab in subjects with advanced refractory solid tumors including subject’s refractory to checkpoint inhibitors if approved for that indication. Methods: Two were evaluated in subjects with advanced solid tumors, single agent PY314 and PY314 in combination with 200 mg of pembrolizumab using a 3+3 dose escalation study design. Dosing was intravenous and administered once every 3-weeks, a defined cycle. Disease assessment by RECIST 1.1 was performed every 6 weeks. Each stratum included 4 dose levels of PY314 (1, 3, 10, and 20 mg/kg). Pharmacokinetics were evaluated at specified time points. Archival tumor tissue was analyzed for TREM2 expression by immunohistochemistry. Based on preclinical evaluation of TREM2 expression, HR+ HER2- and triple negative breast cancer, colorectal cancer, renal cell cancer, non-small cell lung cancer and gynecologic cancers were studied. Results: 28 subjects (median age 60 years [range 26-76], 22 females and 6 ) with an ECOG PS <2 were enrolled and all, but one was (1 subject withdrew consent after dosing). 15 subjects were treated with single agent PY314 and 13 were treated with the combination. No infusion-related reactions, dose limiting toxicities, suspected unexpected serious adverse reactions or high-grade treatment related adverse events (TRAEs) that resulted in treatment discontinuance was seen. 12 subjects experienced at least one TRAE, and in all but one subject, these were low grade. One subject experienced a treatment-related immune system disorder. serious adverse events, all unrelated to treatment. TREM2 expression in archival tumor ranged from 0.0-20%. PY314 pharmacokinetics were linear, dose proportional, unaffected by concomitant pembrolizumab and with a half-life of 8-9 days. Best radiographic response was stable disease seen in 11 subjects (39.3%) ranging in duration from 9-42 weeks. 6 subjects with stable disease have progressed and 5 remain on treatment. Conclusions: PY314 was well tolerated and has an excellent safety profile both as a single agent and in combination with pembrolizumab. A recommended dose for expansion was derived and enrollment in five prespecified cancers is ongoing. Clinical trial information: 04691375.

Approximately one‐third of patients with metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) exhibited primary abiraterone resistance. To identify alternative treatment for abiraterone nonresponders, we performed drug discovery analyses using the L1000 database using differentially expressed genes identified in tumor biopsies and patient‐derived xenograft (PDX) tumors between abiraterone responders and nonresponders enrolled in PROMOTE trial. This approach identified 3 drugs, including topoisomerase II (TOP2) inhibitor mitoxantrone, CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib, and pan‐CDK inhibitor PHA‐793887. These drugs significantly suppressed the growth of abiraterone‐resistant cell lines and PDX models. Moreover, we identified 11 genes targeted by all 3 drugs that were associated with worse outcomes in both the PROMOTE and Stand Up To Cancer cohorts. This 11‐gene panel might also function as biomarkers to select the 3 alternative therapies for this subgroup of patients with CRPC, warranting further clinical investigation.

Conventional imaging has been the standard imaging modality for assessing prostate cancer recurrence and is utilized to determine treatment response to therapy. Molecular imaging with PSMA PET–CT has proven to be more accurate, sensitive, and specific at identifying pelvic or distant metastatic disease, resulting in earlier diagnosis of advanced disease. Since advanced disease may not be seen on conventional imaging, due to its lower sensitivity, but can be identified by molecular imaging, this reveals that metastatic prostate cancer occurs on a continuum from negative PSMA PET–CT and negative conventional imaging to positive PSMA PET–CT and positive conventional imaging. Understanding this continuum, the accuracy of these modalities, and treatment related outcomes based on imaging, will allow the clinician to counsel patients on management. This review will highlight the differences in conventional and molecular imaging in prostate cancer and how PSMA PET–CT can be used for the management of prostate cancer patients in different clinical scenarios, while providing cautionary notes for overtreatment.

176 Background: Despite androgen deprivation therapy, prostate cancer will develop resistance known as castrate resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Androgen signaling is associated with pathways that influence cell proliferation and survival via cell cycle regulation. AR signaling results in inactivation of Rb tumor suppressor by way of AKT and reduction in intrinsic CDK4/6 inhibitors. Since PTEN loss is found in 40% of mCRPC and AKT pathway is a mechanism of CDK4/6 inhibitor resistance, we hypothesize adding an AKT inhibitor to a CDK4/6 inhibitor will have synergistic activity while delaying CDK4/6 inhibitor resistance. Preclinical xenografts have been shown to recapitulate patient response, therefore, can be used to guide clinical trials using novel combinations. Methods: We have established patient derived tumor xenograft models (GUR-017M, TMA-027 and PRJ-88T) from patients with mCRPC with each having a unique genomic alteration profile. In the clinical setting, GUR-017M was resistant to abiraterone, enzalutamide, cabazitaxel and had exposure to docetaxel. TMA-027 and PRJ-88T were resistant to enzalutamide. We combined a CDK4/6 inhibitor with an AKT inhibitor and treated each of these patient tumors in NOD-SCID mice for a total duration of 40 days. Mice were implanted and separated into 4 groups (placebo, CDK4/6 inhibitor, AKT inhibitor and CDK4/6 + AKT inhibitor) with 10-13 mice in each group. Tumor volumes were measured twice a week. For GUR-017M, abemaciclib (50 mg/kg) was combined with MK2206 (120 mg/kg) and was compared to each placebo and each single agent alone. For TMA-027, palbociclib (50 mg/kg) was combined with ipatasertib (50 mg/kg). After 40 days, tumors were harvested for immunohistochemistry analysis. PRJ-88T was grown as 3D spheroids in ultra-low attachment plates and treated with palbociclib + ipatasertib (10 uM-100uM) to evaluate for synergy. Results: GUR-017M and TMA-027 showed significant delayed tumor growth compared to placebo or either single agent alone. In the GUR-017M group, the final mean tumor volume for the combination group was 149 mm3, compared to 377 mm3 (abemaciclib), 358 mm3 (MK2206) and 527 mm3 placebo group, representing a percent decrease compared to control by 72%, 29%, and 32%, respectively. For TMA-027, the final mean tumor volume for the combination group was 102 mm3, compared to 259 mm3 (palbociclib), 416 mm3 (ipatasertib), and 402 mm3 placebo group, representing a percent decrease compared to control by 75%, 36%, and 4%, respectively. PRJ-88T 3D spheroids showed synergy with palbociclib + ipatasertib. In vivo experiments using PRJ-88T are in progress. Conclusions: The preclinical results show combining CDK4/6 inhibitors with AKT inhibitors is a promising treatment strategy and provides the basis for a clinical trial in patients with mCRPC.

153 Background: The prognostic significance of DDR alterations in mCRPC remains unclear, with conflicting data from prior reports. Whether DDR alterations are predictive of outcomes with therapeutic agents other than PARP inhibitors in mCRPC is also poorly understood. With increasing use of molecular profiling in mCRPC, understanding the full prognostic and predictive utility of plasma DDR alterations is paramount. Methods: A next-generation sequencing Predicine liquid biopsy assay was used to profile cfDNA and germline DNA in 407 mCRPC patients (pts) from two independent international cohorts (n=162 Australia, n=245 US). DDR genes profiled were BRCA2, ATM, BRCA1, MLH1 and MSH2. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates and multivariable Cox regression analyses were used to assess associations between DDR alterations and clinical outcomes including PSA response rate (PSA RR), progression-free survival and overall survival (OS). Results: Median age was 74 (IQR 67-79), with median follow up 74 months and median OS 23 months. 65/407 (16%) harboured pathogenic DDR alterations, including 21 patients with ³1 alteration. Frequency of genomic aberrations are shown in the table. BRCA2 alterations were further classified as heterozygous loss (66%), homozygous loss (14%), monoallelic mutation (11%) and biallelic mutation/loss of heterozygosity (9%). Aberrations in any DDR gene, ATM, MLH1 + MSH2 or BRCA2 were associated with shorter OS on univariable analysis, but only any DDR or BRCA2 aberration remained significant upon adjusting for clinical prognosticators and ctDNA fraction (Table). Pre-treatment BRCA2 aberration was associated with significantly shorter OS and lower PSA RR compared to BRCA2 wt for pts receiving an AR pathway inhibitor (ARPI) (18 vs 32 months, p=0.006; 36 vs 60%, p=0.04 respectively) but not for taxane chemotherapy (17 vs 20 months, p=0.3; 45 vs 66, p=0.1 respectively). Conclusions: Detection of an aberration in any DDR gene or BRCA2 was an independent poor prognostic factor across 2 large independent cohorts of mCRPC patients. Intriguingly, patients with a BRCA2 alteration appeared to have worse outcomes with ARPI but not chemotherapy, suggesting predictive utility of DDR profiling. Our data collectively speak to the potential role of DDR alterations, in particular BRCA2, as prognostic and/ or predictive biomarkers in mCRPC.[Table: see text]

150 Background: With the evolving use of targeted therapies exploiting genomic vulnerabilities in mCRPC, screening patients for sensitizing alterations is of increasing relevance. However, the influence of age on the detection of relevant genomic alterations is incompletely understood. In this study, we compared the cell-free DNA (cfDNA) profiles of younger (age <70) versus older (age ≥70) men with mCRPC and assessed the relative prognostic impact of common genomic alterations. Methods: A next-generation sequencing-based Predicine cfDNA assay was used to profile 276 mCRPC patients from two independent international cohorts. The frequency of genomic alterations across age categories was compared using the chi-squared test, while circulating tumour DNA fraction (ctDNA%) was compared using the Mann–Whitney U test. Cox proportional hazards analysis with interaction testing was used to assess the association between age, genomic alteration and overall survival. Results: The median age of the combined cohort was 72 years (IQR 66-78), with 170 (62%) patients ≥70 years old. Despite differences in baseline characteristics (poorer performance status in older patients, higher Gleason score and de novo metastatic disease in younger patients), there was no significant difference in ctDNA% (median 22% vs 30%, p=0.6). We observed similar frequencies of genomic alterations across the 10 most commonly aberrant genes, including AR (<70 vs ≥70: 46% vs 49%, p=0.6), TP53 (40% vs 36%, p=0.6), BRCA2 (29% vs 21%, p=0.13) and PTEN (39% vs 35%, p=0.5). This similarity persisted when analysing mutations and copy number alterations in isolation. While driver alterations in both age categories were strongly associated with unfavourable outcomes (Table), an exploratory analysis revealed that copy number gain in PIK3CA may have a worse prognostic impact in younger men ( p for interaction = 0.03), with a lesser effect observed in AR gain ( p = 0.1) and MYC gain ( p = 0.1). Conclusions: The genomic profiles of pertinent alterations between younger and older men are comparable. Certain genomic alterations may carry a worse prognosis in younger men. Patients should be considered for precision medicine assessment and directed therapies, regardless of age. [Table: see text]