Citations

Abstract While chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy targeting CD19 (CART19) has shown remarkable success in the treatment of hematological malignancies, the durable response rates remain approximately 40% and there are limited solutions for CART cell therapy in the treatment of solid tumors. To further understand mechanisms of resistance, including CART cell exhaustion, we employed three independent approaches: 1) RNA and ATAC sequencing on unstimulated vs. exhausted healthy donor CART19 cells by utilizing an in vitro model for exhaustion, 2) RNA and ATAC sequencing on pre-infusion CART19 cell products from responders and non-responders in the Zuma-1 clinical trial that led to the FDA approval of axi-cel CART19 therapy, and 3) a genome-wide CRISPR knockout screen in healthy donor CART19 cells using our in vitro model for exhaustion. In each of these approaches, IL-4 was identified as a regulator of CART cell dysfunction. In approach 1, ingenuity pathway analysis of genes that were both differentially accessible and expressed in exhausted compared with unstimulated CART19 cells revealed IL-4 as a top upstream regulator (p = 5E-6). In approach 2, IL-4 was one of two genes that were both upregulated and more accessible in CART19 cell products from non-responders (p < 5E-2). Finally, in approach 3, gene ontology enrichment analysis of genes that were positively selected during the genome-wide CRISPR knockout screen, revealed regulation of the IL-4 pathway as one of the top affected pathways (p = 1E-4). Together, our data indicates a role for IL-4 in CART cell dysfunction caused by exhaustion. Investigating this mechanism further, we saw an increase in the production of IL-4 as CART cells became exhausted (p = 4E-3). Treatment of CART19 cells with human recombinant IL-4 (hrIL-4) resulted in dysfunction as evident by a decrease in antigen specific cytotoxicity (p = 4E-3) and proliferative ability (p= 6.5E-2), as well as exhaustion-specific signs of dysfunction such as an increase in the expression of the inhibitory receptor, TIM-3 (p = 3E-3) and an increase in the transcription of the exhaustion-related transcription factor EOMES (p = 1E-2). Finally, we tested whether IL-4 neutralization enhances CART19 cell functions. Using a CD19+ JeKo-1 xenograft mouse model, we compared the combination treatment of CART19 cells and an IL-4 neutralizing monoclonal antibody (10 mg/Kg, clone # MP4-25D2) to CART19 cells and an IgG control. IL-4 neutralization in combination with CART19 cells resulted in reduced tumor burden (p = 4.6E-2), increased CART cell proliferation (p = 8E-3), and prolonged overall survival (p= 5E-2). In summary, our data indicates that 1) IL-4 induces CART cell dysfunction through a state of exhaustion and 2) IL-4 neutralization with a monoclonal antibody enhances CART cell therapy. As such, this novel combination therapy holds the potential to be translated to the clinic to improve durable responses from CART cell therapy. Citation Format: Carli Stewart, Michelle J. Cox, Reona Sakemura, Ekene J. Ogbodo, Ismail Can, Claudia Manriquez Roman, Kun Yun, Olivia Sirpilla, James H. Girsch, Truc Huynh, Elizabeth L. Siegler, Jenny J. Kim, Mike Mattie, Nathalie Scholler, Simone Filosto, Saad S. Kenderian. IL-4 depletion leads to the improvement of CART cell therapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 1153.

Abstract Thyroid cancer is the most common endocrine cancer in the US, and its incidence is rising. Most thyroid cancer deaths are attributed to treatment-refractory, metastatic tumors. Thyroid stimulating hormone receptor (TSRH) expression is largely limited to the thyroid gland and is abundantly expressed on thyroid tumor cells, making TSRH a compelling target for advanced thyroid cancer diagnostics and therapeutics. Therefore, we developed a novel TSHR-targeted chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy to treat aggressive thyroid cancers. TSHR-CAR constructs were cloned into a lentiviral CAR construct containing 4-1BB and CD3ζ. First, we demonstrated potent TSHR-CART antigen-specific anti-tumor activity in vitro. Then, NOD-SCID-γ-/- (NSG) mice were inoculated subcutaneously with TSHR+ tumor cells and randomized by tumor volume to treatment with TSHR-CART cells or control Untransduced T cells (UTD). Treatment with TSHR-CART cells resulted in dose-dependent antitumor activity and prolonged survival. De-differentiated anaplastic thyroid cancers (ATC) downregulate TSHR. Our TSHR immunohistochemistry results corroborated these findings and displayed minimal TSHR protein expression, precluding successful TSHR-CART treatment. We therefore sought to sensitize these tumors with MAPK inhibitors, as a strategy to upregulate TSHR expression in patients with metastatic thyroid cancer. TSHR expression was upregulated in patient-derived xenograft (PDX) ATC models after one week of daily administration of the MAPK inhibitors (p=0.0024). After confirming that MAPK inhibition does not dampen TSHR-CART effector functions, we tested sequential and combination therapy of TSHR-CART with MEK and BRAF inhibition in vivo. NSG mice were engrafted with ATC BRAF-mutant PDX tumors and randomized by tumor volume to daily oral treatment with placebo or trametinib (MEK inhibitor) plus dabrafenib (BRAF inhibitor). One week later, mice received either UTD or TSHR-CART. Mice conditioned with trametinib plus dabrafenib (p=0.0018) and subsequently treated with TSHR-CART showed superior antitumor activity. However, the improved antitumor activity in this setting was transient. We therefore tested the durability of TSHR upregulation following MEK/BRAF inhibition and demonstrated that TSHR upregulation lasts less than 48-72 hours after discontinuation. Finally, we tested the combination of TSHR CART cells with MEK/BRAF inhibitors in ATC BRAF-mutant PDX tumors. Here, combining TSHR-CART cells with MEK/BRAF inhibitors result in durable control of the tumors. Collectively, our findings indicate that MEK/BRAF inhibition of de-differentiated thyroid cancers upregulated TSHR expression and enhanced TSHR-CART antitumor activity. This work represents a viable strategy to improve outcomes of patients with aggressive, metastatic thyroid cancers. Citation Format: Claudia Manriquez Roman, Kendall J. Schick, Justyna J. Gleba, Truc N. Huynh, Elizabeth L. Siegler, James L. Miller, Aylin Alasonyalilar Demirer, Matthew L. Pawlush, Ahmet Biligili, Long K. Mai, Erin Tapper, Leo R. Sakemura, Michelle J. Cox, Carli M. Stewart, Ismail Can, Ekene J. Ogbodo, Gaofeng Cui, Georges Mer, Gloria R. Olivier, Yushi Qiu, Robert C. Smallridge, Zubair C. Abba, Han W. Tun, John A. Copland, Saad S. Kenderian. Addition of MAPK inhibitors to prime and sensitize poorly differentiated thyroid cancers as a strategy to improve TSHR-CART cell therapy antitumor activity. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 5074.

Abstract With the development of various strategies of anti-CD19 immunotherapy for treatment of B cell malignancies, it remains to be elucidated whether CD19 targeting with a monoclonal antibody impairs subsequent CD19 targeted chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CART19) therapy. In this study, we evaluated the potential interference between the CD19 targeting monoclonal antibody tafasitamab and CART19 treatment (using a construct similar to the FDA approved therapy, FMC63-41BBζ, tisagenlecleucel) in preclinical lymphoma and leukemia models. For in vitro assays, the CD19 + cell lines JeKo-1 (mantle cell lymphoma), Nalm6 (acute lymphoblastic leukemia), and OCI-Ly7 (diffuse large B cell lymphoma) were used. When CART19 were co-cultured with CD19 + tumor cells in the presence of increasing concentrations of tafasitamab (10-400 µg/mL) or the isotype control, an impairment of CART19 functions at the highest concentration of tafasitamab was observed. However, when tafasitamab was cocultured with tumor cells overnight and removed from the culture by washing, there was no impairment of CART19 anti-tumor activity or effector functions compared to a pre-culture with isotype control. We then aimed to validate these findings in xenograft mouse models by determining whether prior tafasitamab treatment impairs subsequent CART cell function. First, a two-step JeKo-1 xenograft model was created through inoculation of 1x10 6 luciferase + JeKo-1 cells to immunocompromised NOD-SCID-γ -/- (NSG) mice via tail vein injection. One week later, tumor burden was assessed by bioluminescence imaging (BLI) and mice were randomized to receive either 1) PBS (Group 1) or 2) 10 mg/kg of tafasitamab (Group 2) (Fig. 1A). Treatment was performed until the mice reached the endpoint due to the high tumor load. When reaching the endpoint, mice were euthanized and spleen was harvested. Splenic cells were then injected to naïve NSG mice. Two weeks after the inoculation of splenic cells (PBS or tafasitamab treated), mice were imaged with BLI and randomized according to their tumor burden to receive 2x10 6 of 1) untransduced T cells (UTD) or 2) CART19 (i.v.) (Fig. 1B). Mice, treated with CART19 demonstrated potent anti-tumor effects and showed prolonged survival compared to UTD control mice. Interestingly, CART19-treated mice inoculated with Group 2 splenic cells (pretreated with tafasitamab) showed a significantly better tumor control and overall survival compared with mice engrafted Group 1 splenic cells (PBS pretreatment) (Fig. 1C). This finding led us to further investigate the effects of prior tafasitamab therapy on subsequent CART19 treatment. In this context, we studied the sequential treatment with tafasitamab and CART19 in an additional JeKo-1 xenograft model (Fig. 1D). In brief, NSG mice were inoculated with luciferase + JeKo-1 on day -14. On day -8, mice were imaged and randomized to the PBS (Group I) or tafasitamab (10 mg/kg) group. On day -1 tafasitamab treated mice were imaged again, randomized to the tafasitamab discontinuation (Group II) or continuation (Group III). Treatment with PBS was continued in Group I. All groups were administered with 1x10 6 of CART19 on day 0. Cotreatment of JeKo-1 xenografts with tafasitamab and CART19 led to impaired anti-tumor activity presumably as a result of CD19 binding competition between tafasitamab and CART19 (Group III). Mice treated with tafasitamab followed by CART19 had improved tumor control compared to mice treated with PBS followed by CART19 (Fig. 1E-F). Serial peripheral blood analysis demonstrated that mice from Group I showed the highest CART19 expansion on day 10. Strikingly, Group II exhibited weak CART19 expansion at day 10, but strongest expansion on day 23 (Fig. 1G). We therefore hypothesized that prior treatment with tafasitamab results in modulation of CART19 cell activation. To test this hypothesis, spleens of satellite mice were harvested 24 hours after CART19 administration. Flow cytometric analysis revealed that the mice from Group II showed significantly lower CD69 and HLA-DR expression on CART19 cells compared with Group I, and reduced apoptosis as measured by the Annexin assay (Fig. 1H-I). In summary, concomitant treatment of tafasitamab and CART19 led to impaired anti-tumor activity while, in contrast, sequential treatment of tafasitamab and CART19 did not inhibit CART19 anti-tumor activity but rather promoted anti-tumor effects in xenograft models. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Sakemura: Humanigen: Patents & Royalties. Augsberger: MorphoSys AG: Current Employment. Schanzer: MorphoSys AG: Current Employment. Patra-Kneuer: MorphoSys AG: Current Employment. Heitmüller: MorphoSys AG: Current Employment. Steidl: MorphoSys AG: Current Employment. Endell: MorphoSys AG: Current Employment. Ding: DTRM: Research Funding; Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Octapharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Parikh: Pharmacyclics, MorphoSys, Janssen, AstraZeneca, TG Therapeutics, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, AbbVie, and Ascentage Pharma: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics, AstraZeneca, Genentech, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Verastem Oncology, and AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kay: Acerta Pharma: Research Funding; Targeted Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncotracker: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Juno Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Morpho-sys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Dava Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Behring: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CytomX Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Rigel: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MEI Pharma: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol Meyer Squib: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Tolero Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios Pharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Research Funding; Sunesis: Research Funding. Nowakowski: Celgene, NanoString Technologies, MorphoSys: Research Funding; Celgene, MorphoSys, Genentech, Selvita, Debiopharm Group, Kite/Gilead: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cox: Humanigen: Patents & Royalties. Kenderian: Humanigen, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.