Citations

Abstract Introduction The implantation of a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) can have esthetic and psychological consequences on patients. We explore a heart team model for care coordination and discuss esthetic approaches for improved cosmetic outcomes in patients undergoing (CIED)‐related procedures or de novo implantation. Methods Patients undergoing CIED surgery for approved indications between June 2015 and June 2022 were identified. Patients were included when surgical care was provided by a collaborative relationship between the primary electrophysiologist and the plastic surgeon. Patient demographics, details of the surgical procedure, information on breast implants, complications, and outcomes related to cosmesis were recorded. Results Twenty‐two female patients were included in this study. The mean age was 50.2 ± 18.2 years. The mean follow‐up duration was 2.2 ± 5.5 months. The top two indications for the procedure included CIED generator change ( n = 9, 41%) and implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator (ICD) implantation ( n = 7, 32%). The most common reasons for involving plastic surgery in the procedure included surgery near breast implants ( n = 10, 45%) and device displacement or discomfort ( n = 8, 36%). CIED pocket position was prepectoral in 10 cases (45%), subpectoral in 11 patients (50%), and intramuscular in one patient (4.5%). The majority of the patients (20, 91%) had cosmetically acceptable results postprocedure. One patient (4.5%) had breast asymmetry on the CIED side, and another continued to have skin erosion over the CIED and leads. Conclusion A heart team approach incorporating the expertize of cardiac electrophysiology and plastic surgery is essential for providing optimal care for patients with breast implants and patients requesting esthetic appeal.

Background: Eyelid ptosis may present with upper lid dermatochalasis and brow ptosis. When indicated, ptosis correction (PC) is advocated during upper blepharoplasty (UB). In this study, the authors aimed to report their outcomes following UB and PC. Methods: A retrospective review of patients who underwent UB from November of 2018 to March of 2020 was performed. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and revisions were recorded. Cox regression was performed to assess predictors of revision. Results: Overall, 278 patients with 533 UB were included. The mean patient age was 67.3 years. The mean follow-up was 8.3 months. In 169 cases (31.7%), a brow lift was performed. UB and PC were performed in 109 cases (20.5%), of which 60 (55%) involved Müller muscle conjunctival resection and 49 (45%) were levator repairs. New dry eye symptoms lasting 3 months or longer occurred in 4 cases (0.8%), all of which resolved. The revision rate was 3.8% after UB (residual skin [ n = 11], hypertrophic scar [ n = 4], and Herring law–related ptosis [ n = 1]) versus 9.2% after UB and PC (overcorrection [ n = 4], residual skin [ n = 4], and asymmetry [ n = 2]). Multivariable analysis demonstrated increased revision rates after UB and PC ( P = 0.008). There was no difference in revision rates between different techniques of PC. Conclusions: In this study of 278 patients presenting for dermatochalasis, up to 21% of cases required ptosis correction in addition to upper blepharoplasty. Ptosis correction is a safe procedure when combined with upper blepharoplasty, regardless of technique used. The revision rate in our series was 9.2% after the combined procedure, which is greater than the revision rate of upper blepharoplasty only but comparable to that in the literature. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.

Background: The Schnur scale used body surface area (BSA) to determine the amount of breast tissue resection in reduction mammaplasty, resulting in a greater requirement of breast weight removal in patients with larger BSA. The authors aimed to demonstrate BSA variance among women with similar mastectomy weights and the range of mastectomy weights among women with comparable BSAs. Methods: A retrospective chart review of patients who underwent mastectomy from October of 2021 to June of 2022 was performed. Patients were included if they underwent skin-sparing or nipple-sparing mastectomy with a minimum specimen weight of 700 g. Patient’s BSA, body mass index (BMI), mastectomy weight, and Schnur weight requirement (SWR) were collected. Results: A total of 130 patients (194 breasts) were included. There was significant variance in mean BSA, BMI, SWR, and SWR-to–mastectomy weight ratio among women with similar mastectomy weights. BSA varied by as much as 0.82 units, BMI varied by as much as 32 kg/m2, and SWR varied by as much as 1365 g within the same mastectomy weight group. There was also significant variance in mastectomy weights among women with comparable BSA, especially in BSA groups greater than 2.20, with the greatest range in mastectomy weights being 1684 g. Conclusions: Analysis of mastectomy patients showed no predictable relationship between BSA and breast weight. There was significant variance in the BSA of patients with similar breast weights, and conversely in breast weights of patients with comparable BSA. Therefore, strict adherence to the Schnur weight requirement can prevent patients with macromastia from receiving breast reductions.

Advanced plastic and craniomaxillofacial reconstruction is a multidisciplinary field, requiring communication and accurate planning among various specialists including oncologic surgeons, plastic surgeons, and radiologists. Complex defects may present in pediatric congenital deformities, after trauma or oncologic surgery. Restoration of form and function require precise planning among the various specialists involved and accurate execution of the surgical plan. Often, considerations for bony and soft tissue requirements make the reconstruction more challenging. Virtual surgical planning using computed tomographic imaging, 3D surface imaging technology and computer‐aided design allow the surgeons to perform virtual surgery and generate templates and cutting guides that allow for the precise and expedient recreation of the plan in the operating room. The author presents cases highlighting various reconstructive requirements where virtual planning was used for advanced plastic and craniomaxillofacial reconstruction to achieve precise reconstruction. Support or Funding Information None

Background: Upper facial third morphometrics are an important consideration in aesthetic facial surgery and facial gender-affirming surgery. Although there are generally accepted sexual dimorphic differences, an in-depth analysis of forehead morphometrics in attractive individuals is lacking. Methods: Thirty white female and 30 white male celebrities were included. Three full-face front-view photographs of each celebrity were evaluated by a facial analysis program, using Vision framework and MATLAB. After converting pixel distances to absolute distances, midline and lateral forehead heights were calculated and compared between men and women. Results: Forehead height was similar between attractive men and women, but forehead width was shorter in women. Analysis of forehead height at various points along the hairline demonstrated that forehead measurements above the lateral brow and brow peak were significantly greater in men. Mean forehead height above the lateral eyebrow was 3.51 cm in women and 4.16 cm in men (P = 0.017). Forehead height above the eyebrow peak was 4.34 cm in women and 5.55 cm in men (P < 0.001). Medial forehead height was similar between men and women, indicating that the greatest difference in attractive male and female foreheads is in the lateral forehead and forehead width. Conclusions: Analysis of attractive white celebrities demonstrated no significant differences in central forehead heights between men and women. Forehead width and lateral forehead height were significantly smaller in women, with an overall downward slanting contour. Male hairlines were more horizontal and slanting upward laterally. These results have implications in facial rejuvenation and facial gender-affirming surgery.

The diversity of patients pursuing facial aesthetic and facial gender-affirming surgery (FGAS) is increasing, yet there is a paucity of objective guidelines to facilitate surgical decision-making in patients of color. We conducted a quantitative analysis of black celebrities using standardized frontal photos of 21 female and 21 male celebrities. Celebrities were chosen from popular entertainment magazines and websites, including People Magazine, the Internet Movie Database (IMDb), Cosmopolitan, and Essence. For each celebrity, 100 facial landmarks were detected through a facial analysis artificial intelligence (AI) program. Black males had greater facial height, bizygomatic width, lower facial height, and bigonial width than females. However, the facial height to bigonial width ratio was similar between genders and approximated the golden ratio (1.618). Female faces demonstrated a greater mid-face height to total facial height proportion, and males had a greater lower facial height proportion. Females exhibited an upward-slanted medial brow and shorter total eyebrow length, nose height, and alar width. Forehead height above the lateral brow was greater in males, while central forehead height was similar to females. This is the first study that has utilized AI to provide ethnicity-specific facial morphometrics relevant to facial rejuvenation and FGAS in the black population.

We present clinical and imaging predictors of ocular injuries that required medical management versus surgical intervention in cases of orbital fractures. From 2014 to 2020, a retrospective review of patients with orbital fractures who received ophthalmologic consultation and computed scan (CT) analysis at a level I trauma center was performed. Inclusion criteria were patients with confirmed orbital fracture on CT and ophthalmology consultation. Patient demographics, associated injuries, comorbidities, management, and outcomes were collected. Two hundred and one patients and 224 eyes (11.4% bilateral orbital fractures) were included. Overall, 21.9% of orbital fractures presented with a significant concomitant ocular injury. Associated facial fractures were present in 68.8% of eyes. Management included surgical treatment in 33.5% of eyes and ophthalmology-directed medical treatment in 17.4%. On multivariate analysis, clinical predictors of surgical intervention were retinal hemorrhage (OR=4.7 (1.0–21.0), P=0.0437), motor vehicle accident injury (OR=2.7 (1.4–5.1), P=0.0030) and diplopia (OR=2.8 (1.5–5.3), P=0.0011). Imaging predictors of surgical intervention were herniation of orbital contents (OR=2.1 (1.1–4.0), P=0.0281) and multiple wall fractures (OR=1.9 (1.01–3.6), P=0.0450). Predictors of medical management were corneal abrasion (OR=7.7 (1.9–31.4), P=0.0041), periorbital laceration (OR=5.7 (2.1–15.6), P=0.0006), and traumatic iritis (OR=4.7 (1.1–20.3), P=0.0444). We demonstrated a 22% incidence of concomitant ocular trauma in orbital fracture patients at our level I trauma center. Predictors of the surgical intervention included multiple wall fractures, herniation of orbital contents, retinal hemorrhage, diplopia, and motor vehicle accident injury. These findings emphasize the importance of a multidisciplinary team in managing ocular and facial trauma.

Abstract Background Abdominal wall reconstruction is challenging for surgeons and may be life altering for patients. There are scant high-quality studies on patient-reported outcomes following abdominal wall reconstruction. We assess long-term surgical and patient-reported outcomes of perforator-preserving open anterior component separation (OPP-ACS) following large ventral hernia repair. Methods A retrospective review of patients with large ventral hernia defects who underwent OPP-ACS performed by the authors (B.A.S., M.J.T.) was conducted between 2015 and 2019. Demographics, surgical history, operative details, outcomes, and complications were extracted. A validated questionnaire, Carolinas Comfort Scale (CCS), was used to assess postoperative quality of life. Results Twenty-two patients (12 males and 10 females) with a mean age and BMI of 60.9 ± 10 years and 28.9 ± 4.8 kg/m2, respectively, were included. Mean follow-up was 28.5 ± 16.3 months. All had prior abdominal surgery; 15 (68%) for abdominopelvic malignancy, 3 (14%) for previous failed hernia repair, and 8 (36%) had history of abdominopelvic radiation. Overall, 16 (73%) hernias were in the midline, 4 (18%) in the right lower quadrant, 1 (4.5%) in the right upper quadrant, and 1 (4.5%) in the left lower quadrant. Mean hernia defect surface area was 145 ± 112 cm2. A total of 9 patients (40.9%) underwent bilateral component separation, whereas 13 (59.1%) had unilateral. Bioprosthetic mesh was used in all patients as underlay. Mean mesh size and thickness were 545.6 ± 207.7 cm2 and 3.4 ± 0.5 mm, respectively. One patient presented with a minor wound dehiscence, and two presented with seromas not requiring aspiration/evacuation. One patient had hernia recurrence 22 months after surgery. One patient was readmitted for partial small bowel obstruction and one required wound revision. A total of 14 (65%) patients responded to the CCS questionnaire. At 12 months, mean score for all 23 items was 0.29 ± 0.21 (0.08–0.62), which corresponds to absence or minimal symptoms. Conclusion The OPP-ACS is a safe surgical option for large, complex ventral hernias. Our cases showed minimal complication rate and hernia recurrence, and our patients reported significant improvement in life quality.

Reconstruction of facial trauma has seen a significant evolutionary leap in the last 100 years. The current surgical management of facial fractures was made possible by the efforts and creativity of pioneer surgeons, advances in anatomic understanding, and the continued development of biomaterials and imaging technologies. Virtual surgical planning (VSP) and 3-dimensional printing (3DP) are being incorporated into the management of acute facial trauma. The integration of this technology at the point of care is rapidly expanding globally. This article reviews the history of the management of craniomaxillofacial trauma, current practices, and future directions. The use of VSP and 3DP in facial trauma care is highlighted with a description of EPPOCRATIS, a rapid point-of-care process incorporating VSP and 3DP at the trauma center.

Background: Physicians from the Mediterranean civilization were profoundly instrumental in the early development and contemporary advancement of the craniomaxillofacial field. These feats are scarcely studied or acclaimed. In this editorial, the authors explore the contributions of these major Mediterranean pioneers. Methods: A literature review on the subject was performed using PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Mayo Clinic Libraries. Results: Mediterranean medicine has recognized and managed craniomaxillofacial pathologies from as early as the 10th century. The first inscriptions were authored by Abu Alkasem al-Zahrawi and Serefeddin Sabuncuoglu. Starting in the 15th century, Leonardo da Vinci shed light on anatomy and esthetics at a time where Gasparo Tagliacozzi spearheaded maxillofacial techniques. The field during the Renaissance was dominated by Hippocrates Asclepiades. Varaztad Kazanjian revolutionized the armamentarium necessitated by mass emergencies during the World War. In the 20th century, Paul Tessier redefined the limits of craniomaxillofacial treatment by using facial osteotomies and developing refined surgical instruments. Modern day Sam Hamra, Enrico Robotti, and Daniel Labbé continue to lead educational and innovative fronts of the field. Conclusions: This essay highlights some important historical contributions to the fields of craniomaxillofacial and facial plastic surgery by pioneer surgeons from around the Mediterranean.