Citations

» Management of tetraplegia should be individualized to a patient’s particular deficiencies and functional goals. » Surgical decision-making for upper-extremity reconstruction in patients with tetraplegia relies on a thorough physical examination to determine which nerves and muscles remain under volitional control with adequate strength for transfer. » Peripheral nerve transfers, either in conjunction with or in place of traditional tendon transfers, enable providers to offer an expanded set of surgical options for patients with tetraplegia who are seeking upper-extremity reconstruction. » All upper-extremity reconstructive efforts should be carefully considered with regard to their potential effects on the availability of future reconstructive efforts.

Abstract Background Blood flow restriction (BFR) therapy is an emerging addition to rehabilitative programs that allows patients to increase strength at lower loads over shorter time periods. Therefore, we conducted a study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a rehabilitation program using BFR to a traditional rehabilitation protocol following operative fixation of distal radius fractures. Methods A randomized controlled study was conducted comparing a standardized rehabilitation protocol alone to a combined protocol with the use of BFR therapy in patients treated with volar plate fixation following a displaced distal radius fracture. The same exercises done in the control group were performed by the BFR group with a restrictive tourniquet in place. Patients were followed with serial radiographs to ensure fracture stability. Outcome measures included wrist range of motion, grip strength, pinch strength, visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores at rest and during activity, patient rated wrist evaluation scores (PRWE), and disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand scores. Results Nine patients were randomized and enrolled within the BFR group (n = 5) and control (n = 4) groups. Patients within the BFR group had a significantly greater reduction in pain with activity over the course of the rehabilitation program. Additionally, the BFR group had a significant improvement in PRWE scores during the 8-week rehabilitation program. There was no difference in radiographic measures after initiation of BFR, and all patients tolerated therapy without noted complications. Conclusion BFR therapy is safe and well tolerated after operatively treated distal radius fractures. The addition of BFR therapy can result in quicker reduction in pain with activity and improvement in patient disability when used early following operative management of a distal radius fracture. Level of Evidence This is a Level 1, prognostic study.

Abstract Background In the classic description of perilunate injuries, the short radiolunate ligament (SRL) remains intact. Objective This study was aimed to determine the occurrence of SRL disruptions with perilunate injuries and review the clinical and radiographic outcomes after surgical management. Patients and Methods A retrospective review was conducted for patients who sustained a perilunate injury and a concomitant disruption of the SRL at a single–level-1 trauma center between January 2013 and January 2017. Patients with the combined injury pattern were compared with those with perilunate injury alone without SRL injury during the study period. Outcome measures included pain scores (visual analogue score), wrist and forearm range of motion, patient's return to their former occupation, and multiple radiographic parameters. Results Twenty-seven patients were treated operatively for a perilunate injury. Eight of these patients (30%) were found to have associated disruption of the SRL. When compared with patients with perilunate injury alone, these patients had a lower rate of return to work (57% [4 of 7] vs. 92% [12 of 13]), a significantly longer mean length of time to return to work (5.9 vs. 3.8 months), and a higher rate of associated upper extremity injury (75% [3 of 8] vs. 16% [3 of 19]. Conclusion Combined SRL disruption and perilunate dislocation or fracture dislocation represent a high-energy variant from the classic description of a perilunate injury. A heightened awareness for this combined injury pattern should be maintained when treating patients with perilunate injuries. Level of Evidence This is a Level III, prognostic study.

» Spasticity is the heightened motor tone that occurs as a result of damage to upper motor neurons in the central nervous system from brain or spinal cord injuries. » Nonoperative interventions for upper-extremity spasticity include chemodenervation or orthotic use, but their efficacy may be limited in correcting severe deformities. In such cases, surgical reconstruction may be necessary. » A single-event multilevel surgery (SEMLS) is a method of addressing deformities involving the entire extremity under 1 anesthetic episode. » It is the responsibility of the surgeon to assemble and communicate with the appropriate health-care team members during the patient’s hospitalization to prevent perioperative complications and to optimize outcomes after surgery. Team entities integral to successful SEMLS for patients with spasticity include respiratory therapy, nutrition, neuropalliative care, internal medicine, occupational therapy, and anesthesiology. » The goal of upper-extremity reconstruction in patients with spasticity is to improve the patient’s quality of life, reduce pain, improve hygiene, restore functionality, and correct disfiguring joint contractures.

» The surgical approach for the patient with a spastic upper limb must be individualized and goal-focused. » An injury to the central nervous system can lead to spinal reflex hyperexcitability with exaggerated muscle activation in response to quick stretch stimuli (i.e., spasticity). » Surgical treatment options are dependent on the potential for function in the spastic upper limb. » If volitional motor control is present, spastic motor units can be lengthened or released while preserving function. » In the absence of volitional motor control, spastic muscles can be divided, released, or denervated with selective neurectomies.

Background: Professional baseball players are at risk of acute and chronic injuries to their upper extremities. Methods: Major League Baseball’s Health and Injury Tracking System, a prospective injury surveillance system, was used to identify and characterize all hand and wrist injuries sustained by all Major League Baseball (MLB) and Minor League Baseball (MiLB) players during the pre-, regular, and postseason throughout 2011-2016. Injuries were included if they resulted in at least 1 day out of play and were sustained during standard baseball activities. Days missed were defined as the time between injury and the first time in which a player was cleared to return to play. Results: During the study period, there were 4478 hand and 1748 wrist injuries throughout MLB and MiLB, which resulted in a total of 105 246 days out of play. This was equivalent to the length of 575 individual MLB player seasons, and the mean days missed per injury was 17 days. Most injuries were traumatic in nature, with 43% (n = 2672) of players injured after being hit by a baseball that mainly occurred during batting (n = 2521; 40%). Injuries that most frequently required surgical intervention were hook of hamate fractures (72%) and scaphoid fractures (60%). Conclusions: Understanding the epidemiology and impact of hand and wrist injuries in MLB and MiLB players may lead to improved management of these injuries and reduce time away from play. Most importantly, preventive measures and/or enhanced protective gear may be developed to minimize these types of injuries in MLB and MiLB.

Background Blood flow restriction (BFR) therapy is an innovative rehabilitative program that enables patients to increase strength at a fraction of the weight typically necessary in endurance exercises. Therefore, we conducted a pilot study evaluating patient outcomes with a BFR therapy program for closed management after a distal radius fracture compared to a traditional rehabilitation protocol. Literature review A randomized-controlled study was conducted comparing a standardized hand therapy rehabilitation protocol alone to a combined protocol with the use of BFR therapy in patients who were initially treated with closed reduction and short arm cast immobilization for a displaced distal radius fracture between May 1, 2015 and August 1, 2016. BFR therapy was performed with a restrictive tourniquet applied to the upper brachium, performing the same strengthening exercises as the control group but with the restrictive tourniquet in place. Clinical assessment was conducted at 6, 10, and 14 weeks from the date of initial cast immobilization. Outcome measures collected included wrist range of motion; grip strength; pinch strength; visual analogue scale for pain with activity and at rest; patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE) scores; and disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand scores. Results Thirteen patients were enrolled and randomized between the BFR (n = 6) and control (n = 7) groups. The BFR group noted significantly greater reduction in pain with activity compared to the control group after 8 weeks of therapy (Δ −4.0 vs. −2.3, p = 0.03). Similarly, patients in the BFR group displayed greater reduction in PRWE scores compared to the control group after 8 weeks of BFR therapy (Δ −57.9 vs. 30.8, p = 0.01). The two groups did not demonstrate any significant difference in radiographic outcomes at any time point or throughout the course of the study. All patients tolerated the BFR therapy program and there were no complications. Clinical relevance The addition of BFR therapy to the rehabilitative program after closed management of a distal radius fracture is safe, well tolerated by patients, without any deleterious effects on radiographic outcomes. This pilot study noted that BFR therapy in patients with nonoperative distal radius fractures may result in a larger reduction in pain with activity and greater improvement in overall self-perceived function.

Variation in lunate morphology can exist based on the absence (Type I) or presence (Type II) of medial facet on the distal articular surface of the lunate that contacts the proximal pole of the hamate. This additional lunatohamate articulation can affect load transmission across the radiocarpal joint and exert an influence on carpal kinematics. A Type II lunate is protective against carpal instability patterns associated with scaphoid nonunions and scapholunate dissociations. It may also play a role in the progression of carpal collapse that occurs in Kienböck disease. This review summarizes the effect of lunate morphology in the outcomes of non-operative and operative treatment of carpal disorders.

Summary: Most unstable metacarpal and phalangeal fractures for which operative treatment is indicated can be reduced and stabilized with either open or closed techniques using local anesthetic with epinephrine instead of intravenous sedation or general anesthesia. With the patient wide-awake during surgery, the hand can be taken through active range of motion to assess fracture stability. In this article, the authors review the rationale and technique for wide-awake, local anesthesia, no tourniquet surgery in the treatment of phalangeal and metacarpal fractures and impart pearls to optimize the patient experience and illustrate common fixation techniques using percutaneous Kirschner wires. The intraoperative assessment of fracture stability permits an accelerated, protected–range-of-motion protocol that minimizes postoperative stiffness and facilitates expedient recovery.

Arthrofibrosis is an inevitable consequence of elbow trauma that oftentimes requires surgical release to restore range of motion and function. Although the surgical procedure for elbow osteocapsular release can result in marked improvement in elbow motion, postrelease rehabilitation is paramount to maintaining and even improving the gains achieved in surgery. There are a variety of rehabilitation protocols and modalities that can be implemented that can be divided into an early versus late stage of rehabilitation after surgery. Irrespectively, patient ownership in the rehabilitative process and effective communication between surgeon and therapist are integral in achieving successful outcomes.