Citations

Abstract Though anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint blockade therapy has demonstrated robust anti-tumor immunity in human patients with advanced cancers such as melanoma, only a fraction of patients achieved such durable anti-tumor responses. Among all the non-responders, some patients responded initially but developed resistance to the therapy in the later treatments. This reflects an urgent need to understand the role of PD-1 signals in CD8+ T cells at priming and at effector stages during tumor development for the benefit of immunotherapy. The controversy of rapid tumor progression in PD-1 conditional knockout in regulatory T cells and tumor regression in PD-1 targeted deletion in regulatory T cells indicated germline PD-1 knockout mice might not be sophisticated enough to study the role of PD-1 in CD8+ T cells during tumor development. Thus, we produced a CD8 T cell-specific PD-1 knockout mouse model (CD8 E8ICre-PD-1fl/fl, also called CD8-PD-1 cKO mice) in which PD-1 is deleted in CD8+ T cells in the peripheral tissues. When CD8-PD-1 cKO mice were challenged with B16-OVA mouse melanoma cells, we found a delayed tumor growth and prolonged survival of CD8-PD-1 cKO compared to control mice. However, after 20 days of tumor challenge, the delayed tumor growth rebound in CD8-PD-1 cKO mice. In an OVA antigen immunization model, we found increased effector cells and tissue resident cells in the spleen of CD8-PD-1 cKO mice compared with control mice on day 7 after immunization. Taken together, our results suggest that PD-1 may restrain the expansion of effector T cells that contribute to the early phase of tumor control, but the augmented effector T cell response may cause an attrition of memory T cell pool that will be needed for long term protection. R01CA256927

Abstract Although cancer burden in patients with advanced diseases results in T cell exhaustion and failed prior therapies, some of them achieved durable clinical responses to salvage therapy (chemotherapy or radiation therapy) implying a presence of tumor-reactive resilient T cells in them. However, the phenotype and functional features of resilient T cells have not been clearly defined. We found that CX3CR1+ CD8+ T cells with low mitochondrial membrane potential demonstrated features of resilient T cells: (a) their cytotoxic T cell function (degranulation/CD107a expression) recovered quickly after tumor burden has been reduced by radiation therapy or chemotherapy; (b) they maintain a low profile of glycolysis but produce optimal levels of ATP; (c) they express lower levels of PD-1 and TOX; (4) they share a feature of stem-like T cells (TCF1+PD-1+) that can be responsive to immunotherapy; (5) they avoid accumulation of a harmful level of cytosolic reactive oxygen species (ROS) that may cause T cell exhaustion; (6) they upregulate malic enzyme 1 (ME1) to balance glycolysis and ROS, and to expand cytotoxic effector T cells. These unique features of resilient T cells may not only be used as T cell biomarker to design rational combination therapy to control advanced cancers but can also be used to convey a resilient functional state to T cells in patients who lack them. Citation Format: Joanina K. Gicobi, Yiyi Yan, Hu Zeng, Sean Park, Haidong Dong. Characterization of cytotoxic resilient T cells in patients with advanced cancers in response to salvage radiation therapy or chemotherapy. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 4160.

Abstract Purpose/Objectives: Proton therapy is under investigation in breast cancer as a strategy to reduce heart and lung exposure, which is associated with late cardiopulmonary adverse events and secondary malignancy. To date, studies investigating postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) with protons have used conventional fractionation. We hypothesized that condensing treatment to 15 fractions would be safe based on evidence that breast cancer is more sensitive to higher dose fractions than surrounding normal tissues. Materials/Methods: We conducted a randomized non-inferiority phase II trial comparing conventional and hypofractionated proton PMRT with primary endpoint of 24-month complication rate (defined as grade 3 or higher late adverse events using CTCAE, v 4.0 and/or unplanned surgical intervention in patients undergoing mastectomy with reconstruction). With a 10% non-inferiority margin the study ensured 80% power and had a one sided-type I error rate of 0.05. Cardiotoxicity was assessed with serial transthoracic conventional and 2-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography (2D-STE). Eligibility included age ≥ 18 years with non-inflammatory breast cancer resected by mastectomy with indications for PMRT. Assignment of treatments was balanced with respect to immediate breast reconstruction (IBR). Conventional fractionation group received 50 Gy in 25 fractions of 2 Gy, and hypofractionation group received 40.05 Gy in 15 fractions of 2.67 Gy (RBE 1.1). Target volume included the chest wall and axillary, supraclavicular, and internal mammary lymph nodes. All patients were treated with multi-field optimized pencil beam scanning (intensity modulated proton therapy). Results: Between 2016 and 2018, 82 patients were enrolled and randomized (41 conventional, 41 hypofractionation). Median patient age was 52 years. 32.9% were staged T3-T4 and 79.3% node positive at diagnosis. 57 of 82 patients (69.5%) elected IBR. The median mean heart dose was 0.49 Gy and the median ipsilateral lung volume receiving 40% of prescription or greater (V40%) was 13.6%. No significant changes on conventional or 2D-STE at end-of-treatment or 3-month follow-up compared to baseline were observed. The rate of ≥ grade 2 acute dermatitis was lower with hypofractionation (44% vs 15%, p = 0.006). Other ≥ grade 2 acute adverse events including esophagitis (0 vs 5%), infection (5% vs 2.4%) and skin hyperpigmentation (7.3% vs 4.8%) were not significantly different between the two arms. With a median follow-up of 38.3 months, the 24-month complication rate was conventional 14.6% vs hypofractionation 17.1% (absolute difference 2.4%, p=0.17, 95% CI [-, 15.7%]). In patients with IBR, 6 of 28 (21.4%) conventional and 7 of 29 (24.1%) hypofractionated patients developed complications (p =0.80). There was no significant difference in 3-year disease-free survival between the conventional (89.4%; 95% CI 80.0 – 99.8%) and hypofractionated (92.4%, 95% CI 84.5 – 100.0%) arms (p = 0.91). One local recurrence occurred in the hypofractionated arm simultaneous with regional and distant relapse. The remaining 6 recurrences were isolated distant events. Conclusions: Proton PMRT provided excellent locoregional control and normal tissue sparing. There were no subclinical echocardiographic changes indicative of radiation-induced cardiac dysfunction. Hypofractionation resulted in comparable disease control, tolerability and reconstruction outcomes as conventional fractionation. Although non-inferiority of hypofractionation could not be established based on the upper bound of the 95% confidence interval for complication rate being greater than 10%, both conventional and hypofractionation may be considered appropriate regimens for ongoing phase 3 randomized trials comparing photon and proton radiotherapy. Citation Format: Robert Mutter, Sharmila Giri, Briant Fruth, Nicholas Remmes, Aman Anand, Kathryn Ruddy, Hector Villarraga, Sebastian Santos Patarroyo, Elizabeth Yan, Kenneth Merrell, Lisa McGee, Tamara Vern-Gross, Bradley Stish, Robert Gao, Judy C. Boughey, Sean Park, Kimberly Corbin, Carlos Vargas. Phase II randomized trial of conventional versus hypofractionated post-mastectomy proton radiotherapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr GS4-05.

AbstractBackgroundThis study was aimed at developing and validating a decision‐making tool predictive of overall survival (OS) for patients receiving stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for spinal metastases.MethodsThree hundred sixty‐one patients at one institution were used for the training set, and 182 at a second institution were used for external validation. Treatments most commonly involved one or three fractions of spine SBRT. Exclusion criteria included proton therapy and benign histologies.ResultsThe final model consisted of the following variables and scores: Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS) ≥ 6 (1), time from primary diagnosis < 21 months (1), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status = 1 (1) or ECOG performance status > 1 (2), and >1 organ system involved (1). Each variable was an independent predictor of OS (p < .001), and each 1‐point increase in the score was associated with a hazard ratio of 2.01 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.79–2.25; p < .0001). The concordance value was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.71–0.78). The scores were discretized into three groups—favorable (score = 0–1), intermediate (score = 2), and poor survival (score = 3–5)—with 2‐year OS rates of 84% (95% CI, 79%–90%), 46% (95% CI, 36%–59%), and 21% (95% CI, 14%–32%), respectively (p < .0001 for each). In the external validation set (182 patients), the score was also predictive of OS (p < .0001). Increasing SINS<zaq;6> was predictive of decreased OS as a continuous variable (p < .0001).ConclusionsThis novel score is proposed as a decision‐making tool to help to optimize patient selection for spine SBRT. SINS may be an independent predictor of OS.

Purpose: To evaluate the performance of a new, highly flexible radiofrequency (RF) coil system for imaging patients undergoing MR simulation. Methods: Volumetric phantom and in vivo images were acquired with a commercially available and prototype RF coil set. Phantom evaluation was performed using a silicone-filled humanoid phantom of the head and shoulders. In vivo assessment was performed in five healthy and six patient subjects. Phantom data included T1-weighted volumetric imaging, while in vivo acquisitions included both T1- and T2-weighted volumetric imaging. Signal to noise ratio (SNR) and uniformity metrics were calculated in the phantom data, while SNR values were calculated in vivo. Statistical significance was tested by means of a non-parametric analysis of variance test. Results: At a threshold of p = 0.05, differences in measured SNR distributions within the entire phantom volume were statistically different in two of the three paired coil set comparisons. Differences in per slice average SNR between the two coil sets were all statistically significant, as well as differences in per slice image uniformity. For patients, SNRs within the entire imaging volume were statistically significantly different in four of the nine comparisons and seven of the nine comparisons performed on the per slice average SNR values. For healthy subjects, SNRs within the entire imaging volume were statistically significantly different in seven of the nine comparisons and eight of the nine comparisons when per slice average SNR was tested. Conclusions: Phantom and in vivo results demonstrate that image quality obtained from the novel flexible RF coil set was similar or improved over the conventional coil system. The results also demonstrate that image quality is impacted by the specific coil configurations used for imaging and should be matched appropriately to the anatomic site imaged to ensure optimal and reproducible image quality.

Abstract NRG-1 signals through epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) family members. Despite promising preclinical data, HER2 blockade in prostate cancer has failed to improve outcomes in clinical trials.1-4 We have discovered a novel complex systemic role of NRG-1 that drives sensitivity and resistance to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in castration-sensitive (CSPC) and castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), respectively. Significantly, sensitivity to ADT can be restored in CRPC by manipulating NRG-1 signaling. Our data posit NRG-1 as a systemic “switch” in prostate cancer. Plasma NRG-1 is elevated in our cohort of patients with metastatic CRPC (mean 4.9ng/ml) versus healthy controls (mean 3.2ng/ml, p&lt;0.0001) or metastatic CSPC (mean 3.4ng/ml, p&lt;0.0001). Paradoxically, high systemic NRG-1 predicted superior OS and PFS in CSPC but inferior clinical outcomes in CRPC. Consistently, opposite cell survival between LNCaP (CSPC) vs Du145 & PC3 (CRPC) was observed with recombinant human NRG-1 and enzalutamide (ENZ). ENZ combined with increasing NRG-1 concentration induced LNCaP cell death in an additive manner, but NRG-1 rescued Du145 & PC3 from ENZ-induced death in a dose-dependent manner. We next hypothesized that differential NRG-1 downstream signaling is mediated by engagement with distinct EGFR receptor dimers. While HER2 expression is similar, LNCaP express higher HER3 than Du145 & PC3. High ratio of HER2 to HER3 in Du145 & PC3 mirrors clinical reports of HER2 upregulation in CRPC5,6 and also predicts patient survival in the Stand Up to Cancer cohort.7 Significantly, we recapitulated the CRPC phenotype in LNCaP by inducing HER2 overexpression, HER3 suppression, and chemically-mediated HER2/HER3 dimerization. Conversely, HER2 knockdown sensitized Du145 cells to ENZ. Next, we queried composite single-cell whole human8 and CRPC9 transcriptomes for NRG-1 expression and discovered that the source of NRG-1 is the patients’ own mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). Bone-derived MSC outgrowth cells produced copious NRG-1, which was increased substantially by coincubation with prostate cancer cell supernatants. Importantly, we were able to manipulate MSCs to reduce their NRG-1 production as a possible clinical translation. Similarly, patients treated with these compounds showed significant reduction in plasma NRG-1 levels after treatment. Additional clinical studies are pending. Together, our observations confirm that NRG-1 has differential signaling: HER3 homodimerization leads to prostate cancer cell death, whereas heterodimerization of HER3 with HER2 leads to prostate cancer cell survival via ADT resistance in a plasma NRG-1 dependent manner. Consequently, HER2 and HER3 receptor availability determine the molecular switch of NRG-1 in prostate cancer. Therefore, NRG-1 can be both a prognostic marker and therapeutic target in CRPC, and multiple clinical trials are pending. Citation Format: Jacob Orme, Roman Thaler, Dejie Wang, Siven Chinniah, Jacob Hirdler, Fernando Quevedo, Lance Pagliaro, Kwon Eugene, Alan Bryce, Brian Costello, Haojie Huang, Sean Park. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived systemic NRG-1 mediates a targetable molecular switch in metastatic prostate cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 397.

Background Patients with metastatic melanoma rely on PD-(L)1 immunotherapy, but only one-third of patients experience treatment response and all initial responders eventually develop resistance. Tumour-derived extracellular vesicles expressing Programmed death ligand 1 (evPD-L1) and soluble Programmed death ligand 1 (sPD-L1) in peripheral blood of patients with melanoma limit PD-(L)1 immunotherapy and correlate with poor survival. Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) removes immunosuppressive evPD-L1 and sPD-L1. We hypothesise that TPE may rescue and restore antimelanoma immunity. Methods In this two-arm study, 60 patients with metastatic melanoma progressing on checkpoint inhibition will be accrued. All patients will undergo radiotherapy on days 1–5 (at least one measurable lesion will not be irradiated) and ongoing checkpoint inhibition on day 8 and every 2–3 weeks per standard of care. Patients with baseline sPD-L1 level of ≥1.7 ng/mL and adequate clinical capacity will be enrolled in the TPE intervention arm and will undergo TPE on days 5–7, in addition to standard of care radiotherapy and immunotherapy. Other patients will remain in the standard of care arm. The primary endpoint of the study is to evaluate safety. Secondary endpoints include kinetics of sPD-L1 and evPD-L1 and clinical response by RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) criteria. Study registered at ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT04581382 ). Ethics and dissemination This trial has been approved by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board. It will assess the safety and feasibility of TPE in improving outcomes for PD-(L)1 inhibitor immunotherapy in melanoma. Data will be maintained on a secure database with deidentified patient information. Data will be shared on publication in a peer-reviewed journal without the aid of professional writers. If successful, this trial will lay the ground for phase II studies that will include cancer treated with PD-(L)1 inhibitors which may benefit from TPE such as renal, bladder and lung cancers. Trial registration number NCT04581382 .

Abstract Background: Partial breast irradiation (PBI) is an established option for selected patients with early stage breast cancer. The optimal technique, target volume and dose/fractionation for PBI has yet to be defined. The most studied regimen in North America (38.5 Gy in 10 fractions twice daily) has been associated with cosmetic deterioration. We hypothesized that condensing treatment and reducing the total administered dose could improve the therapeutic ratio in luminal breast cancer and DCIS based on emerging evidence that breast cancer is more sensitive than surrounding normal tissues to high dose fractions. Herein, we report cosmetic, tolerability, disease control, and patient reported outcomes of a novel ultra-accelerated PBI regimen. Methods: We conducted a single arm, three cohort trial of photon, proton, and brachytherapy PBI. Technique was selected at physician and patient discretion. Eligible women were age ≥ 50 years with estrogen receptor positive (ER+), sentinel lymph node negative invasive or in-situ breast cancer measuring ≤ 2.5 cm. The regimen was designed to have comparable biologically equivalent effect as 40 Gy in 15 fractions, assuming an α/β ratio of 3.5. Intracavitary brachytherapy target volume was lumpectomy cavity plus 1 cm and prescribed 21 Gy in 3 fractions. Photon and proton target volumes were post-operative tumor bed plus 1 cm and a 3 mm setup uncertainty margin, prescribed 21.9 Gy (RBE) in 3 fractions, and delivered with image guidance. The primary outcome was the percentage difference in patients with adverse cosmesis (defined as fair or poor cosmesis) at 3 years compared to baseline pre-PBI, as assessed by trained nurses using the 4-point Harvard breast cosmesis scale. Patients also completed quality of life surveys and self-reported cosmesis using the 4-point scale. Locoregional and distant recurrence-free survival was determined using the Kaplan-Meier method. Adverse events were assessed using CTCAE, v 4.0. Results: Between 2015 and 2017, 163 patients were treated: photons in 58, protons in 48, and brachytherapy in 57. Median patient age was 66 years. 129 (79%) patients had invasive breast cancer (all ER+) and 34 (21%) had DCIS (83% ER+). Median tumor size was 1.1 cm. Grade was 2-3 in 102 (63%). The median mean heart/ipsilateral lung doses were photons 0.1/1.6 Gy, protons &lt;0.001/0.1 Gy, and brachytherapy 0.5/0.9 Gy. Median follow-up was 4.1 years (IQR 3.9-5.0). The proportion of patients with adverse cosmesis (by RN assessment) was 14.3% at baseline and 3.8% at 3 years, with four patients (1 photon, 1 proton, 2 brachytherapy) experiencing cosmetic deterioration at 3 years from baseline. The proportion with adverse cosmesis by self-report at 3 years was 2.4%, with three patients (1 photon, 1 proton, 1 brachytherapy) reporting cosmetic deterioration. Four patients developed locoregional recurrence (1 photons, 2 protons, 1 brachytherapy); three were local only and one was local and distant. 4-year locoregional recurrence and distant metastasis-free survival were 97.9% and 97.4%, respectively. There were 2 treatment related ≥ grade 2 late events (grade 2 fibrosis and grade 2 seroma, both brachytherapy associated), and no evidence of deterioration in patient-reported pain, fatigue, breast related or overall quality of life, as assessed by the patient reported outcomes version of the CTCAE, 10-point linear analog scales, and the breast cancer treatment outcomes scale. Conclusions: Ultra-accelerated 3-fraction PBI exquisitely spared normal tissues and was associated with favorable cosmetic outcomes, disease control, and excellent long-term tolerability. This ‘precision-radiotherapy’ approach may optimize the therapeutic ratio over more aggressive radiotherapy options as well as radiotherapy omission, particularly in patients with long life expectancies. Citation Format: Robert Mutter, Tina Hieken, Todd DeWees, Arslan Afzal, Stephanie Kenison, Laura Vallow, Christopher Deufel, Nicholas Remmes, Kathryn Ruddy, Judy Boughey, Keith Furutani, Amy Degnim, James Jakub, Tamara Vern-Gross, Dean Shumway, William Wong, Samir Patel, Lisa McGee, Minetta Liu, Carlos Vargas, Daniel Visscher, Bradley Stish, Deanna Pafundi, Mark Waddle, Michael Golafshar, Michele Halyard, Kimberly Corbin, Sean Park. Ultra-accelerated photon, proton, and brachytherapy partial breast irradiation: Primary results of the Mayo 3-fraction trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD7-03.