Citations

AbstractBackground and AimAlthough fidaxomicin is an effective first‐line treatment for Clostridioides difficile infection, it has not been well studied in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of fidaxomicin for the treatment of C. difficile infection in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.MethodsThis was a multicenter retrospective study of adults with inflammatory bowel disease and C. difficile infection treated with fidaxomicin with at least 3 months of follow up. The primary outcomes were treatment response, defined as resolution of C. difficile infection‐attributed diarrhea and/or negative C. difficile infection stool test, and time to C. difficile infection recurrence after fidaxomicin.ResultsThirty‐three patients (median age 42 years; 60.6% female) were included. Most patients had ulcerative colitis (26, 78.8%), were receiving treatment with a biologic or small molecule medication (19, 57.6%), and had a prior episode of C. difficile infection (26, 78.8%, median 2 episodes, range 0–15). Fidaxomicin led to resolution of C. difficile infection in 20 (60.6%) patients, with 6/20 (30.0%) developing a recurrence at a median of 55 days. Most patients who failed to respond to fidaxomicin underwent fecal microbiota transplantation (10/13, 76.9%) with resolution.ConclusionsIn this cohort of patients with inflammatory bowel disease and C. difficile infection, 60.6% responded to treatment with fidaxomicin. Of those who did not respond, fecal microbiota transplantation was an effective therapy.

Background: Microbiota restoration is highly effective to treat recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) in observational studies (cure rates >90%) but efficacy in controlled clinical trials appears to be lower. Objectives: To perform an updated meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of microbiota restoration for recurrent CDI in open-label registered prospective clinical trials compared to randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Design: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted. Data Sources and Methods: A systematic search of various databases was performed up to July 2022 to identify studies of interest. Clinical trials of microbiota restoration for recurrent CDI with clinical resolution with one dose were included. We calculated weighted pooled rates (WPRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: In all, 19 clinical trials with 1176 recurrent CDI patients were included. Of the patients treated with microbiota restoration, 897 experienced a clinical cure with a single microbiota restoration therapy (WPR, 78%; 95% CI, 71–85%). There was significant heterogeneity among studies with an I2 of 88%. Analysis of trials with a control arm (non-microbiota restoration) revealed CDI resolution in 373 of 523 patients (WPR, 72%; 95% CI, 60–82%) with microbiota restoration. Among the nine open-label clinical trials, CDI resolution was seen in 524 of 653 patients after initial microbiota restoration (WPR, 84%; 95% CI, 74–92%). Comparison of resolution rates between RCTs and open-label trials revealed a lower cure rate in RCTs compared to open-label trials (WPR, 73 versus 84%, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Microbiota restoration in a randomized controlled setting leads to lower resolution rates compared to open label and observational settings, likely due to stricter definitions and inclusion criteria. Resolution rates in open-label studies were similar to observational studies.

Background: The incidence of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) in peripartum women is rising, but limited data on its effect on maternal and neonatal outcomes are available. Objective: To study the effect of peripartum CDI on pregnancy and neonatal outcomes. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Methods: Patients with peripartum CDI 12 weeks before pregnancy through 6 weeks postpartum (January 1996–February 2018) were matched with controls (peripartum women without CDI) 1:1 by age, year of delivery, and prior pregnancies. McNemar’s test and conditional logistic regression were used to analyze the effect of CDI on pregnancy and neonatal outcomes (complications, mode of delivery). p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Overall, 101 cases and 100 controls (1997–2018) were included; median age 27 (range, 20–41) years. Timing of CDI was as follows: pre-pregnancy: 15.8% ( n = 16), during pregnancy: 51.5% ( n = 52), and postpartum: 32.7% ( n = 33). The commonest risk factor was outpatient/emergency room visits. Pregnancy and neonatal outcomes were analyzed for 67 matched pairs with CDI before or during pregnancy. Cases had higher odds of cesarean delivery ( p = 0.02) and lower odds of Group B Streptococcus (GBS) infection/colonization ( p = 0.03). Odds of cesarean delivery remained high after controlling for labor arrest disorders [odds ratio (OR): 17.23 (95% confidence interval (CI), 2.19–543.19; p = 0.004)]; odds of GBS remained low after controlling for antibiotic use (OR: 0.25, 95% CI, 0.04–0.99; p = 0.049). Neonatal outcomes were similar in cases and controls. CDI treatment did not affect treatment-related or delivery outcomes. Conclusion: Peripartum CDI was associated with higher odds of cesarean delivery and lower odds of GBS infections. Larger studies exploring the effect of CDI on pregnancy and neonatal outcomes are needed.

Background: Microscopic colitis (MC) causes chronic diarrhea. It has two histologic subtypes: lymphocytic colitis (LC) and collagenous colitis (CC). Little is known about the natural progression of disease with time and with treatment. Objectives: We aimed to assess histological changes over time. Design: We designed a retrospective study including adults diagnosed with MC from January 1992 to January 2020 at Mayo Clinic. Methods: Pathology reports were reviewed until 31 October 2020. Histological assessments at least 8 weeks apart were considered as adequate follow-up. Histological change from one subtype to the other and resolution were tracked with univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. Results: Overall, 416 patients with a median age at diagnosis of 63.9 years with >1 histopathological assessment were identified. Histology at initial diagnosis was CC in 218 (52.4%) patients and LC in 198 (47.6%). No medications were associated with a histological change. However, histological resolution was more likely with the use of aspirin [hazard ratio (HR): 2.10, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.34–3.31, p = 0.001) and proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs; HR: 2.01, 95% CI: 1.34–3.02, p = 0.001). Histological resolution was more likely with budesonide treatment (HR: 1.86, 95% CI: 1.16–3.00, p = 0.010) and less likely with mesalamine (HR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.19–0.83, p = 0.014), compared to medications such as prednisone, loperamide, and bismuth. Patients with CC were less likely to change their histology compared to patients with LC (HR: 0.24, 95% CI: 0.14–0.42, p < 0.001). There was no difference in histological resolution between the two subtypes (HR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.47–1.05, p = 0.084). Conclusion: Patients with LC have a higher chance of changing their histology as compared to CC. However, histological resolution was associated with the use of PPIs and aspirin, and treatment with budesonide.

ImportanceThe effect of rationally defined nonpathogenic, nontoxigenic, commensal strains of Clostridia on prevention of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is unknown.ObjectiveTo determine the efficacy of VE303, a defined bacterial consortium of 8 strains of commensal Clostridia, in adults at high risk for CDI recurrence. The primary objective was to determine the recommended VE303 dosing for a phase 3 trial.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsPhase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study conducted from February 2019 to September 2021 at 27 sites in the US and Canada. The study included 79 participants aged 18 years or older who were diagnosed with laboratory-confirmed CDI with 1 or more prior CDI episodes in the last 6 months and those with primary CDI at high risk for recurrence (defined as aged ≥75 years or ≥65 years with ≥1 risk factors: creatinine clearance &amp;lt;60 mL/min/1.73 m2, proton pump inhibitor use, remote [&amp;gt;6 months earlier] CDI history).InterventionsParticipants were randomly assigned to high-dose VE303 (8.0 × 109 colony-forming units [CFUs]) (n = 30), low-dose VE303 (1.6 × 109 CFUs) (n = 27), or placebo capsules (n = 22) orally once daily for 14 days.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary efficacy end point was the proportion of participants with CDI recurrence at 8 weeks using a combined clinical and laboratory definition. The primary efficacy end point was analyzed in 3 prespecified analyses, using successively broader definitions for an on-study CDI recurrence: (1) diarrhea consistent with CDI plus a toxin-positive stool sample; (2) diarrhea consistent with CDI plus a toxin-positive, polymerase chain reaction–positive, or toxigenic culture–positive stool sample; and (3) diarrhea consistent with CDI plus laboratory confirmation or (in the absence of a stool sample) treatment with a CDI-targeted antibiotic.ResultsBaseline characteristics were similar across the high-dose VE303 (n = 29; 1 additional participant excluded from efficacy analysis), low-dose VE303 (n = 27), and placebo (n = 22) groups. The participants’ median age was 63.5 years (range, 24-96); 70.5% were female; and 1.3% were Asian, 1.3% Black, 2.6% Hispanic, and 96.2% White. CDI recurrence rates through week 8 (using the efficacy analysis 3 definition) were 13.8% (4/29) for high-dose VE303, 37.0% (10/27) for low-dose VE303, and 45.5% (10/22) for placebo (P = .006, high-dose VE303 vs placebo).Conclusions and RelevanceAmong adults with laboratory-confirmed CDI with 1 or more prior CDI episodes in the last 6 months and those with primary CDI at high risk for recurrence, high-dose VE303 prevented recurrent CDI compared with placebo. A larger, phase 3 study is needed to confirm these findings.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03788434

Abstract Background Microbiota restoration is highly effective to treat recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) in observational studies (cure rates &gt;90%) but efficacy in controlled clinical trials appears lower. Purpose We performed an updated meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of microbiota restoration for recurrent CDI in open-label registered prospective clinical trials compared to randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Method A systematic search of Embase, Web of Science and Scopus was performed up to June 2022 to identify studies of interest. Clinical trials of microbiota restoration for recurrent CDI with clinical resolution with one dose as the primary outcome were included. We calculated both unweighted and weighted pooled resolution rates (UPR and WPR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Result(s) Eighteen studies (9 RCTs and 9 open-label trials) with 1149 CDI patients were included. Of the patients treated with microbiota restoration, 881 experienced symptom resolution (UPR 77%%; WPR 79%, 95% CI, 72%-85%). There was significant heterogeneity among studies with an I2of 86%. Analysis of trials with a control arm (non-microbiota restoration) revealed CDI resolution in 357 of 496 patients (UPR 72%; WPR 73%, 95% CI 63%-82%) with microbiota restoration. Among the 9 open-label clinical trials, CDI resolution was seen in 524 of 653 patients after initial microbiota restoration (UPR 80%; WPR 84%, 95% CI 74%-92%). Comparison of resolution rates between RCTs and open-label trials revealed a lower cure rate in RCTs compared to open-label trials (WPR 73% vs 84%, p&lt;0.0001). Analysis of the 10 trials with non-microbiota restoration revealed CDI resolution in 201 of 397 patients with antibiotics (WPR 52%, 95% CI 43%-60%). There was significant heterogeneity among the included studies with an I2of 61%. Comparison of cure rates with microbiota restoration vs antibiotics showed higher cure rate with microbiota restoration (WPR 73%, [95% CI 63%-82%] vs 52% [95% CI, 43%-60%]; p&lt;0.0001). There were no serious adverse events reported. Conclusion(s) Microbiota restoration in a randomized controlled setting leads to lower resolution rates compared to open label and observational settings, likely due to stricter definitions and inclusion criteria. Resolution rates in open label studies were similar to observational studies. Please acknowledge all funding agencies by checking the applicable boxes below None Disclosure of Interest None Declared

ImportanceA safe and effective treatment for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is urgently needed. Antibiotics kill toxin-producing bacteria but do not repair the disrupted microbiome, which promotes spore germination and infection recurrence.ObjectivesTo evaluate the safety and rate of CDI recurrence after administration of investigational microbiome therapeutic SER-109 through 24 weeks.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis phase 3, single-arm, open-label trial (ECOSPOR IV) was conducted at 72 US and Canadian outpatient sites from October 2017 to April 2022. Adults aged 18 years or older with recurrent CDI were enrolled in 2 cohorts: (1) rollover patients from the ECOSPOR III trial who had CDI recurrence diagnosed by toxin enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and (2) patients with at least 1 CDI recurrence (diagnosed by polymerase chain reaction [PCR] or toxin EIA), inclusive of their acute infection at study entry.InterventionsSER-109 given orally as 4 capsules daily for 3 days following symptom resolution after antibiotic treatment for CDI.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe main outcomes were safety, measured as the rate of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in all patients receiving any amount of SER-109, and cumulative rates of recurrent CDI (toxin-positive diarrhea requiring treatment) through week 24 in the intent-to-treat population.ResultsOf 351 patients screened, 263 were enrolled (180 [68.4%] female; mean [SD] age, 64.0 [15.7] years); 29 were in cohort 1 and 234 in cohort 2. Seventy-seven patients (29.3%) were enrolled with their first CDI recurrence. Overall, 141 patients (53.6%) had TEAEs, which were mostly mild to moderate and gastrointestinal. There were 8 deaths (3.0%) and 33 patients (12.5%) with serious TEAEs; none were considered treatment related by the investigators. Overall, 23 patients (8.7%; 95% CI, 5.6%-12.8%) had recurrent CDI at week 8 (4 of 29 [13.8%; 95% CI, 3.9%-31.7%] in cohort 1 and 19 of 234 [8.1%; 95% CI, 5.0%-12.4%] in cohort 2), and recurrent CDI rates remained low through 24 weeks (36 patients [13.7%; 95% CI, 9.8%-18.4%]). At week 8, recurrent CDI rates in patients with a first recurrence were similarly low (5 of 77 [6.5%; 95% CI, 2.1%-14.5%]) as in patients with 2 or more recurrences (18 of 186 [9.7%; 95% CI, 5.8%-14.9%]). Analyses by select baseline characteristics showed consistently low recurrent CDI rates in patients younger than 65 years vs 65 years or older (5 of 126 [4.0%; 95% CI, 1.3%-9.0%] vs 18 of 137 [13.1%; 95% CI, 8.0%-20.0%]) and patients enrolled based on positive PCR results (3 of 69 [4.3%; 95% CI, 0.9%-12.2%]) vs those with positive toxin EIA results (20 of 192 [10.4%; 95% CI, 6.5%-15.6%]).Conclusions and RelevanceIn this trial, oral SER-109 was well tolerated in a patient population with recurrent CDI and prevalent comorbidities. The rate of recurrent CDI was low regardless of the number of prior recurrences, demographics, or diagnostic approach, supporting the beneficial impact of SER-109 for patients with CDI.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03183141

Abstract Crohn’s disease is a chronic gastrointestinal inflammatory disorder, characterized by episodes of relapsing and remitting flares. As the disease mechanism becomes better elucidated, there is a significant increase in the number of available biologic therapies. This article summarizes and synthesizes current Food and Drug Administration-approved biological therapy for Crohn’s disease and examines the positioning of medical therapy as emerging biologics break onto the market.

BACKGROUND: Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is the procedure of choice when colectomy is needed for medically refractory ulcerative colitis. Pouchitis is one of the most common complications among patients who have undergone ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and represents a spectrum of disease varying in both phenotype and clinical course. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review is to assist clinicians and surgeons in the treatment of both acute and chronic pouchitis, including newer therapies and future directions. DIAGNOSIS AND MANAGEMENT: Diagnosis is made by endoscopy of the pouch with biopsy, since other conditions may produce similar symptoms such as increased stool frequency, abdominal cramps, and urgency. Pouchitis is classified by duration (acute versus chronic), disease pattern (infrequent, relapsing, continuous), and response to antibiotics (responsive, dependent, refractory). The Pouchitis Disease Activity Index may be used to measure disease activity. The management of pouchitis is guided by the disease phenotype. Acute episodes are treated with an initial 2-week course of antibiotics (typically ciprofloxacin or metronidazole), although patients with relapsing or chronic pouchitis may require long-term antibiotic treatment or the cycling of different antibiotics. Certain probiotics may also be used for maintenance therapy in those with chronic symptoms. For patients with chronic antibiotic refractory pouchitis, oral budesonide, immunosuppressive agents (azathioprine), or biologic therapy (infliximab, adalimumab, vedolizumab, ustekinumab) may be required for both induction and maintenance with close monitoring for potential side effects. In rare cases, diverting ileostomy or pouch excision may be required. CONCLUSION: Pouchitis represents a spectrum of disease phenotypes, ranging from acute antibiotic responsive pouchitis to chronic antibiotic refractory pouchitis. The management of pouchitis is primarily directed by the disease phenotype.