Citations

Abstract Rationale: Although guidelines recommend the use of provocative testing to diagnose pulmonary venous hypertension (PVH) that is unapparent at normal resting right heart catheterization (RHC), the incremental value of provocative testing is unknown. We aim to evaluate the incremental diagnostic capability of inhaled nitric oxide (iNO), fluid challenge (FC) or invasive cardiopulmonary exercise testing (iCPET) to unmask PVH using previously defined hemodynamic cutoffs. Methods: We included subjects from the NHLBI-funded Pulmonary Vascular Disease Phenomics (PVDOMICS) study. Our analysis included patients with World Symposium on Pulmonary Hypertension (WSPH) Group 2 disease (G2PH) and G2PH comparators (WSPH Group 2 phenotype without a diagnosis of PH) as determined by the PI or adjudication panel. We then applied a protocol-driven provocative approach based on the feasibility of modalities available in most catheterization labs. Using a pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) cutoff of >15, frequencies were identified for subjects based on resting PCWP and with iNO. Frequencies were also identified for: those who received FC with a PCWP cutoff of ≥18 or those who received iCPET with PCWP cutoff of >20 (upright) or >25 (supine). Results: There were 419 subjects identified with WSPH Group 2 disease (Figure). Roughly half were found to have a PCWP >15 during resting RHC (N = 207). Of the remaining subjects with a resting PCWP ≤15 (N = 150), 42 subjects were found to have a PCWP >15 with iNO administration (40.0%). Of the remaining 63 subjects with PCWP ≤15 following iNO administration, nearly half (N = 26, 48.0%) demonstrated a PCWP ≥18 following FC while 8 subjects (14.8%) demonstrated an elevated PCWP following iCPET. Conclusions: There is a high proportion of G2PH patients (∼35%) who appear hemodynamically similar to precapillary PH at rest. Inhaled nitric oxide vasodilatory challenge unmasks G2PH in many patients. In situations where iNO does not disclose the G2PH phenotype, provocation with FC or iCPET can be useful as a supplementary provocative maneuver. Future directions will focus on agnostically assessing the utility of provocation based on grouping subjects by resting hemodynamics as well as assessing the use of provocation in other forms of PH.

ABSTRACT Background The assessment of aortic stenosis (AS) severity remains a challenge in some patients, and hemodynamic exercise testing has been proposed as a diagnostic tool in this population. However, the current understanding of exercise hemodynamics in AS is limited. Methods Retrospective review of 34 adults (aged ≥ 18 years) with ≥ moderate AS and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) undergoing exercise invasive hemodynamics (supine cycle protocol) with simultaneous measurement of aortic and left ventricular pressures. Results Age was 77.1 (IQR 68.6; 84.1) years, and 50% were female. LVEF was 62.1 ± 6.6%. All patients were symptomatic. Resting aortic valve area (AVA) was 1.0 ± 0.2 cm 2 and aortic valve (AV) systolic mean gradient 22.0 ± 7.3 mmHg. At peak exercise (40 [IQR 30; 60] W), AV systolic mean gradient (Δ3 [0.6; 7] mmHg, p < 0.001) and AVA (Δ0.2 [0; 0.6] cm 2 , p = 0.002) significantly increased, while stroke volume (SV) did not (Δ6.8 ± 19.4 ml; p = 0.07). Exercise‐induced changes in AV systolic mean gradient were directly related to changes in cardiac output ( r = 0.53, p = 0.003), being inversely related to exercise systemic vascular resistance ( r = −0.60, p = 0.002). Elevated pulmonary artery wedge pressure was present in 41.2% at rest (≥ 15 mmHg) and 69.7% during exercise (≥ 25 mmHg). Conclusions Symptomatic patients with ≥ moderate AS and preserved LVEF experience small increases in AV mean gradient with exercise, and unlike the normal physiological response to exercise, there was no significant increase in SV. In most patients, AVA rose during exercise. Exercise‐induced elevation in filling pressures was highly prevalent.

This Viewpoint discusses the use of aortic valve intervention vs watchful waiting for patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis.

Abstract Aims Left ventricular (LV) ventricular-arterial coupling (VAC) refers to the ratio of afterload (effective arterial elastance) to contractility (end-systolic elastance) as an integrated marker of cardiac performance. We sought to determine whether the echocardiographic VAC ratio, defined using the ratio of LV end-systolic volume (LVESV) to stroke volume (SV), predicted mortality in the cardiac intensive care unit (CICU). Methods and results Mayo Clinic CICU patients from 2007 and 2018 were included. Ventricular-arterial coupling ratio was calculated as the Teichholz LVESV divided by the SV calculated from LV outflow tract Doppler. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality and the secondary outcome was all-cause 1-year mortality. A total of 4685 patients were included with a median age of 69 (58, 79) years (37.2% females), with acute coronary syndrome in 54.9% and heart failure in 49.0%. A higher VAC ratio was associated with greater severity of illness, worse echocardiographic findings, and more use of critical care therapies. A total of 329 (7%) patients died during hospitalization. Patients with a higher VAC ratio had higher in-hospital mortality overall and in each admission diagnosis subgroup. After multivariable adjustment, patients with a VAC ratio &gt;2 were at higher risk of in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio 1.63, 95% confidence interval 1.17–2.28, P = 0.010). One-year mortality was higher for patients with a higher VAC ratio, especially VAC &gt;2. Conclusion Ventricular-arterial uncoupling was associated with worse outcomes in an unselected CICU cohort. The echocardiographic VAC ratio is a simple non-invasive bedside measure that can be used for risk prediction in the CICU.

BACKGROUND: Exercise-induced hypertension (EIH) is common in adults with coarctation of the aorta (COA), but there are limited data about hemodynamics and outcomes in such patients. The purpose of this study was to assess changes in arterial load during exercise in patients with COA with versus without EIH, and the relationship to clinical outcomes. METHODS: We compared Doppler-derived arterial load indices (effective arterial elastance index, total arterial compliance index, systemic vascular resistance index), and clinical indices of disease severity (pulmonary congestion, aerobic capacity, and cardiovascular biomarkers) between adults with repaired COA and healthy controls. EIH was defined as systolic blood pressure (BP) at peak exercise >210 mm Hg in men or >190 mm Hg in women. RESULTS: In this prospective cohort study, we assessed patients with COA (n=41, age 43±14 years, 26 [63%] men) and healthy controls (n=41). Although both groups had similar resting systolic BP, the COA group had higher Doppler-derived arterial load indices at rest, as well as a greater rise in systolic BP and Doppler-derived arterial load indices at each stage of exercise, leading to a higher prevalence of EIH in the COA group (37% versus 10%; P =0.004). Compared with patients with COA without EIH (n=26, 63%), those with EIH had higher arterial load at rest and during exercise, as well as worse cardiac dysfunction, pulmonary congestion, and biomarkers of cardiovascular remodeling, despite no significant differences in resting systolic BP. CONCLUSIONS: BP assessment during exercise can improve risk stratification and identify patients who may benefit from intensification of medical therapy.

Abstract Aims To describe the baseline characteristics of the participants in the VICTOR (Vericiguat Global Study in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure; NCT05093933) trial and compare them to recent trials in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Methods and results Baseline characteristics were evaluated in 6105 patients randomized to vericiguat or placebo. The mean age of the participants was 67 ± 11 years, 23.6% were women, 64.4% were White, and 10.7% were self-identified Black. Overall, 29.1% of participants were enrolled in Latin and South America, 27.8% and 18.5% in Eastern and Western Europe, 14.0% in Asia-Pacific and 10.6% in North America. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 30 ± 7% and 79% had New York Heart Association class II symptoms. Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate was 70.9 ± 24.0 ml/min/1.73 m2. Median N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide level was 1476 (970–2495) pg/ml and 47.5% of participants had no prior hospitalization for heart failure. Baseline therapy included 94.4% beta-blockers, 94.3% renin–angiotensin system modulation (including 56.0% on an angiotensin receptor–neprilysin inhibitor), 77.7% mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, 59.1% sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, and 32.9% implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Overall characteristics were relatively similar to other recent HFrEF trials but the VICTOR trial enrolled a higher proportion of participants receiving contemporary drug and device therapy. Conclusion The VICTOR trial enrolled the most optimally treated population in a phase III heart failure trial. These features will facilitate assessment of the benefit of vericiguat and elucidate the outcomes of patients on up-to-date medical therapy.

BACKGROUND: Plasma NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) is commonly used to diagnose heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), but its diagnostic performance in the ambulatory/outpatient setting is unknown because previous studies lacked objective reference standards. METHODS: Among patients with chronic dyspnea, diagnosis of HFpEF or noncardiac dyspnea was determined conclusively by exercise catheterization in a derivation cohort (n=414), multicenter validation cohort 1 (n=560), validation cohort 2 (n=207), and a nonobese Japanese validation cohort 3 (n=77). Optimal NT-proBNP cut points for HFpEF rule out (optimizing sensitivity) and rule in (optimizing specificity) were derived and tested, stratified by obesity and atrial fibrillation. Derived cut points were tested in 3 additional validation cohorts (cohorts 4–6) in whom HFpEF was diagnosed by resting catheterization only (n=260), previous hospitalization for heart failure (n=447), or exercise echocardiography (n=517), respectively. RESULTS: Current recommended rule-out NT-proBNP threshold <125 pg/mL had 82% sensitivity (95% CI, 77%–88%) with a body mass index (BMI) <35 kg/m 2 , decreasing to 67% (95% CI, 58%–77%) with a BMI ≥35 kg/m 2 . A lower rule-out NT-proBNP threshold <50 pg/mL displayed good sensitivity with a BMI <35 kg/m 2 (97% [95% CI, 95%–99%]), with a modest decline in sensitivity with a BMI ≥35 kg/m 2 (86% [95% CI, 79%–93%]); diagnostic thresholds were confirmed in validation cohorts 1 and 2 (91% [95% CI, 88%–95%] and 86% [95% CI, 80%–93%] with a BMI <35 kg/m 2 ; 80% [95% CI, 74%–87%] and 84% [95% CI, 74%–93%] with a BMI ≥35 kg/m 2 ). Current consensus age- and BMI-stratified rule-in thresholds demonstrated only 65% specificity (95% CI, 57%–72%). Rule-in NT-proBNP threshold ≥500 pg/mL had 85% specificity (95% CI, 78%–91%) with a BMI <35 kg/m 2 (87% [95% CI, 80%–94%] and 90% [95% CI, 81%–99%] in validation cohorts), with 100% specificity at a BMI ≥35 kg/m 2 (93% [95% CI, 81%–100%] and 100% in validation cohorts). With a BMI ≥35 kg/m 2 , lower rule-in thresholds (≥220 pg/mL) provided good specificity (88% [95% CI, 73%–100%]; 93% [95% CI, 81%–100%] and 100% in validation cohorts). Findings were consistent in validation cohorts 3 through 6 (sensitivity of <50 pg/mL, 93%–98%; specificity of ≥500 pg/mL, 82%–89%). NT-proBNP provided no incremental discrimination among patients with history of AF; ≥98% of patients with AF and dyspnea were found to have HFpEF in our cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with chronic unexplained dyspnea, current rule-in and rule-out NT-proBNP diagnostic thresholds lead to unacceptably high error rates, with important interactions by obesity and AF status. In our study, NT-proBNP provided little value in those with AF and dyspnea because the presence of AF is by itself a robust biomarker of HFpEF. Use of separate rule-in and rule-out diagnostic thresholds stratified by BMI reduces miscategorization and can guide more appropriate use of exercise testing for possible HFpEF.