Citations

TPS6111 Background: Treatment options for recurrent and/or metastatic (R/M) salivary gland cancer (SGC) are limited with response rates to standard cytotoxic chemotherapy (CT) low at 10-30%, and responses to single-agent immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) <10%. Current therapeutic agents used to treat R/M SGC have an unfavorable toxicity profile including cytotoxic CTs such as cisplatin and doxorubicin and the targeted therapy lenvatinib. Treatments with general applicability and acceptable side effect profile are urgently needed. Pemetrexed (PTX) is a multi-targeted anti-folate CT with an excellent safety and toxicity profile with promising responses reported in a case series of patients (pts) with R/M SGC (Viscuse P and Price K. Marked responses to pemetrexed chemotherapy for metastatic adenocarcinoma of the parotid gland: case series. Head Neck 2019;41(6):E99-103.). As the combination of PTX and pembrolizumab (PMB) showed enhanced responses and survival in pts with lung cancer, we hypothesize that PTX and PMB will have efficacy in pts with R/M SGC and that the combination will have improved anti-cancer activity compared with historical controls. Correlative studies on archived tissues include methylthioadenosine phosphorylase loss, PDL1 expression, and thymidylate synthase expression as potential biomarkers of response. Methods: MC200708 is a single institution (3-site), open-label, single arm phase II study of PTX and PMB in patients with R/M SGC. Pts will be treated in two cohorts: one for pts with adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) and the other for pts with all other types of SGC (non-ACC cohort). Eligible pts must be ≥18 years old, have a pathologically confirmed SGC that is not amenable to curative-intent therapy, ECOG 0-2, adequate organ function, and at least 1 measurable lesion by RECIST 1.1. Any number of lines of prior therapy is allowed; prior treatment with checkpoint inhibitors and/or PTX is allowed. Key exclusion criteria: serious medical co-morbidity or autoimmune disease, prior grade 3-4 adverse event (AE) or grade 2-4 lung AE with ICI, and uncontrolled brain metastases. Simon’s two-stage design will be used for each cohort separately given the expected difference in responses in pts with ACC and non-ACC. Primary endpoint is overall response rate. Secondary endpoints are progression free and overall survival and toxicity. All patients will receive the same treatment of PTX 500 mg/m2 IV + PMB 200 mg IV every 3 weeks until disease progression or treatment intolerance. Response assessments will occur every 3 cycles. Enrollment began July 2021 and 16 of the planned 45 patients (ACC cohort 9 of 20 pts, non-ACC 7 of 25) have been accrued. Clinical trial information: NCT04895735.

4130 Background: KRAS is mutationally activated in over 90% of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Compared to pts with KRAS mutation, KRAS wild-type (wt) PDAC seem to have better response to therapy and may harbor potentially actionable molecular alterations. Here, we analyze the molecular profile and clinical outcome of a cohort of pts with KRAS wt PDAC. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on pts with PDAC who underwent CLIA-certified Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) testing at Mayo Clinic between December 1, 2018 and December 1, 2021. Pts with KRAS wt PDAC with available reports were included. Their genomic drivers, RNA expression, demographics, disease characteristics, therapies offered, and clinical outcome data were collected. The study was approved by the institutional IRB. Results: Of the 241 eligible pts, 8% (19) has KRAS wt PDAC. Among those, 2 pts had no mutation identified by the gene/molecular panel used. Of the 17 pts (89%) with identified alterations, mutations found in ³ 2 pts were TP53 (53%), CDKN2A (16%) and CDKN2B/ERBB2/PTEN/MSH3/RNF43/FBXW7/KMT2D/GNAS (11% each). Chromosomal rearrangements were identified in 5 (26%): CADPS2-BRAF, GP2-ERBB2, PTPRK-RSPO3, EML4-NTRK3 and TFG-MET. RNA expression results were available in 12 pts: common overexpression were ERBB2 (27%) and MET/NRAS/MYC/CCDN1/CCNE1/AR (18% each); and the under-expression MGMT (18%). Among the 13 pts with available MSI status via NGS, 2 (11%) were MSI-high (both had high TMB [28.4 and 23.7 m/MB]) while all others were TMB < 10 m/MB. The median age at diagnosis was 61 years (68% males). 8/19 (42%) were Stage IV at diagnosis with 15/19 (79%) pts ultimately diagnosed with metastatic disease. Among metastatic pts, median lines of treatment received was 2.5 (range:0-4). 4 pts received FOLFIRINOX (FFX), 2 gemcitabine/ nab-paclitaxel (GP) and tumor response were comparable to previously reported results. 1 received 1st-line pembrolizumab and remained on therapy at the time of analysis. The median length of follow up from diagnosis was 29 months. A patient with TFG-MET re-arrangement previously progressed on FFX and GP was treated using a MET inhibitor, and achieved significant CA19-9 drop and pancreas tumor shrinkage at 1st restaging, with ongoing response. Conclusions: The molecular profile of KRAS wt PDAC is highly heterogeneous and difficult to generalize. Novel approaches (e.g., basket trials) are needed to develop therapy for this rare PDAC subgroup.

512 Background: The role of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the treatment of extrapulmonary neuroendocrine carcinoma (EP-NEC) has yet to be established. While objective responses have been observed, it is still unknown which patients are likely to derive benefit. We investigated the genomic profiles of patients who did and did not benefit from ICIs. Methods: Previously we reported the objective responses to ICI in a retrospective series of patients with EP-NEC. RECIST 1.1 criteria were used to categorize patients as achieving disease control (DC = CR, PR, or SD) vs progressive disease (PD). The EMR was reviewed to identify patients who had genomic panels performed, and results were extracted for analysis. Results: Of 31 patients eligible for RECIST assessment, 19 had genomic panels available (9 with DC: 4 SD, 5 PR vs 10 with PD). Of those with NEC histology specified, 9 were small cell, 1 combined large and small cell, 3 were large cell. All tumors were microsatellite-stable. All but one (with TMB = 25) of 16 tumors with TMB status available were < 10 m/MB. Of those with disease control, 67% had both TP53 and RB1 alterations, compared with only 10% in those with progressive disease; this was statistically significant ( p = 0.0198, Fisher exact). Of 7 tumors with TP53 + RB1 alterations, 4 were specified as small cell carcinoma. Half of those with PD showed alterations in β-catenin pathway genes CTNNB1 or APC, compared to only one of the DC group, but this did not reach significance ( p = 0.1409, Fisher exact). In an analysis of all Mayo patients (not just those treated with ICI) with NGS data available (Tempus and FoundationOne), concurrent TP53 + RB1 alteration was significantly more common in SCLC than in EP-NEC (Table). Conclusions: In this small series of patients with EP-NEC treated with ICIs, the SCLC-like genomic signature of concurrent TP53 + RB1 alterations was significantly more common in those with disease control than in those with progressive disease. An analysis of all patients with NGS data (not just on ICI) showed that the dual alteration was more common in SCLC, and SCLC also had more TMB-high tumors. This may explain why ICIs are more effective in SCLC than in EP-NEC. Further study is warranted to determine whether TP53 + RB1 mutations predict response to ICI in NEC.[Table: see text]

248 Background: Esophageal carcinoma is the 6th most common cause of death worldwide. While squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) was the most common among the histologic subtypes in the 20th century, recent reports have demonstrated an increased incidence of adenocarcinoma in both Eastern and Western world. With this changing paradigm of esophageal carcinoma, it is important to estimate the future burden of esophageal carcinoma by histology, age, sex, and race, that could help plan prevention, control, and treatment strategies for this cancer. Methods: We used Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 14 registries to obtain incidence data from 2000 to 2016. We applied age-period-cohort models to estimate future esophageal carcinoma incidence rates and the estimated disease burden by multiplying incidence forecasts by corresponding US Census population projections. Results: Our estimate suggests that the incidence (per 100,000 persons) of esophageal adenocarcinoma is increasing in people within the age group of 40-65 years. Our prediction showed that the incidence will increase from 2.12 in 2021 to 2.82 in 2030 (3.2% per year, 95% CI –2.3% to 9.1%, p=0.26). Notably, we noticed a similar marginal increase in incidence among Asians, Black, and Whites in the 40-65 years age group (3.1%, 3.2%, and 4.2%, per year, respectively). White males aged >65 years had the highest incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma (17.34 in 2021), and incidence decreased 1.3% per year. We noticed a marginally decreased incidence in Black male (-1.1% per year, p=0.71) and Asian male (-3.9% per year, p=0.17) population aged >65 years. Interestingly, we found a decrease in the incidence of SCC in the current age groups 40-65 (-2.7% per year, p=0.31) and >65 years (-4.6% per year, p=0.081). We observed that Asians had the greatest decrease in incidence (-4.3% per year) as compared to that of Blacks (-4.2% per year) and Whites (-2.9% per year), although there was no statistically significant difference in the annual decrease among races. Conclusions: In our study of esophageal cancer, we predict an increased incidence of adenocarcinoma histology subtype in the younger age group (40-65 years) while the SCC subtype will have a decreased trend. Strategies to prevention esophageal adenocarcinoma, including dietary changes, should preferentially target patients <65 years of age.[Table: see text]

Abstract Background Grade 3 gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (G3 GEPNENs) are often aggressive, and the optimal treatment is unclear for this subgroup of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). Temozolomide (TEM)-based regimens have been increasingly used to treat grade 1–2 NENs, but their efficacy in G3 NENs remains undetermined. We aimed to assess the clinical efficacy of TEM-containing regimens in advanced grade 3 GEPNENs. Materials and Methods A multicenter retrospective review (2008–2018) of patients with metastatic/unresectable G3 GEPNENs who received a TEM-containing regimen was undertaken within a North American partnership to pool data. The primary endpoint was time to treatment failure (TTF). Radiologic response was extracted from local reports. Results One hundred and thirty patients in six high-volume NEN centers were included (median age 55, 64% male, 18% functional, 67% pancreatic NEN). Forty-nine percent were well-differentiated, 35% poorly differentiated, and 15% unknown based on local pathology reports. The regimen used was capecitabine and temozolomide (CAPTEM) in 92% and TEM alone in 8%. Radiological response by local assessment was seen in 36% of patients. Median TTF was 3.6 months and median overall survival (OS) 19.2 months. Six percent of patients required discontinuation of therapy due to adverse events. TTF was longer in first-line treatment (7.8 months vs. 2.9 months; hazard ratio, 1.62; 95% confidence interval, 1.11–2.36; p = .015) and in patients with pancreatic NENs (panNENs) compared with gastrointestinal NENs (5.8 months vs 1.8 months; p = .04). The overall response rate was higher in the first-line setting (51% vs 29%; p = .02) and in panNEN (41% vs 23%; p = .04). Conclusion This is the largest TEM treatment series in G3 NEN, involving collaboration of several major North American NEN centers as a partnership. Thirty-six percent of patients showed some degree of radiographic response, and treatment was generally well tolerated, although the median duration of response was short. Response rates and time to treatment failure were superior in the first-line setting. CAPTEM should be considered a viable treatment option in this setting. Further randomized trials are warranted. Implications for Practice Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are heterogeneous, and optimal treatment for aggressive grade 3 (G3) NENs remains undetermined. The capecitabine and temozolomide (CAPTEM) regimen has been used in low-grade pancreas NENs but there are few data for its safety and efficacy in the G3 setting. This article reports on the efficacy of temozolomide-containing regimens, particularly CAPTEM, in management of G3 NENs. The good tolerance and response rate show that CAPTEM should be considered a viable regimen in treatment of G3 NENs pending confirmatory prospective studies.

e17518 Background: Morbidity and mortality for patients with cervical cancer has improved significantly over the past few decades with modern multimodal therapy. However, neuroendocrine carcinoma of the uterine cervix (NCUC), which accounts for 1-2% of cervical cancers, remains a deadly subtype. In this study, we combine data from Mayo Clinic (MC) and the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics (UIHC) to provide information on tumor characteristics, treatment, and outcomes. Methods: The electronic medical record was reviewed for patients with NCUC from MC and UIHC. Data on diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes were collected through chart review. Primary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included median survival, survival at 1 year after surgery, and survival at 1 year by first line chemotherapy agent. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to estimate median PFS, median survival, and OS. Fisher’s test analysis was used to calculate survival at 1 year after surgery and by first line chemotherapy agent. Results: There were 62 patients (MC: 26, UIHCC: 36) with NCUC stage I-IV (stage I: 29, stage II: 9, stage III: 7, stage IV: 14, unknown: 3). Median age of diagnosis was 47 years (range 21-77 years). By subtype, 47 were small cell (76%), 9 were large cell (15%), and 6 were unknown/undetermined (9%). The initial treatment modalities for each patient are outlined in the table. 28 patients had complete/partial response or stable disease from first line treatment, while 10 patients had disease progression. Of the patients who initially responded or had stable disease, 16 later progressed (57%) with a median time to progression of 15 months. Median follow up was 65.1 months with a median OS of 28.5 months. Median survival for those with stage I was 40.9 months, stage II: 54.6 months, stage III: 8.75 months, and stage IV: 11.7 months. There was a significant difference in overall survival at 1 year between those who received surgery and those who did not in stage I/II ( p = 0.01). There was no significant difference in overall survival at 1 year for those who received surgery in stage III/IV. There was no statistical difference in survival at 1 year for carboplatin or cisplatin in combination with etoposide as first line chemotherapy agent. Conclusions: NCUC is an aggressive malignancy that is usually progressive despite multimodal therapy. Our study demonstrated a median overall survival of 28.5 months and 5-year survival rate of 21%. Our study showed a survival benefit at 1 year for those who receive surgery with stage I/II NCUC. There was no significant survival benefit at 1 year between carboplatin or cisplatin in combination with etoposide as first line agent.[Table: see text]

Objectives Checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) for low- and intermediate-grade neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) have been associated with limited efficacy; recent studies suggest CPIs may represent promising treatment for high-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). Methods We examined 57 patients with NENs who were treated with CPIs to determine if NETs and neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) respond to immunotherapy. Results Patients with poorly differentiated NECs on CPI monotherapy had an objective response rate (ORR) of 0% and median progression-free survival (PFS) of 2.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.5–4.6). Patients with poorly differentiated NECs on dual CPI therapy had an ORR of 13% and PFS of 3.5 months (95% CI, 1.4–not reached [NR]). Patients with poorly differentiated NECs on CPI and cytotoxic therapy had an ORR of 36% with PFS of 4.2 months (95% CI, 1.6–NR). Well-differentiated grade 1 and 2 NETs on CPI monotherapy had an ORR of 25% with PFS NR. Well-differentiated grade 3 NETs had 0% ORR with a PFS of 2.9 months (95% CI, 1.4–4.2) on CPI monotherapy. Conclusions Checkpoint inhibitor therapy shows limited activity in patients with NENs. Future studies should identify biomarkers that can help identify patients who are likely responders to immunotherapy.

Abstract Introduction Recent classification of neuroendocrine neoplasms has defined well-differentiated high-grade neuroendocrine tumors (NET G3) as a distinct entity from poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma. The optimal treatment for NET G3 has not been well-described. This study aimed to evaluate metastatic NET G3 response to different treatment regimens. Materials and Methods This was a retrospective study of patients with NET G3 within the Mayo Clinic database. Patients’ demographics along with treatment characteristics, responses, and survival were assessed. Primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival. Secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). Results Treatment data was available in 30 patients with median age of 59.5 years at diagnosis. The primary tumor was mostly pancreatic (73.3%). Ki-67 index was ≥55% in 26.7% of cases. Treatments included capecitabine + temozolomide (CAPTEM) (n = 20), lutetium 177 DOTATATE (PRRT; n = 10), Platinum-etoposide (EP; n = 8), FOLFOX (n = 7), and everolimus (n = 2). CAPTEM exhibited ORR 35%, DCR 65%, and median PFS 9.4 months (95% confidence interval, 2.96–16.07). Both EP and FOLFOX showed similar radiographic response rates with ORR 25.0% and 28.6%; however, median PFS durations were quite distinct at 2.94 and 13.04 months, respectively. PRRT had ORR of 20%, DCR of 70%, and median PFS of 9.13 months. Conclusion Among patients with NET G3, CAPTEM was the most commonly used treatment with clinically meaningful efficacy and disease control. FOLFOX or PRRT are other potentially active treatment options. EP has some activity in NET G3, but responses appear to be short-lived. Prospective studies evaluating different treatments effects in patients with NET G3 are needed to determine an optimal treatment strategy. Implications for Practice High-grade well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NET G3) are considered a different entity from low-grade NET and neuroendocrine carcinoma in terms of prognosis and management. The oral combination of capecitabine and temozolomide is considered a good option in the management of metastatic NET G3 and may be preferred. FOLFOX is another systemic option with reasonable efficacy. Similar to other well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy seems to have some efficacy in these tumors.

e16691 Background: Recent WHO classification of NET has defined high-grade well-differentiated NET (NET G3) as a distinct entity that is clinically different from neuroendocrine carcinoma. The optimal treatment for NET G3 has not been well-described. This study aims to evaluate NET G3 response to different treatment regimens. Methods: This is a retrospective study of NET G3 patients within the Mayo Clinic database (Arizona, Florida, and Minnesota). Patient demographics along with treatment responses and survival were assessed. Primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST 1.1 criteria. Results: 71 patients with NET G3 were identified. Systemic treatment data was available in 30 patients who had a median age of 59.5 years at time of diagnosis. The primary tumor was most commonly pancreatic (73.3%). Ki 67 index was ≥55% in 26.7% of cases. 56.7% of cases had > 1 metastatic site. Treatment regimens included: capecitabine+temozolomide (CAPTEM) (n = 20), somatostatin analog (SSA) (n = 14), carboplatin/cisplatin+etoposide (EP) (n = 7), everolimus (n = 2), FOLFOX (n = 7), and lutetium Lu 177 DOTATATE (PRRT) (n = 10). CAPTEM was the most commonly used regimen (10 first-line, and 10 second-line) with ORR of 35%, disease control rate (DCR) of 65%, and median PFS of 9.4 months. The table summarizes the treatment data and responses rates for the various therapies used. Conclusions: Among NET G3 patients treated at Mayo Clinic, CAPTEM was found to be the most commonly used treatment with reasonable efficacy and disease control. Other treatment options include SSA, PRRT, FOLFOX, and EP. Prospective studies evaluating different treatments effects in NET G3 patients are needed to determine an optimal treatment strategy. [Table: see text]

Objectives A platinum/etoposide doublet is standard first-line therapy for poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma (PD NEC); however, evidence to guide treatment beyond first-line regimens is lacking. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of second-line regimens in PD NEC. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of patients treated with second-line chemotherapy for PD NEC. Inclusion criteria were previous first-line therapy with platinum/etoposide, extrapulmonary PD NEC, and follow-up data. The primary end points were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) after second-line therapy. Secondary end points included OS and PFS from first-line therapy. Results Sixty-four patients were included. The median OS from initiation of second-line therapy was 6.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.9–8.9). The median PFS was 2.3 months (95% CI, 2.0–3.2). No second-line regimen showed a statistically significant difference in OS or PFS. There was a significant increase in OS for cisplatin first-line regimens compared with carboplatin (17.0 months [95% CI, 12.5–22.6] vs 11.7 months [95% CI, 8.0–14.0]). Conclusions The efficacy of current second-line therapy in PD NEC is poor. No second-line regimen showed statistically significant superiority. Cisplatin was associated with longer OS regardless of second-line regimen or age. However, unmeasured confounders such as performance status or comorbidities may explain this effect.