Citations

AbstractBackgroundObjective and quantitative evaluation for low‐contrast detectability that correlates with human observer performance is lacking for routine CT quality control testing. Channelized Hotelling observer (CHO) is considered a strong candidate to fill the need but has long been deemed impractical to implement due to its requirement of a large number of repeated scans in order to provide accurate and precise estimates of index of detectability (d’). In our previous work, we optimized a CHO model observer on the American College of Radiology (ACR) CT accreditation phantom and achieved accurate measurement of d’ with only 1–3 repeat scans.PurposeIn this work, we aim to validate the repeatability of the proposed CHO‐based low‐contrast evaluation on four scanner models using the ACR CT accreditation phantom.MethodsThe repeatability test was performed on four different scanners from two major CT manufacturers: Siemens Force and Alpha; Canon Prism and Prime SP. An ACR CT phantom was scanned 10 times, each time after repositioning of the phantom. For each repositioning, 3 repeated scans were acquired at 24, 12, and 6 mGy on all four scanner models. CHO was applied at the measured dose levels for different low‐contrast object sizes (4–6 mm). The CHO was also applied to images created using deep learning‐based reconstructions on Canon Prism and to four different scan/reconstruction modes on the Siemens Alpha, a photon‐counting‐detector (PCD)‐CT. The repeatability was evaluated by the probability that a measurement would fall within the ±15% tolerance (P<15%).ResultsWith the CHO setting optimized for the ACR phantom and the use of 3 repeated scans and 9 non‐overlapping slices per scan, the CHO measurement could provide high repeatability with P<15% of 98.8%–99.9% at 12 mGy with IR reconstruction on all four scanners. On scanner A, P<15% were 91.5%–99.9% at the three dose levels and for all three object sizes while the numbers were 93.6%–99.998% on scanner B. P<15% were 96.5%–97.2% for the two deep learning reconstructions and 97.0%–99.97% for the four scan/reconstruction modes on the PCD‐CT.ConclusionThe CHO provided highly repeatable measurements with over 95% probability that a CHO measurement would lie within the ±15% tolerance for most of the dose levels and object sizes on the ACR phantom. The repeatability was maintained when the CHO was applied to images created with a commercial deep learning‐based reconstruction and various scan/reconstruction modes on a PCD‐CT. This study demonstrates that practical implementation of CHO for routine quality control and performance evaluation is feasible.

Abstract Objectives To describe the feasibility and evaluate the performance of multiphasic photon-counting detector (PCD) CT for detecting breast cancer and nodal metastases with correlative dynamic breast MRI and digital mammography as the reference standard. Methods Adult females with biopsy-proven breast cancer undergoing staging breast MRI were prospectively recruited to undergo a multiphasic PCD-CT using a 3-phase protocol: a non-contrast ultra-high-resolution (UHR) scan and 2 intravenous contrast-enhanced scans with 50 and 180 s delay. Three breast radiologists compared CT characteristics of the index malignancy, regional lymphadenopathy, and extramammary findings to MRI. Results Thirteen patients underwent both an MRI and PCD-CT (mean age: 53 years, range: 36-75 years). Eleven of thirteen cases demonstrated suspicious mass or non-mass enhancement on PCD-CT when compared to MRI. All cases with metastatic lymphadenopathy (3/3 cases) demonstrated early avid enhancement similar to the index malignancy. All cases with multifocal or multicentric disease on MRI were also identified on PCD-CT (3/3 cases), including a 4 mm suspicious satellite lesion. Four of five patients with residual suspicious post-biopsy calcifications on mammograms were detected on the UHR PCD-CT scan. Owing to increased field-of-view at PCD-CT, a 5 mm thoracic vertebral metastasis was identified at PCD-CT and not with the breast MRI. Conclusions A 3-phase PCD-CT scan protocol shows initial promising results in characterizing breast cancer and regional lymphadenopathy similar to MRI and detects microcalcifications in 80% of cases. Advances in knowledge UHR and spectral capabilities of PCD-CT may allow for comprehensive characterization of breast cancer and may represent an alternative to breast MRI in select cases.

Abstract Objectives. To improve quality of coronary CT angiography (CCTA) images using a generalizable motion-correction algorithm. Approach . A neural network with attention gate and spatial transformer (ATOM) was developed to correct coronary motion. Phantom and patient CCTA images (39 males, 32 females, age range 19–92, scan date 02/2020 to 10/2021) retrospectively collected from dual-source CT were used to create training, development, and testing sets corresponding to 140- and 75 ms temporal resolution, with 75 ms images as labels. To test generalizability, ATOM was deployed for locally adaptive motion-correction in both 140- and 75 ms patient images. Objective metrics were used to assess motion-corrupted and corrected phantom and patient images, including structural-similarity-index (SSIM), dice-similarity-coefficient (DSC), peak-signal-noise-ratio (PSNR), and normalized root-mean-square-error (NRMSE). In objective quality assessment, ATOM was compared with several baseline networks, including U-net, U-net plus attention gate, U-net plus spatial transformer, VDSR, and ResNet. Two cardiac radiologists independently interpreted motion-corrupted and -corrected images at 75 and 140 ms in a blinded fashion and ranked diagnostic image quality (worst to best: 1–4, no ties). Main results . ATOM improved quality metrics ( p < 0.05) before/after correction: in phantom, SSIM 0.87/0.95, DSC 0.85/0.93, PSNR 19.4/22.5, NRMSE 0.38/0.27; in patient images, SSIM 0.82/0.88, DSC 0.88/0.90, PSNR 30.0/32.0, NRMSE 0.16/0.12. ATOM provided more consistent improvement of objective image quality, compared to the presented baseline networks. The motion-corrected images received better ranks than un-corrected at the same temporal resolution ( p < 0.05): 140 ms images 1.65/2.25, and 75 ms images 3.1/3.2. The motion-corrected 75 ms images received the best rank in 65% of testing cases. A fair-to-good inter-reader agreement was observed (Kappa score 0.58). Significance . ATOM reduces motion artifacts, improving visualization of coronary arteries. This algorithm can be used to virtually improve temporal resolution in both single- and dual-source CT.

Objectives Photon-counting detector (PCD) computed tomography (CT) offers improved spatial and contrast resolution, which can impact quantitative measurements. This work aims to determine in human subjects the effect of dual-source PCD-CT on the quantitation of coronary artery calcification (CAC) compared with dual-source energy-integrating detector (EID) CT in both 1- and 3-mm images. Methods This prospective study enrolled patients receiving a clinical EID-CT CAC examination to undergo a research PCD-CT CAC examination. Axial images were reconstructed with a 512 × 512 matrix, 200-mm field of view, 3-mm section thickness/1.5-mm interval using a quantitative kernel (Qr36). Sharper kernels (Qr56/QIR strength 4 for PCD and Qr49/ADMIRE strength 5 for EID) were used to reconstruct images with 1-mm section thickness/0.5-mm interval. Pooled analysis was performed for all calcifications with nonzero values, and volume and Agatston scores were compared between EID-CT and PCD-CT. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test was performed with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results In 21 subjects (median age, 58 years; range, 50–75 years; 13 male [62%]) with a total of 42 calcified arteries detected at 3 mm and 46 calcified arteries at 1-mm images, EID-CT CAC volume and Agatston scores were significantly lower than those of PCD-CT (P ≤ 0.001). At 3-mm thickness, the mean (standard deviation) volume and Agatston score for EID-CT were 55.5 (63.4) mm3 and 63.8 (76.9), respectively, and 61.5 (69.4) mm3 and 70.4 (85.3) for PCD-CT (P = 0.0001 and P = 0.0013). At 1-mm thickness, the mean (standard deviation) volume and score for EID-CT were 50.0 (56.3) mm3 and 61.1 (69.3), respectively, and 59.5 (63.9) mm3 and 72.5 (79.9) for PCD-CT (P < 0.0001 for both). The applied radiation dose (volume CT dose index) for the PCD-CT scan was 2.1 ± 0.6 mGy, which was 13% lower than for the EID-CT scan (2.4 ± 0.7 mGy, P < 0.001). Conclusions Relative to EID-CT, PCD-CT demonstrated a small but significant increase in coronary artery calcium volume and Agatston score.