Citations

INTRODUCTION: Acute portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a rare diagnosis frequently associated with cirrhosis. Clinical presentation is typically nonspecific with potentially catastrophic short-term complications including sepsis, bowel infarction, and death. Management strategies differ for acute and chronic PVT. Guidelines for treating acute PVT recommend immediate initiation of systemic anticoagulation. Direct and indirect thrombolytic therapy (mechanical thrombectomy and fibrinolytic therapy) may be used in combination with systemic anticoagulation in the setting of bowel ischemia or as an adjunct in patients with a contraindication to systemic anticoagulation. We aimed to assess the success of thrombolytic therapy for non-malignant acute PVT and to compare the success of direct versus indirect thrombolytic therapy. METHODS: This was a systematic review and meta-analysis in which two independent librarians searched the following databases from the date of inception to March 2019: Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, Scopus and Web of Science. All included studies provided technical and clinical success data, as well as adverse events, and technique(s) used for the intervention of non-malignant acute PVT. RESULTS: The two independent database searches yielded 143 citations, of which 79 duplicates were removed leaving a total of 64 references and 11 were included in our analyses. The overall success rate of thrombolytic therapy using the random effects model was 83% (95%CI: 0.67, 0.92; P = <0.01; I 2 = 61%). The overall clinical improvement rate of thrombolytic therapy using the fixed effects model was 95% (95%CI: 0.88, 0.98; P = 0.73; I 2 = 0%). The overall mortality of thrombolytic therapy using the fixed effects model was 5% (95%CI: 0.03, 0.11; P = 0.92; I 2 = 0%). In the direct and indirect thrombolytic groups, the rate of technical success was 84% and 52%, respectively, with an odds ratio of 3.37 (95%CI (0.96, 7.67), P -value = 0.127). CONCLUSION: Our analysis demonstrates that thrombolytic therapy successfully eliminates non-malignant acute PVTs with low rates of mortality. Direct thrombolysis may produce increased efficacy compared to indirect thrombolytic therapy. Larger prospective randomized trials comparing these interventions are warranted.

Objectives (1) To perform a systematic literature review to evaluate associations between post‐dural puncture headache (PDPH) and opening pressure (OP), closing pressure (CP), and volume of cerebrospinal fluid (V) removed. (2) To perform a case‐control study to evaluate pressure‐volume index (PVI) as a novel risk factor for PDPH. Background According to the International Classification of Headache Diagnoses, 3rd Edition (ICHD‐3), the diagnosis of PDPH requires documentation of intracranial hypotension. However, this remains an unproven concept. Methods A systematic literature review was conducted, searching Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Ovid EMBASE, OVID MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science. Study inclusion required a comparison of headache incidence following a LP as a function of OP, CP, and/or V. A retrospective, case‐control study with 1:1 matching was conducted utilizing ICHD‐3 criteria. Patients with factors that could influence CSF pressure were excluded. Results In our case‐control study, we did not identify a paired difference in either median (95% CI) elastance (0.05 [−0.09, 0.11], P = .503) or PVI (4.53 [−7.98, 19.97], P = .678). We identified 22 references, evaluating V (n = 14), OP (n = 11), and/or CP (n = 4). There was no convincing evidence for an association of PDPH with either OP or CP. A minority of studies documenting an association with V included patients with high‐volume CSF removal, and/or stratified patients by the timing of the headache onset. Conclusions The overall risk of PDPH does not appear to be influenced by OP, CP, V or PVI. PDPH may be related to V in instances of high‐volume removal, and depend on the timing of outcome assessment. Future revision of criteria should consider the existence of immediate and delayed PDPH subtypes, and not presume intracranial hypotension as a mandatory feature.

Alternating electrical fields can disrupt mitosis leading to apoptosis of rapidly dividing cancer cells. The device that utilizes this mechanism is known as tumor-treating fields (TTFields). TTFields can be applied by ceramic transducer arrays on a shaved scalp to deliver the alternating electric activity to patients with glioblastoma (GBM). It has FDA approval for use in both recurrent and newly diagnosed GBM. The objective is to critically appraise the current evidence for the use of TTFields as adjunctive treatment to newly diagnosed GBM. The objective was addressed through the development of a structured, critically appraised topic. We incorporated a clinical scenario, background information, a structured question, literature search strategy, evidence summary, clinical bottom lines, and expert discussion. Participants included consultant and resident neurologists, a medical librarian, clinical epidemiologists, and content experts in the field of neurooncology. A randomized controlled trial was selected for critical appraisal. Patients with newly diagnosed GBM completing standard radiation and chemotherapy with temozolomide (TMZ) were subsequently randomized to receive maintenance TMZ with TTFields, or TMZ alone. With the addition of TTFields, median progression-free survival was 6.7 months compared with 4 months without the addition of TTFields (95% confidence interval, 0.52-0.76; P<0.001) and overall survival was 20.9 months compared with 16.0 months without the addition of TTFields (95% confidence interval, 0.53-0.76; P<0.001). TTFields may increase both progression-free and overall survival in patients receiving standard chemoradiation therapy for GBM.

Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is the standard of care for patients who present with an acute ischemic stroke within 6 hours of symptom onset, and up to 24 hours in appropriately selected patients. However, optimal postoperative management of these patients remains uncertain, especially with regard to blood pressure control. To review the existing literature to define potential blood pressure goals in the immediate postoperative period in patients who undergo MT for acute ischemic stroke. The topic was defined through a clinical scenario and the subsequent development of a targeted clinical question. A literature search was performed, with relevant articles selected, one of which, a prospective observational study, was critically appraised. Participants included neurology residents and consultants, a medical librarian, clinical epidemiologists, as well as content experts from vascular neurology and interventional neuroradiology. Permissive hypertension (defined as <220/120 or <180/105 mm Hg as per the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association guidelines) may be harmful in the postoperative period following MT, especially in patients who were successfully recanalized. Moderate blood pressure control (<160/90) was found to be a predictor of improved 3-month mortality on multivariable logistic regression analysis in patients who sustained successful reperfusion [odds ratio (OR), 0.08; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.01-0.054; P=0.01]. A 10 mm Hg increase in systolic blood pressure was found to result in a lower OR of having a favorable 3-month functional independence (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.56-0.85; P=0.001) as well as higher rates of 3-month mortality (OR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.18-1.88; P=0.001). Blood pressure goals in the immediate postoperative period in patients who undergo MT should differ than those who do not undergo MT, with data suggesting that lower blood pressure than permissive hypertension may be related to improved outcomes, especially in cases of successful reperfusion. However, current data are derived from observational studies; further studies, preferably in the form of randomized-controlled trials, are needed to further clarify the relationship between postoperative blood pressures and outcomes in this patient population.

Background: The clinical benefit of patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure in patients with cryptogenic stroke (CS) for recurrent stroke prevention has been a subject of extensive debate. Prior clinical trials failed to show superiority of PFO closure versus medical therapy. Meta-analyses suggested a possible benefit of PFO closure in select patients. Objective: The objective of this study was to critically assess current evidence regarding the efficacy of PFO closure compared with medical therapy for recurrent stroke prevention in patients with CS. Methods: The objective was addressed through the development of a structured critically appraised topic. This included a clinical scenario with a clinical question, literature search strategy, critical appraisal, results, evidence summary, commentary, and bottom line conclusions. Participants included consultant and resident neurologists, medical librarian, and vascular neurology and interventional cardiology content experts. Results: A randomized, controlled trial was selected for critical appraisal. This trial compared the efficacy of PFO closure and medical therapy in recurrent stroke prevention. A total of 663 patients who had a recent CS attributed to PFO, with a large interatrial shunt or with an associated atrial septal aneurysm were included. No stroke occurred among the 238 patients in the PFO closure group, whereas 14 of the 235 patients in the antiplatelet therapy group had recurrent strokes. Conclusions: Among patients who had a recent CS attributed to PFO with a large interatrial shunt or with an associated atrial septal aneurysm, the rate of stroke recurrence was lower among those assigned to PFO closure combined with antiplatelet therapy than among those assigned to antiplatelet therapy alone.

Background: Central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) is a neurological and ophthalmologic emergency associated with poor visual recovery. There is a dilemma regarding the appropriate treatment, as formal guidelines are lacking. Despite being considered an ocular equivalent of cerebral infarction, the time window of intravenous (IV) thrombolysis administration for maximum efficacy and safety in CRAO remains uncertain. Objective: To critically assess the current evidence regarding the safety and effectiveness of IV thrombolysis in the treatment of patients with CRAO. Methods: The objective was addressed through the development of a critically appraised topic that included a clinical scenario, structured question, literature search strategy, critical appraisal, assessment of results, evidence summary, commentary, and bottom-line conclusions. Participants included consultant and resident neurologists, a medical librarian, and content experts in the fields of vascular neurology and ophthalmology. Results: A recent patient-level meta-analysis was selected for critical appraisal. The study compared the visual recovery rates after IV thrombolysis in CRAO against the natural history of this illness and conservative therapies (ocular massage, anterior chamber paracentesis, and/or hemodilution). Time to thrombolytic therapy administration had a significant impact on visual recovery in CRAO (P<0.001). IV thrombolysis within the first 4.5 hours after symptom onset resulted in recovery of vision in 50.0% of the patients [95% confidence interval (CI), 32.4%-67.6%]. The rate of visual recovery was nearly 3 times higher than in the natural history cohort [odds ratio, 4.7 (95% CI, 2.3-9.6); P<0.001], with a 32.3% absolute risk reduction and a number needed to treat of 4.0 (95% CI, 2.6-6.6). There was no significant difference in the recovery rate after thrombolysis compared with the natural history cohort for those patients treated after 4.5 hours. No major hemorrhages occurred after alteplase administration in this meta-analysis. Conclusions: IV thrombolysis in CRAO seems to be safe and effective within the first 4.5 hours of symptom onset. A clinical decision based on this meta-analysis alone cannot be made due to several limitations. A randomized controlled clinical trial of early IV alteplase administration in CRAO is necessary to provide evidence-based therapeutic guidance.

Purpose: Essential thrombocythemia, polycythemia vera, and myelofibrosis are rare chronic hematological malignancies known as myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) and are characterized by deregulated myeloid lineage cell production, splenomegaly, and heterogeneous symptom profiles. MPN patients suffer from a significant symptom burden (eg, fatigue, depressive symptoms, early satiety) and an impaired overall quality of life (QoL). Current treatments typically include pharmacological approaches, which may come with additional side effects and may be limited by treatment-associated toxicities (ie, cytopenias). Nonpharmacological approaches such as physical activity may be beneficial for reducing symptom burden and improving QoL. To date, no studies have examined physical activity as a nonpharmacological approach in MPN patients despite preliminary evidence supporting its benefit in other hematological cancers. The purpose of this article is to (1) review the literature related to physical activity and specific hematological cancer subtypes and to (2) make suggestions for future research involving physical activity in MPN patients as a symptom management strategy. Methods: A brief review of studies examining physical activity in leukemias, lymphomas, and myelomas (excluding stem-cell transplant patients) was conducted. Results: There is preliminary evidence to suggest that physical activity may be an effective approach to improve patient-reported outcomes (fatigue, depression, anxiety, sleep), physical fitness (cardiovascular fitness, balance, body composition), and overall QoL in other hematological cancers. Conclusions: Based on encouraging findings in other hematological cancers, future research should examine the feasibility and effectiveness of physical activity in MPN patients.