Citations

Background Despite its approval for acute ischemic stroke >25 years ago, intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) remains underused, with inequities by age, sex, race, ethnicity, and geography. Little is known about IVT rates by insurance status. Methods and Results We assessed temporal trends from 2002 to 2015 in IVT for acute ischemic stroke in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample using adjusted, survey ‐ weighted logistic regression. We calculated odds ratios for IVT for each category in 2002 to 2008 (period 1) and 2009 to 2015 (period 2). IVT use for acute ischemic stroke increased from 1.0% in 2002 to 6.8% in 2015 (adjusted annual relative ratio, 1.15). Individuals aged ≥85 years had the most pronounced increase during 2002 to 2015 (adjusted annual relative ratio, 1.18) but were less likely to receive IVT compared with 18‐ to 44‐year‐olds in period 1 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.23) and period 2 (aOR, 0.36). Women were less likely than men to receive IVT, but the disparity narrowed over time (period 1: aOR, 0.81; period 2: aOR, 0.94). Inequities in IVT resolved for Hispanic individuals in period 2 (aOR, 0.96) but not for Black individuals (period 2: aOR, 0.81). The disparity in IVT for Medicare patients, compared with privately insured patients, lessened over time (period 1: aOR, 0.59; period 2: aOR, 0.75). Patients treated in rural hospitals remained less likely to receive IVT than in urban hospitals; a more dramatic increase in urbanity widened the inequity (period 2, urban nonteaching versus rural: aOR, 2.58, period 2, urban teaching versus rural: aOR, 3.90). Conclusions IVT for acute ischemic stroke increased among adults. Despite some encouraging trends, the remaining disparities highlight the need for intensified efforts at addressing inequities.

Introduction: Collateral cerebrovasculature is important for the survival of penumbral tissue in patients with large vessel occlusive (LVO) stroke, and adequate collateralization is associated with favorable outcomes. The presence of cerebral microbleeds (CMB) have been implicated in vessel wall remodeling and impaired vasoreactivity. We investigated whether the presence of deep and/or lobar CMB predicts poor collateral recruitment in patients with LVO stroke who underwent thrombectomy (MT). Methods: We performed a retrospective, single-center study of adults who presented with LVO stroke and had MT between January 2012-June 2020. CT angiography of head prior to MT was used to assess collateral status with poor status defined as ≤50% filling and good status as >50% filling. CMBs were assessed using T2*-weighted gradient echo or susceptibility weighted magnetic resonance images. Location of CMB was further characterized as deep vs. lobar using consensus definitions. Poor stroke outcome was defined as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) ≥3 at 90 days. Multivariable logistic regressions were performed to evaluate the associations between CMB, CMB types (lobar, deep, lobar+deep) and poor collaterals after adjusting for vascular risk factors. Results: Consecutive 151 subjects were included (mean age 68±15 years, 47% women), with a median NIHSS of 18. CMB were identified in 57 subjects (37.4%). Of these, 20.5% had lobar CMB, 5.3% had deep CMB and 11.9% had combined lobar & deep CMB. Patients with CMB had higher odds of having poor collaterals compared to those without CMB (OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.09-2.23, P=0.015). The association of CMB with poor collaterals was strongest in patients with combined lobar & deep CMB (OR 4.78, 95% CI 1.43-15.93, P=0.011), compared with those with exclusively deep CMB (OR 2.78, 95% CI 0.44-17.62, P=0.278) or lobar CMB (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.19-1.38, P=0.188). Patients with poor collaterals were more likely to have poor outcome compared with those with good collaterals (48.4% vs. 31.0%, P=0.03). Conclusion: Cerebral microbleeds are independently associated with poor collateral recruitment when adjusted for traditional vascular risk factors. Further study is warranted to elucidate the differential effects of CMB types on collateral recruitment.

Background and Objectives: It is unclear whether induced hypertension in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) may improve long-term outcomes. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the safety and efficacy of induced hypertension vs standard medical care in patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke within 72 hours of symptom onset. Methods: Two reviewers systematically searched PubMed using the prespecified terms “induced hypertension” or “blood pressure augmentation” plus “ischemic stroke” for clinical trials that reported functional independence (mRS 0-2) at 90 days. The safety outcome was symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). Pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI across trials were synthesized using fixed-effect model based on Mantel-Haenszel methods. Forest plots were constructed. Results: Three clinical trials with 270 AIS patients treated with induced hypertension (n=126) or standard medical care (n= 144) were included. Mean age was 66.6 years, 35.2% were women, and the mean initial NIHSS was 7.5. The rate of functional independence at 90 days was higher in patients treated with induced hypertension (70.6%) versus control (54.9%) (OR 1.88; 95% CI 1.13-3.11; p=0.01). sICH did not differ between patients treated with induced hypertension (<1%) versus control (<1%) (OR 1.03; 95% CI 0.14-7.45; p=0.98). Discussion: Among patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke with 72 hours of symptoms onset, induced hypertension resulted in better functional outcome at 90 days than standard medical care and did not increase risk of sICH. Large RCTs to test this observation are ongoing and needed to guide clinical practice.