Citations

AbstractBackgroundSeveral programs are available for automatically “de‐facing” brain images. These are designed to prevent the potential use of face imagery to re‐identify research participants. Previous works have compared available software and mri_reface is frequently among the top methods. The “Minimally Invasive DeFacing of MRI images” (MiDeFace) program was more recently added to FreeSurfer, but minimal validation of MiDeFace has been published.MethodWe ran mri_reface 0.3.3 and MiDeFace 7.3.2 on two datasets: A) 207 participants with face photographs and 3D T1‐weighted and 3D T2‐weighted‐FLAIR MRI from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (all unimpaired, Siemens); and B) 300 participants from ADNI3 with 3D T1‐weighted MRI (50 unimpaired + 50 with clinical AD, from each of 3 vendors). For dataset A, we tested the rate at which Microsoft Azure face recognition matched each participant’s photographs with the correct MRI, comparing unmodified images, those from mri_reface, and those from MiDeFace. For dataset B, we compared measured regional brain volume and cortical thickness from original vs. de‐faced images with SPM12, FreeSurfer 7.4.1, and the FSL‐UK Biobank pipeline. For both datasets, images were visually rated to assess removal of the face and retention of brain tissue.ResultAutomated face recognition match rates were lower with mri_reface (17/207 8.2%) than with MiDeFace (24/207 11.6%), indicating stronger identity protection with mri_reface, but both were greatly reduced vs. unmodified images (203/207 98.1%). Example images with both programs are shown in Figure 1. From visual ratings (Table 1), rates of complete success (modification of the entire face while retaining the entire brain) were much higher with mri_reface, but the great majority of failures from MiDeFace were subtle and occurred in relatively less recognizable face regions. The effects of both programs on downstream imaging measurements (Figure 2) were small and very comparable, but MiDeFace was favored mildly for SPM12 and for FSL, while mri_reface was more favored for FreeSurfer.ConclusionAltogether, mri_reface more reliably removed the complete face, leading to smaller rates of potential re‐identification (8.2% vs 11.6%). Effects on downstream image measurements were small and comparable with both methods.

AbstractBackgroundThe Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (MCSA) is a longitudinal, population‐based study of residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota, USA. MCSA is releasing de‐identified clinical and imaging data on GAAIN.org to benefit the research community.MethodWe included longitudinal clinical data from all participants of the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging 30‐90 years of age (average 70.0y) through the first 15 years of the study. Clinical data includes age, sex, self‐reported race/ethnicity, APoE4 allele status, cognitive impairment status (normal, MCI, dementia, or other), height, weight, blood pressure, multi‐domain neuropsychological scores, neuroimaging summary measurements, medications, cardiovascular risk factors, social activity, sleep, mood/anxiety, functional measures, and more. For our initial release of imaging data, we selected the first imaging timepoint acquired on 3T GE MRI scanners and amyloid (PiB) PET during the same visit, from all available imaging participants 50‐90 years of age (average 70.7y). Currently, we included 3D T1‐weighted (MPRAGE) MRI (1x1x1.2mm3), T2‐weighted FLAIR MRI (0.85x0.85x3.6mm3), diffusion MRI (2.7mm resolution with 41 directions at b=1000 and 5 b=0), and numeric cortical global SUVR and Centiloid values from PiB PET scans at 40‐60 minutes post‐injection. All images are released in DICOM format and thoroughly de‐identified using CTP while ensuring preservation of necessary fields for analyses. T1‐weighted and T2‐FLAIR MRI were also de‐faced (identifiable face imagery was removed and replaced with an average) using mri_reface version 0.3.3 to further protect participants’ privacy, and all de‐faced images were visually inspected by a trained data scientist for quality assurance.ResultThe first phase of our public data release includes clinical data from 5925 unique participants from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (MCSA), each ranging from 1‐12 visits at roughly 15‐month intervals, and three MRI sequences (T1‐w, T2‐w‐FLAIR, and diffusion) from 1802 unique participants. Demographic summaries are given in Table 1.ConclusionThis large, richly characterized, de‐identified clinical and imaging dataset is available to the research community at https://www.gaaindata.org/partner/MCSA, and it is suitable for a wide range of research uses. Additional data will be released over time, including de‐faced amyloid PET images.

AbstractBackgroundMany treatments targeting frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) are in the developmental pipeline, but the rarity of the disease, coupled with the behavioral and motor features of FTLD, make it challenging to identify sufficient trial participants who can attend frequent in‐person visits. Decentralized clinical trial designs with remote evaluations are attractive alternatives but require validated tools for symptom tracking. Our previous cross‐sectional analyses showed that cognitive tasks deployed via the ALLFTD Mobile App are reliable and sensitive to early stages of disease. The current study seeks to evaluate whether unsupervised smartphone cognitive tests are sensitive to longitudinal changes that occur with increasing FTLD disease stage.MethodThe study included 194 participants (mean baseline age 54.30, SD = 15.66; mean education = 16.52, SD = 2.31; 55.2% women) who were asymptomatic (Clinical Dementia Rating plus FTLD (CDR®+NACC‐FTLD) = 0 [n = 109; 43 carriers of FTLD‐associated genetic variants]), prodromal (CDR®+NACC‐FTLD = 0.5 [n = 39]), or symptomatic (CDR®+NACC‐FTLD>0.5 [n = 46]) at baseline. Participants completed ALLFTD Mobile App smartphone versions of Stroop, flanker, and 2‐back tasks, as well as an adaptive associative memory task, every six months for up to two years. Linear‐mixed effects models investigated the effect of disease severity on cognitive trajectories by testing the interaction of baseline CDR®+NACC‐FTLD box score and time on smartphone test scores. Analyses were repeated in the subsample of asymptomatic/prodromal CDR®+NACC‐FTLD<1) familial FTLD mutation carriers (C9orf72, n = 27; MAPT, n = 16). All models controlled for age, education, and sex.ResultGreater baseline disease severity was associated with lower cognitive scores across all tasks (β range: ‐0.28 to ‐0.13; p’s < 0.001), and faster rates of decline on the memory and 2‐back tasks (β range: ‐0.15 to ‐0.07; p’s<0.04). When the sample was restricted to asymptomatic and prodromal individuals (CDR®+NACC FTLD<1), greater baseline disease severity was still associated with lower scores across most tasks (β range: ‐0.48 to ‐0.27; p’s<0.002; 2‐back: β = ‐0.19, p = 0.26). When the sample was restricted to asymptomatic/prodromal mutation carriers, disease severity remained associated with the memory and flanker tasks (β range: ‐0.85 to ‐0.45; p’s<0.01).ConclusionThis study provides initial evidence that longitudinal smartphone‐based cognitive measurements capture the accelerated cognitive worsening that accompanies increasing disease progression in FTLD.

AbstractBackgroundFew normative data for computerized measures administered in unsupervised remote environments are available. We aimed to determine what variables to include in normative models for remote self‐administered assessments, develop normative data for measures administered through Mayo Test Drive (MTD, a multi‐device remote cognitive assessment platform) and evaluate application of norms.Method1240 adults ages 33‐100 (96% White) from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging and Mayo Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center met normative sample inclusion criteria that included a concordant Cognitively Unimpaired (CU) diagnosis (3 independent raters all diagnosed CU) and CDR = 0 (see Table 1 for sample characteristics). Raw test scores were converted to normalized scaled scores. We derived regression‐based normative data that adjusted for age, age2, sex and education (base model); alternative models are also provided (age+age2+sex; age+ age2). We evaluated whether additional model terms beyond the base model were needed using an a priori cut‐off of 1% variance improvement in adjusted R2 over and above the base model. We examined rates of low test performance defined as performance below ‐1 SD in independent validation samples (n = 167 concordant CU, n = 64 mild cognitive impairment (MCI), n = 14 dementia). Rates are considered significantly different than expected when 95% confidence intervals (CIs) do not include the expected 14.7% base rate frequency.ResultNo additional potential model terms met our a priori cut‐off for inclusion beyond the base model (see Table 2), including other quadratic and cubic terms or interactions, device type, response input type, potential session interference, and national area deprivation index (ADI available in subset; N = 776). Application of norms showed expected rates of low test performance among CU participants (95% CI includes expected base rate) and significantly greater than expected rates of low test performance for all variables in MCI (e.g., 62.5% for composite) and dementia (e.g., 71.4% for composite; see Table 3).ConclusionTypical normative models appear appropriate for remote self‐administered measures and are sensitive to cognitive impairment. Device type and response input did not explain enough variance to warrant inclusion in normative models but are important for individual level interpretation. Future work will improve representation of individuals from under‐represented groups.

AbstractBackgroundFrontotemporal dementia (FTD) is a common young‐onset dementia. Challenges to in‐person FTD evaluations (e.g., behavioral symptoms, disease rarity), highlight the need to develop remote, low‐burden assessment techniques. A growing literature supports passive digital phenotyping for monitoring neurobehavioral change. Thus, we examined the utility of passively collected data from smartphones to detect prodromal or symptomatic FTD compared to that of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), a common cognitive screener.Method199 adults enrolled in the ALLFTD Mobile App study (mean age = 53.4 [SD = 15.2]; 58% women) completed up to 6 months of passive smartphone monitoring via the ALLFTD Mobile App. 55% were unimpaired [CDR®+NACC FTLD = 0], 22% had prodromal FTD [CDR®+NACC FTLD = 0.5], and 23% had symptomatic FTD [CDR®+NACC FTLD≥1] with a variety of syndromic presentations. Battery percentage was collected frequently (median interval = 45 min), and total daily battery usage was calculated as a proxy for smartphone use (higher battery usage = more smartphone use). Daily step counts were also passively collected. Logistic regression classified prodromal or symptomatic FTD vs. unimpaired as a function of: MoCA score [Model 1]; 7 passive features characterizing average, inter‐day variability, and changes over time in smartphone use and movement [Model 2]; or passive smartphone features and MoCA [Model 3]. Analyses were repeated excluding participants with symptomatic FTD to detect prodromal FTD vs. unimpaired.ResultThe area under the curves (AUCs) for detecting prodromal or symptomatic FTD (vs. unimpaired) from the MoCA alone [Model 1] and passive smartphone features alone [Model 2] were 0.77 (95%CI: 0.70‐0.85) and 0.77 (95%CI: 0.70‐0.84), respectively. Their combination [Model 3] resulted in a significantly improved AUC of 0.86 (95%CI: 0.80‐0.92) compared to Model 1 (p = 0.001). Significant Model 3 predictors included average daily battery usage (p = 0.02), slopes of change in step count (p = 0.04), and MoCA score (p<0.01). When distinguishing prodromal FTD from unimpaired, passive smartphone features alone (AUC = 0.75) were significantly better than the MoCA alone (AUC = 0.66; p<0.01), and their combination had the largest AUC (0.80).ConclusionResults support the utility of novel passively collected information from smartphones for detecting and monitoring FTD without contributing to assessment burden. With continued validation, passive digital monitoring methodologies have potential to increase access to dementia care.

AbstractBackgroundFew normative data for computerized measures administered in unsupervised remote environments are available. We aimed to determine what variables to include in normative models for remote self‐administered assessments, develop normative data for measures administered through Mayo Test Drive (MTD, a multi‐device remote cognitive assessment platform) and evaluate application of norms.Method1240 adults ages 33‐100 (96% White) from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging and Mayo Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center met normative sample inclusion criteria that included a concordant Cognitively Unimpaired (CU) diagnosis (3 independent raters all diagnosed CU) and CDR = 0 (see Table 1 for sample characteristics). Raw test scores were converted to normalized scaled scores. We derived regression‐based normative data that adjusted for age, age2, sex and education (base model); alternative models are also provided (age+age2+sex; age+ age2). We evaluated whether additional model terms beyond the base model were needed using an a priori cut‐off of 1% variance improvement in adjusted R2 over and above the base model. We examined rates of low test performance defined as performance below ‐1 SD in independent validation samples (n = 167 concordant CU, n = 64 mild cognitive impairment (MCI), n = 14 dementia). Rates are considered significantly different than expected when 95% confidence intervals (CIs) do not include the expected 14.7% base rate frequency.ResultNo additional potential model terms met our a priori cut‐off for inclusion beyond the base model (see Table 2), including other quadratic and cubic terms or interactions, device type, response input type, potential session interference, and national area deprivation index (ADI available in subset; N = 776). Application of norms showed expected rates of low test performance among CU participants (95% CI includes expected base rate) and significantly greater than expected rates of low test performance for all variables in MCI (e.g., 62.5% for composite) and dementia (e.g., 71.4% for composite; see Table 3).ConclusionTypical normative models appear appropriate for remote self‐administered measures and are sensitive to cognitive impairment. Device type and response input did not explain enough variance to warrant inclusion in normative models but are important for individual level interpretation. Future work will improve representation of individuals from under‐represented groups.

ABSTRACTCellular senescence is a biological mechanism of aging and age‐related diseases. The aim of this study was to examine whether senescence biomarkers are associated with frailty and physical function trajectories in patients undergoing kidney transplantation (KT). We also discussed the relationship between senescence biomarkers and KT function. In this multicenter study, we prospectively assessed plasma levels of senescence biomarkers, frailty as measured by the Physical Frailty Phenotype, and physical function as measured by the Short Physical Performance Battery prior to KT. Frailty, physical function, and KT function were also measured 1 year after KT. Variable associations were assessed using Cox and relaxed least absolute shrinkage and selection operation regression. The cohort consisted of 197 participants (mean age 53 ± 13 years, 61.4% male, and 80.2% White race). Higher pre‐KT levels of macrophage‐derived chemokine (MDC/CCL22) and growth differentiation factor‐15 (GDF‐15) were independently associated with less improvement in frailty and/or physical function during the first year after KT. Higher pre‐KT levels tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 6 (FAS) and MMP‐9 levels were independently associated with lower KT function one year after KT. Pre‐KT cellular senescence may contribute to frailty, physical function, and kidney function trajectories during the first year after KT.

AbstractBackground and AimsPhysical activity (PA) is associated with higher gait speed. We aimed to examine the associations between PA and change in spatial and temporal gait measures as well as fall risk in community‐dwelling individuals free of dementia.MethodsLongitudinal study among 4173 individuals aged ≥50 years (mean age 71 years; 2078 males; median follow‐up 4 years) enrolled in the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging. Self‐reported late‐life PA was used to calculate overall PA and moderate‐vigorous PA (MVPA) scores. Gait was assessed using GAITRite® and Zeno™ systems. Incident falls information was based on diagnostic codes retrieved from medical records. We ran linear mixed effects models to examine associations between z‐scored PA variables and longitudinal gait parameters, adjusted for age, sex, education, body mass index (BMI), medical comorbidities, and including interactions between PA and time since baseline. In secondary analyses, we calculated Cox Proportional hazard models with age as time scale predicting incident falls by PA, adjusting for sex, education, BMI, medical comorbidities, and falls history.ResultsAt baseline, higher PA was associated with higher velocity (overall PA: estimate 2.9935; MVPA: 2.2961; p < 0.001), higher cadence (overall PA: 1.0665; MVPA: 0.9073; p < 0.001), greater stride length (overall PA: 2.0805; MVPA: 1.4726; p < 0.001), shorter double support time (overall PA: −0.0257; MVPA: −0.0205; p < 0.001), and lower stance time variability (overall PA: −0.0204, p < 0.001; MVPA: −0.0152; p = 0.006). Overall PA was longitudinally associated with less decline in cadence, and MVPA with less increase in intraindividual stance time variability. Overall PA (Hazard ratio 0.892, 95% confidence interval 0.828–0.961, p = 0.003) and MVPA (HR 0.901; 95% CI 0.835–0.973, p = 0.008) were associated with a decreased risk of incident falls.ConclusionLate‐life PA was associated with favorable gait outcomes and decreased risk of incident falls. Thus, late‐life PA may help to maintain gait performance and decrease fall risk in old age.

ABSTRACTPerformance‐based measures of frailty are associated with healthcare utilization after kidney transplantation (KT) but require in‐person assessment. A promising alternative is self‐reported frailty. The goal of this study was to examine the ability of performance‐based and self‐reported frailty measures to predict 30‐day rehospitalizations after KT. We conducted a prospective, observational cohort study involving 272 adults undergoing KT at Mayo Clinic in Minnesota, Florida, or Arizona. We simultaneously measured frailty before KT using the physical frailty phenotype (PFP), the short physical performance battery (SPPB), and self‐report (the Patient‐Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] 4‐item physical function short form v2.0). Both the PFP and self‐reported frailty were independently associated with more than a 2‐fold greater odds of 30‐day rehospitalizations, while the SPPB was not. To our knowledge, this is the first study to assess the prognostic value of all three of the above frailty measures in patients undergoing KT. The PFP is more prognostic than the SPPB when assessing the risk of 30‐day rehospitalizations; self‐reported frailty can complement the PFP but not replace it. However, the 4‐item survey assessing self‐reported frailty represents a simple way to identify patients undergoing KT surgery who would benefit from interventions to lower the risk of rehospitalizations.

Abstract Electrophysiologic disturbances due to neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer’s disease and Lewy Body disease are detectable by scalp EEG and can serve as a functional measure of disease severity. Traditional quantitative methods of EEG analysis often require an a-priori selection of clinically meaningful EEG features and are susceptible to bias, limiting the clinical utility of routine EEGs in the diagnosis and management of neurodegenerative disorders. We present a data-driven tensor decomposition approach to extract the top 6 spectral and spatial features representing commonly known sources of EEG activity during eyes-closed wakefulness. As part of their neurologic evaluation at Mayo Clinic, 11 001 patients underwent 12 176 routine, standard 10–20 scalp EEG studies. From these raw EEGs, we developed an algorithm based on posterior alpha activity and eye movement to automatically select awake-eyes-closed epochs and estimated average spectral power density (SPD) between 1 and 45 Hz for each channel. We then created a three-dimensional (3D) tensor (record × channel × frequency) and applied a canonical polyadic decomposition to extract the top six factors. We further identified an independent cohort of patients meeting consensus criteria for mild cognitive impairment (30) or dementia (39) due to Alzheimer’s disease and dementia with Lewy Bodies (31) and similarly aged cognitively normal controls (36). We evaluated the ability of the six factors in differentiating these subgroups using a Naïve Bayes classification approach and assessed for linear associations between factor loadings and Kokmen short test of mental status scores, fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET uptake ratios and CSF Alzheimer’s Disease biomarker measures. Factors represented biologically meaningful brain activities including posterior alpha rhythm, anterior delta/theta rhythms and centroparietal beta, which correlated with patient age and EEG dysrhythmia grade. These factors were also able to distinguish patients from controls with a moderate to high degree of accuracy (Area Under the Curve (AUC) 0.59–0.91) and Alzheimer’s disease dementia from dementia with Lewy Bodies (AUC 0.61). Furthermore, relevant EEG features correlated with cognitive test performance, PET metabolism and CSF AB42 measures in the Alzheimer’s subgroup. This study demonstrates that data-driven approaches can extract biologically meaningful features from population-level clinical EEGs without artefact rejection or a-priori selection of channels or frequency bands. With continued development, such data-driven methods may improve the clinical utility of EEG in memory care by assisting in early identification of mild cognitive impairment and differentiating between different neurodegenerative causes of cognitive impairment.