Citations

Abstract BACKGROUND Free light chain (FLC) quantification is the most analytically sensitive blood-based method commercially available to diagnose and monitor patients with plasma cell disorders (PCDs). However, instead of directly detecting monoclonal FLCs (mFLCs), FLC assays indirectly assess clonality based on quantifying κ and λ FLCs and determination of the к/λ FLC ratio. Often an abnormal FLC ratio is the only indication of a PCD, and confirmation by a direct method increases diagnostic confidence. The aim of this study was to develop an analytically sensitive method for direct detection of mFLCs. METHODS Patient sera (n = 167) previously assessed by nephelometric FLC quantification and immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE) were affinity enriched for IgG, IgA, and total and free κ and λ light chains and subjected to MALDI-TOF MS. Relative analytical sensitivity of these methods was determined using serially diluted sera containing mFLCs. RESULTS In sera with abnormal FLC ratios (n = 127), 43% of monoclonal proteins were confirmed by IFE, 57% by MALDI-TOF MS without FLC enrichment, and 87% with FLC enrichment MALDI-TOF MS. In sera with normal FLC ratios (n = 40), the FLC MALDI-TOF MS method identified 1 patient with an mFLC. Serial dilution and analysis of mFLC containing sera by IFE, nephelometry, and FLC MALDI-TOF MS demonstrated that FLC MALDI-TOF MS analysis had the highest analytical sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS FLC immunoenrichment coupled to MALDI-TOF MS enables direct detection of mFLCs and significantly increases the confirmation of abnormal serum FLC ratios over IFE and MALDI-TOF MS without FLC enrichment, thereby providing added confidence for diagnosing FLC PCDs.

e19534 Background: Our group has developed a mass spectrometry (MS) method that can identify circulating monoclonal proteins, based on their unique molecular mass signatures. Given the propensity for patients with AL amyloidosis to have MS patterns consistent with post-translational modifications (PTMs), we posed the question whether these changes might be present long before the diagnosis of AL and potentially serve as a predictor for AL in patients with an asymptomatic plasma cell dyscrasia (aPCD). Methods: We included 64 patients with AL who had a preceding aPCD and who had stored serum samples at both time-points. The mass/charge (m/z) of monoclonal LC peaks (P) was noted for each sample. Presence of a PTM was defined as the presence of ≥1 “heavy” Ps at a particular charge state. A P was considered heavy if its m/z exceeded the right sided 95% C.I. of the m/z distribution of the respective normal LC. We used 9 patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (MM) without AL as controls. Results: Prior aPCDs were MGUS (N = 33), smoldering myeloma (n = 9) and MM (N = 1). In 21 patients aPCD was not further classified with a bone marrow biopsy. The median interval between aPCD and AL diagnosis was 77 months. At aPCD diagnosis, 42 patients had a single, typical P and 21 patients (33%) had PTMS: 13 patients had a single heavy P; 5 patients had 2 P (only one of which was heavy); and 3 patients had 2 heavy peaks. No PTMs were noted in our MM controls. The m/z of all typical and heavy P observed at aPCD remained unchanged for 63 patients as they transitioned to AL, which suggests no new PTMs occurred with the exception of one patient, who had a single PTM at aPCD diagnosis, but developed 2 additional heavy P appearing at +1232 and +1392 Dalton at AL diagnosis, suggestive of new PTMs. In all but 3 aPCD, the typical P was more abundant relative to heavy P. Heavy P abundance increased in 6 patients as they transitioned from the aPCD to the AL state and exceeded that of the typical P in 3 patients, suggestive of increasing abundance of existing PTMs in these cases. Conclusions: Pre-existing PTMs are present in 1/3 of AL patients and not in MM and can be used to identify patients at risk for AL. New PTMs are uncommon, but the relative abundance can change over time.

The detection and quantification of monoclonal‐proteins (M‐proteins) are necessary for the diagnosis and evaluation of response in plasma cell dyscrasias. Immunoglobulin enrichment‐coupled with matrix‐assisted laser desorption ionization time‐of‐flight mass‐spectrometry (MASS‐FIX) is a simple and inexpensive method to identify M‐proteins, but its clinical generalizability has not yet been elucidated. We compared MASS‐FIX to protein electrophoresis (PEL), serum/urine immunofixation‐electrophoresis (IFE), and quantitative serum free‐light chain (FLC) for the identification of M‐proteins in different clinical diagnoses. Paired serum and urine samples from 257 patients were tested. There were six patients for whom s‐IFE and FLC ratio were positive and serum MASS‐FIX was negative, but when serum and urine MASS‐FIX results were combined, only one patient with light chain‐MGUS was missed. Serum/urine‐MASS‐FIX detected M‐proteins in 18 patients with negative serum/urine‐PEL/IFE and serum‐FLC, 10 of whom had multiple myeloma or AL amyloidosis, who were mistakenly thought to have complete hematologic response by serum/urine‐PEL/IFE and serum‐FLC. Nearly half of the AL amyloidosis patients had atypical spectra, which may prove to be a clue to the diagnosis and pathogenesis of the disease. In conclusion, MASS‐FIX has a comparable sensitivity with PEL/IFE/FLC methods and can help inform the clinical diagnosis.

Abstract BACKGROUND Electrophoretic separation of serum and urine proteins has played a central role in diagnosing and monitoring plasma cell disorders. Despite limitations in resolution and analytical sensitivity, plus the necessity for adjunct methods, protein gel electrophoresis and immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE) remain front-line tests. METHODS We developed a MALDI mass spectrometry–based assay that was simple to perform, automatable, analytically sensitive, and applicable to analyzing the wide variety of monoclonal proteins (M-proteins) encountered clinically. This assay, called MASS-FIX, used the unique molecular mass signatures of the different Ig isotypes in combination with nanobody immunoenrichment to generate information-rich mass spectra from which M-proteins could be identified, isotyped, and quantified. The performance of MASS-FIX was compared to current gel-based electrophoresis assays. RESULTS MASS-FIX detected all M-proteins that were detectable by urine or serum protein electrophoresis. In serial dilution studies, MASS-FIX was more analytically sensitive than IFE. For patient samples, MASS-FIX provided the same primary isotype information for 98% of serum M-proteins (n = 152) and 95% of urine M-proteins (n = 55). MASS-FIX accurately quantified M-protein to <1 g/dL, with reduced bias as compared to protein electrophoresis. Intraassay and interassay CVs were <20% across all samples having M-protein concentrations >0.045 g/dL, with the ability to detect M-proteins <0.01 g/dL. In addition, MASS-FIX could simultaneously measure κ:λ light chain ratios for IgG, IgA, and IgM. Retrospective serial monitoring of patients with myeloma posttreatment demonstrated that MASS-FIX provided equivalent quantitative information to either protein electrophoresis or the Hevylite™ assay. CONCLUSIONS MASS-FIX can advance how plasma cell disorders are screened, diagnosed, and monitored.

Abstract BACKGROUND Current recommendations for screening for monoclonal gammopathies include serum protein electrophoresis (PEL), imunofixation electrophoresis (IFE), and free light chain (FLC) ratios to identify or rule out an M-protein. The aim of this study was to examine the feasibility of an assay based on immunoenrichment and MALDI-TOF-MS (MASS-SCREEN) to qualitatively screen for M-proteins. METHODS Serum from 556 patients previously screened for M-proteins by PEL and IFE were immunopurified using a κ/λ-specific nanobody bead mixture. Following purification, light chains (LC) were released from their heavy chains by reduction. MALDI-TOF analysis was performed and the mass-to-charge LC distributions were visually examined for the presence of an M-protein by both unblinded and blinded analysts. RESULTS In unblinded analysis, MASS-SCREEN detected 100% of the PEL-positive samples with an analytical sensitivity and specificity of 96% and 81% using IFE positivity as the standard. In a blinded analysis using 6 different laboratory personnel, consensus was reached in 92% of the samples. Overall analytical sensitivity and specificity were reduced to 92% and 80%, respectively. FLC ratios were found to be abnormal in 28% of MASS-SCREEN–negative samples, suggesting FLC measurements need to be considered in screening. CONCLUSIONS MASS-SCREEN could replace PEL in a panel that would include FLC measurements. Further studies and method development should be performed to validate the clinical sensitivity and specificity and to determine if this panel will suffice as a general screen for monoclonal proteins.

AbstractBACKGROUNDThe use of electrophoresis to monitor monoclonal immunoglobulins migrating in the β fraction may be difficult because of their comigration with transferrin and complement proteins.METHODSImmunoassays specific for IgGκ, IgGλ, IgAκ, IgAλ, IgMκ, and IgMλ heavy/light chain (HLC) were validated for use in the clinical laboratory. We assessed sample stability, inter- and intraassay variability, linearity, accuracy, and reference intervals for all 6 assays. We tested accuracy by verifying that the sum of the concentrations for the HLC-pairs accounted for the total immunoglobulins in each of 129 healthy sera, and that the HLC-pair ratios (rHLCs) were outside the reference interval in 97% of 518 diagnostic multiple myeloma (MM) samples.RESULTSWe assessed diagnostic samples and posttreatment sera in 32 IgG and 30 IgA patients for HLC concentrations, rHLC, and total immunoglobulins and compared these nephelometry results with serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP) and immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE). In sample sets from patients with IgG MM, the sensitivity of SPEP was almost the same as for rHLC, and no additional advantage was conferred by running HLC assays. In pre- and posttreatment samples from patients with IgA MM, the SPEP, rHLC, and IFE identified clonality in 28%, 56%, and 61%, respectively. In addition, when M-spikes were quantifiable, the concentration of the involved HLC was linearly related to that of the SPEP M-spike, with a slope near 1.CONCLUSIONSThe use of IgA HLC assays for monitoring β-migrating IgA monoclonal proteins can substitute for the combination of SPEP, IFE, and total IgA quantification.