Citations

Background:Crohn’s disease (CD) exhibits variability in colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and prognostic factors due to diverse clinical and behavioral characteristics, presenting inconsistencies between Western and Eastern patients.Objectives:This study compared clinical characteristics between CD patients with CRC from the US and Korean tertiary referral centers and defined the prognostic factors related to mortality.Design:Retrospective study.Methods:We reviewed the electronic medical records of 236 adult CD patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma evaluated at Mayo Clinic Rochester, Florida, or Arizona ( N = 200) and Asan Medical Center in Korea ( N = 36) between January 1989 and August 2022.Results:Asan patients had a younger age, shorter CD duration, more colonic involvement (L2 plus L3), penetrating behavior, perianal fistula, and shorter biological treatment duration before CRC diagnosis than Mayo patients. Furthermore, despite significant differences in body mass index, smoking status, primary sclerosing cholangitis, immunomodulators, CRC diagnosis period, clinical presentation, CRC location, surgery, and some histopathological details between the two groups, overall survival was not statistically different ( p value, 0.29, log-rank test). Advanced age (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 1.03 per year; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.01–1.04; p value, <0.01), unresectable CRC (aHR, 5.02; 95% CI, 2.49–10.12; p value, <0.01), and advanced CRC stage (aHR, 1.45 per stage; 95% CI, 1.07–1.97; p value, 0.02) were significantly associated with increased risk of death. CD remission at CRC diagnosis (aHR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.08–0.91; p value, 0.04), CRC diagnosis period of 2011–2022 (aHR relative to 1989–2000, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.25–0.87; p value, 0.02), and CRC diagnosis by surveillance (aHR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.32–0.98; p value, 0.04) were significantly associated with decreased risk of death.Conclusion:Notably, some clinical features of CD with CRC differed between Asan and Mayo patients; however, overall survival was not different. CD remission, CRC surveillance, and more recent diagnosis of CRC were associated with a reduced risk of death.

Introduction: Non-invasive assays are needed to better discriminate patients with prostate cancer (PCa) to avoid over-treatment of indolent disease. We analyzed 14 methylated DNA markers (MDMs) from urine samples of patients with biopsy-proven PCa relative to healthy controls and further studied discrimination of clinically significant PCa (csPCa) from healthy controls and Gleason 6 cancers. Methods: To evaluate the panel, urine from 24 healthy male volunteers with no clinical suspicion for PCa and 24 men with biopsy-confirmed disease across all Gleason scores was collected. Blinded to clinical status, DNA from the supernatant was analyzed for methylation signal within specific DNA sequences across 14 genes (HES5, ZNF655, ITPRIPL1, MAX.chr3.6187, SLCO3A1, CHST11, SERPINB9, WNT3A, KCNB2, GAS6, AKR1B1, MAX.chr3.8028, GRASP, ST6GALNAC2) by target enrichment long-probe quantitative-amplified signal assays. Results: Utilizing an overall specificity cut-off of 100% for discriminating normal controls from PCa cases across the MDM panel resulted in 71% sensitivity (95% CI: 49–87%) for PCa detection (4/7 Gleason 6, 8/12 Gleason 7, 5/5 Gleason 8+) and 76% (50–92%) for csPCa (Gleason ≥ 7). At 100% specificity for controls and Gleason 6 patients combined, MDM panel sensitivity was 59% (33–81%) for csPCa (5/12 Gleason 7, 5/5 Gleason 8+). Conclusions: MDMs assayed in urine offer high sensitivity and specificity for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. Prospective evaluation is necessary to estimate discrimination of patients as first-line screening and as an adjunct to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing.

Guideline-recommended screening programs exist for only a few cancer types. Although all these programs are understood to lead to reductions in cancer-related mortality, standard-of-care screening tests vary in accuracy, adherence and effectiveness. Recent advances in high-throughput technologies and machine learning have facilitated the development of blood-based multi-cancer cancer early detection (MCED) tests. MCED tests are positioned to be complementary to standard-of-care screening and they may broaden screening availability, especially for individuals who are not adherent with current screening programs and for individuals who may harbor cancers with no available screening options. In this article, we outline some key features that should be considered for study design and MCED test development, provide an example of the developmental pathway undertaken for an emerging multi-biomarker class MCED test and propose a clinical algorithm for an imaging-based diagnostic resolution strategy following MCED testing.

e15633 Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the fourth most diagnosed cancer, as well as the second leading cause of cancer death in the United States – with an estimated 152,810 diagnoses and 53,010 fatal cases in 2024. Regular screening and early detection can reduce CRC incidence and improve overall survival; however, recent national survey data (2021) demonstrate that only 59% of the US screen-eligible population (≥ age 45) is up to date. Home-based, non-invasive CRC screening test options, such as the multi-target stool DNA (mt-sDNA) test, have the potential to improve patient outcomes and overcome CRC screening adherence barriers at multiple levels. Given that the recommended interval for mt-sDNA is three years, a better understanding of use in repeat users is warranted. We evaluated the effective rescreen rate of previous mt-sDNA test users. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we included patients between the ages of 45 and 75 years who were shipped an mt-sDNA test kit between January 1st – December 31st, 2023, and had previously completed mt-sDNA screening with a negative result > 2.5 years prior. Our primary variable of interest was mt-sDNA completion rate on repeat testing, defined as kit receipt with a valid result within 120 days of the shipment date. Regression analysis was performed to determine baseline characteristics associated with repeat test completion rate. Results: During the analysis period, a total of 481,748 patients who met the inclusion criteria received an mt-sDNA kit. The majority of the cohort was female (61.4%) and between the ages of 65-75 years (50.9%). Overall repeat test completion rate was 83.6%, with the average time to kit return being 18.9 days. Completion rates were similar between males (83.8%) and females (83.6%), and patients receiving included navigation support via mobile phones demonstrated the shortest average time to kit return (18.7 days). Completion rates increased concordantly with patient age: 81.6%, (45-49 years), 82.2% (50-64 years), and 85% (65-75 years). For first-time rescreen participants (2nd lifetime mt-sDNA test), the completion rate was 83.1%. For second-time rescreen participants (3rd lifetime mt-sDNA test), the completion rate was even higher at 93.6%. Logistic regression analyses revealed that patients re-screening for a second-time were three times more likely to return the mt-sDNA kit for CRC screening (OR = 3.118; p < 0.001). Conclusions: Data from this large, retrospective cohort study revealed that repeat CRC screening with the mt-sDNA test is associated with high adherence to triennial follow-up among participants. suggesting a high-level of perceived patient confidence in repeat performance of the mt-sDNA test. These novel data provide relevant insights regarding strong patient willingness to continue with home-based, non-invasive mt-sDNA testing over multiple cycles of average-risk CRC screening.

Abstract Introduction: Barrett’s esophagus (BE) confers increased cancer risk. Endoscopic surveillance is recommended to distinguish non-dysplastic BE (NDBE), low grade dysplasia (LGD), high grade dysplasia (HGD), or adenocarcinoma (EAC) for endoscopic intervention. However, this paradigm is limited by sampling error, leading to missed/interval EAC. Herein, we aimed to classify these samples more accurately by performing whole genome methylation sequencing (WGMS) and utilizing multiple genomic features on endoscopic brush samples. Materials and methods: Endoscopic brush samples from patients with NDBE (n=18), HGD (18), EAC (18), and normal controls (18) were collected and underwent WGMS (discovery dataset). Sequence reads were processed through internal pipeline to extract CpG methylation and read level methylation ratio (alpha value). Copy number aberration (CNA) detection was performed using both CNVkit and ichorCNA. Differential methylated regions (DMRs) were identified through comparing EAC/HGD with NDBE and normal samples. Targeted methylation sequencing for selected DMRs and shallow WGMS were performed on EAC (41), HGD (26), LGD (23), NDBE (42), and normal controls (37) as validation. Ratio of the reads with alpha value&gt;0.6 for each DMR was used for further analysis. Detected CNA segments were summarized into chromosome arm loss or gain (aneuploidy score or AS representing the number of chromosome arms gained or lost in a sample) and trimmed median absolute deviation (tMAD). Classification models were developed using the discovery set and the best performing one was applied to the validation dataset. Results: Genome-wide DNA methylation largely segregated different groups of samples as diagnosed; however, some unexpected group crossings were observed. Top 200 DMRs were identified between EAC/HGD and NDBE and normal samples. CNA changes were widespread in EAC, very common in HGD but rare in NDBE (17/18 EACs,14/18 HGDs, 5/18 NDBEs with AS&gt;0). With tMAD &gt; 0.015, 16/18 EACs, 8/18 HGDs but none of 18 NDBEs passed the threshold. EAC or HGD samples without detectable CNAs had very low “tumor” fraction as determined by methylation-based cell type deconvolution or ichorCNA. Similar results were found in the validation dataset. A multi-omics (AS, tMAD, estimated tumor fraction, and DMR methylation) model could predict EAC, HGD, or NDBE with 0.81 accuracy through cross validation (10X) and 0.73 in the independent dataset. This increased to 0.98 and 0.90 in separating high risk EAC/HGD from NDBE, respectively. Conclusion: Multi-omics data obtained from single WGMS allow for a comprehensive analysis of BE samples with varying dysplasia levels. Using classification modeling, these characteristics can be effectively used to accurately identify and distinguish between EAC and HGD from NDBE, suggesting their utility as adjuncts to endoscopic surveillance biopsies. Citation Format: Zhifu Sun, Caroline L. Matchett, Seth W. Slettedahl, William R. Taylor, Panwen Wang, Calise Berger, Caryn E. Anderson, Melissa A. Passe, Ramona Lansing, Collin E. Chalmers, Patrick H. Foote, Jeanette E. Eckel Passow, Doug W. Mahoney, John B. Kisiel, Prasad G. Iyer. Multi-omics cancer risk assessment of Barrett’s esophagus with DNA methylation sequencing from endoscopic brush samples [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(7_Suppl):Abstract nr LB249.

This cross-sectional study estimates the number of average-risk colorectal cancer screening–eligible individuals in the US since the US Preventive Services Task Force updated its recommendations in 2021.

Abstract Introduction: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a major cancer killer with a low 5-year survival rate of 12%. Diagnosing PDAC at an early stage is one of the strongest predictors of long-term survival. Therefore, novel methods for early detection of PDAC must be explored. In this pilot study we aimed to compare the peripheral blood immune cell phenotypes in PDAC cases and cancer-free controls. Method: CyTOF (cytometry by time-of-flight) was used to evaluate peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from newly diagnosed treatment naïve patients with PDAC and sex and age matched cancer-free controls using a 29-marker immune phenotyping panel. Multiple analysis approaches including dimensionality reduction using tSNE and clustering using Phenograph were used to evaluate the results. Immune subsets having differential abundance differences were verified by manual gating. Results: Twenty patients were included in this pilot study (15 PDAC cases; 5 Cancer-free controls). Among the 15 PDAC cases, 5 were early stage (Stage 1-2). Thirty-two unique immune cell clusters were identified using the Phenograph algorithm: 10 unique clusters with properties consistent with monocytes/macrophages, 9 CD4 T cell clusters, 6 CD8 T cell clusters and 4 NK cells clusters. When comparing the case and control groups we noted lower percentages of CD8+CD27+ T-cells in cases. This was further verified by manual gating that confirmed the distribution of CD8+CD27+ T-cells relative to all T-cells were decreased in PDAC patients. In addition, a 57% increase in naïve CD4 T cells was found in case samples compared to controls. A principal component analysis of the clustering results identified two unique clusters of immune profiles that emerged providing a potential peripheral blood immune cell signature that could stratify and differentiate PDAC cases from controls. A CD14+CD16+CD4LoCD38+CD45RO+ population of monocytes was the primary cell population driving this difference. Conclusion: This study provides early evidence to indicate that a distinct PBMC immune phenotype may differentiate PDAC patients from control subjects. Further analysis in larger sample sets is warranted for in-depth characterization and identification of unique immune based biomarkers for PDAC detection. Citation Format: Kevin D. Pavelko, Jose C. Villasboas, William R. Taylor, Karen A. Doering, John B. Kisiel, Shounak Majumder. Peripheral blood immune phenotypes in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 2445.