Citations

Background Although intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is safe and effective in populations with general stroke, its impact on cervical artery dissection–related acute ischemic stroke (CeAD‐AIS) remains unclear. This retrospective study used the National Inpatient Sample to compare outcomes in patients with CeAD‐AIS treated with and without IVT. Methods We included adult patients with concurrent CeAD and AIS diagnoses ( International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision [ ICD‐10 ], codes) hospitalized from 2016 to 2019. The primary outcome was home discharge; safety outcomes included inpatient death and intracerebral hemorrhage. We performed survey‐weighted multivariable logistic regressions comparing IVT versus no IVT, followed by interaction analyses to examine effect modifications based on age, medical history, stroke severity, carotid artery involvement, and endovascular treatment. Results Between 2016 and 2019, 1360 (12.1%) of 11 285 patients with CeAD‐AIS received IVT. IVT‐treated patients had higher median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores (median [interquartile range], 8 [4–17] versus 3 [1–11]; P <0.001). Adjusted analyses showed IVT was associated with higher odds of home discharge (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.40 [95% CI, 1.01–1.92]; P =0.042), but not with inpatient death (adjusted OR, 1.29 [95% CI, 0.76–2.20]; P =0.347) or intracerebral hemorrhage (adjusted OR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.32–1.48]; P =0.341). Stroke severity ( P for interaction=0.001) and carotid artery involvement ( P for interaction=0.021) significantly modified IVT's effect on home discharge, with IVT being associated with an increased likelihood of home discharge in patients with moderate to severe strokes (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score >4) and carotid artery involvement. Conclusions IVT improves the likelihood of home discharge in patients with CeAD‐AIS without increasing the risk of inpatient death or intracerebral hemorrhage.

Background: CT perfusion (CTP) imaging is an important tool for identifying candidates for mechanical thrombectomy (MT). This modality is increasingly available in regional facilities, but whether pre-transfer perfusion imaging studies may be relied upon for treatment decisions is unclear. We analyzed a cohort of stroke transfers to quantify changes in CTP imaging profiles over time. Methods: A cohort of confirmed ischemic stroke patients who received CTP before and after transfer to a large mid-western comprehensive stroke center (CSC) were identified. We compared perfusion mismatch (MM), core infarct volume (CIV), and favorability of imaging for mechanical thrombectomy (MT) candidacy (defined as the presence of LVO and MM/CIV ratio of >1.8) between studies. Regression models were used to examine predictors of CIV growth including hypoperfusion intensity ratio (HIR) and time between studies. Results: Over a 24-month period, 61 patients met inclusion criteria. Median age was 71 (IQR 60-80), 52% were female, median NIHSS was 14 (IQR 4-19), and most patients had occlusion of the internal carotid and/or middle cerebral arteries (77%). The median time from last known well (LKW) to initial CT was 148 minutes (IQR 71-620) and median time between imaging studies was 149 minutes (IQR 126-194). Median CIV growth was 0 mL (IQR 0-6) and 8% (5/61) had growth ≥25 mL. In linear regression, higher HIR predicted CIV growth (β=24.3, p=0.04), but time from LKW to presentation and time between imaging studies did not. Imaging studies taken at the regional and CSC sites demonstrated excellent agreement in classifying patients as candidates for MT (kappa 0.778 [95% CI: 0.611-0.944]). A favorable regional CTP profile was 93% sensitive for MT delivery at the CSC with a positive predictive value of 63%. Conclusion: In our cohort, CIV growth between facilities was minimal despite relatively long interfacility transport times and was predicted by the regional HIR. A favorable regional imaging profile demonstrated high agreement with the imaging result at the CSC and was strongly associated with MT treatment.

Introduction: The safety and efficacy of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in cervical artery dissection-related acute ischemic stroke (CeAD-AIS) remains unclear. We performed a retrospective study of data from the National Inpatient Sample investigating outcomes in CeAD-AIS patients treated with and without IVT. Methods: We included adult patients with CeAD-AIS hospitalized between 2016 to 2019. CeAD-AIS was defined by concurrent CeAD and AIS diagnoses, identified with ICD-10 codes. The primary outcome was home discharge. The safety outcomes were inpatient death and intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). We used survey-weighted multivariable adjusted logistic regressions comparing the groups (IVT versus no IVT), followed by interaction analyses to examine for effect modifications based on age, medical history, stroke severity, and endovascular treatment. Results: Between 2016-2019, 1,360 (12.1%) of 11,285 CeAD-AIS patients received IVT. Patients treated with IVT- had higher NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores (median 8 [4-17] versus 3 [1-11]; p < 0.001). In adjusted analyses, treatment with IVT was associated with a greater odds of home discharge (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.49; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09-2.05, p = 0.014), but not ICH (aOR 0.90, 95% CI 0.43-1.86, p = 0.773) or inpatient death (aOR 1.22, 95% CI 0.72-2.06, p = 0.454). In interaction analyses, stroke severity significantly interacted with IVT ( p for interaction = 0.001), where IVT was significantly associated with increased likelihood of home discharge in patients with moderate to severe strokes (NIHSS > 4) (aOR 2.28, 95% CI 1.59-3.26, p < 0.001) but not in those with mild stroke (NIHSS 0-4) (aOR 1.03 95% CI 0.62-1.70, p = 0.922). Conclusion: IVT improved the likelihood of home discharge in patients with CeAD-AIS without increasing the risk of inpatient death or ICH.

Background: Emergency medical services (EMS) routing of stroke patients is challenging in rural settings. To address this, the American Stroke Association (ASA) has developed a template severity-based EMS triage algorithm to direct EMS to either the nearest stroke-ready versus the nearest Comprehensive Stroke Center (CSC) hospital, but its real-world impact is uncertain. Methods: This is an interim analysis of a before-and-after quality improvement study examining the impact of implementation of a severity-based EMS stroke destination protocol by three medical control authorities (MCAs) covering 4 rural counties in western Michigan. We defined optimal destination according to the ASA algorithm, which recommends bypass for patients within 24 of last known well if large vessel occlusion suspected and bypass will not delay thrombolysis. Chi square tests were used to compare optimal destination selection before and after implementation among EMS suspected stroke cases originating from the target counties. We also compared the time from EMS scene arrival to ischemic stroke (IS) treatment (thrombolysis or endovascular therapy [EVT]) before and after implementation using Wilcoxon Rank Sum tests. Results: From November 2021 to May 2024, EMS transported 616 suspected stroke cases, 272 (44.2%) of which ultimately received a diagnosis of ischemic stroke (IS) or transient ischemic attack. The protocol was implemented by each MCA in random order at months 21, 23, and 29, resulting in 73 MCA-months before and 17 after implementation, excluding a one-month washout for each MCA. Optimal hospital destinations were selected for 310/499 (62.1%) patients prior to the protocol and 86/117 (73.5%) after (p=0.021). Thrombolytics were administered to 57 patients (48 before and 9 after) and 46 (42 before and 4 after) received EVT. Median times from first EMS contact to needle decreased from 98 (interquartile range [IQR]: 79-107) to 77 (IQR: 75-85) minutes (p=0.012); median times from EMS contact to groin puncture increased nonsignificantly from 165 (IQR: 132-216) to 196 (IQR: 191-228) minutes (p=0.110). Conclusions: Interim analysis of implementation of a rural EMS severity-based triage algorithm for suspected stroke cases resulted in improved destination selection and faster thrombolysis but did not improve EVT treatment times. This analysis will be repeated once follow-up is completed in 7 months.

Introduction: Dynamic vertebral artery insufficiency is a rare vascular phenomenon characterized by insufficient flow of the posterior cerebral circulation induced by dynamic motion of the head. Prior case reports have been limited to vertebral artery occlusion by cervical osteophytes or other structural impingements. Case Report: In this case report, we discuss the unusual case of a 61-year-old female with a history of vertigo, diplopia, nystagmus, and left subclavian stenosis admitted to the hospital for syncope elicited by a left head turn and left shoulder raise. Transcranial Doppler (TCD) ultrasound and angiography showed evidence of dynamic vertebrobasilar insufficiency elicited by a left-head turn. Percutaneous stenting of the left subclavian artery led to the resumption of normal vessel flow as assessed by TCD and the resolution of the patient’s symptoms. Conclusions: This case highlights an unusual cause of dynamic vertebrobasilar insufficiency induced by head turn and/or left shoulder raise due to subclavian stenosis, diagnosed by TCD and angiography, and successfully treated with subclavian artery stenting.

AbstractBackgroundCervical artery dissection (CAD) is a common cause of ischemic stroke in young adults. Local blood clot formation and distal emboli are the key mechanisms for the development of stroke in patients with CAD. Microemboli distal to the dissection point can be detected as high‐intensity transient signals (HITS) using transcranial Doppler (TCD). Despite this unique capability, TCD is used inconsistently in the management of CAD. In this international survey, we aim to explore the frequency and potential barriers to TCD use in CAD.MethodThis study was an international electronic survey, based on the Antithrombotic Treatment for Stroke Prevention in Cervical Artery Dissection (STOP‐CAD) study, aiming at evaluating the use of TCD in diagnosing and managing CAD patients. A comprehensive questionnaire was developed to gather insights into the current practices, perceptions, and potential barriers to the effective use of TCD in participating centers. The collected data was then analyzed.ResultsFifty‐eight medical centers with advanced stroke care capabilities from Europe and United States participated in this study. Half (29 out of 58) of the sites routinely perform TCD on CAD patients, particularly in the presence of carotid or vertebral artery stenosis, complete carotid occlusion, and early neurologic deterioration. The primary reason for participating institutions not performing TCD was because its results would not change their practice. The protocol for TCD monitoring and managing HITS‐positive CAD patients varied among centers but transitioning from antiplatelet to anticoagulant was the most common practice in this patient population.ConclusionHalf of the stroke centers in our survey routinely perform TCD monitoring for CAD patients. The detection of HITS in CAD patients is a warning sign for providers, which may prompt a change in secondary stroke prevention management. However, a standard protocol for performing TCD in CAD and treatment recommendations for HITS‐positive CAD are not currently available, which warrants further research.