Citations

INTRODUCTION: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at an increased risk of infections. Before the COVID-19 pandemic, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) followed predictable seasonal patterns, which have been recently disrupted. This study aimed to investigate whether severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) coronavirus 2 (CoV-2) infection is associated with an increased risk of RSV infection in patients with IBD compared with those without a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used the TriNetX database to identify patients aged 18 years and older with IBD and SARS-CoV-2 infection (IBD-SARS-CoV-2 cohort) during the 2022 and 2023 RSV seasons. A 1:1 propensity score matching was used to compare patients with IBD but no history of SARS-CoV-2 infection (IBD non-SARS-CoV-2 cohort). RESULTS: In the 2022 IBD-SARS-CoV-2 cohort (mean age: 53.7 ± 17.6 years; 59% female; 77% White), the RSV infection risk was 0.47%, higher than 0.19% in the matched IBD non-SARS-CoV-2 cohort (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 2.4; 95% CI: 1.5–3.6). The risk was highest 30–60 days after SARS-CoV-2 infection (aOR: 2.9; 95% CI: 1.7–4.9), particularly in those aged 60 years and older (aOR: 2.5; 95% CI: 1.3–4.5). The use of systemic corticosteroids (aOR: 2.3; 95% CI: 1.1–4.6) or immune-modifying therapies (aOR: 3.9; 95% CI: 2–7.1) was associated with higher RSV infection risk. Similar trends were observed during the 2023 RSV season, with no significant differences in RSV-related hospitalizations. DISCUSSION: Adults with IBD have a higher risk of RSV infection after SARS-CoV-2 infection, particularly those receiving steroids or immune therapies. SARS-CoV-2 infection may have contributed to the recent RSV infection surge in this population, warranting further research.

INTRODUCTION: Evidence-based recommendations for sexual practices regarding anoreceptive intercourse (ARI) do not exist in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases undergoing restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA). This study surveys providers on perspectives and attitudes related to sexual practices after IPAA. METHODS: We developed a 23-item survey and distributed it to providers caring for patients with inflammatory bowel diseases. RESULTS: 95% of providers believe that it is important to discuss sexual orientation or practices before IPAA, but only 27% routinely discuss this. 50% did not feel comfortable and 74% did not feel confident discussing ARI recommendations with patients who underwent or will undergo IPAA. DISCUSSION: Future interventions should aim to standardize recommendations regarding feasibility and time line to safe ARI after IPAA.

Abstract Background The STRIDE-II recommendations highlighted the importance of targeting objective measures of disease control, including endoscopic healing, in patients (pts) with ulcerative colitis (UC).1 Risankizumab (RZB), an interleukin-23 specific inhibitor, showed improvement in the outcomes of clinical remission and endoscopic improvement compared to placebo in pts with moderately-to-severely active UC.2 Visualizing the changes of endoscopic scores from induction and maintenance may provide insight into pt disease course during treatment. Thus, this analysis sought to provide an overview of change in endoscopic scores of pts enrolled in UC clinical studies. Methods Using individual pt data from the Phase 2b/3 studies of RZB in UC, changes in Mayo endoscopic scores in induction and maintenance were assessed. For induction, pts received either intravenous (IV) placebo (PBO) or RZB for 12 weeks (wks). Pts from the Phase 2b and Phase 3 INSPIRE studies who had a clinical response to induction treatment were rerandomized into the maintenance study [COMMAND] and received subcutaneous PBO (withdrawal), RZB 180 mg, or RZB 360 mg every 8 wks for 52 wks. To be eligible for INSPIRE, pts had to have a baseline (BL) Mayo endoscopic score of 3 or 2 confirmed by central review. For this analysis, endoscopic scores are reported for induction BL and wk 12 and maintenance BL and wk 52 for each treatment. "Endoscopic improvement" was defined as a score of 1 or 0 at the time of follow-up. Results Among pts with a Mayo endoscopic score of 3 at induction BL, 28% achieved endoscopic improvement after 12-wk treatment with RZB 1200 mg; 57% of pts with a BL score of 2 showed endoscopic improvement (Fig. 1). In contrast, among PBO-treated pts with a score of 3 or 2 at BL, 11% and 18%, respectively, achieved endoscopic improvement after induction. Most PBO-treated pts (63%) had no score change at wk 12. During the maintenance study, 29%–35% of pts in the RZB treatment groups had an endoscopic score of 2 or 3 at maintenance BL. (Fig. 2). For those with a BL score of 3, most pts receiving RZB 360 mg achieved endoscopic improvement (62%); similarly, 65% of those with a BL score of 2 showed endoscopic improvement at wk 52. Trends were similar for RZB 180 mg with ≥80% of pts with a BL score of 1 or 0 maintained a 1 or 0 through wk 52. Among PBO-treated pts, ≥60% maintained a score of 3 or 2 from maintenance BL to wk 52; approximately one third of pts’ scores improved to 1 or 0. Conclusion This analysis showed that RZB treatment improved endoscopic outcomes from wk 0 to wk 12 of induction and wk 0 to wk 52 of maintenance. These findings may help inform treatment expectations and shared decision-making for pts with UC initiating RZB treatment. References 1.Turner D, et al. Gastroenterology. 2021;160(5):1570-1583. 2.Louis E, et al. JAMA. 2024;332(11):881-897.