Citations

Introduction: Central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) is a neurovascular emergency and acute monocular visual loss should trigger a stroke code activation. As thrombolytic therapy is considered for non-arteritic CRAO in the stroke therapeutic window, we aimed to review all telestroke encounters for acute visual loss in Mayo Clinic national telestroke network, focusing on the ocular diagnosis and the management recommendations. Hypothesis: patients evaluated via telestroke for acute visual loss are less likely to receive thrombolysis Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of the Mayo Clinic Arizona Telestroke/Teleneurology (2010-2017, 6364 encounters) and Mayo Clinic Enterprise Telestroke databases (2018-2020, 3147 encounters), searching for visits requested for acute visual loss. We recorded the subjects’ demographics, time from last seen normal to telestroke evaluation, preliminary diagnosis, and therapeutic/diagnostic recommendation. Results: From a total of 9511 audio-video telestroke encounters, 49 (0.51%) had an ocular diagnosis. Out of those, 6 patients (12.2%) had a provisional diagnosis of CRAO. 4/6 (66.6%) CRAO patients presented within 4.5h from symptom onset (median 2 hours) and none received thrombolytic therapy. All telestroke physicians recommended antiplatelet, ophthalmology consultation for diagnostic evaluation and comprehensive stroke work-up. Conclusions: Telestroke evaluations for CRAO, in routine practice, are less common than the disease prevalence would predict, suggesting that education is urgently mandated to increase the index of awareness. Even when CRAO subjects are evaluated via telestroke within 4.5 hours from symptom onset, they do not receive thrombolytic therapy nor timely ophthalmologic evaluation. Telestroke visits may benefit from the inclusion of tele-ophthalmologic consults to help with establishing the diagnosis in the narrow time-window of intravenous thrombolysis.

Introduction: Reversible cerebral vasonstriction syndrome (RCVS) is an increasingly recognized clinical and radiologic syndrome. However, it has been rarely reported in the setting of the novel coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) infection or sarcomatous tumors. RCVS might be the initial manifestations of COVID-19 infection or noncatecholamine producing masses including sarcoma. Case Report: A 44-year-old male who developed COVID-19–related symptoms followed by rapid onset of severe headaches in the setting of persistently elevated blood pressure (BP). Brain imaging showed multifocal arterial narrowing in the anterior and posterior circulation consistent with RCVS. Serial imaging demonstrated resolution of the arterial narrowing after BP control was achieved with improvement in the patient’s headaches. Further investigation for secondary causes of the patient’s elevated BP revealed a right renal mass, and the patient underwent right nephrectomy, and the biopsy results confirmed the diagnosis of pleomorphic sarcoma. Conclusion: Our case suggests a possible association between severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 with development of RCVS, but further studies are needed to validate this observation, establish a causal relationship and define a pathophysiological mechanism. Considering tumors other than catecholamine-producing masses as a potential risk factor for developing RCVS might lead to earlier detection and treatment of any underlying malignancy in patients whom the main and sole presentation could be RCVS.