Citations

Introduction: The performance of automated left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) assessment in patients with altered cardiac chamber geometry, such as those with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), is not well described. Aims: Accurate assessment of LVEF is required for dose titration and continuation of myosin inhibitors in obstructive HCM. From the VALOR-HCM trial (NCT04349072), the agreement of two commercially available software packages was compared with blinded core lab assessment of LVEF. Methods: From baseline and week 16, among 112 patients randomized to either mavacamten or placebo, 178 echocardiograms were analyzed. Representative clips were manually selected, and automated LVEFs were calculated. Comparisons of LVEFs were made using Pearson’s correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman analysis. Results: With core lab assessment, the overall median LVEF was 68% (Q1 66%, Q3 70%). The correlation with vendor 1 was moderate (r = 0.47, 95% CI 0.35-0.58, p <0.001) and weak with vendor 2 (r =0.21, 95% CI 0.07-0.35, p =0.004). Correlation was also weak between vendor 1 and 2 (r = 0.14, 95% CI 0.00-0.28, p = 0.06). Vendors 1 and 2 had an underestimation bias of LVEF of 8% (95% CI 6-9%) and 8% (95% CI 7-9%), respectively, compared to core lab LVEF (Figure 1). Conclusions: In VALOR-HCM, the concordance of LVEF between different commercially available software packages with each other and with a core lab assessment was limited. Further study is needed to evaluate and improve the performance of automated LVEF tools in obstructive HCM patients who have altered cardiac chamber geometry.

Importance There is an unmet need for novel medical therapies before recommending invasive therapies for patients with severely symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Mavacamten has been shown to improve left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradient and symptoms and may thus reduce the short-term need for septal reduction therapy (SRT). Objective To examine the cumulative longer-term effect of mavacamten on the need for SRT through week 56. Design, Setting, and Participants This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, randomized clinical trial with placebo crossover at 16 weeks, conducted from July 2020 to November 2022. Participants were recruited from 19 US HCM centers. Included in the trial were patients with obstructive HCM (New York Heart Association class III/IV) referred for SRT. Study data were analyzed April to August 2023. Interventions Patients initially assigned to mavacamten at baseline continued the drug for 56 weeks, and patients taking placebo crossed over to mavacamten from week 16 to week 56 (40-week exposure). Dose titrations were performed using echocardiographic LVOT gradient and LV ejection fraction (LVEF) measurements. Main Outcome and Measure Proportion of patients undergoing SRT, remaining guideline eligible or unevaluable SRT status at week 56. Results Of 112 patients with highly symptomatic obstructive HCM, 108 (mean [SD] age, 60.3 [12.5] years; 54 male [50.0%]) qualified for the week 56 evaluation. At week 56, 5 of 56 patients (8.9%) in the original mavacamten group (3 underwent SRT, 1 was SRT eligible, and 1 was not SRT evaluable) and 10 of 52 patients (19.2%) in the placebo crossover group (3 underwent SRT, 4 were SRT eligible, and 3 were not SRT evaluable) met the composite end point. A total of 96 of 108 patients (89%) continued mavacamten long term. Between the mavacamten and placebo-to-mavacamten groups, respectively, after 56 weeks, there was a sustained reduction in resting (mean difference, −34.0 mm Hg; 95% CI, −43.5 to −24.5 mm Hg and −33.2 mm Hg; 95% CI, −41.9 to −24.5 mm Hg) and Valsalva (mean difference, −45.6 mm Hg; 95% CI, −56.5 to −34.6 mm Hg and −54.6 mm Hg; 95% CI, −66.0 to −43.3 mm Hg) LVOT gradients. Similarly, there was an improvement in NYHA class of 1 or higher in 51 of 55 patients (93%) in the original mavacamten group and in 37 of 51 patients (73%) in the placebo crossover group. Overall, 12 of 108 patients (11.1%; 95% CI, 5.87%-18.60%), which represents 7 of 56 patients (12.5%) in the original mavacamten group and 5 of 52 patients (9.6%) in the placebo crossover group, had an LVEF less than 50% (2 with LVEF ≤30%, one of whom died), and 9 of 12 patients (75%) continued treatment. Conclusions and Relevance Results of this randomized clinical trial showed that in patients with symptomatic obstructive HCM, mavacamten reduced the need for SRT at week 56, with sustained improvements in LVOT gradients and symptoms. Although this represents a useful therapeutic option, given the potential risk of LV systolic dysfunction, there is a continued need for close monitoring. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04349072

BACKGROUND: Alcohol septal ablation (ASA) is a minimally invasive treatment for drug-refractory obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Detailed assessment of pressure changes and predictors of mortality and procedure success are not well defined. METHODS: This is a single-center study evaluating pressure changes and predictors of mortality and procedure success in transseptal ASA. Survival analysis and predictors of mortality were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 156 patients were included (mean age, 67.3 years; 46.8% women). Left atrial (LA) pressure and left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradient decreased, whereas aortic pulse pressure (PP) increased post-ASA. Patients with lower baseline mean LA pressure (<median, 19 mm Hg), LVOT gradient reduction >82% (gradient change median), and PP increase >19% (PP change median) had superior survival. On Cox univariable regression, baseline mean LA pressure >median (19 mm Hg; hazard ratio [HR], 2.09 [95% CI, 1.05–4.18]; P =0.036), residual LVOT gradient (HR, 1.02 [95% CI, 1.01–1.03]; P =0.003), and LVOT gradient percent reduction <median (82%; HR, 2.92 [95% CI, 1.46–5.83]; P =0.002) were predictors of mortality. When adjusting for age and sex, baseline LA v wave >median (28 mm Hg; HR, 2.36 [95% CI, 1.17–4.76]; P =0.016), baseline mean LA pressure >median (19 mm Hg; HR, 2.70 [95% CI, 1.33–5.50]; P =0.006), percentage reduction in gradient <median (82%; HR, 2.74 [CI, 1.37–5.50]; P =0.005), and percentage increase in PP <median (19.3%; HR, 2.09 [CI, 1.05–4.16]; P =0.035) predicted survival free of all-cause mortality. CONCLUSIONS: ASA is associated with an acute decrease in the LVOT gradient and LA pressures and increase in aortic PP. Mean LA pressure, percentage decrease in LVOT gradient, and increase in PP are strong predictors of survival free of all-cause mortality following ASA and are important variables for procedural guidance.

Background: An electrocardiogram (ECG)-based artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm has shown good performance in detecting hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM AI-score). However, its clinical application may be challenging due to the low disease prevalence and potentially high false-positive rate when screening unenriched cohorts. Aims: To identify clinical characteristics associated with false-positive HCM AI-score results to improve screening tool application. Methods: From a cohort of 20,677 patients with a digital 12-lead ECG in routine clinical practice in 2021, we performed a detailed chart review of the 200 patients with highest HCM AI-score to determine their HCM status and collect clinical data. Stepwise forward logistic regression was used to create a clinical variable-based “candidacy for HCM screening” score (CHS score), differentiating true- and likely true-positive from likely false-positive HCM AI-score results. We then validated the CHS score in 200 patients with the highest HCM AI-scores from an independent cohort of 15,147 patients with an ECG in 2022. Results: Among the 200 patients in 2021 (median age 71 years, 48% female), 96 (48%) were likely false-positive HCM AI-score results, 71 (36%) definite or likely true-positive results, and 33 (16%) indeterminate. The CHS score included a history of surgical septal myectomy, coronary artery bypass graft surgery, cardiac valve replacement, and pacemaker, and had an AUC of 0.88 (95% CI 0.83-0.92) for the differentiation of true- versus false-positive AI results. In the 2022 cohort, the CHS score had an AUC of 0.82 (95% CI 0.76 - 0.88). After limiting the cohort to HCM candidates identified by the CHS score, the false-positive results rate was reduced to 27/114 (24%). Conclusions: By applying the CHS score to patients with positive HCM AI-screening results, the false-positive rate decreased from 49% to 24%. Utilizing a clinical model used in tandem with an AI model improved diagnostic yield.

Background: Diastolic dysfunction (DD) is frequently present in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) due to abnormal left ventricular (LV) relaxation, wall hypertrophy, increased LV filling pressures and myocardial disarray and fibrosis, even though ejection fraction (EF) remains preserved until late stages. Our aim was to investigate in a large cohort whether contemporary markers of DD and increased filling pressures are associated with outcomes in these patients. Methods: We screened consecutive patients with HCM who had transthoracic echocardiography and no significant valvular heart disease. The associations of septal/lateral e’ velocity, E/e’, left atrial volume index (LAVi), and tricuspid regurgitant velocity (TR) with all-cause mortality were tested. A diastolic score (DS) was also calculated (1 point for each abnormality in e’, E/e’, TR, LAVi). Results: 1,496 patients with HCM were studied (mean age 52±15 yrs; 61% men; LV EF 69±7%; Table). Diastolic abnormalities were highly prevalent in these patients ( Table ). In the subset without septal reduction therapy (SRT; n=900), at a median followup of 9 years (IQR 7-11 yrs; n=78 deaths), increased E/e’ and DS were strongly associated with mortality (log-rank P <.0001 for both; Figure ). However, E/e’ did not remain significant in multivariable models after adjustment for known cardiac risk factors or other significant confounders ( Table ). In contrast, DS >2 remained independently associated with ~2-fold higher mortality risk (adjusted HR 1.91 [1.14-3.20, P =.01]; n=693; Table). In patients who underwent SRT (n=596), these associations showed the same trend but attenuated. Conclusion: In HCM patients who did not require SRT, the severity of DD was associated with mortality, independent of cardiac pump function or known cardiac risk factors. The composite score was more powerful than E/e’. Further studies are needed to fully understand the impact of DD in these patients with and without SRT.

Introduction: In the randomized VALOR-HCM study of symptomatic patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (oHCM), mavacamten reduced the need for septal reduction therapy at 16 weeks. The current sub-study sought to assess the impact of mavacamten on systolic anterior motion (SAM) of the mitral valve and associated mitral regurgitation (MR). Methods: Patients on maximally-tolerated medical therapy referred for septal reduction therapy were randomized 1:1 to mavacamten or placebo. Echocardiographic assessment was performed by an independent, blinded core laboratory. SAM was assessed as none, mild (anterior leaflet >/= 1 cm from the septum), moderate (anterior leaflets <1cm from the septum), and severe (anterior leaflet in contact with septum). MR was assessed according to ASE guidelines. Results: Among 112 enrolled patients, 23.2% (n=27) had at least moderate (2+) MR. Most (92.9%, n=104) had at least moderate resting SAM, of whom 55.4% (n = 62) had severe SAM. At 16 weeks, 53.7% of patients treated with mavacamten had at least one level improvement in resting SAM compared to 21.6% of patients treated with placebo ( p = 0.001), and 35.2% had at least a two level improvement in SAM compared with 11.8% of placebo patients ( p = 0.007)(Figure 1A). Similarly, patients treated with mavacamten had an improvement of -36.0 + 28.8 mmHg in resting left ventricular outflow tract gradient at week 16 compared to -1.5 + 26.5 mmHg with placebo (<0.001). At week 16, 48.1% of patients treated with mavacamten had at least a one grade improvement in MR, and 23.1% had at least a two grade improvement compared to 12.2% and 6.1% of patients treated with placebo ( p <0.001 and 0.025, respectively)(Figure 1B). Conclusions: In highly symptomatic patients with oHCM, treatment with mavacamten reduced resting SAM with an improvement in associated MR.

Introduction: In the randomized VALOR-HCM study of symptomatic patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (oHCM), mavacamten reduced the need for septal reduction therapy at 16 weeks. Because mavacamten is a cardiac myosin inhibitor that may improve ventricular compliance, this sub-study hypothesized that mavacamten would favorably impact diastolic function. Methods: Symptomatic patients on maximally-tolerated medical therapy referred for septal reduction therapy were randomized 1:1 to mavacamten or placebo. Echocardiographic assessment was performed by an independent, blinded core laboratory. Diastolic grade was determined according to ASE guidelines. Between-group comparisons were made from baseline to week 16. Results: Among 112 enrolled patients, baseline left atrial volume index (LAVi) was similar (Table). At 16 weeks, mavacamten treatment resulted in a significant reduction in LAVi (-5.2 vs -0.5 with placebo, p = .003). Similarly, although lateral E/e’ and septal E/e’ were comparable at baseline, patients treated with mavacamten demonstrated a significant reduction at week 16 (lateral E/e’: -3.5 vs 0.7, p <0.001; septal E/e’: -3.3 vs 0.7, p < 0.001)(Table). Patients treated with mavacamten were also more likely to improve their diastolic dysfunction grade (31.4% vs 12.8%, p = 0.032) (Figure). Conclusions: After only 16 weeks of therapy, in a highly symptomatic oHCM population with echocardiographic-guided drug titration, mavacamten improved measures of diastolic function.

Abstract Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy (HCM) is an inheritable heart disease with the highest rate of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in young adults. Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) therapy is recommended for HCM patients at high risk for SCD. Reviewing the recent clinical literature revealed the potential to improve the selection of candidates for ICD implantation. The current study uses information extracted from echocardiography reports to evaluate HCM patients with ICD and aims to provide a comparative insight into patients who benefited the most from the device therapy, including shock and anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP). The proposed interpretable machine learning approach has used the XGboost algorithm. The model’s performance was considered satisfactory, as evidenced by an accuracy score of 81% and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) value of 69% and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) identified common properties of HCM patients in each category and provided high-level reasoning and foundation for a clinical decision support tool.

Importance Whether vigorous intensity exercise is associated with an increase in risk of ventricular arrhythmias in individuals with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is unknown. Objective To determine whether engagement in vigorous exercise is associated with increased risk for ventricular arrhythmias and/or mortality in individuals with HCM. The a priori hypothesis was that participants engaging in vigorous activity were not more likely to have an arrhythmic event or die than those who reported nonvigorous activity. Design, Setting, and Participants This was an investigator-initiated, prospective cohort study. Participants were enrolled from May 18, 2015, to April 25, 2019, with completion in February 28, 2022. Participants were categorized according to self-reported levels of physical activity: sedentary, moderate, or vigorous-intensity exercise. This was a multicenter, observational registry with recruitment at 42 high-volume HCM centers in the US and internationally; patients could also self-enroll through the central site. Individuals aged 8 to 60 years diagnosed with HCM or genotype positive without left ventricular hypertrophy (phenotype negative) without conditions precluding exercise were enrolled. Exposures Amount and intensity of physical activity. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary prespecified composite end point included death, resuscitated sudden cardiac arrest, arrhythmic syncope, and appropriate shock from an implantable cardioverter defibrillator. All outcome events were adjudicated by an events committee blinded to the patient’s exercise category. Results Among the 1660 total participants (mean [SD] age, 39 [15] years; 996 male [60%]), 252 (15%) were classified as sedentary, and 709 (43%) participated in moderate exercise. Among the 699 individuals (42%) who participated in vigorous-intensity exercise, 259 (37%) participated competitively. A total of 77 individuals (4.6%) reached the composite end point. These individuals included 44 (4.6%) of those classified as nonvigorous and 33 (4.7%) of those classified as vigorous, with corresponding rates of 15.3 and 15.9 per 1000 person-years, respectively. In multivariate Cox regression analysis of the primary composite end point, individuals engaging in vigorous exercise did not experience a higher rate of events compared with the nonvigorous group with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.01. The upper 95% 1-sided confidence level was 1.48, which was below the prespecified boundary of 1.5 for noninferiority. Conclusions and Relevance Results of this cohort study suggest that among individuals with HCM or those who are genotype positive/phenotype negative and are treated in experienced centers, those exercising vigorously did not experience a higher rate of death or life-threatening arrhythmias than those exercising moderately or those who were sedentary. These data may inform discussion between the patient and their expert clinician around exercise participation.

Abstract Aims Data on the clinical course of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) are mainly derived from tertiary HCM centre studies, and knowledge of clinical outcomes of patients leaving specialty care and returning to local physicians is limited due to gaps between clinical encounters or complete loss of follow-up. This survey aims to describe the clinical course of HCM in patients following their evaluation at a tertiary referral centre. Methods and results A comprehensive outcomes survey was developed and sent to 4495 eligible patients with HCM previously evaluated at Mayo Clinic. Questions assessed general well-being, New York Heart Association class, procedures performed, and probable HCM-triggered ventricular arrhythmic events (VAEs) since last visit. In total, 2058 patients (mean age 63 ± 15 years; 42% female) responded to the survey covering a total of 10 510 patient-years with an average of 5.4 ± 6.4 years of follow-up since their last on-campus/virtual visit to Mayo Clinic. During their time away from specialty care, 20% of patients reported having cardiac-related hospitalizations and 25% reported having cardiac-related procedures. Similar to high-risk referral cohorts, 5% of patients reported VAEs with an event rate of 0.98 events/100 patient-years. The prevalence of atrial fibrillation, syncope, pre-syncope, cardiac-related hospitalizations, and VAEs during time away from specialty care increased significantly with increasing New York Heart Association class (P &lt; 0.001). Conclusions Acknowledging ascertainment bias, the clinical course of patients away from tertiary care may be more severe than previously anticipated. Among those with exertional symptoms, HCM-related morbidity increased substantially. Higher risk HCM patients should remain in contact with HCM specialty care.