Citations

Clear

68 citation(s) found for "Ganz, PA".

Analysis of somatic mutations in 131 human brains reveals aging-associated hypermutability
Bae, Taejeong , Fasching, Liana , Wang, Yifan , Shin, Joo Heon , Šuvakov, Milovan , Jang, Yeongjun , Norton, Scott , Dias, Caroline , Mariani, Jessica , Jourdon, Alexandre , Wu, Feinan , Panda, Arijit , Pattni, Reenal , Chahine, Yasmine, Yeh, Rebecca C., Roberts, Rosalinda C. , Hüttner, Anita , Straub, Richard E. , Walsh, Christopher A. , Network§, Brain Somatic Mosaicism, Urban, Alexander E. , Weinberger, Daniel R. , Vaccarino, Flora M. , Abyzov, Alexej , Šestan, Nenad , Moran, John V. , Gleeson, Joseph G. , Mathern, Gary W. , Courchesne, Eric, Chess, Andrew , Bizzotto, Sara , D’Gama, Alissa M. , Hill, Robert , Kim, Sonia , Miller, Michael , Borges-Monroy, Rebeca , Bohrson, Craig L. , Galor, Alon , Kwon, Min‐Seok , Luquette, Joe, Sherman, Maxwell A. , Rosenbluh, Chaggai , Cho, Sean, Thorpe, Jeremy , McConnell, Michael J. , Narurkar, Rujuta, Paquola, Apuã C.M. , Shin, Jooheon, Molitor, Cindy, Peters, Mette A. , Linker, Sara B. , Reed, Patrick , Wang, Meiyan , Zhou, Bo , Amero, Aitor Serres, Lobón, Irene , Moruno, Manuel Solis, Pérez, Raquel García, Povolotskaya, Inna , Soriano, Eduardo , Antaki, Danny , Averbuj, Dan, Ball, Laurel, Yang, Xiaoxu , Chung, Changuk , Emery, Sarah B., Flasch, Diane A. , Sun, Chen , Zhao, Xuefang , Zhou, Weichen , Frisbie, Trenton J., Cherskov, Adriana , Pochareddy, Sirisha , Kleinman, Joel E , Hyde, Thomas M , Straub, Richard E , Walsh, Christopher A , Urban, Alexander E , Leckman, James F , Weinberger, Daniel R , Vaccarino, Flora M , Abyzov, Alexej , Shin, Joo Heon , Zhou, Bo , Šuvakov, Milovan , Bae, Taejeong , Wang, Yifan , Jang, Yeongjun , Network§, Brain Somatic Mosaicism, Leckman, James F. , Park, Peter J. , Gage, Fred H , Gleeson, Joseph G. , Courchesne, Eric, Roy, Subhojit , Akbarian, Schahram , Coulter, Michael E. , Ganz, Javier , Hill, Robert, Huang, August Yue , Khoshkhoo, Sattar , Lee, Alice , Lodato, Michael A. , Maury, Eduardo A. , Rodin, Rachel E. , Zhou, Zinan , Chu, Chong , Cortés‐Ciriano, Isidro , Dou, Yanmei , Gulhan, D. , Viswanadham, Vinay , Jones, Attila , Langmead, Ben , Erwin, Jennifer A. , Jaffe, Andrew E. , Zhu, Xiaowei , Juan, David , Marquès‐Bonet, Tomàs , Breuss, Martin W. , Kidd, Jeffrey M. , Kopera, Huira C. , Kwan, Kenneth Y , Mills, Ryan E. , Moldovan, John B. , Scuderi, Soraya

Mayo Clinic

Science | July 28, 2022 | Volume: 377 | Issue: 6605 | Pages: 511-517

10.1126/science.abm6222 | PMID 35901164 Get It

We analyzed 131 human brains (44 neurotypical, 19 with Tourette syndrome, 9 with schizophrenia, and 59 with autism) for somatic mutations after whole genome sequencing to a depth of more than 200×. Typically, brains had 20 to 60 detectable single-nucleotide mutations, but ~6% of brains harbored hundreds of somatic mutations. Hypermutability was associated with age and damaging mutations in genes implicated in cancers and, in some brains, reflected in vivo clonal expansions. Somatic duplications, likely arising during development, were found in ~5% of normal and diseased brains, reflecting background mutagenesis. Brains with autism were associated with mutations creating putative transcription factor binding motifs in enhancer-like regions in the developing brain. The top-ranked affected motifs corresponded to MEIS (myeloid ectopic viral integration site) transcription factors, suggesting a potential link between their involvement in gene regulation and autism.
NRG-BR007: A phase III trial evaluating de-escalation of breast radiation (DEBRA) following breast-conserving surgery (BCS) of stage 1, hormone receptor+, HER2-, RS ≤18 breast cancer.
White, Julia , Mamounas, Eleftherios P. , Théberge, Valérie, Zellars, Richard C. , Shumway, Dean A. , Chen, Guang‐Pei , Julian, Thomas B. , Anderson, Stewart , Harris, Eleanor E R , Mamounas, Eleftherios P. , Stover, Daniel G. , Ganz, Patricia A. , Jagsi, Reshma , Cecchini, Reena S. , Bergom, Carmen , El-Tamer, Mahmoud Bahij , Wolmark, Norman

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | June 6, 2022 | Volume: 40 | Issue: 16_suppl | Pages: TPS613-TPS613

10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.tps613 Get It

TPS613 Background: Approximately 50% of newly diagnosed breast cancers are stage 1, with the majority being ER/PR-positive, HER2-negative. Genomic assays such as the Oncotype DX® have identified patients (pts) with reduced risk of distant metastasis and without benefit from chemotherapy added to endocrine therapy, freeing them from excess toxicity. Genomic assays are also recognized as prognostic for in-breast recurrence (IBR) after BCS and could similarly allow de-escalation of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT). Reducing overtreatment is of interest to pts, providers, and payers. Methods: We hypothesize that BCS alone is non-inferior to BCS plus RT for in-breast recurrence and breast preservation in women intending endocrine therapy (ET) for stage 1 breast cancer (ER &/or PR positive, HER2-negative with an Oncotype DX Recurrence Score [RS] of ≤18). Stratification is by age (<60; ≥60), tumor size (≤1 cm; >1-2cm), & (RS <11, RS 11-18). Pts are randomized post-BCS to Arm 1 with breast RT using standard methods (hypo- or conventional-fractionated whole breast RT with/without boost, APBI) with ≥5 yrs of ET (tamoxifen or AI) or Arm 2 with ≥5 yrs of ET (tamoxifen or AI) alone. The specific regimen of ET in both arms is at the treating physician’s discretion. Eligible pts are stage 1: pT1 (2 cm), pN0, age ≥50 to <70 yrs, s/p BCS with negative margins (no ink on tumor), s/p axillary nodal staging (SNB or ALND), ER &/or PR positive (ASCO/CAP), HER2-negative (ASCO/CAP), and Oncotype DX RS of ≤18 (diagnostic core biopsy or resected specimen). Primary endpoint is in-breast recurrence. Secondary endpoints are breast conservation rate, invasive in-breast recurrence, relapse-free interval, distant disease-free survival, overall survival, patient-reported breast pain, patient-reported worry about recurrence, and adherence to ET. We assume a clinically acceptable difference in of 4% at 10 yrs to judge omission of RT as non-inferior (10-yr event-free survival for RT group is 95.6% vs 91.6% for the omission of RT group). The study is powered to detect a non-inferiority with 80% power and a one-sided α=0.025, assuming that there would be a ramp-up in accrual in the first two years (leveling off in Yrs 3-5); 1,670 (835 per arm) pts are required to be randomized. Conservative loss to follow-up is 1% per yr. Some of the T1a pts screened may have Oncotype DX scores >18, making them ineligible for the study. In the accrual process, pts will be required to register (1,714 pts) to ensure that our final randomized cohort is 1,670 pts. Current accrual (2-2-2022) is 52 screened and 45 randomized. Support: U10CA180868, -180822, NCT04852887. Clinical trial information: NCT04852887.
Abstract P3-18-04: Evaluating de-escalation of breast radiation (DEBRA) following lumpectomy for breast conservative treatment of stage 1, hr+, HER2-, RS ≤18 breast cancer: NRG-BR007 a phase III trial
White, Julia , Harris, Eleanor ER, Mamounas, Eleftherios P. , Théberge, Valérie, Zellars, Rich C, Shumway, Dean A. , Chen, Guang‐Pei , Julian, Thomas B. , Anderson, Stewart , Harris, Eleanor E R , Mamounas, Eleftherios P. , Stover, Daniel G. , Ganz, Patricia A. , Jagsi, Reshma , Cecchini, Reena S. , Bergom, Carmen , El-Tamer, Mahmoud Bahij , Zellars, Richard C. , Wolmark, Norman

Mayo Clinic

Cancer Research | March 8, 2022 | Volume: 82 | Issue: 4_Supplement | Pages: P3-18-04-P3-18-04

10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs21-p3-18-04 Get It

Abstract Roughly 50% of newly diagnosed breast cancer is stage 1, the majority being ER/PR positive, HER2- negative. Genomic assays such as Oncotype DX® have identified patients with reduced distant metastasis and lack of chemotherapy benefit, allowing patients to avoid excess toxicity. These genomic assays have been shown to be prognostic for local-regional recurrence (LRR). The de-escalation of therapy is of interest to patients, providers, and payers. Low risk, as identified by both the use of Oncotype and Mammaprint® is associated with low LRR after lumpectomy and breast radiotherapy. TRIAL DESIGN: In the DEBRA trial, we hypothesized that breast-conserving surgery (BCS) alone is non-inferior to BCS plus radiotherapy for in-breast cancer control and breast preservation in women intending appropriate endocrine therapy for stage 1 (ER and/or PR-positive, HER2-negative, and Oncotype DX Recurrence Score [RS] low) breast cancer. Stratification is by age (&lt;60; ≥60), tumor size (≤1 cm; &gt;1-2 cm), and RS &lt;11, RS 11-18. Patients are randomized to either breast radiotherapy (RT) plus endocrine therapy (arm 1) or to observation and endocrine therapy (arm 2). Arm 1 therapy is post-lumpectomy breast RT using standard methods (hypo- or conventional-fractionated whole breast irradiation with or without boost, accelerated partial breast irradiation) and at least 5 years of endocrine therapy (tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitor). In arm 2, at least 5 years of endocrine therapy (tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitor) will be given. The specific regimen of endocrine therapy in both arms is at the treating physician’s discretion. ELIGIBLITY: Patients who are stage 1: pT1 (2 cm), pN0, age ≥50 to &lt;70 years, status post (s/p) lumpectomy with negative margins (no ink on tumor ), s/p axillary nodal staging (SNB or AND), ER and/or PR positive by ASCO/CAP, HER2-negative by ASCO/CAP, and Oncotype DX RS of ≤18 on diagnostic core biopsy or resected specimen. ENDPOINTS: Primary: In-breast recurrence (IBR). Secondary: Breast conservation rate, invasive in-breast recurrence (IIBR), relapse free interval (RFI), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), overall survival (OS), patient-reported breast pain, patient-reported worry about recurrence, and adherence to endocrine therapy. STATISTICS: We assume a clinically acceptable difference in IBR of 4% at 10 years to judge omission of RT as non-inferior (10-year event-free survival for RT group is 95.6% versus 91.6% for the omission of RT group). To be able to detect non-inferiority with 80% power and a one sided α=0.025, and assuming that there would be a ramp-up in accrual in the first two years of the study (leveling off in Years 3-5), 1,670 (835 per arm) patients are required to be randomized. This conservatively assumes loss to follow-up will be 1% per year. Some of the T1a patients accrued to this study will have oncotype DX scores &gt;18, making them ineligible for the study. An extra step in the accrual process will require us to register 1,714 patients to ensure our final randomized cohort is 1,670 patients. Accrual: Screen 1,714 to randomize 1,670 into the study. Contact information: Protocol: CTSU member website: https://www.ctsu.org. NRG Oncology Pgh Clinical Coordinating Dpt: 1-800-477-7227 or ccd@nsabp.org. Support: U10CA180868, U10CA180822. NCT04852887. Citation Format: Julia White, Stewart J Anderson, Eleanor ER Harris, Eleftherios P Mamounas, Daniel G Stover, Patricia A Ganz, Reshma Jagsi, Reena S Cecchini, Carmen Bergom, Valerie Theberge, Mahmoud El-Tamer, Rich C Zellars, Dean A Shumway, Guang-Pei Chen, Thomas B Julian, Norman Wolmark. Evaluating de-escalation of breast radiation (DEBRA) following lumpectomy for breast conservative treatment of stage 1, hr+, HER2-, RS ≤18 breast cancer: NRG-BR007 a phase III trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-18-04.
Survivorship, Version 1.2021
Denlinger, Crystal S. , Sanft, Tara , Ansbaugh, Shannon M., Demark‐Wahnefried, Wendy , Dickinson, Kristin , Ganz, Patricia A. , Goldman, Mindy, Henry, N. Lynn , Hill‐Kayser, Christine E. , Khakpour, Nazanin , Koura, Divya, McDonough, Allison L. , Melisko, Michelle , Mooney, Kathi , Moryl, Natalie , Moslehi, Javid J. , O’Connor, Tracey L. , Overholser, Linda , Patel, Chirayu G. , Peterson, Lindsay L. , Rodriguez, Maria Alma , Ruddy, Kathryn J. , Schapira, Lidia , Shockney, Lillie D. , Syrjala, Karen L. , Zee, Phyllis C. , McMillian, Nicole R., Freedman-Cass, Deborah A., Broderick, Gregory, Henry, N Lynn , Demark-Wahnefried, Wendy , Tevaarwerk, Amyé , Armenian, Saro H. , Baker, Kevin Scott , Broderick, Gregory A. , Day, Andrew T. , Friedman, Debra L. , Hudson, Melissa M. , Moore, Halle C. F. , Paskett, Electra D. , Pirl, William F. , Smith, Sophia K.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | November 24, 2021 | Volume: 19 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 676-685

10.6004/jnccn.2021.0028 | PMID 34214969 Get It

The NCCN Guidelines for Survivorship are intended to help healthcare professionals working with cancer survivors to ensure that each survivor’s complex and varied needs are addressed. The Guidelines provide screening, evaluation, and treatment recommendations for consequences of adult-onset cancer and its treatment; recommendations to help promote healthful lifestyle behaviors, weight management, and immunizations in survivors; and a framework for care coordination. This article summarizes the recommendations regarding employment and return to work for cancer survivors that were added in the 2021 version of the NCCN Guidelines.
Landmarks of human embryonic development inscribed in somatic mutations
Bizzotto, Sara , Dou, Yanmei , Ganz, Javier , Doan, Ryan N. , Kwon, Min‐Seok , Bohrson, Craig L. , Kim, Sonia N. , Bae, Taejeong , Abyzov, Alexej , Network, NIMH Brain Somatic Mosaicism, Park, Peter J. , Galor, Alon , Yang, Xiaoxu , Kwon, Minseok , Walsh, Christopher A , Abyzov, Alexej , Bae, Taejeong , Park, Peter J , Network, NIMH Brain Somatic Mosaicism, Walsh, Christopher A.

Mayo Clinic

Science | March 18, 2021 | Volume: 371 | Issue: 6535 | Pages: 1249-1253

10.1126/science.abe1544 | PMID 33737485 Get It

Mutations provide an enduring record Somatic mutations pepper our cells with change, but because they are not in the germline, they do not propagate to the next generation. Bizzotto et al. leveraged data on the distribution of somatic mutations in adults to take a backward look at the earliest moments of human development. Calculation of cellular lineages on the basis of shared somatic mutations shows the number of cells from which the body will develop when the human embryo gastrulates. The lineage for forebrain cells is identifiable, as are the asymmetrical fates spun out of many of the gastrula cells. Science , this issue p. 1249
Antimullerian Hormone as a Serum Biomarker for Risk of Chemotherapy-Induced Amenorrhea
Ruddy, Kathryn J. , Schaid, Daniel J. , Batzler, Anthony , Cecchini, Reena S. , Trabuco, Emanuel C. , Ginsburg, Elizabeth S. , Fasching, Peter A. , Vachon, Celine M. , Ganz, Patricia A. , Norman, Aaron, Trabuco, Emanuel, Vachon, Celine, Partridge, Ann H. , Norman, Aaron D. , Fehrenbacher, Louis , Stewart, Elizabeth A. , Couch, Fergus J. , Vachon, Celine M.

Mayo Clinic

JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute | October 29, 2020 | Volume: 113 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 1105-1108

10.1093/jnci/djaa160 | PMID 33159444 Get It

Abstract Antimullerian hormone (AMH) is a promising biomarker for ovarian reserve. In this study, we assessed AMH before and 1 year after initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy on National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP)/NRG Oncology B-47 in female participants aged 42 years and younger (median age = 39 years). At baseline, median AMH was 1.2 ng/mL; 13 (4.7%) values were less than 0.1 ng/mL (the threshold for detectable levels, in the perimenopause and menopause range), and 57 values (20.6%) were less than 0.5 ng/mL. At 1 year, 215 (77.6%) were less than 0.1 ng/mL, and 264 (95.3%) were less than 0.5 ng/mL. Postchemotherapy menses were reported by 46.2% of participants. Multivariable logistic regression found that the odds of having postchemotherapy menses increased with younger age, higher body mass index, and higher prechemotherapy AMH, but not by trastuzumab administration or by the choice of chemotherapy (doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel vs docetaxel-cyclophosphamide). We conclude that higher prechemotherapy AMH predicts a lower risk of chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea and that AMH 1 year after chemotherapy initiation is not informative in this setting because it is likely to be very low.
ACVR1/JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor momelotinib reverses transfusion dependency and suppresses hepcidin in myelofibrosis phase 2 trial
Oh, Stephen T. , Gerds, Aaron T. , Verstovšek, Srđan , Miller, Carole B., Rivera, Candido E., Goel, Swati , Heaney, Mark , Arcasoy, Murat O. , Zhang, Yafeng , Ganz, Tomas , Kowalski, Mark , Brachmann, Carrie Baker, Gerds, Aaron T , Verstovsek, Srdan , Oh, Stephen T , Talpaz, Moshe , Gupta, Vikas , Mesa, Ruben A. , Fleischman, Angela G. , O'Connell, Casey Lee , Kawashima, Jun

Mayo Clinic

Blood Advances | September 11, 2020 | Volume: 4 | Issue: 18 | Pages: 4282-4291

10.1182/bloodadvances.2020002662 | PMID 32915978 Get It

Abstract Momelotinib (MMB) is a JAK1/2 and ACVR1 inhibitor with demonstrated clinical activity in all 3 hallmarks of myelofibrosis (MF): anemia, constitutional symptoms, and splenomegaly. In this phase 2 open-label translational biology study (NCT02515630) of 41 transfusion-dependent patients with MF, we explored mechanisms underlying the favorable activity of MMB on MF-associated iron-restricted anemia, including its impact on serum hepcidin levels, and markers of iron storage and availability, erythropoiesis, and inflammation. A transfusion-independent response (TI-R), defined as red blood cell transfusion independence (TI) ≥12 weeks at any time on study, occurred in 17 patients (41%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 26%-58%), including 14 patients (34%; 95% CI, 20%-51%) who achieved TI-R by week 24. In addition, 78% of TI nonresponse (TI-NR) patients achieved a ≥50% decrease in transfusion requirement for ≥8 weeks. Adverse events (AEs) were consistent with previous studies of MMB in MF, with cough, diarrhea, and nausea as the most common. Twenty-one patients experienced grade ≥3 AEs, most commonly anemia and neutropenia. Consistent with preclinical data, daily MMB treatment led to an acute and persistent decrease in blood hepcidin associated with increased iron availability and markers of erythropoiesis. Baseline characteristics associated with TI-R were lower inflammation and hepcidin as well as increased markers of erythropoiesis and bone marrow function. Overall, the study demonstrates that MMB treatment decreases hepcidin in conjunction with improving iron metabolism and erythropoiesis, suggesting a mechanistic explanation for the reduced transfusion dependency observed in transfusion-dependent MF patients treated with MMB, thereby addressing the key unmet medical need in the MF population.
Transcriptome‐wide association study of breast cancer risk by estrogen‐receptor status
Feng, Helian , Gusev, Alexander , Wu, Lang , Abu-Full, Zomoroda, Aittomäki, Kristiina, Andrulis, Irene L. , Antoniou, Antonis C. , Arason, Aðalgeir , Arndt, Volker , Aronson, Kristan J. , Asseryanis, Ella, Auer, Paul L. , Azzollini, Jacopo , Barkardóttir, Rósa B. , Barrowdale, Daniel , Beckmann, Matthias W. , Bermisheva, Marina , Białkowska, Katarzyna , Bogdanova, Natalia , Bojesen, Stig E. , Bolla, Manjeet K. , Borg, Åke , Brauch, Hiltrud , Brenner, Hermann , Brüning, Thomas , Burwinkel, Barbara , Caldés, Trinidad , Canisius, Sander , Campa, Daniele , Carter, Brian D., Castelao, Jose E. , Chang‐Claude, Jenny , Christiansen, Hans , Claes, Kathleen , Collaborators, GEMO Study, Collaborators, EMBRACE, Collaborators, GC‐HBOC study, Cox, Angela , Daly, Mary B., Leeneer, Kim De , Dörk, Thilo , Dwek, Miriam , Eccles, Diana M., Ejlertsen, Bent , Engel, Christoph , Fasching, Peter A. , Flyger, Henrik, Friedman, Eitan , Frost, Debra, Gabrielson, Marike , Ganz, Patricia A. , Gapstur, Susan M. , García‐Closas, Montserrat , Gaudet, Mia M. , Glendon, Gord , Goldberg, Mark S. , Goldgar, David E., González‐Neira, Anna , Greene, Mark H. , Guénel, Pascal , Haiman, Christopher A. , Hamann, Ute, Hake, Christopher R., He, Wei , Heyworth, Jane , Hogervorst, Frans B.L., Hooning, Maartje J. , Hoover, Robert N. , Hopper, John L. , Huang, Guanmengqian, Hulick, Peter J. , Humphreys, Keith , Imyanitov, Evgeny N., Investigators, ABCTB, Investigators, HEBON, Investigators, BCFR, Investigators, OCGN, Jakimovska, Milena , Jakubowska, Anna , James, Paul A. , Janavicius, Ramunas, Jankowitz, Rachel C. , John, Esther M. , Johnson, Nichola , Jung, Audrey , Kiiski, Johanna I. , Konstantopoulou, Irene , Kristensen, Vessela N. , Laitman, Yael , Lambrechts, Diether , Leroux, Dominique, Lester, Jenny, Lesueur, Fabienne , Lindor, Noralane M. , Lindström, Sara, Lo, Wing‐Yee, Loud, Jennifer T. , Makalic, Enes , Mannermaa, Arto, Manoochehri, Mehdi, Manoukian, Siranoush , Margolin, Sara , Matricardi, Laura , Maurer, Tabea, Mavroudis, Dimitrios, McGuffog, Lesley, Meindl, Alfons , Menon, Usha , Michailidou, Kyriaki , Kapoor, Pooja M., Montagna, Marco , Moreno, Fernando , Muranen, Taru , Nathanson, Katherine L. , Nevelsteen, Ines, Ņikitina-Zaķe, Liene , Offit, Kenneth, Oláh, Edith , Olopade, Olufunmilayo I. , Olsson, Håkan , Osório, Ana , Papp, J., Park‐Simon, Tjoung‐Won , Pedersen, Inge Søkilde , Peixoto, Ana , Peterlongo, Paolo , Peto, Julian , Phillips, Kelly‐Anne , Plaseska‐Karanfilska, Dijana , Poppe, Bruce , Pradhan, Nisha , Prajzendanc, Karolina , Punie, Kevin , Pylkäs, Katri , Rantala, Johanna, Rashid, Muhammad Usman , Rennert, Gad , Romero, Atocha , Saloustros, Emmanouil , Sandler, Dale P. , Santos, Catarina , Sawyer, Elinor J. , Schmutzler, Rita K., Schoemaker, Minouk J. , Scott, Rodney J. , Simard, Jacques , Skytte, Anne‐Bine , Soucy, Penny, Spinelli, John J. , Stone, Jennifer , Tapper, William , Taylor, Jack A. , Teixeira, Manuel R. , Terry, Mary Beth , Teulé, Àlex , Thomassen, Mads , Thöne, Kathrin , Thull, Darcy L. , Tollenaar, Rob A.�E.�M. , Torres, Diana , Vachon, Celine M. , Ouweland, Ans M.W. van den, Vega, Ana , Viel, Alessandra , Vieiro‐Balo, Paula, Wang, Qin , Wappenschmidt, Barbara , Weinberg, Clarice R. , Weitzel, Jeffrey N. , Wendt, Camilla, Winqvist, Robert , Yang, Xiaohong R., Easton, Douglas F. , Chenevix‐Trench, Georgia , Durocher, Francine , Eccles, Diana , Janavičius, Ramūnas , Khaw, Kay‐Tee , Lambrechts, Diether , Lindor, Noralane, Dörk, Thilo , Lambrechts, Diether , Hulick, Peter J , James, Paul , Lesueur, Fabienne , Peterlongo, Paolo , Rennert, Gad , Sandler, Dale P , Teixeira, Manuel R , Eccles, Diana , Menon, Usha , Vega, Ana , Weitzel, Jeffrey N , Claes, Kathleen B M , Azzollini, Jacopo , John, Esther M , Konstantopoulou, Irene , Matricardi, Laura , Olopade, Olufunmilayo I , Arndt, Volker , Jakubowska, Anna , Lambrechts, Diether , Brenner, Hermann , Cox, Angela , Guénel, Pascal , Muranen, Taru A , Romero, Atocha , Saloustros, Emmanouil , Torres, Diana , García-Closas, Montserrat , Makalic, Enes , Michailidou, Kyriaki , Bogdanova, Natalia V , Taylor, Jack A , Nathanson, Katherine L , Arason, Adalgeir , Barrowdale, Daniel , Engel, Christoph , Montagna, Marco , Viel, Alessandra , Simard, Jacques , Chenevix-Trench, Georgia , Jung, Audrey Y , Gabrielson, Marike , Stone, Jennifer , Pylkäs, Katri , Rashid, Muhammad U , De Leeneer, Kim , Manoukian, Siranoush , Bojesen, Stig E , Schoemaker, Minouk J , Weinberg, Clarice R , Phillips, Kelly-Anne , Terry, Mary Beth , Brauch, Hiltrud , Plaseska-Karanfilska, Dijana , Sawyer, Elinor J , Paşaniuc, Bogdan , Long, Jirong , Anton‐Culver, Hoda , Arun, Banu , Balmañà, Judith , Barnes, Daniel R. , Behrens, Sabine , Benı́tez, Javier , Blanco, Ana , Blomqvist, Carl , Boeckx, Bram , Bonanni, Bernardo , Borg, Åke , Briceño, Ignacio , Broeks, Annegien , Cai, Qiuyin , Caligo, Maria A. , Campbell, Ian , Carter, Jonathan , Chanock, Stephen Jacob , Chung, Wendy K. , Clarke, Christine L. , Collaborators, GEMO Study, Collaborators, EMBRACE, Collaborators, GC‐HBOC study, Couch, Fergus J. , Cross, Simon S. , Cybulski, Cezary , Czene, Kamila , Hoya, Miguel de la , Dennis, Joe , Devilee, Peter , Dı́ez, Orland , Domchek, Susan M. , dos‐Santos‐Silva, Isabel , Dunning, Alison M. , Ellberg, Carolina , Eriksson, Mikael , Fletcher, Olivia , Fostira, Florentia , Fritschi, Lin , Garber, Judy E. , García-Sáenz, José Á. , Giles, Graham G. , Godwin, Andrew K. , Goldgar, David E., Gronwald, Jacek , Hall, Per N , Hollestelle, Antoinette , Investigators, ABCTB, Investigators, HEBON, Investigators, BCFR, Investigators, OCGN, Isaacs, Claudine , Vijai, Joseph , Karlan, Beth Y. , Хуснутдинова, Э. К. , Lázaro, Conxi , Leslie, Goska , Lubiński, Jan , Mannermaa, Arto, Martens, John W.M. , Martı́nez, Marı́a Elena , Meindl, Alfons , Kapoor, Pooja M., Miller, Austin , Moserle, Lidia , Mulligan, Anna Marie , Neuhausen, Susan L. , Nevanlinna, Heli , Nielsen, Finn Cilius , Parsons, Michael T. , Pharoah, Paul D.P. , Presneau, Nadège , Radice, Paolo , Risch, Harvey A. , Robson, Mark E. , Schmidt, Marjanka K. , Schmidt, Daniel F. , Sharma, Priyanka , Shu, Xiao‐Ou , Singer, Christian F. , Southey, Melissa C. , Spurdle, Amanda B. , Swerdlow, Anthony J. , Tischkowitz, Marc D. , Toland, Amanda Ewart , Truong, Thérèse , Tung, Nadine , Vachon, Celine M. , Asperen, Christi J. van , Rensburg, Elizabeth J. van , Yannoukakos, Drakoulis , Ziogas, Argyrios , Milne, Roger L. , Zheng, Wei , Kraft, Peter , Jiang, Xia

Mayo Clinic

Genetic Epidemiology | March 2, 2020 | Volume: 44 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 442-468

10.1002/gepi.22288 | PMID 32115800 Get It

AbstractPrevious transcriptome‐wide association studies (TWAS) have identified breast cancer risk genes by integrating data from expression quantitative loci and genome‐wide association studies (GWAS), but analyses of breast cancer subtype‐specific associations have been limited. In this study, we conducted a TWAS using gene expression data from GTEx and summary statistics from the hitherto largest GWAS meta‐analysis conducted for breast cancer overall, and by estrogen receptor subtypes (ER+ and ER−). We further compared associations with ER+ and ER− subtypes, using a case‐only TWAS approach. We also conducted multigene conditional analyses in regions with multiple TWAS associations. Two genes, STXBP4 and HIST2H2BA, were specifically associated with ER+ but not with ER– breast cancer. We further identified 30 TWAS‐significant genes associated with overall breast cancer risk, including four that were not identified in previous studies. Conditional analyses identified single independent breast‐cancer gene in three of six regions harboring multiple TWAS‐significant genes. Our study provides new information on breast cancer genetics and biology, particularly about genomic differences between ER+ and ER− breast cancer.
Clinical Utility of Multisensory Environments for People With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: A Scoping Review
Breslin, Lauren , Guerra, Nichole, Ganz, Lori, Ervin, David A.

Mayo Clinic

American Journal of Occupational Therapy | January 2, 2020 | Volume: 74 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 142-154

10.5014/ajot.2020.037267 | PMID 32078517 Get It

Importance: Adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) are twice as likely as their peers without disabilities to have had a physical exam in the past year; however, as a result of challenging behavior during office visits, they are significantly less likely to have received recommended health screenings. Challenging behaviors in clinical settings have been identified as a barrier to providing adequate care for this population. Objective: This scoping review examined the within-session effects of multisensory environments (MSEs) on people with IDD to determine the clinical utility of MSEs for this population. Data Sources: Studies published between January 1, 2000, and August 1, 2018, were identified using Summon and Google Scholar. Study Selection: Studies were included in the review if they systematically collected and reported data on within-session effects of an MSE intervention on people with IDD. Findings: Thirteen studies met criteria for this review: 4 with Level I evidence, 2 with Level II evidence, 3 with Level III evidence, and 4 with Level IV evidence. Studies examined the effects of MSEs on maladaptive behaviors, positive behaviors, distress and discomfort, activity and alertness states, and cost of care for people with IDD. Conclusion and Relevance: Preliminary support was found for the use of MSEs in clinical settings to reduce anxiety and challenging behaviors in patients with IDD during clinical care. Further research is needed to determine the efficacy of MSEs for producing the effects described in this review. What This Article Adds: The findings support the potential of MSEs as a tool that occupational therapy practitioners can use to support their clients with IDD who have sensory sensitivities in clinical settings. This article also highlights a multidisciplinary approach whereby medical providers and occupational therapy practitioners could work together in nontraditional ways to support this population.
Follow-up Care for Breast Cancer Survivors
Ruddy, Kathryn J. , Sangaralingham, Lindsey R. , Jemal, Ahmedin , Haddad, Tufia C. , Allen, Summer V. , Ganz, Patricia A. , Havyer, Rachel D. , Shah, Nilay D. , Herrin, Jeph , Freedman, Rachel A. , Hieken, Tina J. , Boughey, Judy C.

Mayo Clinic

JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute | October 14, 2019 | Volume: 112 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 111-113

10.1093/jnci/djz203 | PMID 31613369 Get It

Abstract Breast cancer survivorship guidelines recommend at least annual follow-up visits, yet the degree to which this occurs in clinical practice is uncertain. Claims data from a US commercial insurance database (OptumLabs) were used to identify women treated with curative intent surgery for newly diagnosed breast cancer between 2006 and 2014. In 25 035 women, median follow-up was 3 years. In the second year after surgery, 9.6% of the patients did not visit a primary care provider, an oncologist, or a surgeon (guideline-nonadherent). The guideline-nonadherent proportion increased from 7.8% in women diagnosed in 2006 to 12.2% in those diagnosed in 2014 (two-sided Wald P &lt; .001). During years 2–6, guideline-nonadherence was also associated with older age, nonwhite race, no radiation, no chemotherapy, no endocrine therapy, and increasing time after surgery. There is a substantial and increasing rate of inadequate follow-up among breast cancer survivors. This has the potential to impair outcomes.