Citations

Introduction: Understanding the role of risk factors associated with accelerated cognitive decline has important public health relevance for the aging US population. To test hypotheses that mid-life cardiovascular (CV) risk factors increase risk of dementia in old age, the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) cohort was evaluated for dementia in 2011-2013. Anticipating challenges of complete dementia ascertainment in an elderly population, supplementary data sources were collected to aid analysis accounting for potentially informative attrition. Methods: ARIC enrolled 15,792 participants 45-64 years old at baseline (1987-1989) from four US communities and collected baseline CV exposure data. A complete neurocognitive battery including informant interview was completed 2011-2013, yielding an algorithmic diagnosis of dementia, mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or normal cognition. Cognitively impaired and a random sample of cognitively normal were selected for further clinical evaluation. Syndromic diagnoses (dementia/MCI/normal) and etiologic diagnoses were made by a panel of experts using standardized criteria. Standardized protocols, timely reports of reviewer reliability, ongoing training of reviewers and a web-based data management system were developed to ensure reliability, consistency and efficiency of data collection and review. Living participants not attending the visit were asked to complete the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS). Based on dementia discharge codes and death codes identified during cohort surveillance, interviewer impression of hearing loss or cognitive impairment or need for a proxy during semi-annual calls, or random sampling, participants refusing the TICS are eligible for proxy dementia interview. Medicare claims are being examined to identify missed dementia discharge codes. Results: Of 11,017 participants alive as of 2011, 6495 (59%) completed the neurocognitive battery; 2937 of these (45%) were selected for, and completed, additional clinical assessments and classification by committee (algorithmic or reviewer diagnosis: dementia 5%, MCI 21%). Of the 4522 participants who did not undergo the neurocognitive battery, 1463 (32%) completed the TICS (dementia 7%), while 1627 of the remaining participants were eligible for proxy calls (903 completed to date, dementia 58%). Conclusions: Participants who were not examined were more likely to be cognitively impaired, highlighting the importance of collecting supplementary data to support analyses of midlife CV risk factors accounting for informative attrition. Collection of exam data in an elderly cohort is difficult and requires a multi-pronged approach, especially for an outcome highly correlated with attrition. The strategy described here could be applied in other settings.

Background Tools for the prediction of atrial fibrillation ( AF ) may identify high‐risk individuals more likely to benefit from preventive interventions and serve as a benchmark to test novel putative risk factors. Methods and Results Individual‐level data from 3 large cohorts in the U nited S tates (Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities [ ARIC ] study, the Cardiovascular Health Study [ CHS ], and the Framingham Heart Study [ FHS ]), including 18 556 men and women aged 46 to 94 years (19% A frican A mericans, 81% whites) were pooled to derive predictive models for AF using clinical variables. Validation of the derived models was performed in 7672 participants from the Age, Gene and Environment—Reykjavik study ( AGES ) and the Rotterdam Study ( RS ). The analysis included 1186 incident AF cases in the derivation cohorts and 585 in the validation cohorts. A simple 5‐year predictive model including the variables age, race, height, weight, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, current smoking, use of antihypertensive medication, diabetes, and history of myocardial infarction and heart failure had good discrimination (C‐statistic, 0.765; 95% CI , 0.748 to 0.781). Addition of variables from the electrocardiogram did not improve the overall model discrimination (C‐statistic, 0.767; 95% CI , 0.750 to 0.783; categorical net reclassification improvement, −0.0032; 95% CI , −0.0178 to 0.0113). In the validation cohorts, discrimination was acceptable ( AGES C‐statistic, 0.664; 95% CI , 0.632 to 0.697 and RS C‐statistic, 0.705; 95% CI , 0.664 to 0.747) and calibration was adequate. Conclusion A risk model including variables readily available in primary care settings adequately predicted AF in diverse populations from the U nited S tates and E urope.

OBJECTIVE The metabolic syndrome (MetS) is defined as concomitant disorders of lipid and glucose metabolism, central obesity, and high blood pressure, with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. This study tests whether common genetic variants with pleiotropic effects account for some of the correlated architecture among five metabolic phenotypes that define MetS. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Seven studies of the STAMPEED consortium, comprising 22,161 participants of European ancestry, underwent genome-wide association analyses of metabolic traits using a panel of ∼2.5 million imputed single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Phenotypes were defined by the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) criteria for MetS in pairwise combinations. Individuals exceeding the NCEP thresholds for both traits of a pair were considered affected. RESULTS Twenty-nine common variants were associated with MetS or a pair of traits. Variants in the genes LPL, CETP, APOA5 (and its cluster), GCKR (and its cluster), LIPC, TRIB1, LOC100128354/MTNR1B, ABCB11, and LOC100129150 were further tested for their association with individual qualitative and quantitative traits. None of the 16 top SNPs (one per gene) associated simultaneously with more than two individual traits. Of them 11 variants showed nominal associations with MetS per se. The effects of 16 top SNPs on the quantitative traits were relatively small, together explaining from ∼9% of the variance in triglycerides, 5.8% of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, 3.6% of fasting glucose, and 1.4% of systolic blood pressure. CONCLUSIONS Qualitative and quantitative pleiotropic tests on pairs of traits indicate that a small portion of the covariation in these traits can be explained by the reported common genetic variants.

OBJECTIVE Elevated fasting glucose level is associated with increased carotid intima-media thickness (IMT), a measure of subclinical atherosclerosis. It is unclear if this association is causal. Using the principle of Mendelian randomization, we sought to explore the causal association between circulating glucose and IMT by examining the association of a genetic risk score with IMT. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS The sample was drawn from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study and included 7,260 nondiabetic Caucasian individuals with IMT measurements and relevant genotyping. Components of the fasting glucose genetic risk score (FGGRS) were selected from a fasting glucose genome-wide association study in ARIC. The score was created by combining five single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (rs780094 [GCKR], rs560887 [G6PC2], rs4607517 [GCK], rs13266634 [SLC30A8], and rs10830963 [MTNR1B]) and weighting each SNP by its strength of association with fasting glucose. IMT was measured through bilateral carotid ultrasound. Mean IMT was regressed on the FGGRS and on the component SNPs, individually. RESULTS The FGGRS was significantly associated (P = 0.009) with mean IMT. The difference in IMT predicted by a 1 SD increment in the FGGRS (0.0048 mm) was not clinically relevant but was larger than would have been predicted based on observed associations between the FFGRS, fasting glucose, and IMT. Additional adjustment for baseline measured glucose in regression models attenuated the association by about one third. CONCLUSIONS The significant association of the FGGRS with IMT suggests a possible causal association of elevated fasting glucose with atherosclerosis, although it may be that these loci influence IMT through nonglucose pathways.