Citations

Aims This study uniquely explored the relationship between coronary microvascular function and exercise haemodynamics using concurrent invasive testing. Methods and results Fifty‐one consecutive patients with unexplained cardiac exertion symptoms, non‐obstructive coronary artery disease and normal left ventricular ejection fraction (>50%) underwent haemodynamic exercise assessment and concurrent coronary reactivity testing. Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) was defined as a pulmonary arterial wedge pressure (PAWP) ≥15 mmHg at rest and/or ≥25 mmHg at peak exercise. Endothelium‐independent coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) was defined as a coronary flow reserve (CFR) ≤2.5, while endothelium‐dependent CMD was defined as ≤50% increase in coronary blood flow (CBF) in response to intracoronary acetylcholine infusions. Patients with HFpEF ( n = 22) had significantly lower CFR (2.5 ± 0.6 vs. 3.2 ± 0.7; P = 0.0003) and median %CBF increase in response to intracoronary acetylcholine [1 (−35; 34) vs. 64 (−4; 133); P = 0.002] compared to patients without HFpEF ( n = 29). PAWP was significantly higher in patients with endothelium‐independent CMD compared to controls during both rest and exercise. This significant elevation was only present during exercise in patients with endothelium‐dependent CMD compared to controls. CFR had significant inverse correlations with PAWP at rest (r = −0.31; P = 0.03) and peak exercise (r = −0.47, P = 0.001). CFR also had positive correlations with maximal exercise capacity (in W/kg) (r = 0.33, P = 0.02). Conclusions Coronary microvascular function is inversely associated with filling pressures, particularly during exercise. Both types of CMD are associated with higher filling pressures at peak exercise. These findings underscore the potential mechanism and therapeutic target for CMD and HFpEF.

Background We examined feasibility of a unique approach towards gaining insight into heritable risk for early atherosclerosis: surveying gene expression by endothelial cells from living subjects. Methods and Results Subjects aged <50 years (mean age, 37; range, 22–49) without obstructive coronary artery disease underwent coronary reactivity testing that identified them as having normal or abnormal coronary endothelial function. Cultures of Blood Outgrowth Endothelial Cells (BOEC) from 6 normal and 13 abnormal subjects passed rigorous quality control and were used for microarray assessment of gene expression. Of 9 genes differentially expressed at false discovery rate <0.1%, we here focus upon abnormal subjects having elevated expression of HMGB1 (high mobility group box 1) which we unexpectedly found to be linked to low LAMC1 (laminin gamma 1) expression. This linkage was corroborated by 3 of our past studies and confirmed bio‐functionally. Compared with normal BOEC, abnormal BOEC released 13±3‐fold more HMGB1 in response to lipopolysaccharide; and they deposited one tenth as much LAMC1 into collagen subendothelial matrix during culture. Clinical follow‐up data are provided for 4 normal subjects (followed 13.4±0.1 year) and for 12 abnormal subjects (followed 9.1±4.5 years). Conclusions The known pathogenic effects of high‐ HMGB1 and low‐ LAMC1 predict that the combination would biologically converge upon the focal adhesion complex, to the detriment of endothelial shear responsiveness. This gene expression pattern may comprise a heritable risk state that promotes early coronary atherosclerosis. If so, the testing could be applied even in childhood, enabling early intervention. This approach offers a way to bridge the information gap between genetics and clinical phenotype.

Background Coronary artery disease risk factors are associated with atrial fibrillation ( AF ) and coronary endothelial dysfunction ( CED ). We hypothesized that CED is associated with increased risk of incident AF among patients with chest pain and nonobstructive coronary artery disease. Methods and Results Three hundred patients with chest pain, nonobstructive coronary artery disease, and no history of AF underwent intracoronary acetylcholine infusion for evaluation of baseline epicardial (decrease in mid–left anterior descending coronary artery diameter in response to acetylcholine) and microvascular (<50% increase in coronary blood flow in response to acetylcholine) CED . Primary outcome was incident AF over a mean follow‐up period of 10.5±5.5 years. Mean age was 53.3±10.8 years, and 70% were women. Baseline clinical and echocardiographic characteristics were similar between patients with CED (n=256) and those with normal endothelial function (n=44). Overall, 35 of 300 (12%) patients developed AF , among whom 34 of 35 (97%) had CED at baseline. Compared with normal endothelial function, the presence of CED was associated with 11% increased absolute risk and 5.8‐fold increased relative risk of incident AF . Moreover, CED ( odds ratio , 3.87; 95% CI , 1.27–47.0) and increased (>34 mL/m 2 ) left atrial volume index (odds ratio, 3.87; 95% CI , 1.60–9.11) were independent predictors of incident AF . Conclusions Patients with normal coronary endothelial function, as compared with those with CED and similar AF risk factors, have significantly lower incidence of AF on long‐term follow‐up. The potential mechanistic link between vascular dysfunction and AF development warrants further investigation.

AbstractCD34+ cells are haematopoietic stem cells used therapeutically in patients undergoing radiation or chemotherapy due to their regenerative potential and ability to restore the haematopoietic system. In animal models, CD34+ cells have been associated with therapeutic angiogenesis in response to ischaemia. Several trials have shown the potential safety and efficacy of CD34+ cell delivery in various cardiovascular diseases. Moreover, Phase III trials have now begun to explore the potential role of CD34+ cells in treatment of both myocardial and peripheral ischaemia. CD34+ cells have been shown to be safe and well-tolerated in the acute myocardial infarction (AMI), heart failure, and angina models. Several studies have suggested potential benefit of CD34+ cell therapy in patients with coronary microvascular disease as well. In this review, we will discuss the therapeutic potential of CD34+ cells, and describe the pertinent trials that have used autologous CD34+ cells in no-options refractory angina, AMI, and heart failure. Lastly, we will review the potential utility of autologous CD34+ cells in coronary endothelial and microvascular dysfunction.

Aims Cardiovascular health metrics predict the risk not only of cardiovascular diseases but also of several types of cancers. Microvascular endothelial dysfunction can predict future cardiovascular adverse events, but the predictive value of microvascular endothelial dysfunction for future risk of solid-tumor cancer has not been characterized. Methods A total of 488 patients who underwent microvascular endothelial function assessment using reactive hyperemia peripheral arterial tonometry were included in this study. Microvascular endothelial dysfunction was defined as a reactive hyperemia peripheral arterial tonometry index ≤2.0. Results Of 221 patients with a baseline reactive hyperemia peripheral arterial tonometry index ≤2.0, 21 patients (9.5%) were diagnosed with incident solid-tumor cancer during follow-up, whereas of 267 patients with a baseline reactive hyperemia peripheral arterial tonometry index >2.0, 10 patients (3.7%) were diagnosed with incident solid-tumor cancer during follow-up ( p = 0.009). Patients with a reactive hyperemia peripheral arterial tonometry index ≤2.0 had lower solid-tumor cancer-free survival compared to patients with a reactive hyperemia peripheral arterial tonometry index >2.0 (log-rank p = 0.017) (median follow-up 6.0 (3.0–9.1) years). Cox proportional hazard analyses showed that a reactive hyperemia peripheral arterial tonometry index ≤2.0 predicted the incidence of solid-tumor cancer, with a hazard ratio of 2.52 (95% confidence interval 1.17–5.45; p = 0.019) after adjusting for age, sex, and coronary artery disease, 2.83 (95% confidence interval 1.30–6.17; p = 0.009) after adjusting for diabetes mellitus, hypertension, smoking status, and body mass index >30 kg/m2, 2.79 (95% confidence interval 1.21–6.41; p = 0.016) after adjusting for fasting plasma glucose, systolic blood pressure, smoking status (current or former), and body mass index, and 2.43 (95% confidence interval 1.10–5.34; p = 0.028) after adjusting for Framingham risk score. Conclusion Microvascular endothelial dysfunction, as defined by a reactive hyperemia peripheral arterial tonometry index ≤2.0, was associated with a greater than two-fold increased risk of solid-tumor cancer. Microvascular endothelial dysfunction may be a useful marker to predict the future risk of solid-tumor cancer, in addition to its known ability to predict cardiovascular disease. Further research is necessary to develop adequate cancer screening strategies for patients with microvascular endothelial dysfunction.

Background Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (su PAR ) is a proinflammatory biomarker associated with immune activation and fibrinolysis inhibition. Plasminogen activator inhibitor ( PAI ‐1) is associated with excessive fibrin accumulation, thrombus formation, and atherosclerosis. The relationship between cross‐coronary su PAR and PAI ‐1 production and endothelial dysfunction remains unknown. Methods and Results Seventy‐nine patients (age 53±10 years, 75% women) with angina and normal coronary arteries or mild coronary artery disease (<40% stenosis) on angiogram underwent acetylcholine assessment of epicardial endothelial dysfunction (mid–left anterior descending coronary artery diameter decrease >20% after acetylcholine) and mircovascular endothelial dysfunction (coronary blood flow change <50% after acetylcholine). Simultaneous left main and coronary sinus su PAR and PAI ‐1 levels were measured in each patient before acetylcholine administration, and cross‐coronary su PAR and PAI ‐1 production rates were calculated. Patients’ characteristics, except for age (51±10 versus 57±9, P =0.02), and resting coronary hemodynamics were not significantly different between patients with (26%) versus without (74%) epicardial endothelial dysfunction. Patients’ characteristics and resting coronary hemodynamics were not significantly different between those with (62%) and those without (38%) mircovascular endothelial dysfunction. Patients with mircovascular endothelial dysfunction demonstrated local coronary su PAR production versus su PAR extraction in patients with normal microvascular function (median 25.8 [interquartile range 121.6, −23.7] versus −12.7 [52.0, −74.8] ng/min, P =0.03). Patients with epicardial endothelial dysfunction had higher median coronary PAI ‐1 production rates compared with those with normal epicardial endothelial function (1224.7 [12 940.7, −1915.4] versus −187.4 [4444.7, −4535.8] ng/min, P =0.03). Conclusions su PAR is released in coronary circulation of patients with mircovascular endothelial dysfunction and extracted in those with normal microvascular function. Cross‐coronary PAI ‐1 release is higher in humans with epicardial endothelial dysfunction.