Citations

ObjectiveThis study was undertaken to apply established and emerging cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers to improve diagnostic accuracy in patients with rapidly progressive dementia (RPD). Overlap in clinical presentation and results of diagnostic tests confounds etiologic diagnosis in patients with RPD. Objective measures are needed to improve diagnostic accuracy and to recognize patients with potentially treatment‐responsive causes of RPD.MethodsBiomarkers of Alzheimer disease neuropathology (amyloid‐β 42/40 ratio, phosphorylated tau [p‐tau181, p‐tau231]), neuroaxonal/neuronal injury (neurofilament light chain [NfL], visinin‐like protein‐1 [VILIP‐1], total tau), neuroinflammation (chitinase‐3‐like protein [YKL‐40], soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 [sTREM2], glial fibrillary acidic protein [GFAP], monocyte chemoattractant protein‐1 [MCP‐1]), and synaptic dysfunction (synaptosomal‐associated protein 25kDa, neurogranin) were measured in CSF obtained at presentation from 78 prospectively accrued patients with RPD due to neurodegenerative, vascular, and autoimmune/inflammatory diseases; 35 age‐ and sex‐matched patients with typically progressive neurodegenerative disease; and 72 cognitively normal controls. Biomarker levels were compared across etiologic diagnoses, by potential treatment responsiveness, and between patients with typical and rapidly progressive presentations of neurodegenerative disease.ResultsAlzheimer disease biomarkers were associated with neurodegenerative causes of RPD. High NfL, sTREM2, and YKL‐40 and low VILIP‐1 identified patients with autoimmune/inflammatory diseases. MCP‐1 levels were highest in patients with vascular causes of RPD. A multivariate model including GFAP, MCP‐1, p‐tau181, and sTREM2 identified the 44 patients with treatment‐responsive causes of RPD with 89% accuracy. Minimal differences were observed between typical and rapidly progressive presentations of neurodegenerative disease.InterpretationSelected CSF biomarkers at presentation were associated with etiologic diagnoses and treatment responsiveness in patients with heterogeneous causes of RPD. The ability of cross‐sectional biomarkers to inform upon mechanisms that drive rapidly progressive neurodegenerative disease is less clear. ANN NEUROL 2024;95:299–313

The prevalence of Alzheimer’s disease is greater in women, but the underlying mechanisms remain to be elucidated. We herein demonstrated that α-secretase ADAM10 was downregulated and ADAM10 inhibitor sFRP1 was upregulated in 5xFAD mice. While there were no sex effects on ADAM10 protein and sFRP1 mRNA levels, female 5xFAD and age-matched non-transgenic mice exhibited higher levels of sFRP1 protein than corresponding male mice. Importantly, female 5xFAD mice accumulated more Aβ than males, and sFRP1 protein levels were positively associated with Aβ42 levels in 5xFAD mice. Our study suggests that sFRP1 is associated with amyloid pathology in a sex-dependent manner.

AbstractBackgroundGene expression changes have been identified in post‐mortem brain tissue of AD cases when compared with controls, implicating various genes and pathways. Such findings provide important insights into molecular dysregulation associated with this disease and nominate therapeutic targets. Here we investigate brain gene and co‐expression network changes in a cohort of AD cases to identify associations with degree of AD neuropathology including Braak stage (Tau), Thal phase (Amyloid beta) and brain tissue levels of five AD‐related proteins (apoE, Aβ40, Aβ42, tau, and p‐tau).MethodGene expression measures were collected from temporal cortex (TCX) tissue of 477 AD cases, available through the Mayo Clinic Brain Bank, using RNA sequencing (Illumina TruSeq mRNA) performed on the HiSeq4000. Following quality control 456 cases remained for analysis. Braak and Thal were provided by an experienced neuropathologist and TCX levels of five AD‐related proteins from three fractions (buffer‐soluble, detergent‐soluble, and insoluble) were measured by ELISA (Liu et al. 2020). Weighted gene coexpression network analysis (WGCNA) R package was used to build co‐expression networks. Genes and networks were tested for association with neuropathology and AD‐related protein levels, adjusting for relevant covariates.ResultA total of 57,353 genes were profiled, of which 19,044 were reliably expressed above background levels and formed 20 co‐expression modules. 36 genes were associated with Braak stage, 10 with Thal phase and up to 9,000 with the AD‐related protein fractions. Brain levels of pTau had the greatest number of associations, with an overrepresentation of genes involved in synaptic signalling and immune response gene ontology biological processes. 16 of the coexpression modules associated with at least one trait after Bonferroni correction for number of tests.ConclusionWe have identified a number of genes and networks associated with different aspects of AD neuropathology and associated proteins, further lending support to the involvement of synaptic and immune biology in AD. However it is not clear whether observed changes cause disease or are a consequence of the neurodegenerative process. Comparison of these findings across different proteins and fractions is expected to reveal common and distinct vulnerabilities associated with amyloid and tau, and different stages of protein aggregation.

Abstract Alpha‐synuclein (αsyn) aggregates are pathological features of several neurodegenerative conditions including Parkinson disease (PD), dementia with Lewy bodies, and multiple system atrophy (MSA). Accumulating evidence suggests that mitochondrial dysfunction and impairments of the autophagic‐lysosomal system can contribute to the deposition of αsyn, which in turn may interfere with health and function of these organelles in a potentially vicious cycle. Here we investigated a potential convergence of αsyn with the PINK1‐PRKN‐mediated mitochondrial autophagy pathway in cell models, αsyn transgenic mice, and human autopsy brain. PINK1 and PRKN identify and selectively label damaged mitochondria with phosphorylated ubiquitin (pS65‐Ub) to mark them for degradation (mitophagy). We found that disease‐causing multiplications of αsyn resulted in accumulation of the ubiquitin ligase PRKN in cells. This effect could be normalized by starvation‐induced autophagy activation and by CRISPR/Cas9‐mediated αsyn knockout. Upon acute mitochondrial damage, the increased levels of PRKN protein contributed to an enhanced pS65‐Ub response. We further confirmed increased pS65‐Ub‐immunopositive signals in mouse brain with αsyn overexpression and in postmortem human disease brain. Of note, increased pS65‐Ub was associated with neuronal Lewy body‐type αsyn pathology, but not glial cytoplasmic inclusions of αsyn as seen in MSA. While our results add another layer of complexity to the crosstalk between αsyn and the PINK1‐PRKN pathway, distinct mechanisms may underlie in cells and brain tissue despite similar outcomes. Notwithstanding, our finding suggests that pS65‐Ub may be useful as a biomarker to discriminate different synucleinopathies and may serve as a potential therapeutic target for Lewy body disease.

Cerebrovasculature is critical in maintaining brain homeostasis; its dysregulation often leads to vascular cognitive impairment and dementia (VCID) during aging. VCID is the second most prevalent cause of dementia in the elderly, after Alzheimer’s disease (AD), with frequent cooccurrence of VCID and AD. While multiple factors are involved in the pathogenesis of AD and VCID, APOE4 increases the risk for both diseases. A major apolipoprotein E (apoE) receptor, the low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1 (LRP1), is abundantly expressed in vascular mural cells (pericytes and smooth muscle cells). Here, we investigated how deficiency of vascular mural cell LRP1 affects the cerebrovascular system and cognitive performance using vascular mural cell–specific Lrp1 -KO mice ( smLrp1 –/– ) in a human APOE3 or APOE4 background. We found that spatial memory was impaired in the 13- to 16-month-old APOE4 smLrp1 –/– mice but not in the APOE3 smLrp1 –/– mice, compared with their respective littermate control mice. These disruptions in the APOE4 smLrp1 –/– mice were accompanied with excess paravascular glial activation and reduced cerebrovascular collagen IV. In addition, blood-brain barrier (BBB) integrity was disrupted in the APOE4 smLrp1 –/– mice. Together, our results suggest that vascular mural cell LRP1 modulates cerebrovasculature integrity and function in an APOE genotype–dependent manner.

AbstractINTRODUCTIONAt the Alzheimer's Association's APOE and Immunity virtual conference, held in October 2021, leading neuroscience experts shared recent research advances on and inspiring insights into the various roles that both the apolipoprotein E gene (APOE) and facets of immunity play in neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer's disease and other dementias.METHODSThe meeting brought together more than 1200 registered attendees from 62 different countries, representing the realms of academia and industry.RESULTSDuring the 4‐day meeting, presenters illuminated aspects of the cross‐talk between APOE and immunity, with a focus on the roles of microglia, triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 (TREM2), and components of inflammation (e.g., tumor necrosis factor α [TNFα]).DISCUSSIONThis manuscript emphasizes the importance of diversity in current and future research and presents an integrated view of innate immune functions in Alzheimer's disease as well as related promising directions in drug development.

Importance Numerous studies have established the association of the common APOE ε2 and APOE ε4 alleles with Alzheimer disease (AD) risk across ancestries. Studies of the interaction of these alleles with other amino acid changes on APOE in non-European ancestries are lacking and may improve ancestry-specific risk prediction. Objective To determine whether APOE amino acid changes specific to individuals of African ancestry modulate AD risk. Design, Setting, and Participants Case-control study including 31 929 participants and using a sequenced discovery sample (Alzheimer Disease Sequencing Project; stage 1) followed by 2 microarray imputed data sets derived from the Alzheimer Disease Genetic Consortium (stage 2, internal replication) and the Million Veteran Program (stage 3, external validation). This study combined case-control, family-based, population-based, and longitudinal AD cohorts, which recruited participants (1991-2022) in primarily US-based studies with 1 US/Nigerian study. Across all stages, individuals included in this study were of African ancestry. Exposures Two APOE missense variants (R145C and R150H) were assessed, stratified by APOE genotype. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was AD case-control status, and secondary outcomes included age at AD onset. Results Stage 1 included 2888 cases (median age, 77 [IQR, 71-83] years; 31.3% male) and 4957 controls (median age, 77 [IQR, 71-83] years; 28.0% male). In stage 2, across multiple cohorts, 1201 cases (median age, 75 [IQR, 69-81] years; 30.8% male) and 2744 controls (median age, 80 [IQR, 75-84] years; 31.4% male) were included. In stage 3, 733 cases (median age, 79.4 [IQR, 73.8-86.5] years; 97.0% male) and 19 406 controls (median age, 71.9 [IQR, 68.4-75.8] years; 94.5% male) were included. In ε3/ε4-stratified analyses of stage 1, R145C was present in 52 individuals with AD (4.8%) and 19 controls (1.5%); R145C was associated with an increased risk of AD (odds ratio [OR], 3.01; 95% CI, 1.87-4.85; P = 6.0 × 10 −6 ) and was associated with a reported younger age at AD onset (β, −5.87 years; 95% CI, −8.35 to −3.4 years; P = 3.4 × 10 −6 ). Association with increased AD risk was replicated in stage 2 (R145C was present in 23 individuals with AD [4.7%] and 21 controls [2.7%]; OR, 2.20; 95% CI, 1.04-4.65; P = .04) and was concordant in stage 3 (R145C was present in 11 individuals with AD [3.8%] and 149 controls [2.7%]; OR, 1.90; 95% CI, 0.99-3.64; P = .051). Association with earlier AD onset was replicated in stage 2 (β, −5.23 years; 95% CI, −9.58 to −0.87 years; P = .02) and stage 3 (β, −10.15 years; 95% CI, −15.66 to −4.64 years; P = 4.0 × 10 −4 ). No significant associations were observed in other APOE strata for R145C or in any APOE strata for R150H. Conclusions and Relevance In this exploratory analysis, the APOE ε3[R145C] missense variant was associated with an increased risk of AD among individuals of African ancestry with the ε3/ε4 genotype. With additional external validation, these findings may inform AD genetic risk assessment in individuals of African ancestry.

ObjectiveRecent evidence supports a link between increased TDP‐43 burden and the presence of an APOE4 gene allele in Alzheimer's disease (AD); however, it is difficult to conclude the direct effect of APOE on TDP‐43 pathology due to the presence of mixed AD pathologies. The goal of this study is to address how APOE isoforms impact TDP‐43 pathology and related neurodegeneration in the absence of typical AD pathologies.MethodsWe overexpressed human TDP‐43 via viral transduction in humanized APOE2, APOE3, APOE4 mice, and murine Apoe‐knockout (Apoe‐KO) mice. Behavior tests were performed across ages. Animals were harvested at 11 months of age and TDP‐43 overexpression‐related neurodegeneration and gliosis were assessed. To further address the human relevance, we analyzed the association of APOE with TDP‐43 pathology in 160 postmortem brains from autopsy‐confirmed amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and frontotemporal lobar degeneration with motor neuron disease (FTLD‐MND) in the Mayo Clinic Brain Bank.ResultsWe found that TDP‐43 overexpression induced motor function deficits, neuronal loss, and gliosis in the motor cortex, especially in APOE2 mice, with much milder or absent effects in APOE3, APOE4, or Apoe‐KO mice. In the motor cortex of the ALS and FTLD‐MND postmortem human brains, we found that the APOE2 allele was associated with more severe TDP‐43‐positive dystrophic neurites.InterpretationOur data suggest a genotype‐specific effect of APOE on TDP‐43 proteinopathy and neurodegeneration in the absence of AD pathology, with the strongest association seen with APOE2. ANN NEUROL 2023;93:830–843

AbstractBackgroundAlzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most common form of age‐related dementia characterized by the presence of amyloid‐β (Aβ) and tau pathologies leading to neurodegeneration and cognitive impairment. Wnt/β‐catenin signaling modulates multiple pathophysiological processes including synaptic plasticity, neuronal survival, neuroinflammation, Aβ production and tau phosphorylation, but this signaling pathway is greatly inhibited in the AD brain. Notably, two SNPs and an alternative splice variant of Wnt co‐receptor LRP6, which result in down‐regulation of Wnt/β‐catenin signaling, are associated with increased risk of developing AD. In addition, apoE4, the strongest risk factor of late‐onset AD, interacts with and decreases cell surface abundance of LRP6 in astrocytes. Studies from our laboratory have demonstrated that the level of LRP6 is significantly downregulated in human AD brains, and that deficiency in LRP6‐mediated Wnt/β‐catenin signaling leads to synaptic abnormalities and amyloid pathology in amyloid model mice. Therefore, LRP6 is an attractive therapeutic target for restoring Wnt/β‐catenin signaling in the AD brain.MethodIn our previous studies, we have discovered niclosamide, an FDA‐approved anthelminthic drug, inhibits Wnt/β‐catenin signaling via promoting LRP6 degradation. Herein, we demonstrated that CI‐994, an analog of niclosamide, exhibits opposite effects on LRP6 level and Wnt/β‐catenin signaling. Following structural optimization, we have generated a series of novel potent Wnt modulators.ResultThe leading compound W2A‐16 displays a good pharmacokinetic profile with high oral bioavailability and brain penetration. Importantly, W2A‐16 significantly activates Wnt/β‐catenin signaling and inhibits tau phosphorylation in AD patient‐specific iPSC‐derived cerebral organoids. Moreover, W2A‐16 attenuates amyloid pathology and gliosis and improves cognitive function in 5xFAD amyloid model mice. Further, W2A‐16 suppresses tau phosphorylation and neuroinflammation, attenuates body weight loss, and improves the survival of PS19 tauopathy mice.ConclusionTogether, these findings demonstrate that W2A‐16 is a strong drug candidate for AD therapy.

AbstractBackgroundOverlap in the presenting clinical features and test results in patients with rapidly progressive dementia (RPD) confounds the etiologic diagnoses of RPD, contributing to diagnostic delays, missed treatment opportunities, and poorer outcomes. There is a need to improve diagnostic accuracy in patients with RPD, with particular emphasis on identifying patients with potentially treatment‐responsive causes of RPD early in the symptomatic course.MethodPatients with RPD were prospectively enrolled and evaluated in inpatient settings and outpatient subspecialty (memory) clinics at Washington University (Saint Louis, MO; 2016–2019) and Mayo Clinic (Jacksonville, FL; 2020–2021). Etiologic diagnoses were independently assigned by two dementia specialists integrating clinical features and the results of widely accessible diagnostic testing and referencing established diagnostic criteria. Diagnostic disagreements were resolved via blinded review by a third specialist. Clinicopathologic correlation was evaluated using neuropathological and genetic data when available.Result160 patients with RPD were assessed, with average age‐at‐symptom onset 60.0±15.9 years; 50% were female. Diagnostic inter‐rater reliability (91% agreement; Cohen’s κ = 0.88, p<0.001) and clinicopathologic correlation were excellent (100% agreement in 24 patients with neuropathologic or genetic data). Autoimmune encephalitis was the leading cause of RPD (39%), followed by Alzheimer disease and related dementias (29%—i.e., frontotemporal dementia, Lewy body dementia, vascular cognitive impairment), Creutzfeldt‐Jakob disease (15%), and other causes (15%—e.g., neurosarcoid, metabolic disruptions, neoplastic disease). The average age of patients with potentially treatable causes (AE and selected “other” causes; 54.4±18.2) was younger than those with neurodegenerative dementing illnesses (67.3±9.5) or CJD (67.4±7.9; p<0.001). Patients with potentially treatable causes were more likely to present with altered level of consciousness and seizures (p<0.05). CSF pleocytosis (>5 WBC/hpf) was more common in AE patients (p<0.05).ConclusionEtiologic diagnoses can be reliably established in RPD patients using available clinical data. Treatment‐responsive causes of RPD are common warranting consideration, particularly in younger patients with altered consciousness, seizures, and CSF pleocytosis.