Citations

Purpose The role of adjuvant radiotherapy (aRT) in treating patients with pN1 prostate cancer is controversial. We tested the hypothesis that the impact of aRT on cancer-specific mortality (CSM) in these individuals is related to tumor characteristics. Methods We evaluated 1,107 patients with pN1 prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy and anatomically extended pelvic lymph node dissection between 1988 and 2010 at two tertiary care centers. All patients received adjuvant hormonal therapy with or without aRT. Regression tree analysis stratified patients into risk groups on the basis of their tumor characteristics and the corresponding CSM rate. Cox regression analysis tested the relationship between aRT and CSM rate, as well as overall mortality (OM) rate in each risk group separately. Results Overall, 35% of patients received aRT. At multivariable analysis, aRT was associated with more favorable CSM rate (hazard ratio [HR], 0.37; P < .001). However, when patients were stratified into risk groups, only two groups of men benefited from aRT: (1) patients with positive lymph node (PLN) count ≤ 2, Gleason score 7 to 10, pT3b/pT4 stage, or positive surgical margins (HR, 0.30; P = .002); and (2) patients with PLN count of 3 to 4 (HR, 0.21; P = .02), regardless of other tumor characteristics. These results were confirmed when OM was examined as an end point. Conclusion The beneficial impact of aRT on survival in patients with pN1 prostate cancer is highly influenced by tumor characteristics. Men with low-volume nodal disease (≤ two PLNs) in the presence of intermediate- to high-grade, non–specimen-confined disease and those with intermediate-volume nodal disease (three to four PLNs) represent the ideal candidates for aRT after surgery.

Objective To determine the association between peri‐operative blood transfusion ( PBT ) and oncological outcomes in a large multi‐institutional cohort of patients undergoing radical cystectomy ( RC ) for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder ( UCB ). Patients and Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of 2895 patients treated with RC for UCB . Univariable and multivariable C ox regression models were used to analyse the effect of PBT administration on disease recurrence, cancer‐specific mortality, and any‐cause mortality. Results Patients' median (interquartile range [ IQR ]) age was 67 (60, 73) years and the median ( IQR ) follow‐up was 36.1 (15, 84) months. Patients who received PBT were more likely to have advanced disease ( P < 0.001), high grade tumours ( P = 0.047) and nodal metastasis ( P = 0.004). PBT was associated with a higher risk of disease recurrence ( P = 0.003), cancer‐specific mortality ( P = 0.017), and any‐cause mortality ( P = 0.010) in univariable, but not multivariable, analyses ( P > 0.05). In multivariable analyses, pathological tumour stage, pathological nodal stage, soft tissue surgical margin, lymphovascular invasion and administration of adjuvant chemotherapy were independent predictors of disease recurrence, cancer‐specific mortality and any‐cause mortality (all P values <0.002). Conclusions Patients with UCB who underwent RC and received PBT had a greater risk of disease recurrence, cancer‐specific mortality and any‐cause mortality in univariable, but not multivariable, analysis. Although the greater need for PBT with more advanced disease is probably caused by a number of factors, including surgical and cancer‐related factors, the present analysis showed that the disease characteristics rather than need for PBT led to worse outcomes.

Introduction. To assess the role of adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in high-risk prostate cancer patients (PCa) after surgery.Materials and Methods.The analysis case matched 172 high-risk PCa patients with positive section margins or non-organ confined disease and negative lymph nodes to receive adjuvant ADT (group 1,n=86) or no adjuvant ADT (group 2,n=86).Results. Only 11.6% of the patients died, 2.3% PCa related. Estimated 5–10-year clinical progression-free survival was 96.9% (94.3%) for group 1 and 73.7% (67.0%) for group 2, respectively. Subgroup analysis identified men with T2/T3a tumors at low-risk and T3b margins positive disease at higher risk for progression.Conclusion. Patients with T2/T3a tumors are at low-risk for metastatic disease and cancer-related death and do not need adjuvant ADT. We identified men with T3b margin positive disease at highest risk for clinical progression. These patients benefit from immediate adjuvant ADT.