Citations

Abstract Introduction: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are an essential systemic therapy for advanced melanoma. However, most melanomas develop resistance to ICI. Tumor-derived soluble PD-L1 (sPD-L1) and other soluble immunosuppressive factors drive checkpoint inhibitor resistance and correlate with inferior survival. We previously showed that therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) removes sPD-L1 from circulation. Thus, we hypothesized that TPE-mediated removal of sPD-L1 and other immunosuppressive factors could overcome immunotherapy resistance in refractory melanoma. Methods: In this clinical trial (NCT04581382), we prospectively enrolled eighteen (18) patients with widely metastatic melanoma with progression despite anti-PD-1 ICI and elevated sPD-L1 by ELISA (≥1.7ng/mL). Each patient received radiotherapy to between one and three metastatic lesions (at least two unirradiated lesions) followed by three TPE sessions on consecutive days and re-challenge with checkpoint inhibitor. The primary safety and efficacy endpoints of the study were adverse events (AEs) and sPD-L1 reduction by TPE, respectively. Secondary endpoints included RECIST-based response in unirradiated lesions and overall survival. Correlative studies included kinetics of sPD-L1 and soluble immonsuppressive factors and dynamics of peripheral immune cell phenotypes. Results: Mean age was 62 (SD 13) and seven of eighteen (39%) were female. Mean baseline sPD-L1 was 26.31 ng/mL (40.01). The treatment was well-tolerated with one (6%) patient with grade 3 and 4 adverse events from a central line infection after TPE. Levels of sPD-L1 were significantly reduced by TPE (mean 80.2% reduction, p<0.0001). Two patients (11.1%) experienced complete response (CR), one (5.6%) partial response, three (16.7%) stable disease, and 12 (66.7%) progressive disease. In one case, immunotherapy was discontinued after two years due to no detectable lesions. Changes in tumor-reactive (TTR) GZMB+/CX3CR1+/CD11ahigh and other peripheral immune cell populations predicted overall survival in this cohort. In addition to sPD-L1, other soluble mediators of ICI resistance were also reduced by TPE and predicted overall survival in this cohort. Summary/Conclusion: sPD-L1 and other soluble immunoregulatory signaling molecules are important mediators of ICI resistance. SBRT and TPE can resensitize ICI-refractory melanoma by removing these factors. Patients with persistently elevated or rapid rebound of sPD-L1 following TPE experienced poor response and overall survival. Serial monitoring of sPD-L1 may predict response to ICI and multiple courses of TPE may be necessary. Our findings may apply in other ICI-resistant cancers with elevated sPD-L1. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT04581382, ReCIPE-M1 (Rescuing Cancer Immunotherapy with Plasma Exchange in Melanoma 1).

Melanoma is the deadliest form of skin cancer. The median age at diagnosis is 66. While most patients are treated with immunotherapy, the use of targeted therapy is a valid alternative for patients whose tumors harbor a BRAF or c-KIT driver mutation. These agents, while effective, come with a variety of side effects which limit their use, especially in older patients. We sought to assess the efficacy and toxicity of these agents in older melanoma patients. Melanoma patients over 65 treated with BRAF/MEK or c-KIT inhibitors were retrospectively identified, and their data were analyzed for treatment efficacy and toxicity. All data were compared using the Chi-square test for categorical comparisons and the Kruskal–Wallis method for median comparisons. One hundred and sixteen patients were identified. One hundred and six patients were treated with BRAF/MEK inhibitors. The assessed response rate (RR) was 83% and was comparable across different subgroups, including advanced line patients and those with a more aggressive disease. The median progression free survival (PFS) was 7.9 months, and the median overall survival (OS) was 15.7 months. Twenty-seven percent experienced grade 3–4 toxicity leading to a 24% treatment discontinuation rate. Another 10 patients were treated with the c-KIT inhibitor imatinib, for whom the assessed RR was 55%. The median PFS was 4.3 months, and the median OS was 22.6 months. Forty percent needed dose reductions, yet none had to stop treatment due to adverse effects. The use of targeted therapy in older patients is effective yet challenging due to toxicity. Deploying mitigation strategies can help maximizing their usefulness.

TPS5630 Background: Platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC) portends a poor prognosis and, although treatments are available, response rates are low. Previous studies have demonstrated that DNA topoisomerase I (TOP1) inhibitors exhibit clinical activity in PROC. Irinotecan also has a 15-25% response rate in some studies of platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer but does not have FDA approval for this indication. Additional studies in preclinical models suggest that TOP1 poisons are more active if administered at low doses on prolonged schedules. PLX038 is a long-acting prodrug of the potent TOP1 inhibitor SN-38. In PLX038, SN-38 is covalently conjugated to circulating polyethylene glycol and is slowly released at a constant rate to provide the active agent with a long half-life, a low Cmax and very high exposure – important facets for optimal safety and efficacy of this drug. Further, in preclinical studies the nanoparticle prodrug accumulates and is retained in tumors, where it slowly releases the SN-38. Methods: This single arm, phase 2 clinical trial is open at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN. The primary endpoint is overall response rate and secondary endpoints include progression-free survival and assessment of tolerability of PLX038. Correlative goals include i) measurement of TOP1-DNA covalent complexes in tumor biopsies and circulating tumor cells to assess successful target engagement; ii) assessment of homologous recombination status and SLFN11 expression for correlation with tumor response rate; and iii) pharmacokinetics of SN-38 and SN-38G as well as their association with GI toxicity. Assessment of gut microbiota and association with GI toxicity profile are also being investigated. Eligible patients include women with platinum resistant high grade serous ovarian, primary peritoneal, and fallopian tube cancer who have received fewer than two prior chemotherapy regimens in the platinum-resistant setting. All patients must have an ECOG performance status of 0, 1, or 2 and adequate bone marrow, renal, and hepatic function. As of January 31, 2024, 12 of planned 37 patients have enrolled. Clinical trial information: NCT05465941 .

2658 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors provide limited benefit in patients with immunologically cold tumors, characterized by a lack of T cells. This creates a niche for T cell-inducing agents such as TILT-123 (igrelimogene litadenorepvec, Ad5/3-E2F-D24-hTNFa-IRES-hIL2). While the 5/3 chimeric oncolytic adenovirus platform prompts potent immunogenic capacity per se, this virus has been armed with TNFa and IL-2 selected based on their ability to activate and attract T cells into tumors. TILT-123 capsid modification, and double selectivity devices for virus replication in cancer cells only, allow intravenous use of TILT-123. This is an important advantage over conventional oncolytic viruses whose widespread use has been hindered by the need for intratumoral injection. Methods: Here we report tumor transduction, pharmacokinetic and immune effects of a single intravenous administration of TILT-123 from three Phase 1 dose escalation clinical trials (TUNIMO-NCT04695327, TUNINTIL-NCT04217473, and PROTA-NCT05271318), with a total of 52 patients. Overall, the most common tumor types were melanoma (20), ovarian cancer (18) and sarcoma (7). In each of these trials, the first TILT-123 injection was performed intravenously, and a tumor biopsy collected 7 days later. Peripheral blood was collected before and after systemic TILT-123 treatment. No other therapy was administered concurrently. Presence of virus in blood was detected with qPCR, while presence of virus in tumor biopsies was measured with immunohistochemistry (IHC) for adenovirus proteins. Immune changes in tumors were evaluated by IHC. Results: TILT-123 was detected in the peripheral blood of all treated patients. Virus concentration was highest at 1 hour after administration, with lower levels seen 16 hours post-injection. Concurrently, IFN-γ levels increased in the patients´ serum. The lowest TILT-123 blood concentrations were observed with the lowest dose, with progressive increases in subsequent cohorts. At higher doses, TILT-123 was detected circulating in blood one week post-administration. Treatment was safe and no dose-limiting toxicity was encountered. Overall, signs of TILT-123 transduction in tumors were observed in 75% of patients evaluated in all three trials, 80% in TUNIMO patients, and 63.64% in TUNINTIL patients. Early results from PROTA suggest a positive effect of TILT-123 in tumors from all cohorts´ dosages studied. Conclusions: In summary, intravenous injection of TILT-123 results in persistence of the virus in peripheral blood for up to 7 days. Tumor transduction was observed in 75% of patients in three Phase I trials on day 8 post TILT-123 systemic administration. These data suggest that TILT-123 could be developed as an intravenous therapy. However, further increases in tumor transduction could be achieved by using multiple intravenous injections of TILT-123. Clinical trial information: NCT04695327 ; NCT04217473 ; NCT05271318 .

e21554 Background: Pregnancy associated melanoma (PAM) occurs in 1% of female patients with melanoma and affects 1 in 2200 pregnancies. Antepartum evaluation of melanoma must incorporate both maternal and fetal factors, and currently there is lack of standardization. Our study aimed to review the incidence of antepartum melanoma at our institution and highlight patterns in management and treatment during this high-risk scenario. Methods: After IRB approval, the Mayo Clinic electronic medical record was searched with key words “melanoma” and “pregnancy”. 25 patients with melanoma during pregnancy were identified from 1987-2023. 6 patients were excluded as skin changes noted during pregnancy were not formally diagnosed as melanoma until after delivery. Abstracted data included demographic information, disease characteristics, staging (per AJCC guidelines at time of diagnosis), and clinical outcomes. Survival data were calculated. Results: 19 patients were included. Diagnosis occurred at an average maternal age of 30 years (range 24-38 years) and a mean gestational age of 20 weeks (range 6-35 weeks). All patients had a term delivery. 4 patients underwent labor induction at 37 weeks for staging/treatment. 60% of patients had a delay in imaging or treatment attributed to pregnancy, including 1 patient who was upstaged with metastatic disease based on postpartum imaging. 82% of stage I-III patients underwent wide local excision during pregnancy; however, 35% of sentinel lymph node sampling was delayed until postpartum. 3 stage II/III patients received adjuvant therapy (interferon or sargramostim) after delivery. Adjuvant immunotherapy was discussed with 2 patients in the postpartum period but ultimately not given due to the time lapse between surgery and delivery. 1 patient with stage IV disease diagnosed at a gestational age of 20 weeks was evaluated with MRI PET scan then treated with vemurafenib monotherapy during pregnancy. Workup and outcomes were reviewed by stage (Table 1). 7 of 19 patients had subsequent pregnancies, and 1 had recurrence of melanoma during a second pregnancy (stage II followed by stage IV). Due to a low number of censoring events, median progression free survival and overall survival were not reached. Conclusions: Melanoma diagnosed during pregnancy can be safely and effectively staged with sentinel lymph node surgery, MRI imaging (PET-MRI vs standard), and CT imaging with shielding without a need for early induction of labor nor a delay in cancer care. Furthermore, we report a patient with stage IV disease treated with vemurafenib during and immunotherapy after pregnancy, indicating that treating stage IV PAM with systemic therapy is a consideration. [Table: see text]

TPS2699 Background: Despite the success in hematologic cancers, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies are challenging to implement in solid tumors owing to a lack of tumor-specific targets that discriminate cancer from normal cells. MSLN expression normally is limited to the mesothelium of major body cavities but can be upregulated in diverse solid tumor types (TCGA 2022), making it a potential target for cancer therapy. MSLN-targeted cell approaches, including CAR T-cell and T-cell receptor fusion therapies, have shown promising clinical activity; however, on-target, off-tumor toxicity including fatal events have occurred (1-3). A2B694 is an autologous logic-gated, MSLN-targeted Tmod CAR T-cell therapy that addresses the challenges of on-target, off-tumor toxicity by combining 2 CARs: an activating and blocking receptor. The activator recognizes MSLN present on the surface of both tumor and normal cells; the blocker binds HLA-A*02 and prevents CAR T-cell activity. Thus, in patients with both germline HLA-A*02 and tumor-associated HLA-A*02 LOH, the blocker prevents on-target, off-tumor toxicity on normal cells owing to retained HLA-A*02 expression (4). Through this unique discriminatory mechanism, A2B694 may provide a therapeutic window to treat patients with MSLN-expressing solid tumors exhibiting HLA-A*02 LOH. Methods: EVEREST-2 (NCT06051695) is a first-in-human, phase 1/2, open-label, nonrandomized study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of A2B694 in adults with recurrent unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic cancers with MSLN expression, including non-small cell lung cancer, colorectal cancer, pancreatic cancer, ovarian cancer, mesothelioma, or other solid tumors with MSLN expression. Eligible patients should have received ≥1 line of prior therapy such as checkpoint inhibitor, molecular targeted, or chemotherapy. Enrollment to EVEREST-2 occurs through the prescreening study BASECAMP-1 (NCT04981119), which identifies patients with tumor-associated HLA-A*02 LOH via next-generation sequencing (Tempus AI, Inc.). Eligible patients enroll in the BASECAMP-1 study and undergo leukapheresis. A2B694 is manufactured from cryopreserved T cells when clinically appropriate for patients. The primary objective of phase 1 is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of A2B694 and identify the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). The dose-expansion phase will confirm RP2D and collect biomarker data to further characterize A2B694. Phase 2 will assess overall response rate per RECIST v1.1. 1. Beatty, et al. Gastroenterology. 2018. 2. Haas, et al. Mol Ther. 2023. 3. Hong, et al. ESMO 2021. Abstract 9590. 4. Hamburger, et al. Mol Immunol. 2020. Clinical trial information: NCT06051695 .

5562 Background: Platinum-resistant or refractory ovarian cancer remains a hard-to-treat disease given the poor prognosis and survival rates. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI; such as pembrolizumab) have not been approved in this indication. Igrelimogene litadenorepvec (Ad5/3-E2F-d24-hTNF-IRES-hIL2; TILT-123), is an oncolytic adenovirus encoding for IL-2 and TNFa, designed to selectively lyse tumor cells while recruiting and activating T-cells, turning immunologically cold tumors hot. The combination of these therapies is appealing as TILT-123 should allow pembrolizumab to be more active, while pembrolizumab should delay emergence of T-cell exhaustion. Methods: PROTA (NCT05271318) is a multicenter open-label phase 1 clinical trial initiated to investigate the safety of TILT-123 in combination with pembrolizumab, in participants bearing ovarian cancer resistant or refractory to platinum-based therapy. In a 3+3 dose-escalation design, TILT-123 was administered intravenously and intratumorally/intraperitoneally to participants with an injectable tumor or carcinomatosis. Pembrolizumab (200mg/Q3wk) was not altered. Eligibility criteria included adequate hepatic and renal functions, and WHO/ECOG performance status of 0-1. Primary endpoint was safety by day 92 evaluated based on adverse events, laboratory values, vital signs, and electrocardiogram. Secondary endpoints included anti-tumor response (RECIST1.1/iRECIST), CA125 levels, pharmacokinetics, transduction of tumors, immune response towards the virus and tumors. Data cutoff was 22Jan2024. Results: 15 patients were enrolled with a median age of 66 (36-78) years, and 14 were evaluable for treatment response with RECIST 1.1/iRECIST. 8 patients were platinum-resistant, and 7 patients were platinum-refractory. Majority of patients had WHO/ECOG performance status 1. Prevalent cancer histology was epithelial ovarian cancer, with some fallopian tube cancer and primary peritoneal cancer. Dose-limiting toxicities were not observed. Frequent grade 1-4 treatment-related AEs (>30% of patients) were anemia, nausea, lymphocyte count decreased, fever and diarrhea. Stable disease (SD) by RECIST1.1 was achieved in 64.3% of evaluable patients and CA125 decreased below baseline in 50% of the patients at least in one timepoint. Median PFS and OS in all patients were 105 and 280 days, respectively. In patients with SD on day 92 by RECIST1.1, median OS was 293 days and median PFS was 174 days. Tumor biopsies indicated the presence of virus and induction of T-cells in injected and non-injected lesions. Conclusions: Combination of TILT-123 and pembrolizumab is safe and appears to induce disease control in a difficult-to-treat patient population. Investigation of TILT-123, pembrolizumab and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin is ongoing in similar patients. Clinical trial information: NCT05271318 .

e23270 Background: Melanoma is the most lethal form of skin cancer which have seen drastic improvement in patient survival over the last decade. BRAF is the most common driver mutation in melanoma, seen in ≈50% of all patients (≈30% of patients > 65). The use of BRAF & MEK inhibitors yields high response rates, though it is limited by toxicity and development of acquired resistance. Acknowledging these limitations, we aimed at assessing the efficacy and toxicity of these agents in melanoma patients > 65. Methods: We identified electronic medical records of all melanoma patients > 65 that were treated with BRAF & MEK inhibitors at our institution over the years 2017-2023. Data was retrospectively collected including demographics, disease characteristics, treatment given, response patterns and toxicity. Results: 106 patients were identified. The median age was 71 (65-89), 55% were males. The median follow up was 28.9 months. 32 (30%) patients were treated at first line, 58 (55%) at second line and 16 (15%) at third line. 88 (83%) evaluable patients received treatment for unresectable/metastatic disease of which 84% had an objective response (60% partial response, 24% complete response). Response rate (RR) was 82%, 85% and 87% for first, second and third line respectively. RR was 86% for patients with an increased serum lactate dehydrogenase. 33% of patients had active central nervous system (CNS) metastases at treatment initiation, for whom the systemic RR was 80% and the CNS RR was 39%. The median progression free survival (PFS) was 7.9 months, with a PFS of 6, 8.3 and 13.4 months for first, second and third line respectively. The median PFS was 5.7 months for patients with active CNS disease. The median overall survival (OS) from treatment initiation was 15.7 months (12.5, 14.5, 31.9 for first, second & third line respectively). The median OS for patients with CNS disease was 9.8 months. 16 patients were treated in the adjuvant setting, of which 6 (37%) finished treatment as planned, 3 stopped due to disease progression (19%) and 6 stopped due to toxicity (37%). 88% of patients experienced adverse events (AEs) of any grade, with 27% having grade 3-4 toxicity. There were no grade 5 toxicities reported. 36% of patients experienced one AE, while 52% experienced two or more. 21% of patients stopped treatment due to toxicity, 28% needed a dose reduction and 20% changed to different BRAF/MEK inhibitors. 10% of patients needed systemic corticosteroids to treat AEs. The most common toxicities seen were fever (30%), fatigue (30%), skin rash (22%), elevated liver function tests (20%), arthralgia/myalgia (15%), nausea (14%) and diarrhea (11%). 7% had decrease in cardiac ejection fraction with one grade 3 leading to treatment discontinuation. Conclusions: Treatment with BRAF & MEK inhibitors is challenging in older patients, with a high prevalence of toxicity leading to treatment modifications and discontinuation. Efficacy seems to be the same as in the general population.

e23269 Background: Most cases of malignant melanoma are cutaneous, with ≈50% having a BRAF driver mutation that predicts response to MAPK pathway inhibitors. A small minority of melanoma cases harbor an activating KIT mutation, most notably in mucosal and acral melanomas (15-20%) and occasionally in those arising from chronic sun-damaged skin (2-3%). Only about a third of KIT mutated melanomas respond to targeted therapy with Imatinib, yet data is scarce and limited, especially in older patients. We sought to characterize the efficacy and toxicity of Imatinib in KIT-mutated melanoma patients over 65. Methods: We identified electronic medical records of patients over 65 that were treated with Imatinib for KIT mutated melanoma at our institution over the years 2017-2023. Data was retrospectively collected including demographics, disease characteristics, response patterns and toxicity. Results: 10 patients were identified, 50% were males. The median age at treatment initiation was 75 years (71-100). 3 patients had cutaneous primary, 3 had Vulvar/vaginal primary, 3 had acral primary and 1 had anal canal primary. All patients had normal Lactate dehydrogenase at treatment initiation and ECOG performance status was 0-2 (median 0). 9 patients received Imatinib for stage IV disease with an overall response rate (ORR) of 55% (44% partial response, 11% complete response). Median duration of response was 4 months. Responses were seen in acral melanoma (67%), vulvar/vaginal melanoma (67%) and cutaneous melanoma (33%). Median Progression free survival was 4.3 months (1.8-44), median overall survival from treatment initiation was 22.6 months (4-64). 6 patients were treated as 2nd line with an ORR of 67% and 3 were treated as 3rd line with an ORR of 33%. There was one patient with M1d disease who did not respond to treatment either systematically or intracranially. 6 patients had Exon 11 mutations (V560D/G/E, N564S and L576P) of which 4 responded (67%). 2 had Exon 17 mutations (N822C/K) of which 1 responded (50%) and the 2 others had an Exon 14 (F681I) and Exon 13 (K642E) mutation that did not respond to treatment at all. Toxicity was moderate with 90% of patients experiencing any grade AE, yet only 1 experienced toxicity requiring dose interruption with two Grade 3 toxicities - Pneumonitis and decreased neutrophil count, leading to temporary treatment interruption, dose reduction and a course of corticosteroids. The rest of the patients experienced only Grade 1-2 toxicity. 4 patients needed dose reductions, there were no treatment discontinuations due to toxicity. Conclusions: Treatment with Imatinib for elderly KIT mutated melanoma patients is safe and well tolerated with no treatment discontinuations recorded. The response rate is encouraging yet seems to vary according to the KIT mutation present as previously reported. The duration of response is usually short-lived and alternative/combination treatments are still needed for this patient population.