Citations

Background Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is a safe and effective treatment option for acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion. To investigate differences in outcomes between patients receiving left-sided and right-sided MT, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods A systematic literature review was performed using Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Additional literature was searched for manually. Studies reporting safety and efficacy metrics for MT were included. Data regarding the modified Rankin scale (mRS), thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (TICI), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and 90-day mortality were included. A random-effects model was used to calculate pooled odds ratios (ORs), mean differences (MDs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results The literature search yielded 13 reports consisting of 19 studies ranging from 98 to 5590 patients. Patients presenting with left-sided stroke had a National Institutes of health stroke scale score 2.89 greater than patients presenting with right-sided stroke (MD = 2.89; 95% CI = 2.09–3.68; P -value < 0.001). There were no differences between left-sided and right-sided MT patients for mRS 0–2 (OR = 0.94; 95% CI = 0.85–1.04; P -value = 0.224), TICI 2b–3 (OR = 1.05; 95% CI = 0.88–1.25; P -value = 0.598), sICH (OR = 0.83; 95% CI = 0.61–1.14; P -value = 0.255), or 90-day mortality (OR = 1.06; 95% CI = 0.84–1.33; P -value = 0.610). Conclusions There does not appear to be a difference in outcomes for patients undergoing left-sided or right-sided thrombectomy.

Introduction: While balloon guide catheters (BGCs) enhance safety and efficacy of mechanical thrombectomy in large vessel occlusions, their impact on distal medium vessel occlusion (DMVO) remains underexplored. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of BGC vs non-BGC in DMVO thrombectomy. Methods: This retrospective study focused on DMVO cases defined as occlusions in M2-M4 middle cerebral artery, anterior cerebral artery, and posterior cerebral artery. Baseline characteristics and technical and clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups, with subgroup analysis in first-line thrombectomy techniques, including ADAPT, stent retriever, and Solumbra. First pass effect (FPE) was defined as a modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) score ≥ 2C after the first pass. Results: A total of 1,508 patients were included, of whom 231 (15.3%) were in the BGC group and 1,277 (84.7%) were in the Non-BGC group. The BGC group was associated with a lower mTICI score ≥ 2C (overall: 43.2% vs. 52.7%, p = 0.01; ADAPT: 42.2% vs. 57.1%, p = 0.01; Solumbra: 32.4% vs. 51.4%, p = 0.005), longer puncture to intracranial access time (overall: 15 vs. 8 min, p < 0.001; ADAPT: 17 vs. 8 min, p < 0.001; Solumbra: 12 vs. 8 min, p = 0.02), and longer puncture to recanalization time (overall: 97 vs. 35 min, p < 0.001; ADAPT: 100 vs. 28 min, p < 0.001; Solumbra: 78 vs. 46 min, p < 0.001; Stent retriever: 95 vs. 45 min, p < 0.001 ). The BGC group also had a lower FPE rate (17.4% vs. 30.7%, p = 0.03) in the Solumbra subgroup. In terms of clinical outcomes, the BGC group had a lower rate of distal embolization (overall: 8.8% vs. 14.9%, p = 0.02), but there were no significant differences in other clinical outcomes between the two groups in first-line thrombectomy techniques. Conclusions: Our findings showed that the use of BGC in DMVO had a lower mTICI score, reduced FPE rates, decreased distal embolization, and longer procedure times. Figure 1: Figure 2:

Background Distal medium vessel occlusions (DMVOs) and minor strokes represent emerging frontiers in mechanical thrombectomy (MT). Although several randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are underway, the design characteristics of these trials and the specific questions they aim to address have not been extensively explored. This current study sought to investigate the design and data elements reported in active prospective DMVO and minor stroke studies. Methods The ClinicalTrials.gov database was searched for ongoing prospective studies assessing the role of MT in patients with DMVOs or minor strokes. The Nested Knowledge AutoLit platform was utilized to categorize reported outcomes and inclusion/exclusion criteria. Frequencies of reported data elements were extracted from study protocols. Results A total of 10 (8 DMVO and 2 minor stroke) studies enrolling 3520 patients were included. All DMVO studies employ different criteria regarding target occlusion locations. Five DMVO studies use stent retrievers as the first-line thrombectomy technique (62.5%, 5/8), while three studies allow any MT techniques, generally at the operator’s discretion. Four DMVO studies permit intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) utilization in both intervention and control arms (50%, 4/8). The DISTALS trial excludes patients receiving IVT, while the DUSK trial and Tigertriever registry only enroll patients who are ineligible for IVT or for whom IVT failed to achieve reperfusion. DMVO studies exhibit notable heterogeneity in symptom onset duration thresholds for inclusion (<6 hours: 2 studies; <12 hours: 2 studies; <24 hours: 3 studies). Minor stroke trials employ similar inclusion criteria and outcome measures except for symptom duration thresholds for inclusion (8 hours for ENDOLOW and 23 hours for MOSTE). Conclusions There is considerable heterogeneity among active DMVO trials regarding potential target DMVO locations and time thresholds for inclusion based on the last known well time. Furthermore, our review indicates that the utility of aspiration thrombectomy in DMVOs and the advantages of MT without IVT over IVT alone will remain largely unexplored even after completion of active DMVO trials.

Background The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of ≤2 (functional independence) has been the most common primary endpoint of modern mechanical thrombectomy (MT) trials. However, unlike mRS 0-1, mRS score of 2 indicates disability. An important proportion of the mRS 2 patients are home dependent and report a significant decrease in their quality of life. Purpose To investigate excellent outcome (mRS 0-1) rates after MT. Methods We systematically searched Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the role of modern MT in acute ischemic stroke were screened. Posterior circulation and large-core infarct trials were excluded from the study. The data regarding excellent outcomes (mRS: 0-1), functional independence (mRS: 0-2), and reperfusion were collected. Results Twenty-two RCTs comprising 5692 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The overall mRS 0-1 rate was 31.24% (95% CI = 26.95–36.2). The rate of successful reperfusion was 81.8% (95% CI = 77.93–85.86). MT achieved significantly higher rates of mRS 0-1 compared to standard care alone (OR = 2.04; 95% CI = 1.64–2.55; P-value < 0.001), with no heterogeneity detected among studies (I 2 = 0%; P-value = 0.52). The direct MT and MT plus intravenous thrombolytic treatment groups’ excellent outcome rates were comparable (OR = 0.98; 95% CI = 0.82–1.18; P-value = 0.863). Also, aspiration and stent retriever thrombectomy techniques provided similar excellent outcome rates (OR = 0.76; 95% CI = 0.55–1.05; P-value = 0.141). Conclusions Our results prove the additional benefit of MT over standard care, using a stricter definition for favorable functional outcome. Nearly one-third of patients presenting with large artery occlusion and treated with MT had no disability at 90 days. While this is remarkable, our results also indicate that reperfusion alone is often not enough to prevent disability and underline the need for better neuroprotection strategies.

Background Although direct contact aspiration has emerged as one of the leading techniques for mechanical thrombectomy (MT), there is still ongoing debate about the aspiration/suction pump devices that can optimize recanalization rates. To address this gap, we conducted a meta-analysis comparing the aspiration efficacy of 60 ml syringe and pump devices in benchtop MT models. Methods Systematic literature review was conducted using Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Outcomes of interest included flow rate and vacuum pressure delivered by a 60 ml syringe and several aspiration pumps. We used a random effects model to calculate the mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and a statistically significant difference was considered as a two-sided p -value of less than 0.05. Results We included six benchtop studies comparing 60 ml syringes and vacuum pumps. Our meta-analysis showed that there were no significant differences in vacuum pressure (MD:0.71inHg, 95% CI: [−0.81;2.23], p = 0.359) and flow rate (MD:0.27 mL/s, 95% CI: [−3,07; 3.61], p = 0.873) between 60 ml syringes and vacuum pumps groups. Conclusions Our study demonstrated comparable performance in terms of vacuum pressure and flow rates between a 60 ml syringe and a heterogeneous combination of commercially available aspiration pumps.

Background The comparison of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) outcomes between patients with the hyperdense middle cerebral artery sign (HMCAS) and non-HMCAS is important to evaluate the impact of this radiological finding on treatment efficacy. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the association between HMCAS and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing thrombectomy, comparing the outcomes over non-HMCAS. Methods A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Ovid Embase, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library to identify studies on MT outcomes for M1 occlusions of HMCAS over non-HMCAS. Inclusion criteria encompassed modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score, mortality, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and successful recanalization. Using R software version 4.1.2, we calculated pooled odds ratios (ORs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results The meta-analysis was performed for 5 studies with 724 patients. There was no association found between presence of HMCAS and achieving mRS 0–2 (OR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.29–1.47; p = .544). Mortality analysis also showed no significant association with presence of HMCAS (OR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.37–1.65; p = .520). No significant difference in sICH risk (OR = 1.54, 95% CI: 0.24–9.66; p = .646) was found between groups. Recanalization analysis showed a non-significant positive association (OR = 1.23, 95% CI: 0.67–2.28; p = .501). Heterogeneity was observed in all analyses. Conclusion Our findings showed that there is no statistically significant difference in mRS scores, mortality, sICH, and recanalization success rates between the HMCAS and non-HMCAS groups.

Abstract Background: Many patients use artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots as a rapid source of health information. This raises important questions about the reliability and effectiveness of AI chatbots in delivering accurate and understandable information. Purpose: To evaluate and compare the accuracy, conciseness, and readability of responses from OpenAI ChatGPT-4 and Google Bard to patient inquiries concerning the novel 177Lu-PSMA-617 therapy for prostate cancer. Materials and Methods: Two experts listed the 12 most commonly asked questions by patients on 177Lu-PSMA-617 therapy. These twelve questions were prompted to OpenAI ChatGPT-4 and Google Bard. AI-generated responses were distributed using an online survey platform (Qualtrics) and blindly rated by eight experts. The performances of the AI chatbots were evaluated and compared across three domains: accuracy, conciseness, and readability. Additionally, potential safety concerns associated with AI-generated answers were also examined. The Mann-Whitney U and chi-square tests were utilized to compare the performances of AI chatbots. Results: Eight experts participated in the survey, evaluating 12 AI-generated responses across the three domains of accuracy, conciseness, and readability, resulting in 96 assessments (12 responses x 8 experts) for each domain per chatbot. ChatGPT-4 provided more accurate answers than Bard (2.95 ± 0.671 vs 2.73 ± 0.732, p=0.027). Bard's responses had better readability than ChatGPT-4 (2.79 ± 0.408 vs 2.94 ± 0.243, p=0.003). Both ChatGPT-4 and Bard achieved comparable conciseness scores (3.14 ± 0.659 vs 3.11 ± 0.679, p=0.798). Experts categorized the AI-generated responses as incorrect or partially correct at a rate of 16.6% for ChatGPT-4 and 29.1% for Bard. Bard's answers contained significantly more misleading information than those of ChatGPT-4 (p = 0.039). Conclusion: AI chatbots have gained significant attention, and their performance is continuously improving. Nonetheless, these technologies still need further improvements to be considered reliable and credible sources for patients seeking medical information on 177Lu-PSMA-617 therapy.

Background Cervicofacial arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are a significant source of morbidity. Endovascular embolization has emerged as a promising treatment technique for these lesions. However, current literature on cervicofacial AVM embolization mostly consists of single-agent oriented case series, and to date, no comprehensive study has compared the outcomes of available embolic agents. Purpose To investigate the performance of different embolic agents in the management of cervicofacial AVMs. Methods We systematically searched Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, Ovid Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials Scopus, and Web of Science. Studies providing data for the endovascular treatment of cervicofacial AVMs were included. The data regarding complication and cure rates were collected for each embolic agent. Pooled event rates were presented as descriptive statistics. Results Eleven studies comprising 204 patients were included in the review. The overall complete and partial cure rates were 62.2% (127/204) and 36.2% (74/204), respectively. Embolization failed to achieve significant improvement in only 1.6% (3/204) of the patients. The complete cure rates were 87.5% (75–100%) for n-Butyl cyanoacrylate (NBCA, glue), 80.5% (61–100%) for Onyx (Medtronic, MN, USA), and 51.5% (18–85%) for ethanol. The overall complication rate was 30% (61/204). The complication rates were 33% (12.5–53%) for ethanol, 14% (0–28%) for Onyx, and 0% for NBCA. Conclusions Our systematic review supports that endovascular embolization is an effective treatment option for cervicofacial AVMs. In our review, the use of Onyx and NBCA was associated with consistently high complete cure rates and a promising safety profile. However, more research is needed to investigate the use of different embolic agents in the treatment of cervicofacial AVMs.

Background Distal transradial artery access (dTRA) has received increasing consideration for performing diagnostic cerebral angiography and neurointerventional procedures. In this meta-analysis, we aim to evaluate the safety and efficacy of dTRA compared to conventional transradial access (cTRA) for cerebral angiography and neurointerventions. Method A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted on studies investigating outcomes of dTRA and cTRA in neurointerventions. The primary outcome was technical success rates. Secondary outcomes included access site complication rates, crossover rates to alternative vessels, fluoroscopy time, and contrast volume. The random effects model was used to calculate the mean difference (MD) and odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (Cl). Results Eight retrospective observational studies with a total of 1477 patients who underwent 1175 diagnostic cerebral angiography and 516 neurointerventional procedures using 546 dTRA and 1164 cTRA approaches were included in our meta-analysis. The technical success rate was similar between dTRA and cTRA groups (95.8% vs 91.4%; OR:1.65; 95% Cl: 0.52 to 5.22; P = 0.40). Similarly, no difference was seen in dTRA and cTRA regarding access site complications (2% vs 1.4%; OR: 1.31; 95% CI: 0.47 to 3.61; P = 0.61) and access site crossover (2.1% vs 5.3%; OR: 0.55; 95% Cl: 0.28 to 1.05; P = 0.07). After resolving heterogeneity among included studies, dTRA was associated with a shorter fluoroscopy time (MD: −0.91 min; 95% CI: −1.74 to −0.09; P = 0.03) and lower contrast volume (MD: −8.32 mL; 95% CI = −14.7 to −1.94; P = 0.011). Conclusion Our findings suggest that the dTRA approach is a safe and effective alternative to the cTRA approach in patients undergoing cerebral angiography and neurointerventions.

Background The Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device is used to treat wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms (WNBAs). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the retreatment rate strategies following aneurysmal recurrence of WEB device treated WNBAs. Methods This study is reported following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. We conducted a systematic review of the literature using PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science. Data were pooled using a random-effects model. We calculated pooled prevalence and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results We included 11 studies. The overall retreatment rate was 171/1875 aneurysms (10.3%; 95% CI = 8.3–12.9). Stent-assisted coiling was used to treat 59 aneurysms (36.7%; 95% CI = 26.4–48.5), and flow diverters were used to treat 44 aneurysms (18.7%; 95% CI = 9.9–32.5). Following retreatment, the complete occlusion rate was 57/91 aneurysms (62.8%; 95% CI = 48.2–75.3) and the adequate occlusion rate was 24/91 aneurysms (26.4%; 18.4%–36.4%). The most common aneurysmal recurrence site was the anterior communicating artery (44/136 aneurysms, 32.4%; 95% CI = 25.0–40.7). Conclusions Roughly 10% of WNBAs initially treated with the WEB device will undergo retreatment. Retreatment is an effective strategy for WEB-treated aneurysms, with high rates of adequate and complete occlusion. Future studies should work to identify risk factors for aneurysmal recurrence.