Citations

AbstractBackgroundAlthough both age‐related and highly prevalent, little is known regarding the prevalence of hearing loss among persons with dementia (PwD). Current understanding is based on convenience samples primarily from specialized memory clinics. The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Neurocognitive Study (ARIC‐NCS) is a large, prospective study of a population‐based cohort from 4 U.S. community sites with audiometric and neurocognitive testing and bi‐racial representation. We examined the prevalence of hearing loss and hearing aid use among older adults with cognitive impairment and whether cognitive status influences hearing aid use.MethodWe analyzed audiometric and hearing care data from ARIC‐NCS Visit 6 (2016‐2018). Participants underwent a full neurocognitive battery and audiometric evaluation at Visit 6. Participants with complete audiometric data and an adjudicated diagnosis of cognitively normal, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), or dementia were included in the analytical cohort (N=3,385). Differences in participant characteristics by cognitive status were descriptively compared using Chi‐square tests or one‐way ANOVAs. We performed a series of logistic regression models to estimate the odds of hearing aid non‐use by cognitive status.ResultPrevalence of hearing loss was greater with increasing cognitive impairment (cognitively normal:64.7%; MCI:71.3%; dementia:83.3%). Prevalence of hearing aid use among those with hearing loss and cognitive impairment varied by race (African Americans 7.2%; whites 32.8%). In a multivariable‐adjusted model, cognitive impairment was independently associated with higher odds of non‐use of hearing aids (MCI odds ratio (OR):1.4 (95%CI:1.0‐1.8); dementia OR:1.8 (95%CI:1.2‐2.9) versus cognitively normal). The strongest risk factor for non‐use of hearing aids was race, where African Americans have almost a 5 times higher odds of not using hearing aids compared to whites (95% CI:2.9‐7.4).ConclusionHearing loss is highly prevalent but vastly untreated among older adults with cognitive impairment, particularly African Americans, and cognitive impairment is independently associated with hearing aid use. These estimates are some of the first population‐based estimates of audiometric hearing loss among diverse older adults with adjudicated diagnoses of MCI or dementia. With increased calls to address ethnic/racial disparities, we must include hearing loss, as one of the most common co‐morbidities, in order to optimize health and well‐being among all PwD.

Purpose The purpose of this study was to investigate associations between performance on a clinical speech-in-noise measure with a comprehensive neurocognitive battery of tests. Method A group of older adults ( N = 250, M age = 77 years, age range: 67.3–89.1 years) enrolled in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Neurocognitive Study took part in the hearing pilot study (2013) that included testing for audiometric thresholds and speech-in-noise performance (Quick Speech-in-Noise Test; Killion, Niquette, Gudmundsen, Revit, & Banerjee, 2004). This research study analyzed the associations between domain-specific cognitive function and speech-in-noise performance after adjusting for hearing thresholds and other demographic and cardiovascular factors. Results Multivariable-adjusted associations were found between all cognitive domains and speech-in-noise performance in the full sample, but the observed associations varied when participants with varying levels of moderate to moderately severe hearing loss were excluded from the analysis. Conclusions The findings are discussed in terms considering the cognitive status of older adults in relation to their speech-in-noise performance during audiological evaluation and implications for aural rehabilitation.

OBJECTIVE We sought to examine associations in older adults among diabetes, glycemic control, diabetes duration, and biomarkers of hyperglycemia with incident mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and incident dementia. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We conducted a prospective analysis of 5,099 participants from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study who attended the fifth (2011–2013) exam. Cognitive status was assessed during follow-up via telephone calls, death certificate codes, surveillance, and a follow-up examination (2016–2017). We defined incident cognitive impairment as incident MCI or incident dementia in persons dementia-free at the index examination; we also examined each outcome separately. Diabetes was defined using self-report, medications, or HbA1c ≥6.5%; poor glycemic control in persons with diabetes was defined as HbA1c ≥7%. We examined the following biomarkers of hyperglycemia: HbA1c, fructosamine, glycated albumin, and 1,5-anhydroglucitol. RESULTS Mean age at baseline was 76 years, 59% were female, and 21% were black. Diabetes (hazard ratio [HR] 1.14 [95% CI 1.00, 1.31]), poor glycemic control in persons with diabetes (HR 1.31 [95% CI 1.05, 1.63]), and longer diabetes duration (≥5 vs. <5 years; HR 1.59 [95% CI 1.23, 2.07]) were significantly associated with incident cognitive impairment. We found a J-shaped association between HbA1c and incident dementia. Glycated albumin and fructosamine were also associated with incident dementia, independently of HbA1c. HbA1c and fructosamine were also associated with incident MCI. CONCLUSIONS Diabetes status, poor glycemic control, and longer diabetes duration were associated with worse cognitive outcomes over a median follow-up of 5 years.

AbstractIntroductionThe easily‐imaged retinal microvasculature may reflect the brain microvasculature and therefore be related to dementia.MethodsIn a population‐based study of 12,482 adults aged 50‐73 years (22% African American), we estimated the relationship of retinal characteristics from fundus photography (1993‐1995) with incident all‐cause dementia (1993‐1995 to 2011‐2013) and with etiologic subtype of dementia/mild cognitive impairment (2011‐13).ResultsA total of 1259 (10%) participants developed dementia over a mean 15.6 years. Moderate/severe (vs. no) retinopathy (hazard ratio [HR], 1.86; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.36–2.55) and central retinal arteriolar equivalent (narrowest quartile vs. widest three quartiles; HR, 1.26; 95% CI: 1.09–1.45) were associated with all‐cause dementia. Results were qualitatively stronger (but not statistically significantly different) in participants with diabetes. Retinopathy was associated with a joint outcome of cerebrovascular‐related, but not Alzheimer's disease–related, dementia/mild cognitive impairment (HR, 2.29; 95% CI: 1.24–4.23).DiscussionExploration of measures in the eye may provide surrogate indices of microvascular lesions relevant to dementia.