Citations

Abstract Introduction: Indolent systemic mastocytosis (ISM) is a clonal mast cell disease driven by the KIT D816V mutation in ~95% of cases and is associated with symptoms of mast cell activation and tissue infiltration. It can cause chronic, debilitating symptoms − including life-threatening anaphylaxis and impaired bone health. While historically most patients have relied on symptom-directed best supportive care (BSC) therapies, avapritinib is used as a new standard of care targeting KIT D816V, the primary driver for SM. Avapritinib is an oral, potent, selective KIT D816V inhibitor, and the first and only approved targeted therapy for adult patients with ISM in the USA and the EU. Approval was based on results from the phase 2 PIONEER trial. Here, we present the findings from ~3.5-year long-term follow-up. Methods: Adults with centrally confirmed ISM and uncontrolled moderate-to-severe symptoms who completed the randomized dose-finding (Part 1), or randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled (Part 2) portions of PIONEER (NCT03731260) rolled over to the open-label, long-term extension (Part 3). This cumulative analysis includes patients who initiated avapritinib at the recommended dose of 25 mg once daily (QD) in either Parts 1, 2, or 3. All patients received BSC. Per investigator discretion and based on disease burden, dose titration up to 50 mg QD of avapritinib was permitted in Part 3. Long-term efficacy was assessed by measuring changes in symptoms and QoL, using the ISM-Symptom Assessment Form (ISM-SAF; ©2018 Blueprint Medicines, a Sanofi Company) and the Mastocytosis Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (MC-QoL). Safety was also assessed. Results: Overall, 226 patients initiated avapritinib 25mg QD across Parts 1, 2, and 3. This longer-term analysis is inclusive of 65 patients who dose titrated from 25 mg to 50 mg QD in Part 3. Median (range) treatment duration was 40.0 months (0.7‒67.2) as of February 21, 2025. Longer-term efficacy data with ~3.5 years of follow-up demonstrated sustained disease-related symptom improvements. The mean change (standard deviation [SD]) in total symptom score (TSS, per ISM-SAF), was −19.80 (19.81) at Week 144 (Month 33) and −20.43 (20.57) at Week 168 (Month 39) from a baseline of 48.08 (19.47). Additionally, avapritinib-treated patients demonstrated durable improvement in their most severe symptoms (mean change [SD] from baseline of −3.35 [3.02] at Month 33 and −3.47 [3.19] at Month 39) per ISM-SAF. Sustained responses were observed across all individual symptom domains (0–30) with mean changes (SD) at Month 33 and Month 39 of −3.77 (5.52) and −3.84 (6.05) for the gastrointestinal domain, −8.21 (7.70) and −8.20 (7.85) for the skin domain, and −4.66 (6.24) and −4.87 (6.51) for the neurocognitive domain. The mean percent change (SD) in MC-QoL was −34.67 (40.16) at Month 33 and −40.72 (33.24) at Month 39 from a baseline of 54.24 (18.32). Treatment with avapritinib was well tolerated, and its safety profile was similar to the previously reported placebo-controlled portion. Most treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were Grades 1–2, and 7% of patients experienced Grade ≥3 TRAEs of which diarrhea, neutrophil count decrease, and weight increase occurred in >1 patient. No Grade ≥3 TRAEs of increase in transaminases were observed. Edema (peripheral and periorbital), the most frequently reported TRAE, was mostly Grade 1 and occurred most frequently during the first 3–4 months of treatment. Three patients (1%) experienced serious adverse events assessed as treatment related. However, none led to treatment discontinuation and no trends were observed. After approximately 3.5 years of follow-up, low rates of treatment discontinuations (n=7, 3%) due to TRAEs were observed. Conclusion: Longer follow-up of patients with ISM treated on the PIONEER trial, including some on avapritinib for up to 5 years, demonstrates that prolonged avapritinib therapy continues to be effective and well tolerated. Additional prospective analyses will be needed to determine effects of selective KIT D816V-inhibition on anaphylaxis. These data support a favorable benefit-risk profile of avapritinib as a chronic treatment for adult patients with ISM.

Abstract Background Etentamig is a second-generation B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) x CD3 bispecific antibody that has shown promising efficacy and a favorable safety profile in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Etentamig possesses a unique combination of 2 high-affinity BCMA binding domains, coupled to a low-affinity CD3 binding domain that have been shown to reduce the negative impact of soluble BCMA (sBCMA), decrease risk for cytokine release syndrome (CRS), and drive sustained T-cell activation with reduced immune exhaustion in preclinical models of MM (Blood 2023;142 [suppl 1]:4666). Here, we describe correlative biomarker analyses from Phase 1 (NCT03933735) and Phase 1b (NCT05650632) clinical trials of etentamig in RRMM designed to assess the impact of sBCMA on clinical response and pharmacodynamic changes in proinflammatory cytokines, and T-cell redistribution, activation, proliferation, and exhaustion. Methods Peripheral blood and serum samples from patients with RRMM enrolled in Phase 1 and Phase 1b open-label studies who received etentamig monotherapy were collected at baseline, on treatment, and at disease progression. The Phase 1b study consisted of dose-optimization (DO) and dose-expansion (DE) phases. During DO, patients received a single step-up dose (SUD) of intravenous etentamig (2 or 4 mg) on Cycle (C) 1 Day (D) 1, followed by the target dose of 60 mg on D4. In DE, based on DO findings, patients received the recommended etentamig SUD (2 mg) on C1D1, followed by 60 mg on D4 with modified dexamethasone predosing. Samples were analyzed by flow cytometry for immune cell populations, Luminex® for cytokines, and electrochemiluminescence for sBCMA. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells and bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMMC) at baseline and on-treatment were subjected to single-cell Cellular Indexing of Transcriptomes and Epitopes sequencing (scCITEseq) and single-cell T-cell receptors (scTCR) / B-cell receptors clonality analyses. Results While baseline serum sBCMA levels did not correlate with clinical response to etentamig at the selected dose level of 60 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) with 2 mg SUD, a reduction in sBCMA levels over time was associated with best International Myeloma Working Group response. Etentamig treatment led to a rapid and transient increase of proinflammatory cytokines and promoted T-cell redistribution, activation, and proliferation. Maximum reduction in peak levels of CRS-related cytokines, including (interleukin [IL]-6, IL-8, IL-10, tumor necrosis factor–a), were observed in DE compared with DO and 60 mg Q4W without SUD. Peak induction levels of proinflammatory cytokines during C1 correlated with occurrence of CRS (≥Grade [G] 1) as well as clinical response across dose levels. A modified dexamethasone premedication schedule of 2 mg/60 mg Q4W cohort for C1 resulted in significantly reduced baseline levels of IL-6 and key macrophage-associated cytokine/chemokines (eg, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 and macrophage inflammatory protein-3 beta). Incidence of CRS was lowest in the 2 mg/60 mg Q4W cohort (26% G1, 4% G2, 0% ≥G3). Higher T-cell to myeloma cell ratio in BMMCs at baseline correlated with better response to etentamig. scCITEseq and scTCR analysis revealed that at baseline, responders also had greater CD8+ T-cell cytotoxic activities, increased TCR clonality, and elevated inflammatory signatures in T-cells from both peripheral blood and bone marrow. Etentamig at a dosage of 60 mg Q4W resulted in significant clonal expansion of CD8+ effector T-cells and enhanced gene expression signatures related to activation and cytotoxicity in both CD8+ T effector and natural killer cells. Along treatment cycles, responders maintained their T-cell fitness, high clonality, and low T-cell exhaustion levels. Frequency of baseline CD4+ or CD8+ T-cell exhaustion (programmed cell death receptor 1+/ T cell immunoglobulin and mucin-domain containing-3 +) did not impact clinical response at optimal dose level of 2 mg/60 mg Q4W etentamig. Conclusions Responses to etentamig were independent of baseline sBCMA levels and resulted in rapid and transient proinflammatory cytokine production that promoted robust T-cell redistribution, activation, and proliferation indicating that the optimal dose of etentamig (2 mg/60 mg Q4W) maximizes its clinical potential as a convenient, safe, and effective therapy for MM.

Abstract Introduction: Standardized reporting of clinical trials results for MDS is essential to improve clinical interpretation and cross-study comparison. However, reporting of patient characteristics, response criteria, and endpoints in publications is often inconsistent; there is no systemic analysis of MDS trial reporting available. We conducted a systematic review of published MDS trial manuscripts on behalf of the international consortium for MDS (icMDS) to assess variability in reporting practices. Methods We searched ClinicalTrials.gov to identify all clinical trials registered for adults (≥18 years) with MDS that reported results between 2015-2024. Clinical trials that included acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or MDS/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) were included if they enrolled ≥5 MDS patients. We excluded trials without an MDS cohort; non-therapeutic trials; trials focused on transplant interventions; or those which enrolled solid malignancies or other hematologic malignancies (chronic myeloid leukemia or lymphoid diseases). Finally, trials were required to have a manuscript available on Larvol, PubMed, or Google Scholar. Trials were categorized by disease risk (lower-risk [LR] vs. higher-risk [HR]) and trial phase (early phase [EP] vs. late phase [LP]). Results We identified 502 MDS trials on ClinicalTrials.gov, of which 351 did not meet inclusion criteria and 79 lacked a manuscript. A total of 72 trials (32 EP, 40 LP) with 80 publications (34 EP, 46 LP) were analyzed. Frequently reported baseline characteristics included age (100% EP, 100% LP), disease risk (74% EP, 74% LP), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (85% EP, 72% LP), prior treatments (71% EP, 67% LP), and RBC transfusion dependency (32% EP, 70% LP). Less frequently reported characteristics included blood counts (hemoglobin [Hb; 38% EP, 54% LP], platelet count [38% EP, 54% LP], neutrophil count [24% EP and LP]) and bone marrow blasts (29% EP, 43% LP). Although disease risk was widely reported, definitions varied: IPSS and IPSS-R were each reported in 54% of manuscripts, while IPSS-M appeared in only 3%. Cytogenetic risk was separately reported in 39% of manuscripts (38% EP, 39% LP), and mutational data in 45% (47% EP, 43% LP). Responses per IWG 2006 criteria were reported in 84% of manuscripts. The primary endpoint involved safety/tolerability in 85% of EP manuscripts, though definitions were variable; recommended phase 2 dose was the most common (26% of EP manuscripts). In LP trials, primary endpoints were risk-specific: transfusion independence (TI) in 77% of LR, overall response rate (ORR) in 28% of HR, and complete remission (CR) or overall survival (OS) in 22% of HR. In HR manuscripts, CR was reported in 100%, ORR in 73%, hematologic improvement (HI) in 48%, RBC-TI in 23%, and OS in 80%. However, seven different definitions were used for ORR: CR + marrow CR + partial remission + HI per IWG 2006 was most common (35%). Event-free survival was reported in 25%; progression-free survival and relapse-free survival in 13%; and leukemia-free survival in 5%. Early mortality rate was reported in 35% (18% EP, 56% LP) and transplant rate in 58% (50% EP, 67% LP). Only 47% of HR and 90% of LR manuscripts identified HI-eligible patients. In LR-MDS, RBC-TI was reported in 72% of manuscripts but used six definitions. The most common were RBC-TI ≥8 weeks at any time during treatment (24%), ≥8 weeks within 28 weeks of treatment (13%), ≥8 weeks with Hb increase ≥1.0 (4%), ≥12 weeks with Hb increase ≥1.5 (4%), and ≥16 weeks within 24 weeks of treatment (12%). The remainder did not report RBC-TI, did not define it, or used a custom definition not used in another trial. HI was reported in 80% of LR papers with most of those reporting HI using IWG 2006 criteria (90%). Conclusion Reporting of baseline characteristics, response criteria, and outcomes is inconsistent in MDS clinical trials, with wide variability in response definitions, including ORR and TI. This heterogeneity limits interpretability, hampers historical comparisons and may obscure efficacy signals. Our findings highlight the need for standardized reporting guidelines to ensure clarity and consistency in MDS trial publications. As a next phase of this effort, we will conduct a formal Delphi process among icMDS experts to establish consensus recommendations for minimal and optimal MDS clinical trial reporting in manuscripts by disease risk (LR/HR) and trial phase (EP/LP).

Abstract Background and Significance: CMML is a myeloid neoplasm characterized by hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell (HSPCs) monocytic bias, leading to downstream monocyte expansion that plays a key role in disease maintenance and progression. Monocytes in CMML express high surface expression of the homing C-C chemokine receptor 2 (CCR2), which promotes malignant monocyte survival. Expansion of CCR2+ monocytic progenitors drives acute transformation in CMML and contributes to venetoclax resistance in AML. For these reasons, CCR2 is a potential novel therapeutic target in CMML and monocytic AML. The CyTAC platform was designed to enable targeting of cell surface antigens that demonstrate limited or ineffective binding to conventional therapeutic antibodies. A CyTAC is a heterobivalent small molecule that binds to both a target of choice and to a fully humanized monoclonal antibody. STX-0712 comprises a CCR2 CyTAC which potently binds to CCR2 on malignant cells, and a CyTAC humanized ADCC-enabling monoclonal antibody, which when combined eliminates target cells via enhanced effector-mediated killing in the presence of NK cells. We have demonstrated that treatment with STX-0712 ex vivo results in human target engagement and pharmacodynamic activity, and in vivo leads to depletion of CCR2 MO1 monocytes in a potent and dose-dependent manner in CMML and AML (ASH 2024). Therapeutic depletion of CCR2+ malignant monocytes presents a novel opportunity to develop a potential disease-modifying targeted therapeutic agent. We have designed a first-in-human, phase 1 clinical trial to evaluate the effect of CCR2 CyTAC in patients with refractory/resistant CMML, and relapsed/refractory monocytic or monocytic predominant AML. Study Design and Methods This is a phase 1, first-in-human, open-label, multicenter clinical trial based in the USA to evaluate STX-0712 as a monotherapy in patients with CMML and AML who have no remaining treatment options known to confer clinical benefit. STX-0712 will be administered as a single intravenous (IV) infusion every 3 weeks (additional regimen schedules may be explored) until evidence of disease progression, death, intolerance to study medication, or withdrawal of consent. The study consists of a dose-escalation and dose-expansion part and includes two cohorts: Cohort 1 (refractory/resistant CMML) and Cohort 2 (relapsed/refractory monocytic or monocytic predominant AML). Dose escalation will begin in participants with CMML using the Bayesian Optimal Interval (BOIN) design, with a minimum of three patients enrolled at each dose level. Backfilling of up to two cleared dose levels will be initiated once efficacious exposure levels are reached and at least one CMML participant has achieved a complete remission (CR) or a partial remission (PR), marrow response, or clinical benefit as defined by the MDS/MPN IWG 2015 criteria. In the AML cohort, backfilling may begin once at least one participant has achieved a response defined by ELN 2022 criteria. Dose expansion will occur upon completion of dose escalation in each cohort, using a Simon 2-stage adaptive design. Approximately 47 CMML and 58 AML patients may be enrolled in this phase 1 study. The primary objectives of the study are to evaluate the safety and tolerability of STX-0712 and to determine the minimal safe and biologically effective dose, recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), and/or maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and to characterize dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). Secondary objectives include evaluation of preliminary antitumor activity, pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters, and pharmacodynamic effects of STX-0712 on CCR2+ malignant cells in blood and bone marrow. Key exploratory endpoints include: (1) assessment of changes in CCR2+ tumor cells following STX-0712 dosing, (2) evaluation of candidate biomarkers, (3) characterization of T cells, B cells and NK cells at baseline and over the course of treatment, and (4) to explore the effects of STX-0712 on patient-reported outcomes using the CMML Symptoms Assessment Tool (MPN-SAF-TSS scoring system) and the EuroQoL 5 Dimension 5 level (EQ-5D-5L) for AML. Enrollment for Cohort 1 (CMML) began in March 2025, and the study is ongoing. Clinical Trial Information: NCT06950034

Abstract Introduction There is currently no standard-of-care for patients (pts) who cannot tolerate full dose anthracycline regimens in frontline large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). R-miniCHOP is a commonly used regimen that provides curative intent treatment with manageable toxicity. Despite this, lymphoma and treatment-related mortality are the leading causes of death in these pts. Additionally, many pts may not be eligible to receive R-miniCHOP due to comorbidity or frailty. There are limited clinical trial and real-world data focused on this population. Methods Pts with LBCL age 18 years (yrs) and older were identified from the Lymphoma Epidemiology of Outcomes (LEO) cohort, a prospective study of newly diagnosed pts with non-Hodgkin lymphoma enrolled from 2015-2020 at 8 academic medical centers in the US. Pts with LBCL were included in this analysis if they had received R-miniCHOP or a regimen that did not include an anthracycline (nonAC). NonAC regimens included R-CVP, BR, rituximab, radiation and lenalidomide and rituximab. Pts completed the Vulnerable Elders Survey (VES-13) and were considered vulnerable if they had a score >3. Event-free survival (EFS) was defined as the time from start of treatment until progression/relapse, retreatment, or death due to any cause; EFS at 24 months (EFS24) was a secondary endpoint. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from start of treatment until death due to any cause. EFS and OS for R-miniCHOP and non-IC groups, as well as vulnerable and not vulnerable by VES-13 were estimated using Cox models. Results A total of 190 pts received R-miniCHOP (N=139) or nonAC (N=51). R-miniCHOP-treated pts were older (median 82 vs 72 yrs) and more commonly female (55% vs 35%). The majority in both groups (86% vs 78%) received their treatment at a LEO center and did not receive therapy on a clinical trial (89% vs 100%). Most pts receiving R-miniCHOP had high-intermediate (32%) or high (30%) international prognostic index (IPI) score, while both high-intermediate (22%) and high (20%) IPI were lower in the nonAC-treated pts. Cell of origin was determined by immunohistochemistry as available clinically, with GCB 42% vs 31%, non-GCB 32% vs 29%, and not done/unknown 26% vs 39% in R-miniCHOP vs nonAC pts. Double-hit status by FISH was known in 115 pts and was positive in 13% of R-miniCHOP pts and 10% of nonAC pts. The diagnosis-to-treatment interval (DTI) was ≤14 days in 30% of R-miniCHOP pts and 24% of nonAC pts. Of pts who had a VES-13 score (N=119), vulnerable status trended higher in the R-miniCHOP (66%) vs the non-IC group (50%; p=0.15). With a median follow-up of 50.5 months, the median EFS was 37.1 months and median OS was 50.0 months. R-miniCHOP, compared with non-IC, was associated with improved EFS (unadjusted HR=0.54, 95% CI 0.36-0.81; p=0.003) and OS (unadjusted HR=0.58, 95% CI 0.38-0.88; p=0.011). When adjusted for age, IPI, LBCL subtype (diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified vs other), DTI and VES-13, R-miniCHOP was strongly associated with improved EFS (HR=0.26, 95% CI 0.14-0.50; p<0.001) and OS (adjusted HR=0.29, 95% CI 0.15-0.57; p<0.001). EFS24 rate was 56% in all pts and was superior in pts treated with R-miniCHOP vs non-IC (62.7% vs 34.1%; p=0.001). In the R-miniCHOP group, vulnerable status (adjusted for IPI) was associated with inferior OS (HR=2.22, 95% CI 1.09-4.50; p=0.028) and trended towards inferior EFS (HR=1.76, 95% CI 0.93-3.32; p=0.083). In a competing-risk cumulative-incidence analysis, lymphoma was the leading cause of death for pts receiving R-miniCHOP at 2 (0.16, 95% CI 0.11-0.24) and 5 (0.20, 95% CI 0.14-0.28) yrs, as well as for those receiving non-IC at 2 (0.35, 95% CI 0.24-0.53) and 5 (0.38, 95% CI 0.26-0.56) yrs. Treatment-related mortality was similar in both groups. In the R-miniCHOP group, the 2-yr (0.20 vs 0.03) and 5-yr (0.20 vs 0.11) lymphoma-related mortality was higher in pts who were vulnerable vs not by VES-13, while there were no differences for mortality due to therapy or other causes by vulnerable status. Conclusions These data support R-miniCHOP as a curative regimen in older and frail pts with the majority achieving EFS24. R-miniCHOP compared to non-IC use is strongly associated with improved EFS and OS when adjusted for disease and patient related variables. Within the R-miniCHOP group, vulnerable status is associated with inferior OS. Additional research efforts are needed to optimize outcomes for this group of pts.

Abstract Background: Rural/nonmetropolitan (nonmetro) counties face known barriers to comprehensive cancer care compared with metropolitan (metro) counties, which may impact the outcomes for lymphoma patients. We evaluated the impact metro vs nonmetro status on outcomes after a diagnosis of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) in the context of clinical, demographic, and lifestyle factors. Methods: Of 7724 participants enrolled in the prospective LEO cohort study from 2015-2020, 7610 (98.5%) had their county of residence at diagnosis assigned a RUCC (2013) code. We compared outcomes of participants from metro (defined as RUCC 1-3, which are central counties with ≥1 urban areas of ≥50,000) vs nonmetro counties (RUCC 4-9, which are counties with smaller urban areas as well as completely rural). We estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) from univariable and multivariable Cox models for associations of metro status with overall survival (OS). Cause of death (lymphoma [including treatment related], non-lymphoma, unknown) was assessed using a competing risk approach. Results: Compared with metro counties (N=6096), LEO participants from nonmetro counties (N=1514) were older (median age 64 vs 62 years; p<0.001), more likely to be non-Hispanic white (94% vs 75%; p<0.001) and married (84% vs 75%; p<0.001), and less likely to have completed graduate or professional school education (16% vs 27%; p<0.001). There were no notable differences (>5%) by metro status for sex, employment status, NHL subtype, stage, performance status, abnormal lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), international prognostic index (IPI), number of comorbidities, time from diagnosis to treatment interval (DTI) or participation in a clinical trial. Compared with LEO participants from metro counties, those from nonmetro counties had inferior OS at 5 years (74.5% vs 78.4%; HR=1.23, CI 1.10-1.37; p<0.001). The OS association only slightly attenuated after adjustment for age, sex, race/ethnicity and NHL subtype (HR=1.20, CI 1.07-1.34; p=0.002), and held in models that adjusted for clinical prognostic factors (stage, NHL subtype, IPI, DTI), socioeconomic status (SES; education, marital status), health status (comorbidity, frailty), or lifestyle factors (smoking, body mass index). Using a competing risk model, the cumulative incidence of death at 5 years due to lymphoma (16.9% vs 14.1%; p=0.002) and non-lymphoma (5.9% vs 3.9%; p=0.002) was higher for participants from nonmetro vs metro counties, respectively. For participants <65 years, nonmetro vs metro status had inferior OS (HR=1.40, CI 1.17-1.67; p<0.001). This association remained after adjustment for age, sex, race/ethnicity and NHL subtype (HR=1.36, CI 1.14-1.63; p<0.001), as well as after adjustment for clinical prognostic, SES, health status, or lifestyle factors. The cumulative incidence of death at 5 years due to lymphoma was higher in participants from nonmetro vs metro counties (15.1% vs 11.5%; p=0.002), while there was no difference by metro status for non-lymphoma related deaths (2.1% vs 1.7%; p=0.47). In contrast, for participants age 65+ years, there was no differences by metro status for OS (HR=1.04, CI 0.91-1.20; p=0.56). After adjustment for age, sex, race/ethnicity and NHL subtype, participants from nonmetro areas had inferior OS (HR=1.12, 0.97-1.29) although this was not statistically significant (p=0.13), and was attenuated in models adjusting for clinical, health status, or lifestyle factors. The cumulative incidence of death at 5 years due to lymphoma was no different in participants from nonmetro vs metro counties (18.9% vs 18.0%; p=0.37), while non-lymphoma related deaths were higher in nonmetro counties (9.9% vs 6.8%; p=0.017). Conclusion: LEO participants from nonmetro vs metro counties had inferior OS overall, although this was predominately observed for younger (<65 years) participants. These associations did not appear to be explained by demographic, NHL subtype, clinical, SES, health status, or lifestyle factors. Of particular note, the risk of death due to lymphoma was higher in nonmetro areas for participants <65 years but not those 65+ years, while the risk of death due to other causes was higher in nonmetro areas for participants 65+ years but not those <65 years. These findings require further study, particularly related to barriers to care, and suggest the potential need for age-specific strategies to optimize outcomes for NHL patients from nonmetro/rural areas.

Abstract Background: Population registries and the Alliance co-operative group database have highlighted racial disparities in AML survival attributed to differential prevalence and impact of oncogenic drivers on disease biology. However, the small number of Black patients with well-annotated genomic profiles limits the validity of these findings. The current study leverages ECOG-ACRIN cytogenetic and outcomes data from newly diagnosed adult AML patients treated on intensive chemotherapy-based clinical trials over three decades. Methods: Self-reported race was categorized as White, Black or Other. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize baseline characteristics using the Wilcoxon rank-sum and Fisher's exact tests. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models evaluated the association between race and survival outcomes adjusting for age, hemoglobin, platelet count, white blood cell count, blast percentage, performance status and ELN cytogenetic risk score (RS). All Cox models were stratified by protocol. Subgroup analyses of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were performed using Kaplan-Meier curves stratified by race using log-rank tests. All statistical tests were two-sided. Analyses included only patients with complete data for the variables of interest. Results: Data was collected across 10 phase II and III interventional trials for newly diagnosed adult AML that accrued patients between 1984 and 2019. The study population included 3469 White, 184 Black, and 156 Other patients with a Black representation of 1.1-11% across trials. Blacks were significantly younger at diagnosis with a median age of 47.9 years compared to 53.5 years in Whites (p<0.001). Racial groups were well matched for gender and performance status. Black race was an independent prognostic factor for inferior OS (HR 1.212, CI 1.01 – 1.453; p = 0.0383) and DFS (HR 1.313, CI 1.05-1.641; p = 0.017). Complete cytogenetic results were available for 117 Black and 2162 White patients and revealed no significant racial differences in the distribution of ELN 2017 cytogenetic RS, although core binding factor AML was non-significantly enriched in Black patients (12.8% vs 8.3%). No difference was observed between Blacks and Whites in the prevalence of complex karyotype (CK), CK with -5/del(5q), -7/del(7q), or -17/del(17p), and AML-MRC including +8 and del(20q). Notably, the ELN 2017 cytogenetic RS effectively predicted OS in Black (57.8 vs 14.2 vs 5.8 months in favorable, intermediate and adverse RS, p = 0.018), and White patients (60.1 vs 15.2 vs 7.1 months, p < 0.0004 for Whites) but only predicted DFS for White AML patients (p < 0.0001 for Whites, p=0.48 for Blacks). In patients with molecular data for FLT3-ITD (n=1218), CEBPA (n=576), TP53 (n=572), or NPM1(n=683), no racial difference in the prevalence of these mutations was observed. However, NPM1 mutations were associated with inferior OS in Blacks compared to Whites (19.1 vs 8.9 months; p = 0.0095). Black and White AML patients had similar responses with complete remission rates of 58.2% vs 57.5%, p=0.55, and treatment tolerability with 30-day mortality of 7.1% vs 8.9%, p=0.50. However, consolidation approaches differed significantly. Among patients that underwent stem cell transplant (SCT), a significantly higher percentage of White patients received allogenic SCT compared to Blacks (48.5% versus 37.1%, p <0.01). Conclusions: This study represents one of the largest race-based comparisons of cytogenetic abnormalities and clinical outcomes in prospective trials of intensive chemotherapy in AML . Our data confirms the independent prognostic relevance of race in AML survival and validates the predictive ability of the ELN 2017 cytogenetic RS for OS across racial groups. There is ancestry-based attenuation of the survival benefit of NPM1 mutations as previously reported, underscoring the need to tailor the current treatment approach to NPM1 mutated AML based on race. The availability of NGS data limited the genomic analysis to a subset of patients. Future studies should examine the depth of treatment response incorporating MRD biomarkers and explore the effect of race on co-occurring mutations and the leukemic stem cell transcriptome to better explain the observed disparities. Finally, persistent disparities in access to allo-SCT even within the context of clinical trials reinforces the need to address diversity in the stem cell donor pool and social barriers to transplant.

Abstract BACKGROUND Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT) is the second most common inherited bleeding disorder (IBD) worldwide, afflicting 1 in 5,000 people. HHT is likely the most morbid IBD of women. Severe, recurrent epistaxis, gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, and solid organ arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) cause major clinical and psychosocial morbidity and reduced survival. In recognition of the serious morbidity of HHT as an IBD, in 2022 the U.S. Congress allocated funding to create CHORUS, the Comprehensive HHT Outcomes Registry of the United States (NCT06259292). Herein, we present the initial report from CHORUS. METHODS CHORUS is a prospective, multicenter, U.S. longitudinal registry enrolling unselected patients with HHT, collecting over 2400 data elements. Data were collected by trained research coordinators at enrollment and follow-up visits via the medical record and direct participant interviews. RESULTS Patients. 600 patients with genetically- or Curacao criteria-confirmed HHT were enrolled from November 2023 to April 2025 at 15 U.S. HHT Centers of Excellence. Median (range) age was 53 (0-88) years, and the cohort was 60% female. Despite most patients developing typical HHT disease manifestations by age 13, most HHT diagnoses (63%) were made during mid-to-late adulthood. Mucosal Bleeding. 568 patients (95%) developed recurrent spontaneous epistaxis, with 339 (60%) developing recurrent epistaxis prior to age 13; 43% had at least one nasal surgery/procedure and 22% had at least one medical therapy (e.g., antifibrinolytic or antiangiogenic) for epistaxis. 180 (30%) had a known diagnosis of chronic GI bleeding. Among post-menarche females, 124 (34%) had been diagnosed with heavy menstrual bleeding. 247 (41%) reported other clinically significant mucocutaneous oral or skin bleeding. 454 (76%) had developed moderate-to-severe HHT-associated mucocutaneous bleeding, defined as an Epistaxis Severity Score >4, bleeding requiring targeted pharmaceutical or surgical intervention, IV iron, and/or red cell transfusion. This includes 334 (56%) with moderate-to-severe HHT-associated epistaxis. CNS and Pulmonary Hemorrhage. 16 patients (3%) suffered one or more intracranial hemorrhages (ICH), with 10 (63%) suffering a first ICH by age 25. 13 (2%) suffered one or more pulmonary hemorrhages. Iron Deficiency and Anemia. 408 patients (68%) had been diagnosed with anemia (351, 59%) or iron deficiency (381, 64%). Of those, 247 (61%) and 150 (37%) required IV iron and RBC transfusion, respectively. Solid Organ AVMs. Brain, pulmonary, and liver AVMs were diagnosed in 81 (15%), 268 (45%), and 128 patients (21%), respectively. Just 30 with brain AVMs (37%) had these diagnosed by age 25. 3 patients (2%) had undergone liver transplantation. Thrombosis. Venous and arterial thromboembolism occurred in 44 (7%) and 38 patients (6%), respectively, including 34 (6%) with ischemic stroke (94% of whom had pulmonary AVMs). Other Serious HHT Complications. These included heart failure in 41 patients (7%), pulmonary hypertension in 44 (7%), chronic liver disease in 17 (2.8%), epilepsy in 24 (4%), severe bacterial/deep-seated tissue infection in 35 (6%), and brain abscess in 15 (3%). 205 (34%) developed migraine. Notably, serious CNS manifestations of HHT (brain AVM, ischemic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, and/or epilepsy) occurred in 128 (21%). 241 (40%) required emergency room visits and/or hospital admissions specifically to manage HHT complications. CONCLUSIONS This first-of-its-kind HHT registry reliably describes for the first time the incidence and severity of numerous HHT complications. Most patients develop moderate-to-severe recurrent epistaxis and/or chronic GI bleeding as well as iron deficiency anemia (usually requiring IV iron and/or RBC transfusion). Heavy menstrual bleeding, thromboembolism, severe cardiopulmonary complications, and serious CNS complications are all substantially more common in HHT than previously thought. Notably, ICH occurred in 3% of patients, which approximates the ICH incidence of hemophilia in the pre-factor prophylaxis era and is ~2-fold and ~9-fold higher than in hemophilia A treated with modern factor prophylaxis (1.6%) and modern non-factor prophylactic agents (0.3%), respectively, per the ATHN registry. This 3% number may be an underestimation given the known high ICH mortality rate, pervasive delay in HHT diagnosis, and the fact that survival post-ICH is necessary to enroll in CHORUS.

Abstract Background: Dissemination and implementation science (D+I) efforts often begin after clinical trial (CT) efficacy data are available. However, delaying this work limits opportunities to identify barriers and facilitators that can enhance adoption of evidence-based practices. Integrating D+I during trial development, activation, and conduct supports more timely, effective, and scalable implementation. The Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network (BMT CTN) includes >125 centers, conducting transplant and cellular therapy (TCT) trials with practice-changing potential, with >17,000 patients enrolled since 2001. Data from Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) provides a way to measure real-world adoption. With this comprehensive structure in place, the BMT CTN launched a D+I Committee that established a D+I process to better understand uptake of CT findings and to leverage that information to promote adoption. Methods: Informed by established D+I frameworks, a structured, cyclical process to integrate implementation considerations spanning the CT lifecycle was developed. A multidisciplinary team including experts in D+I, clinicians, and investigators iteratively refined the proposed D+I algorithm. The process begins upstream when a trial concept is approved to move forward, it is shared with the D+I Committee for initial assessment. This includes a landscape review for studies in development using CIBMTR data, literature, and expert experience. The Committee then reviews the developing protocol with the BMT CTN protocol team to proactively identify implementation barriers and facilitators to implementation in real-world settings and outline plans for dissemination. The Committee also provides recommendations for integrating relevant implementation data collection and analyses within the protocol. After study completion, both clinical efficacy and implementation outcomes are analyzed, followed by active dissemination. Additional assessment using surveys, qualitative methods, and CIBMTR data occurs after dissemination to understand adoption. Insights gathered also inform further refinement of the process. Tools and templates are in development to build capacity and ensure consistency for Committee members. Results: To date, the Committee has published three peer-reviewed articles addressing implementation implications of three BMT CTN trials (PMC7735536, PMC8578257, PMC9364468) and a fourth is in press. Using the designed D+I process flow, a current effort used a survey sent to US CIBMTR centers, to evaluate factors influencing the implementation of results of the BMT CTN 1703 trial of post-transplant cyclophosphamide as graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis and assessed dissemination and adoption considerations for the upcoming BMT CTN 2203 CT of ruxolitinib as GvHD prophylaxis. CIBMTR data is being analyzed to demonstrate practice patterns before, during, and after BMT CTN 1703 study completion. This effort has allowed for further refinement of the BMT CTN D+I process flow and has highlighted critical opportunities for incorporating dissemination and implementation objectives and endpoints into BMT CTN protocols. We also used the process to guide a review of severe aplastic anemia treatment gaps and ongoing studies. This review underscored how proactive transplant and non-transplant stakeholder engagement and early implementation planning, core elements of this process, can bridge evidence to practice and advance access to care. A complementary survey on current practice patterns in severe aplastic anemia is ongoing. Conclusions: With the existing structure of the BMT CTN and associated practice registry of the CIBMTR, the BMT CTN D+I Committee developed a systematic process to build D+I considerations into trial workflows to increase real-world impact. This process aims to ensure that barriers to uptake of trial results can be identified and addressed appropriately, improving care quality for patients undergoing TCT.

Abstract While the use of NCCN guidelines is essential in lymphoma care, adherence among oncologists remains highly variable. Real-world concordance ranges from 65–80% overall, dropping to as low as 11–46% for certain lymphoma subtypes. Although 88% of clinicians report using NCCN guidelines for Hodgkin lymphoma, adherence to PET-adapted approaches is inconsistent. This gap highlights a critical need for tools that support guideline-concordant care.Large language models (LLMs) such as GPT–4 promise decision support, yet hallucinations and divergence from evidence-based care remain obstacles. We assessed whether retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) with National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines improves GPT–4 performance in lymphoma treatment recommendation tasks. To address this, we developed a RAG-enhanced GPT-4 agent (RAG-GPT) by indexing the 2025 NCCN Lymphoma Guidelines into a vector database. Fifty clinical vignettes spanning diverse lymphoma subtypes were compiled from published case reports; this sample provides 80 % power (α = 0.05) to detect a mean score difference of ≥ 0.18 on the modified Generative AI Performance Score (mG-PS). Guideline concordance was assessed based on NCCN guidelines and clinical judgment reflecting real-world oncological decision-making. Scores were normalized between -1.0 and 1.0 for consistent evaluation. Readability and rationale clarity were rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Baseline GPT-4 and RAG-GPT generated treatment plans via standardized prompts. An oncologist scored all outputs with mG-PS, which rates NCCN concordance (0.0–1.0) and penalizes hallucinations (-0.25 to –1.0). RAG-GPT achieved a higher mean mG-PS (0.32) than baseline GPT–4 (0.10) (t(98)=-2.11, p=0.038; mean score difference ΔmG-PS=0.22). Importantly, RAG-GPT eliminated severe hallucinations, reinforcing confidence in the safety of its treatment reccomendations. Fully concordant “gold-standard” plans were produced in 46 % of vignettes with RAG-GPT versus 22 % with baseline. Readability scores favored RAG-GPT modestly without statistical significance. Lymphoma's bimodal age distribution, heterogeneity, and lack of standardized treatment algorithms, coupled with regimen toxicity and the need to account for patient frailty and comorbidities, create complex clinical scenarios that constrain LLM applicability for nuanced decision-making. Non-Hodgkin lymphoma, particularly relapsed/refractory, transformed disease, or rare subtypes, lacks a defined standard of care, leading reviewers to rely on clinical judgment or published case series beyond NCCN guidelines. This underscores a key limitation of LLM-supported tools: their performance is highly dependent on the presence of clear algorithmic consensus within a given disease. Linking GPT-4 to NCCN guidelines via RAG significantly improved treatment accuracy and reduced hallucination severity in lymphoma, though performance remained lower than prior RAG studies in cancers like breast and CNS suggesting a greater impact on hallucination reduction than on retrieval of a consistent gold standard regimen. These findings support continued development and prospective validation of guideline-anchored LLMs for clinical use.