Citations

131 Background: KRAS G12C mutations occur in 3%–4% of CRC cases and are associated with poor prognosis. In the phase 1/2 KRYSTAL-1 study (NCT03785249), at a median follow-up of 11.9 months (mo), Ada (irreversible inhibitor of KRAS G12C ) in combination with Cetux (anti-EGFR antibody) demonstrated promising clinical activity (objective response rate [ORR] of 34% per blinded independent central review [BICR] and 43% per investigator [INV]) and was well tolerated in patients (pts) with previously treated KRAS G12C -mutated mCRC. Based on these findings, Ada + Cetux was granted accelerated approval in the United States for these pts. Here, we present longer-term follow-up analyses from this study. Methods: Adults with previously treated KRAS G12C -mutated mCRC and ECOG performance status of 0 or 1 were treated with Ada (600 mg BID) in combination with Cetux (400 mg/m 2 followed by 250 mg/m 2 QW or 500 mg/m 2 Q2W) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or death, in separate phase 1 and phase 2 cohorts. Primary endpoints were safety (phase 1) and ORR per BICR (phase 2). Secondary endpoints were duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety (phase 2). Results: A total of 94 pts received Ada + Cetux. The median number of prior lines of systemic therapy was 3 (range, 1–9); 23 pts (24%) had received ≥ 4 prior lines of systemic therapy. The most frequent sites of metastases at baseline were the lung (71%) and liver (64%). At a median follow-up of 20.4 mo, ORR per INV was 43% (95% CI 32–53) and all were partial responses; median DOR was 5.9 (95% CI 5.5–7.6) mo. Disease control rate per INV was 86% (95% CI 78–92). Median PFS per INV was 6.9 (95% CI 5.9–7.4) mo; 6- and 12-mo PFS rates were 61% and 19%, respectively. Median OS was 16.0 (95% CI 13.3–18.8) mo; 6- and 12-mo OS rates were 88% and 66%, respectively. Any-grade treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were reported in 100% of pts, 28% of which were grade 3/4. TRAEs led to discontinuation in 10% of pts. Efficacy analyses by BICR, subgroup analyses, and additional safety results will be presented. Conclusions: In heavily pretreated pts with KRAS G12C -mutated mCRC, Ada + Cetux continued to demonstrate clinically meaningful activity and tolerable safety with longer follow-up. These updated results are consistent with those from the primary analysis and constitute the longest duration of follow-up for dual KRAS G12C /EGFR blockade in this setting. Efficacy of second-line Ada + Cetux vs chemotherapy in KRAS G12C -mutated mCRC is being investigated in the phase 3 KRYSTAL-10 study (NCT04793958). Clinical trial information: NCT03785249 .

AbstractBackgroundInflammatory bowel disease (IBD) affects more than 10 million people worldwide. Men and women are equally affected by Crohn's disease (CD). It has been shown that patients with CD are at an increased risk of a colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosis and CRC‐related mortality. During the last two decades, biological therapies have revolutionized the treatment of CD. There are no current studies investigating the prevalence of CRC in patients with CD in the era of biological therapy and the possible features of patients with CD who are at high risk of developing CRC.AimWe aim to assess the prevalence of CRC, risk factors and profile of CRC in patients with CD receiving biological treatment compared with those who are not under biological therapy and the impact of CD‐associated colorectal strictures on CRC development. The study hypothesis is that the use of biological therapy in the control of CD activity may decrease the risk of developing CRC.Study design and settingAn international, retrospective, snapshot of the prevalence of CRC in patients with CD, reported according to the SPIRIT guidelines. The study will involve centres that hold regular IBD multidisciplinary team meetings and have both IBD colorectal surgeons and gastroenterologists. Each participating centre will provide a local consultant lead and a local trainee lead. Data will be collected within a 2‐year recruitment period (January 2017–January 2019).Study populationAdult patients who presented with CD during the study period. Patients with an incidental diagnosis of CD during evaluation for CRC will be excluded.Statistical planBaseline patient characteristics will be summarized using the appropriate descriptive statistics. Univariable, multivariable and Cox regression models will be used to identify factors significantly associated with CRC. For noncontinuous variables a comparison between the subgroups will be carried out using the chi‐square test corrected by Fisher's exact test if appropriate. A p‐value of <0.05 will be considered statistically significant.Data storageData will be stored on a secured server, pin‐code protected according to the local data management agreement.

Introduction Taxane medications, paclitaxel, and docetaxel, are chemotherapy agents that have a higher incidence of reported hypersensitivity and infusion reactions. To help classify these reactions, the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) is utilized. Prophylactic medications have been used to decrease the incidence and severity of these events. At our institution, medications that patients can receive prior to the initiation of a taxane infusion are a histamine 1 receptor antagonist (H1RA), histamine 2 receptor antagonist (H2RA), a steroid or a combination of these medications. The purpose of this retrospective review was to compare the rates and severity of infusion reactions based on the timing of prophylactic medication administration in the first and second doses of taxane infusions. Methods Patients who received paclitaxel or docetaxel from January 30 th , 2022, through January 30 th , 2023, were included in the analysis. To assist in the identification of a reaction, taxane administrations were flagged for review if a rescue medication was administered after the start of a paclitaxel or docetaxel infusion. The rates and severity of infusion reactions were analyzed based on the timing of prophylactic medication administration. A sub-group analysis comparing infusion reaction characteristics between taxanes given, was performed. Results Of the 1486 taxane infusions that were completed within the year, 249 infusion reactions were confirmed and graded utilizing the NCI CTCAE. When examining the first and second doses of a taxane (N = 536), we identified 222 infusions reactions. The odds of a patient having an infusion reaction, during the first and second doses, was found to be less likely for patients given a prophylactic medication 30 min prior to receiving a taxane compared to those who did not receive a pre-medication (p = 0.037). Conclusion This multisite retrospective study showed that administration of prophylactic medications 30 to 80 min prior to the first and second infusion of a taxane was the optimal timing to decrease the likelihood of patients having an infusion reaction. No difference in the severity of the reaction was seen. Most patients were able to complete the entire infusion, regardless of what rescue medications were used following the infusion reaction.

Background To provide recommendations on risk mitigation, diagnosis and treatment of infectious complications associated with the practice of regional anesthesia, acute and chronic pain management. Methods Following board approval, in 2020 the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA Pain Medicine) commissioned evidence-based guidelines for best practices for infection control. More than 80 research questions were developed and literature searches undertaken by assigned working groups comprising four to five members. Modified US Preventive Services Task Force criteria were used to determine levels of evidence and certainty. Using a modified Delphi method, >50% agreement was needed to accept a recommendation for author review, and >75% agreement for a recommendation to be accepted. The ASRA Pain Medicine Board of Directors reviewed and approved the final guidelines. Results After documenting the incidence and infectious complications associated with regional anesthesia and interventional pain procedures including implanted devices, we made recommendations regarding the role of the anesthesiologist and pain physician in infection control, preoperative patient risk factors and management, sterile technique, equipment use and maintenance, healthcare setting (office, hospital, operating room), surgical technique, postoperative risk reduction, and infection symptoms, diagnosis, and treatment. Consensus recommendations were based on risks associated with different settings and procedures, and keeping in mind each patient’s unique characteristics. Conclusions The recommendations are intended to be multidisciplinary guidelines for clinical care and clinical decision-making in the regional anesthesia and chronic interventional pain practice. The issues addressed are constantly evolving, therefore, consistent updating will be required.

Abstract Background Specialty societies, including the Infectious Diseases Society of America, strive to address gender and racial inequities in professional advancement. Microaggressions remain a persistent and pervasive barrier to these goals. Nonprofessional speaker introductions are a manifestation of race- and gender-based microaggressions, which have not been previously assessed at IDWeek. We assessed disparities in speaker introductions at IDWeek over a 7-year period that included formal gender equity initiatives introduced in 2016. Methods We conducted a retrospective observational study of video-recorded IDWeek speaker introductions from 2013 to 2019. Trained coders reviewed presentation video archives to assess a primary outcome of nonprofessional introductions: when a speaker's professional title was not used as the first introduction. We used descriptive statistics, Fisher exact tests, Cochrane-Armitage trend tests, and multivariable logistic regression to characterize relationships between speaker introductions and presentation year, speaker demographics, and speaker-moderator demographic concordance. Results Of 1940 videos reviewed, 48.9% of IDWeek speakers received nonprofessional introductions during and before 2016 vs 41.5% of speakers after 2016 (P = .0013). There was an increasing linear trend in the frequency of professional introductions by speaker age group from 47.1% for age &lt;40 years to 65.3% for age &gt;60 years (P &lt; .0001). White moderators more frequently used nonprofessional introductions than moderators from backgrounds underrepresented in medicine (47.7% vs 29.1%, P = .0014). Women-men speaker-moderator pairs had more nonprofessional introductions (54.6%, P &lt; .001). Conclusions In the largest assessment of microaggressions in speaker introductions at a national medical specialty conference, we highlighted some progress over time and ample opportunity to further standardize equitable speaker introductions, especially for women and junior speakers

AbstractSurveillance of individuals at high‐risk of pancreatic cancer using CAPS criteria and other expert consensus guidelines may result in earlier pancreatic cancer detection in some cases; therefore, clinicians are responsible for appropriately identifying and referring these individuals to appropriate high‐risk pancreas cancer screening programs. This study aimed at assessing the perspective, knowledge, and clinical practices of cancer genetic counselors surveyed nationwide towards identification of individuals at high‐risk of pancreatic cancer and utilization of high‐risk pancreatic cancer screening programs. One hundred and eighty‐nine genetic counselors who listed “Cancer” as their specialty on the NSGC website responded to the survey, which consisted of multiple practice‐based, knowledge‐based, and clinical vignette‐based questions. Almost 70% of the genetic counselors surveyed accurately identified when an individual would be considered for high‐risk pancreatic cancer screening, when using 2019 CAPS consensus guidelines as a benchmark. Access to high‐risk pancreatic cancer screening programs and increased provider comfort in counseling individuals at high‐risk of pancreatic cancer were found to be statistically associated in accurate identification of high‐risk individuals in three of the clinical vignettes. Additionally, 60% of genetic counselors reported the majority of high‐risk individuals accept a referral for pancreatic cancer screening, which shows a high uptake of patients accepting referrals from genetic counselors. Genetic counselors have high accuracy in determining who is eligible for high‐risk pancreas screening; thus, they are the ideal providers for initiating referrals to high‐risk pancreatic cancer screening programs. Genetic counseling programs and high‐risk pancreatic cancer screening programs should establish a close working relationship to optimize the identification and subsequent referrals of high‐risk individuals eligible for pancreas cancer screening.

ImportanceBlood culture (BC) use benchmarks in US hospitals have not been defined.ObjectiveTo characterize BC use in adult intensive care units (ICUs) and wards in US hospitals.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsA retrospective cross-sectional study of BC use in adult medical ICUs, medical-surgical ICUs, medical wards, and medical-surgical wards from acute care hospitals from the 4 US geographic regions was conducted. Critical access hospitals, less than 6 months of BC data, and non-US hospitals were excluded. The study included BC use data from September 1, 2019, to August 31, 2021. Data were analyzed from February 23 to July 14, 2024.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was BC use per 1000 patient-days. Adjusted means with 95% CIs were calculated using mixed-effects negative binomial regression models adjusted for unit type, hospital bed size, geographic region, seasonality, and state COVID-19 case load, with random intercepts accounting for clustering at unit and hospital levels. Secondary outcomes included blood culture positivity, single BCs, BC contamination, and minimum threshold for BC use where blood culture positivity would be optimized.ResultsA total of 362 327 blood cultures were analyzed from 27 medical ICUs, 35 medical-surgical ICUs, 121 medical wards, and 109 medical-surgical wards from 48 hospitals in 19 states and the District of Columbia. The adjusted mean BC use per 1000 patient-days was 273.1 (95% CI, 270.2-275.9) for medical ICUs, 146.0 (95% CI, 144.5-147.5) for medical-surgical ICUs, 80.3 (95% CI, 79.8-80.7) for medical wards, and 65.1 for medical-surgical wards. Blood culture use was significantly higher across all 4 unit types in hospitals with more than 500 beds compared with 500 or less beds and in the West-Midwest compared with other regions. Single blood culture and positive blood culture rates were below 10% across all 4 unit types. Of the 292 units, 97% had a mean BC contamination rate within 3% of the recommended threshold, and 51% were within 1%. The minimum BC use thresholds (ie, BC use below this number may represent undertesting) were 120 BCs per 1000 patient-days for medical ICUs, 80 BCs per 1000 patient-days for medical-surgical ICUs, and 30 BCs per 1000 patient-days for medical-surgical wards.Conclusions and RelevanceThe findings of this study suggest that blood culture positivity may help determine appropriate BC use for individual unit types.

AbstractBackgroundSubjective cognitive concerns are common in functionally intact adults, potentially indicating future cognitive decline. Remote smartphone cognitive testing holds promise for objectively tracking cognition in individuals reporting complaints. In our initial exploration of the link between subjective cognitive complaints and digital clinical outcomes, we examined participants' self‐reported cognitive complaints' association with smartphone tests on memory and executive functioning.MethodsParticipants, without self‐reported MCI or dementia, were recruited from the UCSF Brain Healthy Registry (BHR) to complete cognitive tasks on their personal smartphone with the ALLFTD Mobile App. Participants also completed the 12‐item Everyday Cognition Screening Tool (ECog‐12), assessing subjective cognitive impairment, online as part of BHR. Average ECog‐12 scores, including Memory and Executive Functioning subdomains, were calculated. Correlations between scores from online ECog‐12 scores and app‐based smartphone tasks were examined. Regression analyses, adjusting for age, education, and sex, were performed to evaluate the relationship between ECog‐12 and smartphone tasks (Stroop & Flanker) measuring executive function and memory.ResultsOut of 2,283 invited BHR participants, 456 (mean age: 64.6 years (SD=11.8) and education: 16.3 years (SD=2.4)) completed smartphone tasks (81.1% completion rate). Age was negatively associated with executive functioning and memory tasks (β’s=‐0.51 to ‐0.54, p’s<0.05), while higher education correlated with better performance (β’s=0.10‐0.14, p’s<0.05). Sex was not significantly associated with performance on any task (β’s=‐0.04 to 0.09, p’s>0.05). Subjective cognitive concerns were linked to tasks of executive functioning (Stroop: β=‐0.18, p=0.002) and memory (β=‐0.14, p=0.02). Endorsement of executive functioning items on ECog‐12 associated with Stroop performance (β=‐0.16, p=0.005), and memory‐specific complaints were related to memory performance (β=‐0.1, p=0.09). The relationship with flanker scores was not significant (β=‐0.08, p=0.17). Similar patterns emerged with the online ECog‐12; online and app‐based scores are strongly correlated (β=0.75, p<0.05).ConclusionsIn this cognitively intact sample, subjective cognitive concerns were linked to poorer performance on ALLFTD Mobile App tasks assessing executive functioning and memory. These findings suggest that unsupervised remote smartphone testing merits further consideration to monitor cognition in individuals with subjective cognitive concerns. Subsequent studies in deeply phenotyped cohorts with follow‐up assessments are essential for understanding the clinical relevance of these results.

AbstractBackgroundTwo main risk factors of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) are aging and APOE‐ε4. However, some individuals remain cognitively normal despite having these risk factors. They are considered “cognitively resilient”. This study aimed to identify molecular factors that confer cognitive resilience in APOE‐ε4 carriers ≥ 80 years of age and may serve as biomarkers.MethodWe applied weighted gene co‐expression network analysis (WGCNA) to generate consensus co‐expression networks from blood of participants in two antemortem cohorts, the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (MCSA, n=105), and the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI, n=91), using RNA‐sequencing and microarray data, respectively. We associated these networks with resilience (resilient vs non‐resilient), cognitive endophenotypes and hippocampal volume. Preservation between consensus networks from blood and those derived from postmortem brain tissues of AD and control donors from AMP‐AD (n=1174) was evaluated. We validated the human findings in four AD mouse models. Finally, machine learning models were utilized to discriminate cases (AD+mild cognitive impairment (MCI)) from controls in MCSA, ADNI and ANMerge antemortem cohorts.ResultFour consensus networks were significantly correlated with a memory phenotype (logical memory delayed recall=LMDR) and hippocampal volume in both MCSA and ADNI. Among these, blood expression module M3 was most preserved with the brain transcriptome. M3 was enriched with NDUF hub genes that are involved in the mitochondrial respiratory chain. Expression levels of M3 and many blood NDUFs had significant associations with better LMDR and hippocampal volume. In brain, NDUFs were upregulated in controls compared to AD, and their expression levels were associated with better global cognition and decreased AD neuropathology. Many NDUFs were significantly downregulated in the hippocampus or cortex of AD mice compared to wild‐types. Lastly, models that included blood NDUFs improved diagnostic accuracy of AD+MCI compared to models that only included demographic and risk variables (age, sex, APOE‐ε4) in MCSA, ADNI and ANMerge. In MCSA and ADNI, adding NDUFs’ expression to models that included established blood biomarkers (Aβ42/40, ptau181, NFL) further improved diagnostic accuracy.ConclusionOur results suggest that mitochondrial NDUFs are centrally‐linked peripheral molecular signatures that may be resilience factors against AD and serve as both therapeutic targets and novel diagnostic biomarkers.

AbstractBackgroundThe earliest cognitive manifestations of asymptomatic and prodromal familial frontotemporal dementia (f‐FTD) mutation carriers are still being characterized. Patients with symptomatic FTD are known to be error prone, particularly on tasks of executive function, but little is known about the frequency or predictive utility of these errors in the earliest stages of f‐FTD. The current study compared error rates on executive functioning tasks in controls and asymptomatic and prodromal mutation carriers and investigated whether errors predict worsening clinical status as follow up.MethodThis study included 90 participants (mean age = 48.57, SD = 13.30; 51.1% female; 86.67% white) with pathogenic FTD mutations (C9orf72, n = 45; GRN, n = 30; or MAPT, n = 15) who were asymptomatic or prodromal (Clinical Dementia Rating plus FTLD; CDR®+NACC‐FTLD ≤ 0.5). Propensity score matching identified (CDR®+NACC‐FTLD = 0) who did not carry pathogenic mutation but were matched on age, education, and sex. Regressions were used to compare controls and mutation carriers on error scores (rule violations and/or repetitions) from three executive functioning tasks: design fluency, lexical fluency, and Stroop inhibition. Mutation carriers with longitudinal data within 1.5 years were binarized as stable (n = 35) or progressors (n = 13) based on whether their CDR®+NACC‐FTLD sum of boxes score was worse at follow up (mean follow up = 1.07 years). Regressions were fit to evaluate the relationship between baseline error scores and group (i.e., stable vs. progressor).ResultMutation carriers committed significantly more errors than controls on the Stroop task (β = 0.67, p = 0.03) and lexical fluency (repetitions: β = 0.27, p = 0.02). The groups did not significantly differ in errors on the remaining tasks. A greater number of Stroop errors predicted mutation carriers who progressed at follow up (β = 1.04, p<0.001). When introducing the primary outcome from each task as a covariate (e.g., correct responses), the fluency task (repetitions: β = 0.10, p = 0.03) and Stroop task (errors: β = 0.82, p<0.001) were significantly associated with progression.ConclusionErrors on executive tasks may be early cognitive features in familial FTD. Importantly, errors were uniquely predictive above and beyond total scores. Research in larger samples will enable investigations of genetic differences in error rates.