Citations

Clear

437 citation(s) found for "Clarke, J".

Bone disease in hypoparathyroidism
Clarke, B.L. , Clarke, Bart L

Mayo Clinic

Arquivos Brasileiros de Endocrinologia & Metabologia | August 20, 2014 | Volume: 58 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 545-552

10.1590/0004-2730000003399 | PMID 25166046 Get It

Hypoparathyroidism is a rare disorder that may be acquired or inherited. Postsurgical hypoparathyroidism is responsible for the majority of acquired hypoparathyroidism. Bone disease occurs in hypoparathyroidism due to markedly reduced bone remodeling due to the absence or low levels of parathyroid hormone. Chronically reduced bone turnover in patients with hypoparathyroidism typically leads to higher bone mass than in age- and sex-matched controls. Whether this increased bone density reduces fracture risk is less certain, because while increased bone mineralization may be associated with increased brittleness of bone, this does not appear to be the case in hypoparathyroidism. Treatment of hypoparathyroidism with recombinant parathyroid hormone may reduce bone mineral density but simultaneously strengthen the mechanical properties of bone.
Prevalence of Self-Reported Metal Allergy in Patients Undergoing Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty
Bloemke, Adam D., Clarke, Henry D.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Knee Surgery | June 20, 2014 | Volume: 28 | Issue: 03 | Pages: 243-246

10.1055/s-0034-1381959 | PMID 24949984 Get It

En bloc hemisacrectomy and internal hemipelvectomy via the posterior approach
Zadnik, Patricia L., Groves, Mari L. , Dasenbrock, Hormuzdiyar H. , Sciubba, Daniel M. , Hsu, Wesley , Witham, Timothy F. , Bydon, Ali , Gokaslan, Ziya L., Wolinsky, Jean‐Paul , Clarke, Michelle J.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine | June 13, 2014 | Volume: 21 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 458-467

10.3171/2014.4.spine13482 | PMID 24926933 Get It

Object Traditionally, hemisacrectomy and internal hemipelvectomy procedures have required both an anterior and a posterior approach. A posterior-only approach has the potential to complete an en bloc tumor resection and spinopelvic reconstruction while reducing surgical morbidity. Methods The authors describe 3 cases in which en bloc resection of the hemisacrum and ilium and subsequent lumbopelvic and pelvic ring reconstruction were performed from a posterior-only approach. Two more traditional anterior and posterior staged procedures are also included for comparison. Results In all 3 cases, an oncologically appropriate surgery and spinopelvic reconstruction were performed through a posterior-only approach. Conclusions The advantage of a midline posterior approach is the ability to perform a lumbosacral reconstruction, necessary in cases in which the S-1 body is iatrogenically disrupted during tumor resection.
Nonspecific motility disorders, irritable esophagus, and chest pain
Krarup, Anne Lund , Drewes, Asbjørn Mohr , Hejazi, Reza , McCallum, Richard W. , Achem, Sami R., Liao, Donghua , Gregersen, Hans N. , Vega, Kenneth J. , Frazzoni, Marzio , Frazzoni, Leonardo , Clarke, John O.

Mayo Clinic

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences | June 6, 2014 | Volume: 1300 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 96-109

10.1111/nyas.12244 | PMID 24117637 Get It

This paper presents commentaries on whether Starling's law applies to the esophagus; whether erythromycin affects esophageal motility; the relationship between hypertensive lower esophageal sphincter and vigorous achalasia; whether ethnic‐ and gender‐based norms affect diagnosis and treatment of esophageal motor disorders; health care and epidemiology of chest pain; whether normal pH excludes esophageal pain; the role of high‐resolution manometry in noncardiac chest pain; whether pH–impedance should be included in the evaluation of noncardiac chest pain; whether there are there alternative therapeutic options to PPI for treating noncardiac chest pain; and the usefulness of psychological treatment and alternative medicine in noncardiac chest pain.
Osteoporosis Prevention, Screening, and Treatment: A Review
Kling, Juliana M. , Sandhu, Nicole P. , Clarke, B.L. , Kling, Juliana M

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Women's Health | April 25, 2014 | Volume: 23 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 563-572

10.1089/jwh.2013.4611 | PMID 24766381 Get It

Osteoporosis, defined as low bone mass leading to increased fracture risk, is a major health problem that affects approximately 10 million Americans. The aging U.S. population is predicted to contribute to as much as a 50% increase in prevalence by 2025. Although common, osteoporosis can be clinically silent, and without prevention and screening, the costs of osteoporotic fracture–related morbidity and mortality will burden the U.S. healthcare system. This is a particularly relevant concern in the context of diminishing health care resources. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry is the most widely used, validated technique for measuring bone mineral density (BMD) and diagnosing osteoporosis. Cost-effectiveness analyses support early detection and treatment of high-risk patients with antiresorptive medications such as bisphosphonates. Moreover, optimization of bone health throughout life can help prevent osteoporosis. Current guidelines recommend screening women by age 65 years, but because no guidelines for screening intervals exist, decisions are made on the basis of clinical judgment alone. Although the recent literature provides some guidance, this review further explores current recommendations in light of newer evidence to provide more clarity on prevention, screening, and management strategies for patients with osteoporosis in the primary care setting.
Socioeconomic disparities in mortality after diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in the modern treatment era
Foran, James M. , Gomez, Scarlett Lin , Keegan, Theresa H.M. , Li, Tao , Clarke, Christina A.

Mayo Clinic

Blood | April 5, 2014 | Volume: 123 | Issue: 23 | Pages: 3553-3562

10.1182/blood-2013-07-517110 | PMID 24705494 Get It

Key Points Patients living in low SES neighborhoods had worse survival after DLBCL. Disparity was most striking in younger (non-Medicare) patients and after the introduction of rituximab.
How common are myeloproliferative neoplasms? A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Titmarsh, Glen J., Duncombe, Andrew , O’Rorke, Michael , Vocht, Frank de , Horan, Sarah, Fritschi, Lin , Clarke, Mike, Anderson, Lesley , McMullin, Mary Frances , Mesa, Ruben A. , Clarke, Mike, Anderson, Lesley A , Fritschi, Lin

Mayo Clinic

American Journal of Hematology | February 12, 2014 | Volume: 89 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 581-587

10.1002/ajh.23690 | PMID 24971434 Get It

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are a heterogeneous group of diseases including polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), and primary(idiopathic) myelofibrosis (PMF). In this systematic review, we provide a comprehensive report on the incidence and prevalence of MPNs across the globe. Electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Web of Science) were searched from their inception to August 2012 for articles reporting MPN incidence or prevalence rates. A random effects meta‐analysis was undertaken to produce combined incidence rates for PV, ET, and PMF. Both heterogeneity and small study bias were assessed. Thirty‐four studies were included. Reported annual incidence rates ranged from 0.01 to 2.61, 0.21 to 2.27, and 0.22 to 0.99 per 100,000 for PV, ET, and PMF, respectively. The combined annual incidence rates for PV, ET, and PMF were 0.84, 1.03, and 0.47 per 100,000. There was high heterogeneity across disease entities (I2 97.1–99.8%) and evidence of publication bias for ET and PMF (Egger test, P = 0.007 and P ≤ 0.001, respectively).The pooled incidence reflects the rarity of MPNs. The calculated pooled incidence rates do not reflect MPN incidence across the globe due to the high unexplained heterogeneity. Improved, widespread registration of MPNs would provide better information for global comparison of the incidence and prevalence of MPNs. Am. J. Hematol. 89:581–587, 2014. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Defining esophageal landmarks, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and Barrett's esophagus
DeVault, Kenneth R. , McMahon, Barry P. , Marchese, Michele , Hejazi, Reza , McCallum, Richard W. , Savarino, Vincenzo , Zentilin, Patrizia , Savarino, Edoardo , Thomson, Mike , Souza, Rhonda F. , Donohoe, Claire L. , O’Farrell, Naoimh J. , Reynolds, John V. , DeVault, Kenneth, Çelebi, Altay , Costamagna, Guido , Clarke, John O. , Savarino, Edoardo

Mayo Clinic

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences | January 6, 2014 | Volume: 1300 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 278-295

10.1111/nyas.12253 | PMID 24117649 Get It

The following paper on gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and Barrett's esophagus (BE) includes commentaries on defining esophageal landmarks; new techniques for evaluating upper esophageal sphincter (UES) tone; differential diagnosis of GERD, BE, and hiatal hernia (HH); the use of high‐resolution manometry for evaluation of reflux; the role of fundic relaxation in reflux; the use of 24‐h esophageal pH–impedance testing in differentiating acid from nonacid reflux and its potential inclusion in future Rome criteria; classification of endoscopic findings in GERD; the search for the cell origin that generates BE; and the relationship between BE, Barrett's carcinoma, and obesity.
A large-scale assessment of two-way SNP interactions in breast cancer susceptibility using 46 450 cases and 42 461 controls from the breast cancer association consortium
Herránz, Jesús , Michailidou, Kyriaki , Zamora, M. Pilar , Pérez, José Ignacio Arias , González‐Neira, Anna , Pita, Guillermo , Alonso, M. Rosario, Wang, Qin , Bolla, Manjeet K. , Czene, Kamila , Eriksson, Mikael , Humphreys, Keith , Darabi, Hatef, Li, Jingmei , Hopper, John L. , Apicella, Carmel, Southey, Melissa C. , Chenevix‐Trench, Georgia , Investigators, kConFab, Group, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study, Swerdlow, Anthony J. , Ashworth, Alan , Orr, Nicholas, Schoemaker, Minouk J. , Jakubowska, Anna , Lubiński, Jan , Jaworska–Bieniek, Katarzyna, Durda, Katarzyna, Andrulis, Irene L. , Knight, Julia A. , Glendon, Gord, Mulligan, Anna Marie , Bojesen, Stig E. , Nordestgaard, Børge G. , Flyger, Henrik, Nevanlinna, Heli , Muranen, Taru , Aittomäki, Kristiina, Blomqvist, Carl , Chang‐Claude, Jenny , Flesch‐Janys, Dieter, Vachon, Celine M. , Purrington, Kristen S. , Winqvist, Robert , Pylkäs, Katri , Jukkola‐Vuorinen, Arja , Grip, Mervi, Dunning, Alison M. , Shah, Mitul , Guénel, Pascal , Truong, Thérèse , Sanchez, Marie, Mulot, Claire , Brenner, Hermann , Dieffenbach, Aida Karina, Stegmaier, Christa, Lindblom, Annika , Margolin, Sara , Hooning, Maartje J. , Hollestelle, Antoinette , Collée, J. Margriet, Jager, Agnes , Cox, Angela , Brock, Ian W., Reed, Malcolm , Devilee, Peter , Tollenaar, Robert A.E.M., Seynaeve, Caroline, Haiman, Christopher A., Henderson, Brian E., Schumacher, Fredrick R. , Simard, Jacques , Dumont, Martine , Soucy, Penny, Dörk, Thilo , Bogdanova, Natalia , Hamann, Ute , Rüdiger, Thomas , Ulmer, Hans-Ulrich, Fasching, Peter A. , Häberle, Lothar , Ekici, Arif B. , Beckmann, Matthias W. , Fletcher, Olivia , Johnson, Nichola , dos‐Santos‐Silva, Isabel , Peto, Julian, Radice, Paolo , Peterlongo, Paolo , Peissel, Bernard , Mariani, P., Severi, Gianluca , Baglietto, Laura , Sawyer, Elinor J. , Tomlinson, Ian , Kerin, Michael J. , Miller, Nicola, Marmé, F., Burwinkel, Barbara , Mannermaa, Arto, Kataja, Vesa , Kosma, Veli‐Matti , Hartikainen, Jaana M. , Lambrechts, Diether , Yesilyurt, Betül T., Floris, Giuseppe , Leunen, Karin, Alnæs, Grethe Grenaker, Kristensen, Vessela N. , Børresen‐Dale, Anne‐Lise , García‐Closas, Montserrat , Lissowska, Jolanta , Figueroa, Jonine D. , Schmidt, Marjanka K. , Verhoef, Senno, Rutgers, Emiel J. , Brauch, Hiltrud , Brüning, Thomas , Ko, Yon‐Dschun, Network, The GENICA, TNBCC, The, Yannoukakos, Drakoulis , Malats, Núria , Easton, Douglas F. , Manoukian, Siranoush , Durocher, Francine , Zaffaroni, Daniela , Orr, Nick , Thorne, Heather , Bowtell, David D.L. , Rabstein, Sylvia , Lotz, Anne , Lambrechts, Diether , Milne, Roger L. , Dennis, Joe , Tyrer, Jonathan P. , Eriksson, Mikael , Anton‐Culver, Hoda , Neuhausen, Susan L. , Ziogas, Argyrios , Clarke, Christina A. , Dite, Gillian S. , Investigators, kConFab, Group, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study, Orr, Nicholas, Rudolph, Anja , Seibold, Petra , Wang, Xianshu , Olson, Janet E. , Vachon, Celine M. , Sanchez, Marie, Arndt, Volker , Hooning, Maartje J. , Marchand, Loı̈c Le , Försti, Asta , Giles, Graham G. , Mannermaa, Arto, Chanock, Stephen Jacob , Broeks, Annegien , Network, The GENICA, Couch, Fergus J. , Toland, Amanda Ewart , TNBCC, The, Pharoah, Paul D.P. , Hall, Per N , Benı́tez, Javier , Nevanlinna, H , Dörk, Thilo , Lambrechts, Diether , Peterlongo, Paolo , Swerdlow, Anthony J , Radice, Paolo , Lissowska, Jolanta , Southey, Melissa C , Malats, Nuria , Dunning, Alison M , Jakubowska, Anna , Lambrechts, Diether , Brenner, Hermann , Cox, Angela , Guénel, Pascal , Li, Jingmei , Muranen, Taru A , García-Closas, Montserrat , Schmidt, Marjanka K , Severi, Gianluca , Ekici, Arif B , Michailidou, Kyriaki , Hartikainen, Jaana M , Bogdanova, Natalia V , Simard, Jacques , Chenevix-Trench, Georgia , Figueroa, Jonine D , Czene, Kamila , Bowtell, David D , Pylkäs, Katri , Yannoukakos, Drakoulis , Devilee, Peter , Manoukian, Siranoush , Lubinski, Jan , Baglietto, Laura , Fletcher, Olivia , Bojesen, Stig E , Purrington, Kristen S , Schoemaker, Minouk J , Truong, Therese , Brauch, Hiltrud , Lindblom, Annika , Sawyer, Elinor J , Orr, Nick

Mayo Clinic

Human Molecular Genetics | November 16, 2013 | Volume: 23 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 1934-1946

10.1093/hmg/ddt581 | PMID 24242184 Get It

Abstract Part of the substantial unexplained familial aggregation of breast cancer may be due to interactions between common variants, but few studies have had adequate statistical power to detect interactions of realistic magnitude. We aimed to assess all two-way interactions in breast cancer susceptibility between 70 917 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) selected primarily based on prior evidence of a marginal effect. Thirty-eight international studies contributed data for 46 450 breast cancer cases and 42 461 controls of European origin as part of a multi-consortium project (COGS). First, SNPs were preselected based on evidence (P < 0.01) of a per-allele main effect, and all two-way combinations of those were evaluated by a per-allele (1 d.f.) test for interaction using logistic regression. Second, all 2.5 billion possible two-SNP combinations were evaluated using Boolean operation-based screening and testing, and SNP pairs with the strongest evidence of interaction (P < 10−4) were selected for more careful assessment by logistic regression. Under the first approach, 3277 SNPs were preselected, but an evaluation of all possible two-SNP combinations (1 d.f.) identified no interactions at P < 10−8. Results from the second analytic approach were consistent with those from the first (P > 10−10). In summary, we observed little evidence of two-way SNP interactions in breast cancer susceptibility, despite the large number of SNPs with potential marginal effects considered and the very large sample size. This finding may have important implications for risk prediction, simplifying the modelling required. Further comprehensive, large-scale genome-wide interaction studies may identify novel interacting loci if the inherent logistic and computational challenges can be overcome.
Position statement on ethics, equipoise and research on charged particle radiation therapy
Sheehan, Mark , Peach, Ken , Binik, Ariella , Wilson, Puthenparampil , Lodge, Mark , Kehoe, Sean , Brada, Michael, Clarke, Steve , Crellin, A., Dunn, Michael , Fossati, Piero , Harris, Steve , Hocken, Michael, Hope, Tony, Ives, Jonathan , Kamada, Tadashi , London, Alex John , Miller, Robert C. , Pijls-Johannesma, Madelon, Short, Susan , Skene, Loane, Tsujii, Hirohiko, Tuan, Jeffrey , Weijer, Charles , Timlin, Claire L. , Burnet, N.G. , Parker, Michael James , Savulescu, Julian , Short, Susan C

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Medical Ethics | September 18, 2013 | Volume: 40 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 572-575

10.1136/medethics-2012-101290 | PMID 24045770 Get It

The use of charged-particle radiation therapy (CPRT) is an increasingly important development in the treatment of cancer. One of the most pressing controversies about the use of this technology is whether randomised controlled trials are required before this form of treatment can be considered to be the treatment of choice for a wide range of indications. Equipoise is the key ethical concept in determining which research studies are justified. However, there is a good deal of disagreement about how this concept is best understood and applied in the specific case of CPRT. This report is a position statement on these controversies that arises out of a workshop held at Wolfson College, Oxford in August 2011. The workshop brought together international leaders in the relevant fields (radiation oncology, medical physics, radiobiology, research ethics and methodology), including proponents on both sides of the debate, in order to make significant progress on the ethical issues associated with CPRT research. This position statement provides an ethical platform for future research and should enable further work to be done in developing international coordinated programmes of research.