Citations

e18556 Background: RARS is a subtype of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) defined by < 5% blasts and ≥15% ring sideroblasts (WHO 2008). Hereditary hemochromatosis is a disorder characterized by dysregulations in iron absorption, largely associated with C282Y and H63D mutations of the HFE gene. Iron levels are elevated in both disorders and pathophysiologic correlations were suggested. HFE gene mutations were previously found higher in MDS compared to controls (50% vs 36%) ( Nearman et al, Am J Hematol 2007). Methods: A total of 168 RARS patients’ data from 1994 to 2015 at Mayo Clinic were reviewed after appropriate IRB approval was obtained. All cases had their bone marrow slides reviewed at our center. We searched patients’ records retrospectively to Identify those tested for HFE gene (C282Y, H62D, S65C) mutations, done inside or outside our institution. Survival estimates were calculated using Kaplan-Meier curves. Results: Out of the 168 RARS patients, only 17 (10%) were tested for HFE gene mutations. Out of the 17 tested, 11 (65%) were found to have mutations; 2 of which (18%) had homozygous H63D mutation, 1 patient (9%) had double heterozygous H63D and C282Y mutations, 5 (45%) had only one H36D heterozygous mutation vs 3 patients (27%) with only one C282Y heterozygous mutation. Only one patient was tested for the additional S65C mutation and it was not detected. H63D mutation was present in a total of 8 patients (73%) vs C282Y mutation which was present in 4 patients (36%). Bone marrow iron stores were increased in all 17 tested patients, except one who had decreased stores, this patient had one heterozygous C282Y mutation. Median overall survival (mOS) was 117 months in the HFE mutated patients vs 75 months in the non-mutated (p = 0.6). Conclusions: Our study found the HFE gene, when tested, to be mutated in higher frequencies among patients with RARS compared to that reported in the general population (65% vs 36%), with H63D mutation in almost three quarters of all mutated patients. Although it did not reach statistical significance, the longer survival observed among HFE mutated patients compared to the wild-type raises the question whether testing for HFE gene mutations among patients with MDS-RARS should be further explored.

e18514 Background: Standard induction therapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) includes “cytarabine and anthracycline”. Anthracyclines are known to cause acute, subacute and chronic cardiac complications ( Lefrak , EA et al, Cancer 1973:32(2):302-314; Singal, PK et al, NEJM 1998;339(13):900-905). It is recommended to do base line cardiac function assessment with echocardiogram prior to induction therapy containing anthracycline. This study was done to find the frequency of changes made in avoiding anthracycline usage following this evaluation. Methods: The Mayo clinic data base was interrogated to identify patients with newly diagnosed AML who underwent echocardiogram prior to anthracycline containing induction chemotherapy. Echocardiogram results, including left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), diastolic dysfunction, valvular disease, and any resultant treatment alterations were reviewed. Results: Three hundred twenty six patients were identified. The median (range) age was 61 (17-82) years and 62% were male. The median (range) LVEF was 65% (30-87), and 3 (0.9%) patients had LVEF < 50% (range 30-47%). Of these 3 patients, 1 had 4 vessel CABG a decade ago, his EF was 46% and treated with full dose idarubicin; 2 of them presented with blastic crisis, 1 had EF 46% and improved to 51% after 5 days and then given daunorubicin, the other one had an EF of 30% and treated with 50% dose reduced cytarabine alone. Sixty five (23%) patients had previous chemotherapy or radiation exposure, including 24 (7.4 %) with previous anthracycline, 14 (4.3%) had prior radiation to the chest wall. No patient with previous chemotherapy or radiation exposure had a reduced LVEF. Conclusions: Echocardiography prior to anthracycline therapy rarely detects abnormal LVEF. Screening echo may be helpful in those presented with leukemic blastic crisis or had previous exposure to chemo-radiation.

7058 Background: The 2016 WHO classification includes myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms, unclassifiable (MDS/MPN-U), as an MDS/MPN overlap syndrome not meeting criteria for well-defined entities such as CMML. No standard prognostication or treatment guidelines exist for such patients. Methods: We retrospectively identified MDS/MPN-U cases from 1990-2016 through our myeloid malignancies database. All bone marrow reports were reviewed to ensure compliance with 2016 WHO criteria. Clinical & cytogenetic parameters at diagnosis were assessed & compared with treatment outcomes. Results: Eighty nine patients met study criteria, with a median age of 69 years (range: 37-93); 58 (65%) males. Median follow-up was 22.2 months (range: 0-172), with 41 (46%) deaths & 13 (15%) leukemic transformations. Median OS was 24.8 months (range: 0-172). 43 (53%) patients had an abnormal karyotype, with common abnormalities being trisomy 8 (12%), complex karyotype (9%) & del (20q) (6%). Given the fewer types of abnormalities identified, the IPSS cytogenetic stratification was more effective than IPSS-R, with risk categorization including; 45 good (55%), 20 intermediate (25%) & 16 high risk (20%) respectively (8 unavailable). On univariate analysis, increased age (p = 0.05), decreased hemoglobin (p = 0.02), higher ANC (p = 0.03), circulating immature myeloid cells (p = 0.02), higher LDH (p = 0.009), absence of bone marrow ring sideroblasts (p = 0.001) & higher risk (intermediate & high) IPSS cytogenetic categories (p = 0.01) adversely impacted OS. In a multivariate model that included the aforementioned variables, higher risk IPSS cytogenetics retained a negative prognostic impact (p = 0.04). 28 patients received a median of 6 cycles (range: 1-21) of hypomethylating agent therapy (HMA), with an overall response rate of 18% (CR-3, PR-2). All responders had an abnormal karyotype (p = 0.01). However, HMA did not affect either OS or LFS. Conclusions: Intermediate & high risk IPSS cytogenetic categories independently & adversely impact survival in WHO defined MDS/MPN-U patients. HMA use did not impact OS; however, patients with abnormal karyotypes were more likely to respond.

7056 Background: No therapies are approved for MDS after HMA failure. 04-24 was a single-arm study to evaluate best BMBL response as a potential surrogate for OS in higher-risk (HR) MDS pts who progressed on or after an HMA. Rigo is a Ras-mimetic that inhibits the RAS-RAF-MEK pathway, which is frequently activated in HR MDS (Athuluri-Divakar Cell 2016; Gil-Bazo Cancer Biol Ther 2016). Methods: Eligible MDS pts had 5-30% BMBL confirmed within 6 wks pre-study and progression per International Working Group (IWG) 2006 criteria on or after HMAs within 2 yrs. Rigo 1800 mg/24 hrs was continuously infused over 72 hrs q 2 wks × 8 cycles, then q 4 wks until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint was relationship of best BMBL IWG response to OS by Kaplan Meier method. Results: 64 pts were treated (median 5 cycles, range 1-32+), with 61% male, median age 73 (range 47-87), median prior HMA duration 10.8 mos (range 1.2-70.2). Revised International Prognostic Scoring System scores were low 2%, intermediate 11%, high 27%, very high 53%, and unknown 8%. ≥Grade 3 adverse events in ≥10% of pts were anemia 19%, thrombocytopenia 19%, and febrile neutropenia 16%. At the analysis time 40 pts (63%) had died. Best BMBL IWG response was marrow complete response (mCR) 14 pts (22%), stable disease (SD) 30 (47%), progressive disease (PD) 15 (23%), and failure (early death/withdrawal) 5 (8%); 2 mCR pts had transplant. Median OS was 7.0 mos (95% confidence interval 4.8-10.8). Landmark median OS (from day of best BMBL response) was mCR not reached; SD 6.3 mos; PD 3.3 mos. Median OS of mCR+SD was 8.5 mos, with log-rank p = 0.011 (mCR+SD OS to PD OS). Conclusions: BMBL response is a predictor of survival for MDS pts receiving Rigo after HMA failure, confirming findings in earlier Phase 1/2 studies (Silverman ASCO 2015 Abstr 7017). Based on earlier results identifying an MDS subset benefitting from Rigo (Garcia-Manero Lancet Oncol 2016; ASCO 2016 Abstr 165681), a randomized Phase 3 trial of Rigo vs physician’s choice (INSPIRE) is ongoing to determine if Rigo improves survival after HMA failure within 9 cycles. Clinical trial information: NCTO 1928537.

AbstractTrabectedin is an FDA‐approved DNA minor groove binder that has activity against translocation‐associated sarcomas. Lurbinectedin is a next‐generation minor groove binder with preclinical activity against myeloid leukemia cells. A dose‐finding phase 1 clinical trial was performed in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) with further assessment of safety and tolerability. Forty‐two patients with relapsed/refractory AML/MDS received lurbinectedin administered as a 1‐hour intravenous infusion in a 3 + 3 study design. Two dosing schedules were used: 3.5, 5, 7, or 6 mg on days 1 and 8 or 2, 3, 1, or 1.5 mg for 3 consecutive days on days 1 to 3. Three patients experienced dose‐limiting toxicities of rhabdomyolysis (grade 4), hyperbilirubinemia (grade 3), and oral herpes (grade 3) with the day 1 and 8 schedule. Otherwise, adverse events mainly consisted of gastrointestinal manifestations (n = 11), febrile neutropenia/infections (n = 4), pulmonary toxicity (n = 2), and renal failure (n = 2). The most common laboratory abnormalities observed were an increase in creatinine (93%) and anemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia (100%). Overall, 33 of 42 patients (79%) had reduction in blasts in peripheral blood or bone marrow. One patient achieved a partial response and 2 patients a morphologic leukemia‐free state. Most (n = 30, 71%) were discontinued due to progressive disease. Early deaths occurred from disease‐related causes that were not attributable to lurbinectedin. Four patients with a chromosome 11q21‐23 abnormality had significantly greater bone marrow blast reduction than those without such abnormality, with decrease of 31 ± 14% (n = 4) vs 8 ± 8% (n = 16), respectively (P = .04). Overall, lurbinectedin was safe and tolerated using the schedules and dose levels tested. While no sustained remissions were observed, single‐agent lurbinectedin was transiently leukemia suppressive for some patients.